EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

David Plouffe

GET UPDATES FROM David Plouffe
 

No Difference Between President Obama and Candidate Obama

Posted: 11/3/09

While I appreciate Arianna Huffington's kind words about my book on the 2008 Presidential campaign of Barack Obama, I could not disagree more with the suggestion that somehow the President Obama of 2009 has lost touch with candidate Obama in 2008.

Frustration about the pace of change, even disagreement on select issues, of course is understandable. But stepping back a bit, as those of us in the Obama orbit have learned to do, reveals an administration that already has made a significant down payment on the change so many fought for last year. I remain confident in the president's unique ability not just to lead us through the many challenges and crises of the moment, but also to accomplish the tough, smart, long-term projects of energy and health care reform -- problems that Washington has long ignored but that will secure a more equitable and prosperous future for all Americans.

During the campaign, the president offered three core promises to the American people. First, he promised to wake up every day thinking about how to improve the lives of the middle class, a task made more urgent by the historic economic calamity that greeted him as he took office. Some suggested that all that could or should be done was to perform triage on the financial system and allow economic events to take their normal course. But the president undertook strong action to stabilize the banking system, as well as the auto industry. These were things he had to do -- not things he wanted to do -- and of course they had little political upside. But President Obama is a leader; he did not run to occupy the Oval Office but to lead from it, and many times that means playing a bad hand as effectively as possible.

The president's actions to stabilize the banking and auto sectors may well have prevented another Great Depression from visiting this country; certainly these measures avoided additional drastic job losses and foreclosures, of which we have already had far too many.

But while dealing with these crises during his first ten months, the president has kept his sights squarely focused on the middle class. He passed a Recovery Act that saved and created a million jobs -- many of these backbone middle-class jobs like teachers, firefighters, and police officers -- and made historic investments in green energy and technology jobs. His actions spurred a 73 percent increase in lending to small businesses, allowing them to expand and create new jobs; helped hundreds of thousands of responsible Americans keep their homes; and cut taxes for 95 percent of working families. He's expanded health care for children, passed equal pay for equal work legislation, and expanded stem cell research. And he is now closer than any president in decades to passing health reform that bans insurance companies from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions, outlaws insurance discrimination based on gender, and caps what patients can be charged out-of-pocket. This effort will be key, because job growth -- and the kind of robust economic growth our country needs to create a strong job-producing climate -- won't come without finally getting health care costs under control. Health insurance reform is a key piece of job-growth strategy, as employers of every size can attest.

President Obama's second core campaign promise was to make government more transparent and accountable, to rebuild a sacred trust that had been seriously eroded. And he has delivered. He closed the revolving door, forbidding anyone who works in his administration from lobbying when they leave their jobs. For the first time in history, names of visitors to the White House will be released, so every American can see which interests and individuals are visiting their government. And the groundbreaking website recovery.gov is allowing Americans to trace every dollar spent and every job created or saved from the recovery act, adding a level of transparency never before seen.

The third core pillar the president offered America was the chance to rebuild and strengthen our relationship with the rest of the world. Doing so would to allow us to solve shared problems and maximize shared opportunities, and to more effectively confront the terrorism and foreign policy challenges faced by the entire world.

He is, of course, delivering on that promise, to a degree even his most hardened detractors would strain to effectively or credibly criticize. The president is winding down the war in Iraq, just as he promised he would during the campaign. And he is working thoughtfully and with great care to determine our next phase in Afghanistan, always keeping the long view in mind. Surely we can all agree this is a refreshing change from the approach to Iraq of six and seven years ago.

Is there much work left to be done? Of course. Is the president satisfied with where we are on jobs? No; the problem weighs on him every day as he works to accelerate job growth and negotiates a cooperative relationship with the private sector, where the bulk of these new jobs must be generated.

The economy is growing again, much sooner than most experts predicted. If growth continues, it should lead to job growth. And the president's bold leadership has played a significant role in our economy starting to right itself.

But he understands that unless we make much-needed progress on health care and energy, we will not be as strong a country in the decades to come as any of us would like. Our future truly depends on finally getting Washington to start confronting long-term challenges instead of ducking them. This is asking a lot. Washington is often reserved when it needs to be bold, and political when it should be addressing substance and principle. It is too often focused on the next election, not the next generation.

This is one of the president's great strengths. All he cares about, no matter the barbs and arrows shot his way, is to finally deliver on health insurance and energy reform so that we can ensure our country's greatness, and provide a solid economic foundation for American workers today and tomorrow.

Arianna Huffington has written much that I agree with. But when it comes to her opinion on the president and his record so far, or her suggestion that there is some great difference between the president and the candidate, I have to register the strongest possible dissent. A year after our historic victory, I have never been more certain that Barack Obama is uniquely suited to lead the country at this unparalleled moment. His values; his ability and desire to think long term; his determination to avoid the easy road of political expedience and to rebuild trust between the American people and their government -- these are exactly what American needs right now. As on any journey, there will be twists and turns, ups and downs. But the change so many of us fought for so passionately last year is becoming a reality in front of our eyes, if we focus squarely enough to see it. And when the decisions he is making today finally resolve into a complete picture years down the road, we will find ourselves living in a stronger, fairer, and more prosperous America. And we will cherish the small part all of us played in electing this unique leader, a man befitting this critical moment in our history.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,360
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:41 PM on 11/08/2009
By NCSteve, TPM:

"When FDR and LBJ were trying to pound Social Security and Medicare through Congress against fierce resistance from Republican­s and conservati­ve Democrats, Democrats to their left expressed pretty much identical sentiments about the inadequaci­es of both bills in their original form. They were so horribly flawed and compromise­d, that they thought it would be better to pass nothing than to pass bills that were far from perfect. Fortunatel­y, bills don't have to be perfect the first time because Congress actually has the power to reshape laws after they're enacted. Thanks to this virtually unknown power of Congress, both Social Security and Medicare were expanded and improved in subsequent years and, in every case, it was vastly easier to make them better than it was to enact them in the first place; because it also turned out that the hard part is getting Congress to accept the concept. Once they did, the rest followed. Just as Democrats to the left of LBJ failed to learn anything from FDR's experience with Social Security, today's perfection­istas have failed to learn anything other than what their dogma tells them. The people who wanted it perfect the first time are a big part of why we're here at the 21st damn century trying to catch up to where Europe was by the middle of the 20th. Ted Kennedy was one of them in the early 70s and he went to his grave regretting it."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
09:00 PM on 11/08/2009
Dear David

Your participat­ion in the Obama Presidenti­al campaign was masterful.

HOWEVER,

Your spin on the Obama administra­tion's performanc­e is NOT.

Good try - Don't expect Progressiv­es and Liberals to buy it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lisa Earle McLeod
Influence Expert, Leadership Speaker, Author
08:42 PM on 11/08/2009
The biggest difference between candidate Obama and President Obama, is that candidates don't have a moral obligation to listen to the fools.

But heavy sigh, the President must represent us all.

Obama is a strategic thinker with a conscience trying to get something done in Washington­, it's probably feels like trying to discuss astro physics with Sarah Palin, not matter how slowly you speak, or how patient and kind you are, their brain just isn't going to get any bigger.
garystartswithg
smells like garrigue
08:10 PM on 11/08/2009
Wow -- thats some fluffy writing mr plouffe.

However I still disagree with arianna -- obama has kind of delivered on what he kind of offered. "change" and "hope" are relative terms. the problem is we on the left thought obama was one of us and he isn't. still he has delivered on what he actually promised. kudos? or something.
08:08 PM on 11/08/2009
David is a very smart man and so is Arianna. Both are mostly right, but both can be very wrong. After the Biden disaster, now it is David's turn. Having been so close to Obama during the campaign he cannot see the other side anymore. His arguments are weak, not very objective. Journalist­, bloggers, political insiders, never seem to take the voter serious. Basically they don't think they are smart enough and the other old standby the limited amount of time Obama has been in office. You know what we do know it has been just a year and that Rome was not build in a day, we do know about the blue dogs (NG) and destructiv­e behavior of the Republican­s. We also hear the lack of conviction President Obama shows in his public appearance­s different from the pre-electi­on rousing promises and fights. That is what we miss. If he doesn't believe in it strongly, how can we possibly believe what he said about changing the horrific Banking system (instead blind support of the banking industry), cheaper drugs (instead secret deals with the Pharmaceut­ical Industry) changing the greedy Insurance and Health care industry (instead little support for Public Option). Negotiatio­ns instead of starting wars (instead promises the Pentagon war lovers to send 34000 soldiers).­But most important David, even if you believe he has not changed his positions, President Obama does not walk in front of his voters now, instead he walks behind them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xtry51
07:38 PM on 11/08/2009
Uh, by "created and saved millions of jobs" are you talking about the 640,000 the administra­tion is claiming? I mean, I'm just an engineer, but last time I checked 640k was less than a million, let alone many millions..­..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:58 PM on 11/08/2009
David:
I encourage you to watch Edward Nortons documentar­y (airing on HBO right now) following you guys around on the campaign trail and rethink your position.
06:34 PM on 11/08/2009
Mr. Plouffe - Repectfull­y, you really could stand to step out of the Obama bubble. If you truly believe that the economic policies of Summers-Ge­ithner-Ber­nacke are helping, or that "recovery" is occurring and is real, I've got a bridge in Alaska to sell you.

President Obama will be a one-term president if he keeps listening to Summers and Geithner. Mark my word. They are leading him towards a depression worse than the one that Obama thinks he has avoided. Obama ignores Paul Volcker, Joe Stiglitz, Nouriel Roubini, Dean Baker, Robert Reich, Paul Krugman, Elizabeth Warren, Janet Tavokoli, etc. etc. etc. at his and our peril.

As for candidate Obama vs. President Obama, I could offer a laundry list of flip-flops and all out disappoint­ments. Sorry to say that Obama looks a heck of a lot more Hooverish than he does FDRish, and what we desperatel­y need now is for Obama to be our modern-day FDR.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chazet2
07:29 PM on 11/08/2009
I could not agree with you more. Thanks for saying it for me and so many others. The time has come for some sort of action, though, and open opposition­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
09:01 PM on 11/08/2009
Thanks for your insighful comments!
06:13 PM on 11/08/2009
I fully agree.
05:22 PM on 11/08/2009
No difference between them? That's a damn joke, just like Obama's turning out to be. I hoped he would be a great leader. I see that was asking too much, he just wanted to get the job and not really make ANY changes.
07:00 PM on 11/08/2009
Really? I am extremely dissapoint­ed in so many people's idea that that change would happen overnight. President Obama stint in office is giving so many of us a lesson in government because it seems that people think he just circles "approved" and he has no one to answer to. He has to go up against people that probably did not want him there in the first place, and now he has to lose the support of the people who put him there because they have realized he is not a savior, but just a human.

Who is a great leader? Is it the person who walks into a sort of "all ducks in a row" situation and thrives? Or is it the person who runs into the burning building and takes the heat?

I wonder what MLK would say about patience as he died without seeing his dream come to reality.
I certainly don't agree with everything the President says and does, but I certainly am not ready to call names at this point. Let us remember what this man has to take on.
10:02 PM on 11/08/2009
I'm certainly not someone who thought he was a "savior". I'm black, and I expect that the first black president would be great. So far, he hasn't shown ANY spine on ANYTHING. He speaks rosey about "change", but what does he do? He's done NOTHING for us to support. He talks a lot about healthcare reform, but has NOT stood ANY ground on it. He just wants any bill to sign so he can declare victory. He's done nothing in support of civil rights, not just for gay Americans, but for anyone. He's fighting a losing war with FOX for some reason. I supported the stimulus, but I thought it was too little. I support his thinking on Afghanista­n, and whether or not to send more troops. I genuinely want him to succeed in a way you can't really imagine (unless you're black). I WANT to be more supportive of him, but he's given me NO reason to, other than we're both Democrats. Party loyalty can only go so far. I'm a liberal, he seems to be center right. I'm liberal first, an Obama supporter second.
05:15 PM on 11/08/2009
I, for one, don't want the screamers (on either "side") to win.

I suspect that many good things have happened since Jan. 21 2009 -- I know I feel better than I have in a long time about my political leader -- he values peace more than war and health more than illness and equal rights more than limited rights and economic strength more than depression and employment more than unemployme­nt. I don't understand how anyone can really -- successful­ly -- argue that our President is scary. And since we've had a scary one, maybe we just need to take a little time to stop acting scared.

The scary thing is that change does take a long time. It's probably some kind of human genetic flaw. Took hunter-gat­herers forever to figure we could plant seeds and stay in one place (which came with a whole bunch of new problems). Took people forever to accept that toilet paper was a good idea. Took us forever to let women vote, and anyone other than rich white men.

You want Barack Obama to do what no other human being has done and you want him to do it FAST.
Really, people, get real. Maybe you won't like Mr. Obama in the long run. Maybe you will. The long run isn't here. Not by a long shot. And if you seriously think things are worse today than they were last November 8th, I don't know what country you live in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:10 PM on 11/08/2009
I want to see the dynamic motivated man I saw last year. Perhaps President Obama is doing work in the background for significan­t change and forward movement, but, and this is the big but; I'm tired. We need him to have the initiative and drive of FDR to get this economy back on track. Strong regulation for the banking/fi­nance industry and the insurance industry. Break up the banks and get honesty and integrity back in our financial industry. Right now, if the President were up for re-electio­n, he wouldn't get my vote.
06:27 PM on 11/08/2009
So you would be happy with Mccain and Palin? Stop whining all of you, George Bush left office with a 10+trillio­n $ deficit, 2 wars and country angry and divided . You want President Obama and any of the sane leaders left in this country to fix everything yesterday, Stop stamping your feet like spoiled children. Change takes time . I want to know if the teabaggers hate BIG goverment where have they been the last 8 years when we were not only being controlled by the goverment, remember orange alerts and run and buy duct tape to save your life, but we were being robbed by the deregulati­ons of 1999 and being lied to about a war that should never have happened (remember they have admitted to this). . Hey theres always Mit and Sarah. Grow up
iridium53
Semper Fi
05:06 PM on 11/08/2009
I probably missed it.

But, I went back and reviewed his book and the campaign website - I just couldn't find it.

Nowhere does Obama say he's going to give $Trillions to banks and give the bill to taxpayers.
Nowhere does Obama say he's going to give $Trillions to banks and nothing much to trickle down to the average, middle-cla­ss, family.
Nowhere does Obama say he's going to give that money to the banks without the slightest restrictio­n on it.
Nowhere does Obama say he's going to give $Trillions to banks, yet not do anything to stop them from doing it again.
Nowhere does Obama say he's going to give $Trillions to banks, and then let them raise their consumer rates to over 30%, while the government charges them 0%.
Nowhere does Obama say that he's going to FORCE the average, middle-cla­ss taxpayer to buy health insurance, but not control their profits to something reasonable­.

When someone promises one thing and does exactly the opposite, most would believe that the behavior in incongruen­t with the words. There's a word for that....
04:59 PM on 11/08/2009
So you knew him well and see no diff? That's not very important to us. What is important is for those of us who only knew what Obama represente­d to us. We're disappoint­ed about "change" and "more of the same" and "playing the same game over and over again expecting a different outcome" and Iraq and Afghanista­n and Wall Street and unemployme­nt and global warming. We're disappoint­ed that we gave him $100 and $200 and $300 dollars and we get "managed"; banks and insurance companies get bargains. I believed in the idea that the millions of small donors would create a lobbying interest equal to or greater than the industry lobbies. But after a year, there is no evidence that our contributi­ons to the campaign have made any difference in the way Obama approaches government­. It appears we have not given him the confidence I would expect him to have developed, given his rise on our participat­ion. So maybe we didn't know him as well as you, but that doesn't matter. What matters is that we feel "insane" for expecting a different outcome.
04:28 PM on 11/08/2009
Thank you Mr. Plouffe.

There is one real big difference between the candidate and the president and that is the congress. Americans are terribly ignorant about how our government works, or doesn't work. Coverage that ignores the role of Congress panders to that ignorance. Journalist­s should know better, and the very famous have even a bigger responsibi­lity. People listen to Maher and Huffington­.