The conventions are over and the platforms have been approved. The Republican and Democratic platforms were disappointing this year in their lack of focus on child care. At a time when 11 million American children under the age of 5 spend part of their day most weeks in child care, addressing the child care needs of families with child would seem an opportunity for both parties. This is especially true as the annual per child cost of child care can be above $13K a year in some states in the northeast and state and local revenues are squeezed. Moreover, given the importance of women voters and the attention both campaigns are paying to them it is surprising that more attention is not being paid to child care.
While the GOP platform discusses families, flexibility, and education, it makes no mention of child care. It does continue GOP support for child tax credits but does not directly address the child care needs of families. This is not too surprising as recent GOP platforms have not emphasized it either. However, given the gender gap, it is a missed opportunity for the GOP. Even mentioning the child care needs of families could demonstrate empathy for GOP candidates who too often this cycle face a gender gap with Democratic candidates. Offering policies that address the affordability, access and quality of child care in America could help close it.
The Democratic platform takes a step back in its focus. In 2008, the Democratic platform touched on such issues both in a "Work and Family" section and it included a section on "Children and Families," while in 2012 the similar section dropped the word "children" and is called simply "Families." While a long list of policies, from tax credits to fatherhood to EITC to work/family to foster care and adoption are included, child care is not directly mentioned. In 2008, the Democratic platform included child care explicitly ("We will make an unprecedented national investment to guarantee that every child has access to high-quality early education, including investments in Pre-K, Head Start, and Early Head Start, and we will help pay for child care.") In some ways a shift to early childhood education has taken its place but the platform still misses the opportunity to address child care directly.
In the 1988 campaign, both George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis emphasized child care. As the Romney and Obama campaigns now sprint towards November 6, the opportunity remains for them to discuss the child care needs of American families.
Footnote: At the New America Foundation in Washington D.C. we are holding an event on September 27 at 12:30pm about what the presidential candidates should be saying about child care and early learning.
Sen. Chris Coons: Finding God in the Party Platforms
 |
 |
|
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Electoral Votes (270 to win) |
332 | 206 |
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 65,899,660 | 60,932,152 |
| Percent | 51.1% | 47.2% |
| Democrats* | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Current Senate | 53 | 47 |
| Seats gained or lost | +2 | -2 |
| New Total | 55 | 45 |
| Democrats | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats won | 201 | 234 |
I stayed home and raised my four kids, for which we did without the motorboat and camper that most of the neighbors had. How about reimbursing me for 25 yrs of child care??
Look around the world at nations with free trade and you won't find balanced budgets and safe and healthy child care programs. They just don't exist together.