Can Vaccines Cause Autism? CDC: "We Don't Know"

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

Posted March 29, 2008 | 02:20 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

It was a big morning in Atlanta today. In case you missed CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding this morning on CNN's "House Call with Dr Sanjay Gupta," it was rather interesting:

TRANSCRIPT: Here

VIDEO: here

If I have read the transcript below correctly, Dr. Gerberding is saying that, yes, in some mitochondrial disorder cases, vaccines can be the trigger that causes "symptoms that have characteristics of autism." So, Dr. Gerberding admits a link -- but then denies that it is a link to autism.

The only problem with this line of argument is that I know for a fact that Hannah, as well as the kids in the new unpublished mito study were, as one doctor told me, "plucked right from autism clinics. They all have autism, there is no question of that."

JULIE GERBERDING, DR., CDC DIRECTOR: "Well, you know, I don't have all the facts because I still haven't been able to review the case files myself. But my understanding is that the child has a -- what we think is a rare mitochondrial disorder. And children that have this disease, anything that stresses them creates a situation where their cells just can't make enough energy to keep their brains functioning normally. Now, we all know that vaccines can occasionally cause fevers in kids. So if a child was immunized, got a fever, had other complications from the vaccines. And if you're predisposed with the mitochondrial disorder, it can certainly set off some damage. Some of the symptoms can be symptoms that have characteristics of autism."

So, complications from vaccines can set off damage that causes characteristics of autism (just not autism itself). I don't believe I have ever heard that from a CDC official before, though that doesn't mean they never said it.

At the same time, this language does not quite jive with what Director Gerberding told reporters just over three weeks ago on a conference call:

"Let me be very clear that (the) government has made absolutely no statement about indicating that vaccines are a cause of autism. That is a complete mischaracterization of the findings of the case, and a complete mischaracterization of any of the science that we have at our disposal today. So I think we need to set the record straight on that."

I guess it all depends on what the meaning of the word, "cause," is.

The CNN interview this morning with Sanjay Gupta continues:

GUPTA: Are we ready to say right now that childhood vaccines do not cause autism?


GERBERDING: We can say absolutely for sure that we don't really understand the causes of autism. We've got a long way to go before we get to the bottom of this.

GUPTA: And you are comfortable saying that with everything we know?

GERBERDING: I'll never be comfortable with everything we know. I mean, I think we have to have an open mind about this. We know that there is very little chance that something related to a vaccine is going to cause a serious problem for a child.

Amid the usual "vaccines save lives" answer to questioning if it's possible that childhood vaccines could cause autism, there is some new and interesting rhetoric in the CDC Director's statements:

To wit:

"Set off some damage"

"Have an open mind"

"Get to the bottom" of vaccines and autism.

"Ill never be comfortable"

"Very little chance" - instead of "there is no evidence"

"Something related to A vaccine" - (as opposed to several vaccines at once)

This seems like news to me, but I could be wrong. At the least, I think it is interesting, and worthy of follow up, should anyone in the media be able to talk with Dr. Gerberding. For some reason, she doesn't return my calls.


 
 

Comments
112
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- melann830 See Profile I'm a Fan of melann830 permalink

As this is World Autism Day, I would like to express my sincere thanks to the author for his research and information. This can only arm parents to better protect their children from the potentially crippling effects of the rigorous vaccine schedule. As a parent of a child on the spectrum, I do believe there is a strong link. I believe that they can cause or trigger ASD in children and will continue to do so if we do not stand in solidarity as parents on this issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 04/02/2008
- Scote See Profile I'm a Fan of Scote permalink

Oh, wait, maybe I'm wrong. I just assumed that was a typo. Did you actually mean what you said "I know, the fourth one would not have been autistic had the child been vaccinated." So, are you conceding that vaccines don't cause autism?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 03/30/2008
- melann830 See Profile I'm a Fan of melann830 permalink

They potentially either cause or trigger autism. Believe me, believe us all, no one wants to jeopardize the health of children by refusing to vaccinate, but it is not unreasonable to request or demand independent studies, a more lenient vaccine schedule and the complete removal of toxins from the vaccines. We can put men/women on the moon. We can do better for our children and all children in the world by listening to parents, testing children for pre-existing auto-immune, metabolic and mitochondrial abnormalites. Also, not to make light of this, but lets ponder this a moment. As women, we prep our hair before color treating it with chemical dyes, perms, relaxers. Why would we not prepare our children's bodies before by making sure they are not deficient in vitamins like B-12, B-6, minerals -magnesium, zinc, amino acids etc.. Why don't we start arming ourselves and our children's bodies before the administration of the vaccine schedule. This is something critical we should all consider.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 04/02/2008
- jhNY See Profile I'm a Fan of jhNY permalink

Perhaps I missed it in the comments thread, but is there anybody out there in Scienceland who has considered the possiblity that, as late as a few years ago,a lot of moms-to-be ate a lot of canned tuna? A mom I know ate a lot of it during her pregnancy (before the warnings about eating fish), as it was one of her favorite foods, and her child is now what they call 'on the spectrum'. Are there any studies which seek to find tuna's effect on the huge uptick in the incidence of autism?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 03/30/2008
- bluevalentine See Profile I'm a Fan of bluevalentine permalink

Hate fish.

I was careful about every morsel of food that went into my mouth during pregnancy....no mercury.

Child with CNS dysfunction, CAS, SID, dysarthria and expressive language disorder.

Funny, I do refer to this time in the vaccine era as cover-up mode, but it is interesting that in the last year there was actually a recommendation for pregnant woman to eat tuna, for the Omega's. It took 6 MONTHS, but the FDA did finally come out and say that they simply could not support telling pregnant women to consume tuna.

Go figure...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 04/05/2008
- melann830 See Profile I'm a Fan of melann830 permalink

Tuna and other fish which pregnant moms were warned not to eat contain mercury and other harmful contaminants. Also eating anything canned in general poses risk. My son is on the spectrum and our son's doctor has prohibited consuming anything canned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 04/02/2008
- Clinton See Profile I'm a Fan of Clinton permalink

Don't know of any studies about this, but it does appear plausible. There's also concern with raw tuna in sushi and as sashimi. Expensive, and so bad for you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 03/31/2008
- Clinton See Profile I'm a Fan of Clinton permalink

If anyone has any doubts about mercury poisoning in general, here is a link that describes a tragic laboratory accident awhile ago.
http://www.udel.edu/OHS/dartmouth/drtmtharticle.html

Handling mercury organometallic compounds is dangerous.

There is tox data for Thimerosal [USAN:JAN]
RN: 54-64-8
available here:
http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/ProxyServlet?objectHandle=Search&actionHandle=getAll3DMViewFiles&nextPage=jsp%2Fcommon%2FChemFull.jsp%3FcalledFrom%3D&chemid=000054648&formatType=_3D

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 03/30/2008
- Scote See Profile I'm a Fan of Scote permalink

If I may be so bold as to say "Duh!" Did you see anyone claiming mercury is good for you? Strawman much?

The issue in this thread is primarily do childhood vaccines currently cause Autism? And, since Thimerosal was removed from childhood vaccines years ago, if there was a correlation there would have been a dramatic drop in Autism in recent years--and there hasn't been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 03/30/2008
- melann830 See Profile I'm a Fan of melann830 permalink

Mercury has not entirely been removed but merely drastically reduced. There are still traces of it. Also there are other chemical toxins in these vaccines-antifreeze allegedly for one. How many of you would walk into a bar and ask for antifreeze on the rocks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 04/02/2008
- Clinton See Profile I'm a Fan of Clinton permalink

A bit of advice: if you don't really have any evidence to back up your arguments, it is better to admit that as soon as possible. And Latin phrases such as 'post hoc ergo propter hoc' may impress the uneducated, but many can recognize them for what they learned as sophomores in high school. It makes you come across as an arrogant fool (synonym for Republican these days).

The molecular structures of dimethyl mercury (a deadly poison that can penetrate rubber gloves) and thimerosal ( a known toxin) are similar enough to warrant further research into their mechanisms of toxicity (including partitioning in tissues and other pharmacodynamics). This is information one with your evident bias should have at their fingertips. And yet all we get are snide, sophomoric remarks. Hope this isn't too ad hominem for your refined sensibilities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 AM on 04/01/2008
- TimKasemodel See Profile I'm a Fan of TimKasemodel permalink

want you to answer the question about why asking for vaccines without thimerosal (or aluminum at high concentrations) and spreading them out make us anti vaccine.

Answer or KWICHERBICHEN

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 03/31/2008
- Clinton See Profile I'm a Fan of Clinton permalink

Care to present the data? Care to direct anyone to where the data are?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 03/31/2008
- CraigWilloughby See Profile I'm a Fan of CraigWilloughby permalink

Go to the CDC's website and look up the Influenza Vaccines and the DTaP, and several other vaccines. You'll notice that no, Thimerisol has NOT been removed from vaccines.

And as to your question to who is claiming mercury is good for you? Watch this article.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZArebYZzdc

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 03/31/2008
- LBKN See Profile I'm a Fan of LBKN permalink

Scote,

What's your investment? Are you a pharm rep, or a pharm scientist, or a defense lawyer for the pharm, or a propagandist/disinformationist? You have gone to some effort to shamanize the accumulated anecdotes that surround a preservative connection. You harp on the necessity of clean, hard science... but you should know... clean, hard science always starts as "anecdotal hypothesis"... followed by an unbiased investigation.

Your rants stink of bias.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 03/30/2008
- Scote See Profile I'm a Fan of Scote permalink

It is sad when a call for sound, evidence based science is seen as a conspiracy. Speaking of bias, what standard of evidence would it take to convince you that their is no causal relation to childhood vaccines and autism?

If you are in favor of science--as you claim to be--you have to be open to that possibility. So what would you accept? Your problem in answering that question is going to be explaining how you are "open to science" while creating a standard that excludes the large body of evidence showing no correlation between childhood vaccines and autism--I suspect you'll use the "medical establishment can't be trusted" angle. So, if that's the case, who? And what standard of evidence?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 03/30/2008
- melann830 See Profile I'm a Fan of melann830 permalink

My son is on the spectrum. I know those vaccines triggered his autism. I even voiced my concern to my pediatrician before he administered the vaccines. Do you even comprehend the level of guilt that many parents feel because they did not listen to themselves and instead believed misguided doctors fooled by the pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. My son had completely ceased stimming. When the Dpt vaccine was administered around age 4, he developed a huge hump from his upper arm to his shoulder and back. It was red, swollen and he had a fever. This is all documented by my son's second pediatrician because after the first disaster, I switched. My second pediatrician understands my concerns and allows me to vaccinate at my own pace, without force feeding these poisons to my son. My son has autoimmune abnormalities and metabolic abnormalities. If more parents seek the expert advice of pediatric rheumatologists who are used to treating this disorder we may one day find a way to prevent it from further spreading.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 04/02/2008
- fil See Profile I'm a Fan of fil permalink

Ok......Try out this article.
http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080330/NEWS01/803300409/1075

In news-press.com
The Alvarerez have 4 children.
The first 2 were adopted ( not related) vaccinated and regressed into Autism.
Then they concieved a child.......vaccinated.......regressed into Autism.

They had another child who is now three........not vaccinated......not Autistic.

I know, the fourth one would not have been autistic had the child been vaccinated.

The parent's should be thrown in jail for not protected that last child from all those childhood diseases........ or should they be thrown in jail for having the first two vaccinated and then stupidly having the third one vaccinated?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 03/30/2008
- MidwestDad See Profile I'm a Fan of MidwestDad permalink

Shamanize?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 03/30/2008
- Clinton See Profile I'm a Fan of Clinton permalink

second that

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 03/30/2008
- KevLeitch See Profile I'm a Fan of KevLeitch permalink

In a previous post you stated:

..."the regression [could] be traced directly and temporally to immunizations"...

when you were referring to two kids - one of whom was Hannah Poling. In my opinion, consider the above, the regression might be able to be temporally traced to her vaccines, but directly? I don't see how. Taken individually or together the injuries presented as being those caused by her vaccines can't be used to come anywhere close to a diagnosis of autism.

What it seems the study authors have here (and I assume discussed with the CDC) is a mito/autism relationship. Pretty interesting but its link to vaccines is - at best - temporal.

http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/mmr.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 AM on 03/30/2008
- Scote See Profile I'm a Fan of Scote permalink

I like your diagram clearly illustrating the post hoc propter hoc fallacy as it relates to this topic, but the last one isn't the same fallacy, it's an invalid syllogism. So, while it is satisfying, it illustrates a different error in logic than the one you are trying to disprove.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 AM on 03/30/2008
- CraigWilloughby See Profile I'm a Fan of CraigWilloughby permalink

Going along this line of thought, and the somewhat childish and immature diagram that Kevin posted, let me posit the following statements:

At one time, everyone thought the world was flat. It was only through a THEORY that this was proven wrong.

At one time, everyone thought that the sun circled the earth. It was only through a THEORY that this was proven wrong.

At one time, everyone thought the moon was made of cheese. The big bang is just a theory, black holes are just a theory.

Are you saying that all of those theories are wrong, simply because, at one time, someone thought otherwise? There has been no credible scientific evidence to disprove the autism-vaccine link. I know, you're going to say that there are tons of credible studies out there. Show my one that is independant and not tainted by parties with a vested interest in the matter, then we'll talk.

Until then, here's some latin for you, since you seem to be so "fluent"

Age quod agis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 04/01/2008
- KevLeitch See Profile I'm a Fan of KevLeitch permalink

1) Loss of previously acquired language
**2) Eye Contact**
**3) Relatedness**
4) disruption in CHILD"s sleep patterns,
5) Persistent screaming
6) Arching
7) the development of pica to foreign objects,
8) loose stools
**9) CHILD watched the fluorescent lights repeatedly during the examination**
10) fever to 38.9°C
11) inconsolable crying
12) irritability
13) lethargy
14) refused to walk
15) waking up multiple times in the night
16) having episodes of opisthotonus
17) no longer normally climb stairs
18) Low-grade intermittent fever
19) generalized erythematous macular rash
20) spinning
**21) gaze avoidance**
22) disrupted sleep/wake cycle
**23) perseveration**
**24) expressive language was lost**
25) chronic yellow watery diarrhea
26) appetite remained poor for 6 months
27) body weight did not increase
28) decline on a standard growth chart
29) atopic dermatitis
30) slow hair growth
31) generalized mild hypotonia
32) toe walking
33) normal tendon reflexes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 AM on 03/30/2008
- TimKasemodel See Profile I'm a Fan of TimKasemodel permalink

My child experienced nearly 100% of this list (not sure of the slow hair growth)

My child has markers that indicate he has possible mito dysfunction, which will now be resarched so people like you can stop saying there is no evidence.

This happened in conjunction with an accelerated vaccine schedule, nealry always given when sick and on antibiotics, symptoms of autism developing by 17 months.

My child has full blown DMS-IV autism.

I am sure that that you will say it is simply coincidence.

We say it is not.

Medical doctors within the HHS say it is not.

We are ineligable for compensation from VICP because we missed the limitations by a few months, so I am not in this for money. I personally think that 5000 cases against the VICP is letting them off easy.

Fact is Kev, you can ignore this and twist this any way you want, it was conceded, by the government (not a court) that vaccines caused autism. Period.

Your house of cards is about to blow away.


"This is not true and easily refuted." By the way, when exactly did this happen, must have missed it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 03/31/2008
- KevLeitch See Profile I'm a Fan of KevLeitch permalink

...."If I have read the transcript below correctly, Dr. Gerberding is saying that, yes, in some mitochondrial disorder cases, vaccines can be the trigger that causes "symptoms that have characteristics of autism." So, Dr. Gerberding admits a link -- but then denies that it is a link to autism.

The only problem with this line of argument is that I know for a fact that Hannah, as well as the kids in the new unpublished mito study were, as one doctor told me, "plucked right from autism clinics. They all have autism, there is no question of that."".....

Hi David,

This is another variation of correlation not equating to causation. A few years ago it was thought that because autism became apparent in a child's life at roughly the same time as vaccines are given that they caused autism. This is not true and easily refuted.

The argument you make here is equally (in my opinion) illogical - Yes Hannah Poling is autistic. Yes, Hannah Poling was damaged by her vaccines. No, the two facts are not related.

How do we know the two facts are not related? Well, all we need to do is look at the symptoms that were presented as those being the result of vaccine damage (taken from Poling/Zimmerman Case Study and HHS report - features meeting DMS (IV) starred):

(PLEASE SEE NEXT COMMENT - HUFFPO HAS A TEXT LIMIT ON COMMENTS)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 03/30/2008
- foe2Hg See Profile I'm a Fan of foe2Hg permalink

Kev,

Is there more to this? I am not seeing your point. Looking at that list of symptoms, I could include my daughter and about 85% , possibly more,of the kids I know with autism to have had almost all those symptoms. That is why DMS is completely inadequate as these kids have such medical problems not ever discussed by the media, their peds, CDC and interestingly, from your camp.

Teresa Conrick

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 03/30/2008
- foe2Hg See Profile I'm a Fan of foe2Hg permalink

I wrote DMS as I was copying from you but we both mean DSM IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition. In case anyone needed clarification.

Teresa

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 03/30/2008
- JeffMOM See Profile I'm a Fan of JeffMOM permalink

Gerberding = not sure what causes autism. But we are sure its NOT the vaccines.

Reminds me when OJ SImpson wanted to set up a reward fund to find the REAL KILLERS

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 03/29/2008