iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

David Fiderer

David Fiderer

Posted: August 17, 2008 10:31 AM

Republican Deceptions on Energy: The Little, The Big, The Hysterical


When Lou Dobbs lied, Bill Schneider played along.

Dobbs: "We have to consider what else happened in the markets and that is precisely as most of the experts had suggested, once the executive ban on oil drilling offshore had been lifted, we have seen a huge decline of approximately 13 percent decline in the price of crude oil and gasoline prices actually begin to roll back over the course of 11 days, which is remarkable, isn't it?"


Schneider: "It is certainly remarkable. And the vast majority of Americans do support offshore oil drilling. They support anything, anything that will give them relief from high gas prices." Lou Dobbs Tonight, July 29, 2008

No experts said any such thing. For obvious reasons. "[Bush's] move to end the moratorium, in place since 1992, won't have any effect until a separate congressional prohibition expires or is overturned," said The Wall Street Journal on July 15. Instead, analysts "point to two distinct trends that may take the wind out of this year's price spike: an easing of tensions over Iran and evidence that demand for oil in the U.S. is falling faster than many believed."(The Wall Street Journal, July 18, 2008)

No one in the industry is falling for the scam. Nowhere in the Oil & Gas Journal, The Financial Times or in any respected source does anyone say that U.S. offshore drilling will bring down oil prices within the foreseeable future. As the Energy Information Agency said, "Because oil prices are determined on the international market, however, any impact on average wellhead prices is expected to be insignificant." But, "the average field size in the Pacific and Atlantic regions tends to be smaller than the average in the Gulf of Mexico, implying that a significant portion of the additional resource would not be economically attractive to develop at the reference case prices." In other words, oil companies might not even drill there if they could. The EIA estimates that it takes about five years, after the regions became open for drilling, before any oil production would commence.

Dobbs signed on to the Republicans' disinformation campaign. But what about legitimate journalists? Who in the mainstream media has enough guts to say a lie is a lie?

These are not occasional slips. When Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman, Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Mike Huckabee, Mitch McConnell, Bobby Jindal, Trent Lott, George Will, and Bill O'Reilly, all echo the McCain campaign's lie - that "we withstood hurricanes Rita and Katrina and did not spill a drop" of oil - it's not a coincidence. When Norm Coleman, Jean Schmidt, Mary Matalin , Rudy Giuliani all repeat Dick Cheney's lie - that the Chinese are drilling for oil off the coast of Cuba - it's not a coincidence. It's a strategy. Those are the small lies which create an aura of plausibility for the big one, told by John McCain, that, "there's abundant resources in the view of the people who are in the business that could be exploited within a period of months. So offshore drilling is something we have to do."

It's all straight from Dr. Goebbels' playbook. If you think the historic analogy is overstated, check out this hysterical call to arms from Jeff Mazzella, head of a right wing advocacy group oxymoronically called The Center for Individual Freedom. The idea: subvert any attempt at constructive compromise among lawmakers.


"Five Republicans-in-Name-Only (RINOs) are siding with the NO NEW DRILLING CROWD in Congress and basically betraying American families suffering severe financial hardship because of the high price of gasoline at the pump.


"You've probably already heard the news. Five RINOs are trying to strike a deal with the devil and they're calling it a 'compromise.'

"But like last year's so-called attempted 'compromise' on amnesty for 12-20 million illegal aliens... it is NO SUCH THING!

"In actuality, it's a complete and total surrender... a capitulation to liberals who see record energy costs as a political football and tell you 'inflate your tires,' 'we can't drive our SUVs' or we can't "eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees.'

If you listened to Rush Limbaugh on Friday, you already know some of the sordid and DECEPTIVE details of this proposed SURRENDER:

"' Essentially there is a Gang of Ten senators, five Republicans led by Lindsey Graham, John Thune, Saxby Chambliss, Bob Corker, and Johnny Isaakson. They joined five Democrats to craft an energy bill in the Senate that is exactly what Barack Obama wants. It is an utter disaster.'

"'It's a Democrat giveaway. ... The regulatory hurdles are huge. They have expanded. They are higher. PETA has a role. The ACLU has a role. The bill bars drilling within 50 miles of the United States coastline. That puts off limits some of the most productive areas -- even if the states allow it -- including in ANWR. Well, you can only drill in four states anyway under this bill, but no -- you can't drill any closer to 50 miles of the coastline... This deal would allow drilling if -- if and when -- the EPA and PETA and states and cities and counties and the ACLU clear the way.'

"In other words, Limbaugh is essentially saying, we CAN drill as long as we drill only when PETA and the ACLU and the EPA say it's okay to drill!

"That's NOT 'compromise!' That's essentially the same scam liberals have been perpetrating on the American people all along!

"And make no mistake, RIGHT NOW, at this very minute, these ten Senators are advancing their treacherous case... attempting to drive a stake into the heart of the grassroots movement to force Congress to "Drill Here and Drill Now!"

"We can't let that happen!

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax Messages to President George W. Bush, Senators Graham, Thune, Chambliss, Corker and Isaakson and each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Tell them that this ill-hatched plan from Graham, Thune, Chambliss, Corker and Isaakson MUST NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY!

"Can You Believe The Audacity?


"Good people are in a rage over this betrayal."

Sound familiar? Who says, "Good people are in a rage over this betrayal," if they believe in rational debate or political compromise? Who says that a political proposal "MUST NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY!"? People who are honest?

The parliamentary analog to these brownshirt sentiments can be found in Congress, where hardliners have tried to strongarm any Republican willing to negotiate a deal for energy legislation. Daniel J. Weiss reported on their tactics in the House, and Oliver J. Willis reported their cloture maneuvers in the Senate.

It's all part of the same strategy.

When Lou Dobbs lied, Bill Schneider played along. Dobbs: "We have to consider what else happened in the markets and that is precisely as most of the experts had suggested, once the executive ban on ...
When Lou Dobbs lied, Bill Schneider played along. Dobbs: "We have to consider what else happened in the markets and that is precisely as most of the experts had suggested, once the executive ban on ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 119
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robrtl
02:17 AM on 08/21/2008
one llitle rule the countries the ountries that have oil will rul the world
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robrtl
02:05 AM on 08/21/2008
gentlemen... i am small oil producer and it is obviously against my financial nterest to support domestic drilling...80 % of american oil is produced from wells that make less than 10 bbls a day. we import 2billion dollars of oiland gasoline a day thats 730 billon a year being paid to foreign oil producers. if over tenyears we could reduce that outflow of dollars by a quarter by producing oil here the money paid for domestic oil would reduce that drain, provide jobs and preserve american economy. if we don't reduce that drasin we wil go bankrupt we must develop domesticrefineries,find oil, build nuclear plants and use alternat e fuels...only wealthy countries can afford environmentalism for whe poverty rears it horrid visage environmentalism heads for the door.. politics of green tobe an effort
--to construct ablind pandalfian world
03:33 PM on 08/19/2008
There is reality and delusion, common sense and no sense and all of these contrasts merge when energy discussions are on the table. Most of the world's oil is controlled by cartels of national governments (85%) and all are foreign, and they control supply. Hugo Chavez is a bit different (in more ways than sanity) in that Venezuela owns Citgo. Most of the oil is in "unfriendly" hands or unsteady realms (Nigeria). Gasoline for Saudi motorists is 45 cents/gallom; 55 cents for Libyams and 12 cents for drivers in Venezuela. The Saudis pump oil for under $2/barrel. We use 25 million barrels a day and produce 5 million. The rest is imported. It is absurd to not want to develop our own huge oil resources just to produce our own and reduce dependence on unfriends. The market place always treats increased supplies by reduction in prices based on competition. We can double our supply within 2 years, triple it in 5 and be independent in 7. To consider any other option is delusional and senseless. In the end, prices will fall.
09:01 PM on 08/19/2008
Donald
You segued from facts into delusions, beginning with "it is absurd to not want to develop our own huge oil resources ..."

Nobody at
the EIA, http://www.eia.doe.gov/steo#Global_Petroleum_Markets
the API, http://www.api.org/statistics/
the IEA, http://www.iea.org/Textbase/subjectqueries/keyresult.asp?KEYWORD_ID=4114
CERA http://www.cera.com/aspx/cda/public1/home/home.aspx

believes, "We can double our supply within 2 years, triple it in 5 and be independent in 7."

That's the talk of right wing crackpots.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjt218
09:12 PM on 08/19/2008
I tend to agree Donny . . . Even if we had the oil reserves in the first place (which we don't), we simply don't have the technical workforce (geologists, geophysicists, engineers, technicians, etc.), the equipment (rigs, ships, etc.) or the blue collar labor to get it done. Such a project would make Apollo look like a new sidewalk installation.
12:33 PM on 08/19/2008
almost everything the GOP does goes through talk radio . if rove was/is the architect, limbaugh and sons do the heavy lifting. dems should anoint limbaugh as the king of the GOP- the guy who best represents their values and principles.

limbaugh and sons have had a huge and underestimated influence on the MSM by laundering GOP/rove talking points and framing through its coordinated uncontested repetition to 50-70MIL Americans. the talk radio monopoly has given false certainty and fake populism to bush/conservative values and have shifted the media/political center way right of USA's true populist liberal values that appear in study after study.

because media critics and political analysts and progressives don't have access to a searchable talk radio transcript database, and because guys like limbaugh and hannity give them headaches the talk radio effect has been largely ignored. unless you listen once in a while (and there's a station near every American) it is impossible to watch the migration of talking points and myths from talk radio into the MSM and onto the floor of congress.

dems lick their wounds and try to figure out what's going wrong- we should be winning- and stick in another cd while rove's rangers whack them with the invisible talk radio 2x4. the GOP will continue to keep it close until dems can break the talk radio monopoly or at least recognize their local talk radio stations as the place to boycott and wave signs.
11:46 AM on 08/19/2008
…We have to diversify our energy profile and force the oil companies to contribute. Not by giving them subsidies that will never be used to develop alternative fuel source, but by tax their collective obscene profits and using those monies to support real technologies and develop others that will solve the problem. I’m sick of preaching to the choir on these blogs. We need the responsible media groups and the truly patriotic representatives (if there are any left) to stand up and expose these lies. Congress and the new prez must introduce legislation supporting real-world solutions instead of focusing on the next reelection campaign.

BTW, in case you were wondering, the color of the sky in my world is fuchsia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjt218
10:32 PM on 08/19/2008
I guess you missed Obama's comments about decrying someone's patriotism for not agreeing with you in front of the VFW today . . .
11:47 AM on 08/19/2008
This is sooo true. The Republicans are so accustomed to lying, it just comes natural. Say it one, say it twice, then it’s in the right-wing media machine and it has to be true. That’s exactly how Bush and Co. sold the war in Iraq and fear mongered their way into a second term. Sadly, the Dems and media didn’t do their jobs for fear of being called unpatriotic. Now you’re traitorous if you don’t jump on the “Drill here, Drill now!” bandwagon. PLEASE! Stop the insanity, and grow a pair! I say you’re traitorous if you continually support the oil companies’ deceptive tactics, suck up the of lobbyists’ campaign contributions while awarding them tax subsidies and more oil leases, knowing damn good and well it won’t solve a thing. Worst, it will delay our most urgent mission which is to become less dependent on oil, ANYONE’S OIL! It is our number one priority because it impacts our national security, economic security, foreign policy, and military readiness. Instead of pouring a trillion dollars into war in Iraq, we would be so much more secure if we had used it to get of the Arab oil teat. I don’t have a problem with developing our existing resources in a responsible way, but that won’t happen as long as we buy into these oil-company-bought-and-paid-for Republican lies....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spiderbucket
Free speech above all else
10:03 AM on 08/19/2008
What if we allow drilling only under the rule that the oil can ONLY be sold in the United States ? It would be the ultimate put up or shut up.
09:38 AM on 08/19/2008
There is one thing I find astounding about this argument. Why on earth would we give the oil companies anything that belongs to us at this point. They have shown themselves to be vampires that will drain us of every bit of our resources and pocket outrageous profits along the way.

Thank you sir may I have another. Take more of our resources so you can abuse us some more.

Forgive me but I don't believe for one minute that this will benefit us at all. We are the worst kind of enablers.

If we are even going to have this conversation, we are going to start with renegotiating the terms of the deal.

Frankly, this approach would put a stop to this nonsense because the oil companies don't even want to discuss curtailing their profit margins.

There are many reasons why our oil based economy needs to change. Global warming, Peak oil, pollution, geopolitical instability, etc. Just pick any of these topics and it points us in the same direction. Its time to stop looking for temporary solutions that avoid the big issues. Its only going to make it harder in the future.
09:08 AM on 08/19/2008
Neither Lou Dobbs, CNN, CNBC or this author mentions SPECULATORS.

Do yourself a favor and sign the petition at:

http://www.stopoilspeculationnow.com/

Also, Go To:

http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wallace/story/659081.html

and read how the speculators are cheating you and me.

Then, tell your relatives and friends and send the article by Ed Wallace to your Congressman.

OBAMA 08
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjt218
08:17 AM on 08/19/2008
McCain will be offshore today in the Gulf of Mexico . . .

http://www.chevron.com/news/press/release/?id=2008-08-18
01:14 AM on 08/19/2008
Whether or not negitivity affects oil trading in the stock market is obviously just his opinion. Isn't the free-trade issue that was discussed on the show more important? All of us should be against free trade.
08:36 PM on 08/18/2008
Oil s/b owed by americans and used by us. Oil co s/b paid a fee for retrieving the oil for us only. this is the only way to get some relief. Refineries s/b paid for service & used for US production 1st then remaining capacity can be sold on world market.
07:04 PM on 08/18/2008
The most important point in your essay is that "the oil companies might not drill even with they could." If we could bribe the MSM into properly framing the debate here, it wouldn't be "drill...dril...drill" it would be "cede control....cede control....cede control".

Big oil wants the rights, but they will get oil offshore on their own sweet time, sell it on the open market when they can maximize their profit. They aren't going after proven reserves now, so why would they want to expand supply when they are doing so well? Cuz they are patriots who feel our pain? They bring the pain and now they have mentally offbalanced shills like Dobbs and Gingrich doing the heavy lifting for them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjt218
08:44 AM on 08/19/2008
I think you would be hard pressed to find an Oil Exec who will endorse OCS and ANWR exploration and production expansion as a short term fix to gas prices, as Dobbs and company are reporting. Oil companies have been pushing for this for years in order to gain control of more resources in order to develop them (which they will argue will take time, and which you can't blame them for since it's their business). Politicians are the ones trying to turn this into a nonsensical argument about "drilling now" to distract from the real issues (sacrifice on the part of Americans to improve efficiency and pay to adopt altenatives), not oil companies.
01:28 PM on 08/19/2008
Fair enough, but those oil execs need to stop sitting in silence while these yahoos on CNN and CNBC spout off about drilling and explain why they are not drilling currently on millions of acres of leased land with proven reserves...and let's just make sure we don't give them lease control of ANWR or the West Coast as a reward for their candor about not fixing short term prices by drilling there.
04:58 PM on 08/18/2008
The United States has 3% of the world's oil reserves, and we use 25% of the world's oil. How in the world can we drill our way to self independence from foreign oil. Also there was an interesting piece in the news a few weeks ago. The oil tankers required to get the oil from the off shore wells back to the refinery are booked for the next five years. Lou Dobbs gave up his credentials as a journalist years ago, and CNN once the beacon of news is now a joke.
04:53 PM on 08/18/2008
I agree! Offshore drilling will not any time soon bring cride prices down. However what would bring it down would be Congress taking dramatic actions, not just band aid solutions. And forgive me, offshore drilling is a band aid solutuon.
Dramatic actions in turn would be a concerted, synchronized project that includes electrification of cars and trucks, hydrogen, wind power development, and - sorry about that - nuclear plant develpment.
Seeing a determined plan - no whussy approach - will scare the bejeevers out of big oil resulting in reduced crude prices. Which inturn would result in Congress falling back into doing nothing - as seen before.
photo
Marlyn
If I'm wrong, let me know.
05:50 PM on 08/18/2008
"sorry about that - nuclear plant development." ???

Nuclear is the most EXPENSIVE option and takes the longest to implement, not to mention the reality that there is NO WAY to dispose of the waste.

No ... nuclear is not an answer to our energy crisis.

The USA should immediately begin construction of a national high voltage DC electric grid so that every kind of renewable energy technology can feed in.
photo
unitron
Reverse Chron Order never stays checked
01:45 AM on 08/19/2008
"The USA should immediately begin construction of a national high voltage DC electric grid so that every kind of renewable energy technology can feed in."

Most renewable energy technologies are either going to produce AC or low voltage DC. You're going to have to use electronics to turn that low voltage DC into high voltage DC, and it just makes more sense to use the electronics to turn it into AC.

If you're going to move electricity any appreciable distance AC is the only feasible way, and we already have a considerable AC transport infrastructure in existance.