iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Lose

GET UPDATES FROM David Lose
 

Do Christian Denominations Have a Future?

Posted: 06/22/2012 11:28 am

A quick, but important caveat: I teach at a denominational seminary, was ordained into and serve in a denomination -- and therefore have much of my retirement savings tied to a denominational pension plan -- and not only take seriously, but take pride in, my Lutheran identity and heritage. (Whether that makes you want to take more seriously or dismiss altogether my feelings about denominations is, of course, for you to decide.) Despite my obvious denominational loyalty, however, I'm not sure Christian denominations have a future -- or whether they even should.

In fact, here are five reasons that I not only suspect the day of denominations has passed but also can't seem to find it in me to shed many tears about it.

1) Denominations are incredibly confusing in a post-Christian world. When the larger culture was nominally Christian, believers had the luxury of squaring off behind denominational identities. No longer. Ask the typical person with little or no familiarity with the Christian faith the difference between Methodists, Lutherans, and Presbyterians and she'll likely give you a blank stare that indicates she's wondering whether you're still talking about Christianity. The facts of the matter are pretty straightforward, if not that encouraging: most people in the various denominations have little sense what they mean and absolutely no one outside them really cares.

2) The theological differences between the major denominations are relatively minor. As much as I love a good real-presence vs. memorial-feast slugfest or round of justification/sanctification truth-or-dare, the truth is that most of the theological differences between denominations not only are unintelligible to their own members but are, in the larger scheme of things, relatively minor. Across the board, the major Protestant denominations, for instance, share a biblical canon, confess the major ecumenical creeds, and observe the same two sacraments. I therefore can -- and regularly do -- worship at churches of any of the major denominations and feel not the slightest tremor in my theological conscience.

3) Inordinate amounts of funding are spent on maintaining denominational structures and bureaucracies, money that could be spent on mission. Even though every denomination I know has in recent years cut way back on spending, eliminated various divisions or boards, or extended the times between major assemblies or conventions, denominations are still expending vast sums of money to prop up dated denominational bureaucracies. Would it not make sense to conserve resources by efficiently combining structures? Are seven or eight struggling denominational publishing houses better than one robust one? Where there are three beleaguered denominational seminaries in a single region, might not one healthy pan-denominational school suffice? (And we haven't even started on congregations!) Think of what might happen if the savings were channeled to funding creative media campaigns that didn't extol the virtues of one denomination but taught the Christian faith.

4) Political differences outstripped theological ones decades ago. Let's face it: progressive Lutheran, Presbyterian, and Episcopalian congregations have a lot more in common than do progressive and conservative congregations in the same tradition. Differences over how to read the Bible, the nature of the atonement, and the character of God are far more important today than nuanced differences in polity or regarding the sacraments.

5) Denominational affiliation often represents the triumph of ethnic and cultural loyalties over theological convictions. While denominations may have initially arisen over theological differences, they were soon co-opted by the political realities of their sponsoring state. Little wonder, then, that ethnic and cultural identity is closely tied to denominational affiliation. Those in the club, after all, talk not simply of Presbyterians and Lutherans but Scotch Presbyterians and Swedish or German Lutherans. This has always made it difficult to reach beyond one's ethnic enclave because interested seekers, even if they were attracted to, for instance, Lutheran theology, had to accept it in the form of German chorales or Swedish traditions. Moreover, as ethnic culture has declined as an important identity-maker, so also has religious affiliation -- after all, for many folks, if Lutheranism isn't about Santa Lucia, what is it about? And if they've stopped going to the Santa Lucia festival, why bother with church?

The bottom line is this: while I love my denominational heritage and am all for a robust theological identity and spirited theological conversation, I'd give up denominational identity and structure in a heartbeat if it meant a more unified, comprehensible, and compelling witness to the Gospel.

This makes some of my tribe, I know, rather nervous. But lest we imagine that denominations are, like the Holy Trinity, one of those things that, "always have been, are, and forever will be," perhaps a few words from one of the original Reformers will ease our fears. Just a few years into what would eventually be called the Protestant reformation, some of the followers of Martin Luther began to take his name for their cause. Luther, however, was neither amused nor pleased. In 1522 he wrote the following in a public treatise:

I ask that people make no reference to my name; let them call themselves Christians, not Lutherans. What is Luther? After all, the teaching is not mine. Neither was I crucified for anyone.... How then should I -- poor stinking maggot-fodder than I am -- come to have people call the children of Christ by my wretched name? Not so, my dear friends; let us abolish all party names and call ourselves Christian.

Not a bad idea, if you ask me. In fact, if denominations have a future, perhaps it rests precisely in taking the counsel of their founders to heart.

Note: An earlier version of this post appeared at the website ...In the Meantime.

 
 
 
FOLLOW RELIGION
A quick, but important caveat: I teach at a denominational seminary, was ordained into and serve in a denomination -- and therefore have much of my retirement savings tied to a denominational pension ...
A quick, but important caveat: I teach at a denominational seminary, was ordained into and serve in a denomination -- and therefore have much of my retirement savings tied to a denominational pension ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 285
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
01:58 PM on 07/16/2012
Lutherans & Episcopalians now have an 'exchange of orders' that allows the clergy of either to be hired by either. (This is more significant than is obvious).
03:03 PM on 07/09/2012
Interesting article. In the end, whatever denomination or tradition you find yourself, isn't there a greater call to spread the gospel in unity per John 17:23? I suspect people will often 'identify' with traditions for cultural or personal reasons and that seems appropriate. From a larger perspective, though, what can we do to unite to get the gospel to our community and to our world? There are some practical steps for our postmodern world - but these are just some ideas to a greater dialogue (cf. www.facebook.com/redroverthebook (p. 138-153).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 AM on 07/08/2012
Honesty
We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ. 2 Corinthians 10:5.
A man’s heart is not subject to the understanding of any human, for it is too complex and full of mysteries to be discerned by any but Almighty God, including political candidates.
W. Ralph Mangum
www.thetotalmanministries.org
talkbackamerica@hotmail.com
Host on Talk Back America @KLAV1230am/KLAV1230am.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
08:56 AM on 07/05/2012
Not sure its a post-Christian world when that's still the world's largest religion by substantial amount. I do agree as a non-denominational person, those differences and silos are divisive and often create more confusion within Christianity and outside of it.
photo
Morgan Guyton
United Methodist Pastor, Blogger
12:11 AM on 07/03/2012
As a United Methodist, I'm not sure that theological distinctions are all that minor. On the theological landscape, I see three main theological camps: reformed/predestinarian, Baptist/semi-Pelagian, and Wesleyan/Arminian. The non-denominational megachurches are split between reformed and Baptist. I see a lot of widespread heresy in the teachings of the powerful pop-evangelical movement. I took some of them to task in this post I put up today on HuffPost: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/morgan-guyton/four-cringeworthy-claims-_b_1631944.html
10:49 AM on 07/01/2012
If denominations die out we, as religious consumers, will be worse off because we will then have fewer choices. Denominations are brands of religiousity. We should be able to choose the style of religiousity we most enjoy. The more brands there are available, and the more diverse their offerings, the better.

I want my religion fancy and guilt free, with lots of incense and no sermons. If my brand dies out, I will be worse off, and so will others who share my taste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OHexpat12
07:42 AM on 07/01/2012
The author's 5th point is the primary reason why my early-lifetime experiment with ordination and mission, and lack of a structure to put me back into the church in America has led me to decide against denominationalism. In its place we have another polity "congregationalism" that is adopted not only by Christians but by many other religious faiths as well. What is most important is that this coincides with increasing"lateralism" in all matters from economy to social policy to a quickening turn to socialism around the world. What I find, though is that the power of some families in local churches becomes stifling to others...so there will continue to be splits.

In this environment the burdon of ownership of church buildings for worship will decline and a professional clergy will also become overskilled. In short, church budgets are in for big changes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 AM on 06/28/2012
Agreed. Those Protestant denominations mentioned used to be fairly different but have become less distinguishable as they have strayed away from their roots. For example, the current day Methodist church is radically different than their Wesleyan foundings.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
06:23 PM on 06/26/2012
With them letting it slip how bloodthirsty they really are, I doubt it.

Remember gang, the Bible has death penalties for about 90% of America's citizens. It's just which ones they choose to apply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zappbrannigan420
I'm not taking attendance you dork!
11:10 AM on 06/26/2012
Interesting points, all of them.
03:35 AM on 06/26/2012
I was raised in the Presbyterian Church. I attended Baptist and Lutheran Parochial schools. I received my university degrees in a Disciples of Christ affliated school. There are many things about each of those four denominations that I genuinely like. I come from a long-line, maternally, of Methodist ministers. My, paternal, GrandMother was Episcopalian. And, on the Italian side of the family there are many Catholics.

I have attended church services in just about every denomination there is. And, I can truly say that I enjoyed every one...even, the Pentacostal churches or Assembly of God Churches. I have felt welcome in all churches that I have attended. I am a member of the Lutheran Church, and my Children were all baptized in the Lutheran Church.

I can easily tell you the doctrinal differences of each denomination. But, the main criteria for me is...if they teach and preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ. There will be no denominations in Heaven, and we will all sit at the Marriage Feast of the Lamb together.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
02:36 AM on 06/26/2012
I believe that the many denominations are a good thing for two reasons. First, the different "takes" on theology allow people to follow their conscience, as well as worship preference, thus bringing more people to Christ (with the caveat that there not be condemnations of one another). Second, splitting up the organization reduces the political power and corruption of the church body overall.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jacob Aud
12:51 AM on 06/26/2012
Using a simple illustration, Jesus showed that immediately after he planted the seeds of Christianity, an enemy, Satan, would interfere. (Matthew 13:24, 25) Thus, it was not a mere social phenomenon that caused Christianity to be transformed during the first few centuries after Jesus’ ministry. It was enemy action, Satan’s action. Today the churches of Christendom are perpetuating mistakes made in the past and are reaping the effects.—2 Corinthians 11:14, 15; James 4:4.

A Sneak Attack on Christianity

Jesus foretold that his teachings would be subverted. He said: “The kingdom of the heavens has become like a man that sowed fine seed in his field. While men were sleeping, his enemy came and oversowed weeds in among the wheat, and left.” Surprisingly, when servants brought the evil deed to the man’s attention and asked for permission to collect the weeds, the man said: “No; that by no chance, while collecting the weeds, you uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest; and in the harvest season I will tell the reapers, First collect the weeds and bind them in bundles to burn them up, then go to gathering the wheat into my storehouse.” —Matthew 13:24-30.

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD FOR CHRISTIANITY?
http://www.watchtower.org/e/200702/article_01.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
american64woman
Feminist liberal atheist... Hillary/Warren 2016
11:08 PM on 06/25/2012
MHO The Catholic Church will fail first....which will lead to a slight and short lived increase in other denominations..but the majority will become secularly monotheist. I dont see your immediate future or funds at risk but your grandchildren will see it in theirs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zappbrannigan420
I'm not taking attendance you dork!
11:14 AM on 06/26/2012
Unlikely.
12:38 PM on 07/16/2012
LOL...okay. The Catholic Church is 2000 years old and has outlasted every kingdom, empire, cultural movement and sin from within and without. It's not going anywhere, thank God.
10:21 PM on 06/25/2012
I agree with you that there are minor differences between many denominations. Personally, I consider myself a CHRISTIAN. At the present time, I attend a Calvary Chapel, but I have been completely at home in Baptist and other churches.

Frankly, I don't care about the denomination of the church I attend. My primary concern is 'do they faithfully teach the WHOLE Bible, or does the pastor spend most of his time on a few 'pet' subjects'.
photo
bermudababy
Left lane for passing only!!
09:07 AM on 06/26/2012
Do they uphold the Name of God? As Jesus did?
Do they teach that the Kingdom of God is a real government?
Do they take seriously the commission that ALL disciples are to publicly preach the Word of God?
Do they endorse man's governmemts and kill ?
Do they perform idolotris acts to idols such as crosses, statues, etc.?

Really, I could go on and on.