More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Macaray

GET UPDATES FROM David Macaray
 

Nordic Whoring

Posted: 01/09/12 09:35 AM ET

Sociologists tell us that the reason an otherwise happily married man will seek the services of a prostitute is because he knows she will do things his wife would never consent to do. Whether or not that observation is accurate, the same perception appears to be Sweden's reason for embracing the American worker. Judging from their recent actions, Swedish companies are convinced they can get American workers to do things their own citizens would never do.

Early evidence of this perception was seen in the draconian measures instituted at Sweden's IKEA manufacturing plant in Danville, Virginia. After getting the local community to pony up more than $12 million in tax breaks and other subsidies (as an inducement for IKEA to locate its factory in this job-starved region of Virginia), it didn't take long for the company to show its true colors.

They not only hired a union-busting outfit to keep the IAM (International Association of Machinists) from making a run at the employees, they proceeded to drastically slash employee wages, and unilaterally modify long-standing work and overtime rules. Needless to say, these measures not only would have been frowned upon by Swedish society, they would've been illegal. They would have been in violation of Sweden's federal labor laws.

As brutal as the Danville crackdown was, a similar move is occurring at the AAK (AahusKarishamn) oils and fats processing plant, in Louisville, Kentucky. The Louisville plant was formerly owned and operated by Golden Brands, but was sold to the Swedish multinational corporation last July. Despite having had a fairly cooperative relationship with Golden Brands for more than 25 years, once the company changed hands, things turned ugly almost immediately.

Within months of acquiring the facility, AAK launched an unprecedented anti-union campaign, one that culminated in -- and this is going to sound preposterous -- the company circulating a decertification petition, urging the 50 members of Chapter 320 of the National Conference of Firemen and Oilers (NCFO/Local 32BJ SEIU) to voluntarily leave their union. The arrogance and audacity of such a move was stunning. Had management dared circulate a decertification petition in Sweden, the company's executives would've been strung up by their Buster Browns.

But when the decert effort failed, AAK became even more determined. The company not only threatened to fire members of the union bargaining committee if they didn't recommend to their fellow workers ratification of a grossly inferior contract, but their negotiators came to the bargaining table armed with a set of ultimatums that would have effectively stripped the union of its legitimacy (including abolishing the union security clause and eliminating seniority rights).

Say what you will about the Swedes, but they're shrewd and resourceful. Accordingly, they were perceptive enough to realize that the United States no longer qualifies, technically, as a "country" -- at least not in the way that Sweden qualifies as one.

The U.S. appears to have lost its sense of identity; it no longer feels like a national community. Rather, it seems to have mutated into a gladiatorial arena, a battleground where corporations compete for profits in a merciless zero-sum game, where everything is reduced to winners and losers, and where, unfortunately, the federal labor laws are so weak they practically guarantee that the workers will always be the losers.

What we have before us is a case of Sweden -- arguably one of the most socially and economically enlightened countries in the world -- looking for a prostitute who will do things that its own citizens won't do. And that prostitute happens to be America. Whoever said it was right... we are, indeed, the Land of Opportunity.

David Macaray, a Los Angeles playwright and author ("It's Never Been Easy: Essays on Modern Labor"), was a former union rep. He can be reached at dmacaray@earthlink.net

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:21 PM on 01/16/2012
It has to be said that Ikea is not based in Sweden. It is owned by a swede, who left Sweden many years ago for Switzerland. He did so because it wouldn't be possible to operate in Sweden and pay slave wages. It is not Sweden looking for a prostitute, it's simply a case of capitalism gone full circle. Americans are as exploited as they exploit, and few cares or bothers to know why they buy cheap products made by cheap labor. The name of the game: Capitalism!
photo
Icecube
Fortuna's #1 Leykis 101 graduate
06:01 PM on 01/09/2012
We put ourselves in this position with giving business everything they wanted. Why blame the opportunist?
05:47 PM on 01/09/2012
The principal reason that corporations outsource is to avoid the restrictions on their freedom of action in their own countries. This is why, for example, the working conditions at the factories that make Apple products in China was extremely hazardous and slavery-like. No corporation could get away with such conditions in the US.
05:35 PM on 01/09/2012
From the article: "What we have before us is a case of Sweden -- arguably one of the most socially and economically enlightened countries in the world -- looking for a prostitute who will do things that its own citizens won't do."

What's new? This is the way the global economy works. American multinationals pollute, pay slave wages, and exploit child labor in foreign countries and then bring the goods home for American consumers. Also commonly referred to as the race to the bottom.
03:26 PM on 01/09/2012
1. Why should the local community give $12 Million in subsidies to a foreign corporation?

2. What were the prospects of local labor in the Danville area without IKEA?

3. Why did AAK sell their oils and fats processing plant? Was it losing money? What are local labor's prospects if this plant closes?
05:21 PM on 01/09/2012
Why would the local community give $12 million in subsidies to a foreign corporation? For the same reason that there are now close to 40 auto plants (assembly and parts) in the Deep South, many of them foreign, and all of them lured there with subsidies. The answer? Jobs.
02:23 PM on 01/09/2012
It's called unfettered capitalism aka 'The Free Market' and it cannot exist in the same vicinity as democracy. You don't even need a scorecard to see which one is winning.
jhNY
Mercy.
02:12 PM on 01/09/2012
Ironic, I guess, but unsurprising.

After all, plants all over the developing world owned by American corporations do not operate in accord with American wage minimums, safety standards, retirement packages, workplace rights, environmental law, etc.

Suppose this must shock those who figured somehow we'd always be the ones doing this sort of thing to other people. And now it's being done to us, such as it is, by capitalist Swedes.
01:44 PM on 01/09/2012
Well said Mr. Macaray. This is the first that I've heard about Ikea doing such things as these. Why hasn't anyone reported on these terrible practices that we have been doing to other countries for more years that I can remember? As I see it, when the Democracts are in office, Labor, at least, gets a favorable look but when the Republicans are in power, Labor becomes invisible. Why do the Republicans hate the working man and fawn over wealthy people? Maybe it's in the genes!
12:50 PM on 01/09/2012
Now, if we just open up our sweat shops again and remove these draconian laws against child labor and end OSHA we'll get our jobs back from China.
12:10 PM on 01/09/2012
It's not so much that another corporation or another country is doing what, admittedly, the U.S. has done for decades, but that it is being done to us. We do it to the Third World and Mexico, but did anyone honestly think that our standard or living could fall so far that we would become a target of the same practices?
10:59 AM on 01/09/2012
Not condoning this, but isn't this what U.S. companies have been doing for years -- outsourcing various manufacturing functions to countries where people will work in horrid conditions for a pittance?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antonioarganda
10:46 AM on 01/09/2012
Sounds like we're in a race for the bottom of the barrel. The fruits of globalization are upon us. Next , our population will be living in cardboard boxes and working 18 hour shifts and giving our daughters to the Man in order to hold on to our jobs.
10:59 AM on 01/09/2012
With GOP candidates seriously suggesting dumping all environmental, safety and child labor laws, we are winning the race to the bottom. We do qualify as a country: A third world country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:28 AM on 01/09/2012
Well said D. Mac. Workers in the United States are completely splintered and intimidated by big business and our own government. Though we have a Democrat in the WH now I fear these forces will continue to prevail.
09:55 AM on 01/09/2012
What makes it harder is that these anti-union methods are just what the good old USA used to employ across great swathes of the world. Remember the United Fruit Company's actions? Now you complain that Sweden behaves like the United States did and does?
08:38 PM on 01/09/2012
It's not just that Sweden is behaving like America did and does, it's that they're doing it to US---as if we were one of those developing Third World countries we regularly exploit. Doesn't it shock you that a European nation would consider us that "disadvantaged"?