A Pentecostal pastor lays down a saw at a residence for homeless people with AIDS, raps on wood and expresses pride in being able to look out in his church and see two pews filled with people with HIV.
A retired Episcopalian schoolteacher in her 80s, with a shawl over the shoulders of her barely 5-foot frame, describes a series of religious visions at 3 a.m. that led her to start an AIDS hospice.
Men in crew-cuts embrace a colorfully dressed gay man as part of a care team at a block-long Southern Baptist church in Texas.
These stories and images come to mind looking back 20 years when, amid widespread suffering caused by the AIDS crisis, many religious communities found themselves working through a response balancing traditional teaching on sexuality, fear of the unknown and the commands of their faith to love their neighbor.
Today, as President Obama comes forward to support same-sex marriage, many religious communities find themselves undergoing similar challenges balancing theology, experience and personal consciences on issues of sexuality.
Extremists continue to judge and condemn one another, and the vitriol may ramp up as the issue becomes part of the 2012 election. But new research offers a cautionary note for those who would try to fit members of different religious groups into monolithic boxes on gay and lesbian issues.
In interviews with 40 Christian clergy, researchers from Brandeis University and Clemson University found many pastoral leaders were still developing their opinions on sexuality and how they would respond to requests for ceremonies such as same-sex blessings.
Other studies show evolving attitudes among evangelicals and younger religious adults as the debate shifts away from theological forums and into the public arena.
In the pews and in the pulpits, U.S. religious groups continue to struggle with sex.
Theology and Practice
There have been significant shifts in public opinion in recent years in support of same-sex marriage; still, there are signs that religious individuals in general are not leading the way.
For example, the 2010 Baylor Religion Survey found that while 88 percent of religiously unaffiliated respondents supported same-sex marriage, support from Christian groups ranged from 45 percent of Catholics to 37 percent of evangelicals.
In studying data from the 2006-2007 National Congregations Study, researcher Andrew Whitehead of the University of Mobile reported that Catholic, mainline Protestant and politically and theologically liberal congregations were more likely to accept gays and lesbians in their churches.
Overall, however, many churches are not welcoming. Whitehead said 37 percent of congregations allowed gays and lesbians in committed relationships to become members, with around one in five allowing those members to hold leadership posts.
The results indicate "the access of gays and lesbians to religious congregations is clearly limited," he writes in the latest edition of the Review of Religious Research.
But attitudes are not set in stone.
A separate study examines the uncertainty experienced by pastors as they come to terms with issues from above -- denominational stands on homosexuality; from below -- the expectations and views of church members; and from within -- their own developing understanding of same-sex issues.
In-depth interviews with 40 clergy from Catholic, Episcopal, Southern Baptist and United Church of Christ congregations revealed that seven in 10 pastoral leaders said they were unsure about their personal opinions on homosexuality, how they should act in pastoral settings relative to the issue, or uncertain about both their views and actions.
The sense of being on a journey crossed denominational lines, researchers Wendy Cadge, Jennifer Girouard, Laura Olson and Madison Lylerohr reported in the Review of Religious Research.
One Southern Baptist pastor said, "I'm on a journey with God. What I believe today about this issue I may not be believing tomorrow ... as I continue down the pathway of maturity."
A United Church of Christ minister said he looks to Scripture, science and his own experience and finds issues around homosexuality "terribly complicated and challenging. ... This is one of the questions of our day that we will for the rest of our lives continue to struggle with."
Still, as public opinion shifts to be more supportive of gay rights, and doctrinal mandates hold less sway over younger generations, a perceptible shift in attitudes also is occurring in religious communities, some researchers state.
The Journey Continues
In a study of 665 Christian heterosexual students at a Midwestern university, 85 percent of students said their religion's core teaching views homosexuality as a sin. But fewer than four in 10 respondents said their own beliefs about homosexuality were fairly consistent with the teachings of their religion, researchers Michael Woodford, Denise Levy and N. Eugene Walls said in article in the Review of Religious Research.
In a separate review article looking "Beyond the Culture War," researchers Jeremy Thomas and Daniel Olson of Purdue University note that more evangelical congregations can expect to face these issues as America's growing acceptance of homosexuality makes it likely more church members will be open about their sexual orientation.
Gays and lesbians "unwilling to sell their evangelical souls" to affirm their orientation will be coming out at a time when a growing number of churches are seeking to find ways to share values such as unconditional love, commitment, stability and monogamy within the context of how gays and lesbian members lead their lives, according to Thomas.
In these congregations, the focus is shifting to the idea that "We're here to help. We're here to minister," Thomas said.
Overall, new research is providing a more nuanced understanding of how many people in various religious communities, far from being rigid ideologues on the issue, are struggling to find ways to move forward.
This brings back to mind a conversation I had many years ago with a priest involved in AIDS ministry. Back then, some AIDS activists disrupted Masses and destroyed sacred hosts as they demanded that religious groups give unqualified acceptance of homosexuality. And some preachers filled the airwaves with the message that AIDS was God's punishment for homosexuals and drug users.
The cleric said what was needed was conciliation, the ability to seek forgiveness from one another for being judgmental.
What if today more Americans, instead of promoting polarization over dialogue on the issue of same-sex marriage, decided to forgive one another for the times they chose vitriol over compassion and respect for individual consciences on both sides.
Maybe then the nation could journey together toward greater understanding. Not a bad American dream.
David Briggs writes the Ahead of the Trend column for the Association of Religion Data Archives.
Follow David Briggs on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ReligionData
Reverend William E. Flippin, Jr.: Whose House Are You Building? The Message of Haggai
shiloh7 of the WBC just gave self away by using OBEY
everyone knows how the wbc loves the use of that word,and over accentuates the use of it.
you know that like the older song,of a woman being raped and deserved it because of how she dressed.
now it's you deserve everything we give you because of what you are.
peace girl-
All too many people perceive being "on a journey with God" to be a guided tour where you're not allowed to get off the bus at any time and even looking out the windows very much is suspect.
That's not the way to move on.
Just don't force churches to perform the ceremony.
If that didn't work, just write legal contracts that do everything a marriage contract does. I did with my brother. We share property and a bank account and even have the same last name. The States where we have wives can't say a thing.
This isn't an issue. It never has been. Churches can marry who they like, except for those churches that WANT to marry same-sex couples but are being denied their religious freedom. Churches are already protected from having to marry same-sex couples, but the last few bills legalizing marriage for same-sex couples added even more language to spell out this protection. New York went even further.
It's a fake argument. Divorce is legal (and not one Christian seems to want it any other way, despite their noise about the BIble when it comes to marriage equality) and the Catholic church doesn't marry divorcees when it doesn't want to.
And there is no way to get a fraction of the 1100 plus benefits and rights of marriage without marriage. Not through legal contracts, not through any intervention except marriage.
The Democrats are saying that Christians are keeping Gays from loving one another and getting the same subsidies that straight people get.
And notice both sides are Bible Thumping saying, "This is what the Bible says."
No one is respecting "Separation of Church and State." It is too good a weapon for both.
Marriage is a legal contract between two people and the government. A contract always has two parts. What the people get out of the contract and what the government gets out of the contract.
We think oil subsidies are bad. The government (We The People) make tens of billions of dollars for a few measly million dollars in oil subsidies.
What does the government get out of the marriage subsidies?
Subsidies are legal contracts between the government and something the government wants to grow bigger for the benefit of the government.
Will the government supply vasoline with gay marriage contracts? They don't for Straight marriage contracts. Good Luck.
Everyone have their own Insurance.
Everyone pay $10,000 a year for Federal Governmental services.
Everyone pay an equal share of their State governmental services.
Everyone pay for teacher, fire, police and emergency personel at the local level like it has been for 200 years.
Until then, you're just rationalizing real and ongoing oppression and trying to claim you're somehow moral.
They each have their political agendas they religiously believe in.
Maybe by basics you mean the US Constitution.
So, when We The People elect someone to Represent We The People, they quit their job as a Democrat or Republican and work for We The People. As their employers, they let us know every single word they mutter on our behalf. Better yet, we have a camera monitoring them right in the district that voted them in and they send OUR vote to Washington, DC via modern technology.
Nothing. When the Bible is translated accurately, read in context, and evaluated with a bare minimum of reason and integrity, it does not condemn homosexuality.
"but to try and “force” someone to change their interpretation of Scripture is not only wrong,"
We are not trying to force you, or anyone, to change their interpretation of Scripture. But with laws that punish us for our God-given sexual orientation, and with your public denunciations of our lives and faith, you are trying to force us to change our understanding of Scripture, God, and our lives.
"I don’t hate gays "
Please don't lie. You just stated that our innate capacity for love and intimacy is worthy of death and damnation. You just falsely accused of us coercing people.
Yeah, r-i-i-i-g-h-t, THAT'LL happen from the 'religious' - NOT!
I've NEVER said that heterosexuals are the equivalent of (and again, I quote): "beastialists", "necrophiliacs", "rapists", "murderers", "child-molesters", "worse than terrorists".
I've NEVER tried to prevent any heterosexuals from being treated equally before the law.
I've NEVER tried to remove nay rights or freedoms from any heterosexuals, let alone 'Christianist' ones.
Don't presume to lecture ME on judgementalism.
Be healed, kettle.
I don't see where we have an issue with LGBT "extremists" condemning religion in general (anonymous postings on internet blogs should not be used as a measure). What I see in this statement is another false equivalence. There are many LGBT religious people, there are plenty of Christian churches that embrace us, the LGBT community has not waged a war against religion. We have people fighting for equality against true extremists like the Family Research Council and the American Family Association, both groups have been designated as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center and there are countless other institutions that reflect the same toxic bigotry that contributes to the irrational fear and hate of LGBT people in the US. I would label the Republican Party as one of those organizations, there are plenty of facts to back this up. It's high time the media acknowledges this fact.
Like participation in the societal institution of marriage, we equally participate in society's many religious institutions too.
It's just that the pious 'religious' don't WANT US TO. I'm sorry Mr. Briggs ignores this salient fact.