Broke California will begin the new decade with crushing debt and wholesale elimination of human services. Meanwhile, President Obama has rankled Congressional Democrats with plans to earmark millions of dollars in NIH funds to find the causes and cures of autism.
Are these two things related? You bet they are.
Barack Obama is not a stupid man. He sees the budgetary train wreck hurtling down the track towards the US Treasury. His Administration knows that the number of adults with autism in this country is about to explode. Parents can't foot the bill, so taxpayers will have to. The price tag will be stratospherical.
Isn't it better to earmark millions in autism research funds right now for NIH to identify the causes of autism - despite outcries from Rep. Obey, Sen. Harkin and others - in order to save hundreds of billions further down the road?
It's called frontloading the budget, and if we don't do it, the coming army of young adults with autism will march in and break the bank.
Anyone who thinks that a lot of people with autism somehow "grow out of their disorder" by adulthood should take a look at an important article published today in the Sacramento Bee.
Here, you will meet California residents such as Marlon Barton, a 6'2", 283-pound "strapping young man who flaps his hands and makes odd noises," according to reporter Cynthia Hubert. "No one knows quite what to do with him," she says.
Marlon Barton is 26 years old and "acutely" autistic. He scares people. My heart goes out to him, and to his amazing mother.
But they are hardly alone.
"As a tidal wave of these youngsters moves toward adulthood with complex behavioral and medical problems, society is largely unprepared," Hubert writes. "The futures of hundreds of thousands of autistic people in America cannot be ignored for long."
Dr. Robert Hendren, director of the UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute, concurs. "We don't have the programs. We don't have the research," he warns. "We have this very large adult population of autistics coming along, and we don't know how to deal with them. We just haven't come to terms with it."
California has certainly not come to terms with it - and I have no idea what will happen to the thousands of young people in need who will be showing up at state offices in the next few years, their parents desperately seeking services.
Currently, 81.7% of all autism cases in the state Department of Development Services system are under 18, but that ratio is about to change fast.
There are now 6,300 adult Californians receiving autism services through DDS. But over the next four years, more than 4,000 teenagers will join their ranks. By 2018, the total number of adults with autism will more than triple, to 19,000 people -- each requiring tens of thousands of dollars (or more) in care, education and support services, every year.
California cannot afford it.
Which brings us back to President Obama. By 2023, the US will have some 380,000 people who will need "extensive adult services," at the cost of billions of dollars a year, Hubert writes. "Care providers are just beginning to grapple with how to deal with the surge, even as governments slash social services to cope with budget deficits."
That may be one reason why HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the Obama team, "is attempting a 'balancing act' of respecting science while trying to find cures for autism and cancer," according to The Hill newspaper in Washington.
Anyone still trying to lull Americans into complacently believing that autism is a genetic disorder that has always been with us in such staggering numbers (we just never noticed before) needs to stop doing that. Now.
It's time to stop pretending this isn't happening.
Autism's toll on children, families, friends and caregivers has been devastating. President Obama knows that the disorder will now exact its toll on taxpayers. I am encouraged that Federal health officials are finally moving to identify all possible environmental autism triggers - including vaccines - so we can finally learn how to slow this spigot down.
Why not spend money now to find the causes and cures for autism? If we don't, that tidal wave will just keep on washing over us.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy#cite_note-62
Thimerosal has been present in many of our vaccines. If mercury is influenced by testosterone levels - or vice versa - we'll naturally see more males affected. Mercury has many side effects - but isn't one, it's impact on our immune systems? If our children are full of mercury (from Thimerosal) - then they receive "live virus shots"....aren't they more apt to contract the same viruses that they are suppose to be protected against? Many children with autism and children with encephalitis mimic one another's symptoms. The kids get their "mercury" shots and then their "viral" shots and are more apt to present with encephalitis/encephalopathy...and mercury toxicity...and autism.
Why isn't there more discussion about acetominophen? Many parents are advised by their doctors to give children "Tylenol" when they receive their shots - to counter "side effects (like fever)". Since acetaminophen suppresses liver function and glutathione production - how many of "our children" have been harmed by this "innocent" drug?
Under your post - under "More in Living" - is a link to an article about Tylenol and liver damage. When will you write about this topic? Couldn't it be playing a role for a lot of our kids? If our kids didn't get so many vaccines, they likely wouldn't ingest so much "Tylenol". But, couldn't "Tylenol" be a "player" in this epidemic?
A very good question, and one that I would like to see answered.
It's interesting to note that the director of Defeat Autism Now! is none other than Jane Johnson, one of the members of the Johnson and Johnson family (as in the makers of Tylenol). She and other members of her family have also been donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund Dr. Wakefield's work at Thoughtful House, most likely to ensure that the focus of autism research stays on vaccines instead of their own toxic waste product.
http://www.thoughtfulhouse.org/annual-report-2007.pdf
see page 11.
I believe the cases in the state Department of Development Services may only be the crest of a wave few are viewing as a whole. My California-born child is not affected enough to be included in the above numbers, yet, if no intensive acceleration is made in her development, she will probably need some level of supervision, personal care, and financial support all of her life. How many parents are to be put in the position where they might have to hope to outlive their children to try to care for them?
This isn't a multi-decade research opportunity to study individuals who were "hardwired" in their genes to become chronically ill, and maybe find "treatments" to "control" symptoms and "improve their quality of life." This is a wake-up call for a much need societal environmental course change that should have happened yesterday.
What will our children see happen to the health of their children? How will they thank us decades of inaction (excluding people like yourself who work very hard to help us see what is happening)?
They've begun making more combination vaccines (DTaP, MMR, MMRV) as well as giving two or three doses of most vaccines (in case the first didn't produce a significant titer response) within months of each other, as well as boosters before Kindergarten because for many the immune response has waned by five years (vaccines do not confer lifelong immunity). This means children are vaccinated for multiple diseases in nearly every "well-baby" visit.
Also, while they lowered the age (body weight) for receipt of these vaccines they did not proportionately lower the amount of ingredients such as thimerosal (mercury), aluminum, etc. These ingredients are being injected in doses that exceed what guidelines we have for daily exposure by extreme amounts, while we apparently do not have any safety guidelines for this type of bolus dose exposure (and this is assuming the child doesn't already have an ongoing exposure to these in their environment).
Legislation mainstreaming disabled children into schools didn't pass until the later half of the 70's.
'A good article, having said which we have to note that "autism epidemic" denialism, which has set us back so many years was always closely allied to "vaccine causes autism" denialism, and these were always closely allied projects, as in this article by Eric Fombonne, who was retained by the vaccine companies:'
A good article, having said which we have to note that "autism epidemic" denialism, which has set us back so many years was always closely allied to "vaccine causes autism", and these were always closely allied projects, as in this article by Eric Fombonne, who was retained by the vaccine companies:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/107/2/411
The fallacy in this article (though I was much less experienced in these matters in 2001) was already evident when it was sent to me at the time by a British civil servant - for Fombonne the absence of controls in the data, was sufficient reason for retreating behind the static incidence theory. But all those years ago no sane person could have looked at the data and not have been extremely troubled. I hope we are not going to spend another decade pretending that it might not be the vaccines: frankly there is already sufficient evidence of obfuscation and malfeaseance (let alone the direct evidence of parents) for vaccines to be the main - although not only - suspect.
And let's face it the pharmaceutical industry are already pinning their growth forecasts on huge expansion of the already over-expanded vaccine schedule - we have to be strong on this issue now because things are planned to get much worse.
John Stone - Contributing editor, Age of Autism
Does autism have one etiology or many? Do you think there is any genetic role whatsoever?
What exactly is going to get worse and how?
"I'm sorry, let me see if I understand you correctly? "
I am sure you don't.
"Are you asserting that all ASDs are due to vaccine damage? "
No
"Or just some of it?"
Most likely.
"Or is it anything big pharma does collectively?"
It would be infantile to regard the pharma as a benign operator, or properly accountable.
"Does autism have one etiology or many?"
Almost certainly several.
"Do you think there is any genetic role whatsoever?"
Surely - vaccines don't effect all children badly, only some.
"What exactly is going to get worse and how?"
As I have said the pharma project its major growth in the vaccine sector:
Kids’ vaccine market set to quadruple – Drug Researcher – By Anna Lewcock 20-Nov-2007
http://www.drugresearcher.com/Research-management/Kids-vaccine-market-set-to-quadruple
New Report Forecasts More Than Doubling of Vaccine Sales by 2013 – MarketWatch Jun 11, 2009 – Kalorama News Release
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-report-forecasts-more-than-doubling-of-vaccine-sales-by-2013
And it has all got to be injected into our children, for whose benefit?.
Fine reward for being responsible parents and protecting the herd. And they wonder why so many parents and patients have lost faith in modern medicine - these days, even if you don't have autism in your immediate family, someone that you love does.
Maurine Meleck
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/8619/cameronskclass20082009c.jpg
I worry not only for our Cameron and his future, but for our country.
The video is called
"Growing in My Garden... a few flowers, weeds, Twins, and a bit of Autism"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZYf_d57JSA