More

David Goldstein

David Goldstein

Posted: June 4, 2009 11:55 AM

How the Pro-Life Camp Sees the Tiller Murder


The cold, hard truth about the right's reaction to the murder of Dr. George Tiller -- the truth that most anti-abortion activists are reluctant to admit, at least publicly -- is that they're happy he's dead.

Well, maybe not "happy." "Relieved," might be a better word. Or, less succinctly, I think it is safe to say that there are many anti-abortion activists who genuinely believe that the ultimate good that comes from Dr. Tiller's death far outweighs the inherent evil of his murder.

An apt analogy comes to mind, the oh-so-cliche thought experiment: If you could go back in time to pre-Nazi Germany, would you kill Adolf Hitler?

Murder is wrong; I think that's a pretty universal moral standard. But knowing the crimes Hitler committed and the horrors he wrought, few would consider it immoral to preemptively kill a man who would ultimately be responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of innocent men, women and children. And while many of us might lack the fortitude to commit the act ourselves, neither would we mourn Hitler's death. Indeed, we'd welcome it.

Yes, murder is wrong, but not all killing is murder, and as a society we tend to make moral exceptions in circumstances such as war, executions, and self-defense.

Now let's look at the rhetoric anti-abortion advocates have used to describe Dr. Tiller, both before and after his death.

Few on the right have publicly condoned Dr. Tiller's murder, but even in disowning and/or condemning the assassination, some very public figures continue to describe Tiller as a "serial killer," a "baby killer," a "mass murderer" and worse. Even anti-abortion activists and organizations who genuinely disavow violence have referred to Dr. Tiller as "Tiller the Killer" and "Dr. Death," comparing him to the infamous Nazi war criminal, Dr. Josef Mengele.

Many, many people in the anti-abortion movement, mainstream and extreme alike, have used and embraced this sort of rhetoric, and I see little reason to doubt their ingenuousness. These people believe that Dr. Tiller was a serial killer who brutally murdered thousands of babies, and who would have continued his killing spree for years to come... had he not been stopped by an assassin's bullet.

Undoubtedly, most would have preferred that he were stopped through legal means, and damn few would have had the personal fortitude to pull the trigger themselves. But don't kid yourselves. They don't mourn Dr. Tiller's death any more than I did the deaths of Saddam Hussein and his two odious sons, regardless of my opposition to the Iraq war itself. And they don't think his killing was particularly immoral, especially when balanced by the thousands of babies who might have been saved in the process.

The cold, hard truth is, political and PR considerations aside, many in the anti-abortion movement are happy Dr. Tiller is dead. Or relieved. Or at the very least, comfortable with a moral calculus that, in their minds, balances the life of one guilty man against the lives of thousands of innocent babies.

And that is a disturbing truth the so-called "pro-life" movement needs to come to terms with.

David Goldstein writes on WA state politics at HorsesAss.org.

The cold, hard truth about the right's reaction to the murder of Dr. George Tiller -- the truth that most anti-abortion activists are reluctant to admit, at least publicly -- is that they're happy he'...
The cold, hard truth about the right's reaction to the murder of Dr. George Tiller -- the truth that most anti-abortion activists are reluctant to admit, at least publicly -- is that they're happy he'...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:01 AM on 06/05/2009
I see you still object to anyone defending themselves against this irresponsible rhetoric.
12:11 PM on 06/04/2009
Can we PLEASE stop allowing the right wing to define the terms of debate? We should NEVER use the term "pro-life". Who isn't pro-life"??!! Conservatives conveniently use this term only when referring to abortion, but never when discussing war or the death penalty. Are they "pro-life" then? We need to re-frame the debate as a matter of pro-CHOICE versus anti-choice, especially when discussing it in the mainstream media.
12:25 PM on 06/04/2009
Since the topic is abortion, it seems to me that pro-abortion and anti-abortion are the most accurate descriptions. Pro-choice is at least as euphemistic as pro-life. As you point out, the discussion is not just about "life", but then it's also not just about "choice" either, is it? Call it like it is.
12:35 PM on 06/04/2009
To be pro-choice is NOT to be pro-abortion. Pro-choice simply means that I think women should have control over their own reproductive/health care. I may disagree with abortion but I don't have the right to interfere with the decision that a woman makes when deciding whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. As a pro-choice individual, I chose to focus on preventing unwanted pregnancies so abortions become unnecessary.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Goldstein
02:03 PM on 06/04/2009
Agreed. It's not my headline. (Apparently, the editors thought "When Tiller Equals Hitler" was too provocative.) The only time I used "pro-life" in my post, I deliberately placed it in quotes and prefaced it with "so-called."