NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David J. Linden

GET UPDATES FROM David J. Linden
 

Anthony Weiner, Straus-Kahn, Arnold Schwarzenegger: Are They Just Bad Boy Politicians Or Is It Their DNA? (PHOTOS)

Posted: 06/14/11 10:15 AM ET

From Paris to New York to Los Angeles the cry rings out, "What the hell were they thinking?" We're irresistibly drawn to the stories of Anthony Weiner, Dominique Straus-Kahn and Arnold Schwarzenegger by the conundrum they offer. How could these smart, savvy, charismatic men of power make the impulsive decisions to risk so much for brief sexual pleasure? Most explanations focus upon their social environment: These men are surrounded by people who are eager to please and flatter them and to cover up for their mistakes.

That is true but it misses a crucial point: For humans, and particularly for male humans, a certain degree of novelty-seeking and risk-taking are traits that promote success, not just in the world of business, politics, academia or sports, but in the evolutionary sense of propagating one's genes in the next generation. In my book, "The Compass of Pleasure: How Our Brains Make Fatty Foods, Orgasm, Exercise, Marijuana, Generosity, Vodka, Learning, and Gambling Feel So Good," I discuss that there are brain centers for pleasure and reward that use the neurotransmitter dopamine and that these centers are activated by stimuli as diverse as orgasm, alcohol and food. Genetic variants that ratchet down dopamine signaling substantially increase risk-taking and novelty-seeking behaviors as their bearers seek high levels of stimulation to reach the same set-point of pleasure that "normals" can achieve with more moderate indulgence. These behaviors often provide a drive for career success but they also confer an increased risk for antisocial compulsive behavior in many realms, from sex to gambling to drugs and alcohol. The essence of these Shakespearean tragedies is partly genetic: the seeds of the rise and fall of men of power are often buried in the same sections of their DNA.

Who are some of the most notorious men to let their brains' pleasure centers override common sense?

Anthony Weiner
1 of 7
Anthony Weiner, married Congressman from New York City, admitted sending sexy emails and Twitter messages to college-age women, some adorned with now-famous ostensible beefcake photos. We now know that, in gambling, the brain's pleasure centers are activated not just with winning but also during the anticipation phase, while the roulette wheel is spinning for example. Is Twitter Weiner's roulette wheel?
Total comments: 41 | Post a Comment
1 of 7
This Politician's Wrong-Doings
Eh, not so bad
YIKES!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top 5 Wrong-Doings
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

 
 
 
From Paris to New York to Los Angeles the cry rings out, "What the hell were they thinking?" We're irresistibly drawn to the stories of Anthony Weiner, Dominique Straus-Kahn and Arnold Schwarzenegger...
From Paris to New York to Los Angeles the cry rings out, "What the hell were they thinking?" We're irresistibly drawn to the stories of Anthony Weiner, Dominique Straus-Kahn and Arnold Schwarzenegger...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
09:33 AM on 06/17/2011
Anyone who craves power over others is a sociopath.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joymora
03:10 PM on 06/14/2011
Is that what you understand by "comment screening," HuffPost? Not posting any comments which criticize your choice of article titles or content? I see the merger with AOL was really a great deal.

None of the comments that appeared on Facebook, which mention that you cannot have an equivalence between people who cheated and people who were accused of committing a violent crime, like Dominique StrausS-Kahn are nowhere to be found in here. That's just great. Keep allowing only the comments you approve of. But don't be surprised if you start losing readers.
01:34 PM on 06/14/2011
The problem is that the institutions and culture came before our understanding of ourselves/each other did. Now, no one wants to hear about why this happens. If there is a good reason for it, our collective faith in monogamy might be shaken.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neige
01:31 PM on 06/14/2011
Funny I don't see David Viter on that list?
pmc617
Never! There, I said it.
12:58 PM on 06/14/2011
I love the reminder that men have two decision making organs, but only enough blood to fill one at a time.
12:57 PM on 06/14/2011
The question should be "Why are you (the writer & media) so drawn to these guys?" Oh, here's the answer: $$$$$

At the end of this article, all i heard was the "Dum Dum-Dum Dum" from the South Park mormon episode.
12:42 PM on 06/14/2011
Weiner has a medical condition. It's like alcoholism or gambling or food addiction. Brain can't stop it - mixture of brain chemicals and hormones not working properly. In 50 years, this will be a recognized condition - just as it took decades for people to figure out alcohol, drug and food addiction conditions.

He wasn't sleeping with anyone. He should not resign.
01:27 PM on 06/14/2011
I don't know if Weiner should or should not resign. I have facilated back and forth but am willing to leave it to him and his constituents. However, as for as I know until this week when he allegedly was to be assessed, he has no diagnoses medical condition. Criteria exists for diagnosing sex addition but it is not recognized in the upcoming DMS-V as a Mental or Emotional disturbance and no one has sufficient information to render a medical diagnosis.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
12:30 PM on 06/14/2011
Anthony Wiener doesn't strike me as a "bad boy" and probably only became one after he landed a job in Congress. I suspect he spent most of his childhood getting picked on, mocked for his name, and not landing a whole lot of dates. Hence the working out/self body obsession and the making up for lost time now that women find him hot, even if they are strangers.
01:32 PM on 06/14/2011
I don't think you have any factual information regarding Weiner's childhood or adolescence. He was named by Cosmo as one of New York's top 10 most eligible bachelors before ever being elected to Congress.
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
03:17 PM on 06/14/2011
If you think there is any way a kid named Weiner wasn't mocked growing up, you must have been home schooled.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
12:20 PM on 06/14/2011
I think AW might be suffering from a good old-fashioned midlife crisis because... well, he claims... this all started 3 years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hawkseye
we have nothing to fear but fear itself
12:20 PM on 06/14/2011
As I recall, Arnold was put over the top in both gubernatorial elections by young, male voters and other men who like "tough-talkers". It's a national and very worriesome problem.
01:33 PM on 06/14/2011
Gubernatorial elections? He did run but he didn't win. No one put him over the top.
photo
jf12
Occupying myself
12:19 PM on 06/14/2011
Yes, just bad boy politicians.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
NoMercy
Member Since October 2005
12:19 PM on 06/14/2011
Can't believe Tiger Woods wasn't included in that list.
01:35 PM on 06/14/2011
Woods isn't a politician and no one wants to get into the weeds of bad conduct by sport's celebrities. There are just way too many of them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
12:18 PM on 06/14/2011
Smart guys who are not cute, but have charisma and so seek political office, are always going to be enticed by the sexual power they obtain by their social advancement, and as a consequence, they are in for trouble.

Duh.
01:36 PM on 06/14/2011
In 1998, when Weiner was named by Cosmo as one of New Yorks top 10 most eligible bachelors he was hot.
photo
lemmyk73
Foxy Shazam!
12:14 PM on 06/14/2011
Why does American society over the last 30 years or so always try to make excuses for bad behavior? Human beings are vile creatures and we do vile things and we must be held accountable for our behavior.
01:09 PM on 06/14/2011
You call it "making excuses". Others call it trying to understand. The reason it seems more prevelent in the last 30 years is that we've learned more about ourselves within that time.

It isn't a way out of accountability. It's a way towards understanding and possibly prevention. Or, we can keep telling guys to "zip it up" and hope animal behavior somehow changes.
photo
lemmyk73
Foxy Shazam!
01:27 PM on 06/14/2011
What is to understand other than humans are vile. We do vile things and most of us do not have any self control. It is much easier to make excuses and label the reasons for behaviors than it is to just call bad people bad.
01:18 PM on 06/14/2011
Just because a reason for a specific behavior may be used as an excuse by some, doesn't mean that reason is invalid. We can't solve problems without understanding the reasons for those problems. Accountability only works if the punishment fits the crime, so extenuating circumstances should always be taken into account.
photo
lemmyk73
Foxy Shazam!
01:28 PM on 06/14/2011
In some cases yes but in the case of powerful men acting like 16 year old teenage boys, there is no reason to understand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eastfernstreet
Too micro to be seen . . .
12:09 PM on 06/14/2011
It's evolutionary, my dear Watson. The greatest achievement any individual member of any species can attain is to reproduce. 'Successful' mammalian males are those with the strongest drive and the best resources available (physical strength, level of attraction, virility, etc.) to reach this goal.

Why, then, are we so often surprised that those men who are successful in non-biological ways (money, fame, etc.) are the same individuals who are predisposed to success in their most basic of roles?

It's not an excuse for 'bad' behavior because in a biological sense it's actually 'good' behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
NoMercy
Member Since October 2005
12:20 PM on 06/14/2011
I'm never surprised.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
12:23 PM on 06/14/2011
And yet we judge women harshly who also opt for biologically diversifying their offspring.
12:48 PM on 06/14/2011
Is that code for having lots of kids produced by different fathers, but not always sure of who the father was?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eastfernstreet
Too micro to be seen . . .
01:49 PM on 06/14/2011
I know not who this "we" is of whom you speak, but in an evolutionary sense, females were most often not in a position to choose. While I couldn't care less who sleeps with whom, evolution doesn't offer much in support of women who work to diversify their partners.

Our current social acceptance of women as more-or-less equal to men (still usually less, I'm afraid) is so recent as to make any biological claims irrelevant.