We campaign continues to shoot itself, and climate movement, in the foot

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Posted August 11, 2008 | 02:50 PM (EST)




grist.org

So as to start by saying nice things, I think this new ad from the We campaign is a vast improvement over the sitting-on-a-couch, lending-credibility-to-scumbags ads they ran earlier this year:

That said, I got an email from the campaign on Friday that about made my head explode. Here's a bit:

Last week, the U.S. Congress left Washington without addressing the energy crisis. They didn't deal with gas prices. They didn't move on solutions to climate change. What's worse, their inability to renew the clean energy tax credits means that government incentive programs to support the solar and wind industries will expire at the end of this year. Jobs will be lost as a result of their inaction.

You'll note that this explicitly reinforces two current right-wing narratives. First, that Congress should skip its vacation and stay in session to "deal with" gas prices. And second, that "Congress" -- as opposed to, say, Republicans -- is responsible for failing to pass the renewable tax credits. Did We not notice that Democrats tried to pass the tax credits about a dozen f*cking times?

I was going to write a long rant about this -- about Gore's millions being put in service behind such strategic dumbassery -- but I see that Matt Stoller already has. What he said.

Doesn't anybody know how to play this game?

 
Comments
1
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
I was going to write a long rant about this -- about Gore's millions being put in service behind such strategic dumbassery
}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

I have been posting about Gore's hypocrisy and his blatant misuse of funds in every Climate Related commentary I can find..

Let me ask you...

What helps the environment more??

Using $300 MILLION to equip 30 THOUSAND houses with complete Solar Power systems???

OR

Using $300 MILLION to TALK about the environment and make Ad Companies, Lobbyists and Al Gore richer???

Now, I am not the climate scientist that Al Gore professes to be, but it seems to me that this is a no-brainer...

Michale.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 08/11/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect