When referring to the number of people voting for Hillary that are racist we need only look at the demographic of where Obama loses his "white" support.
While we need not make assertions about people in Iowa, as this whole race thing "new", we certainly can make assertions about many whites in Mississippi. While the media decried the loss of Obama's "white" percentage points there, there was an underlying statistic at play. I've read anywhere from 12% to 25% of the Clinton vote was from Republicans voting in response to Rush Limbaugh. That changes the results drastically. Even in Mississippi there were many white voters who had no problem with Obama. More than I would have thought. But the media keeps the "Rush-narrative" going without investigation and keeps the race question in question.
The same may be said for Southern Ohio, Kentucky, Southern Indiana, even parts of Southern Illinois where the accent is a drawl. Obama has the ability to get to everyone who is not harboring some kind of subconscious race problem, or is an out and out racist. Lack of familiarity IS what keeps people from understanding. There are many white people who have never met a black person.
There are hard-core democrats that will for reasons not neccessarily known to them, refuse to vote for Obama. We won't have statistics until the general, but it will be clear how many of them there are. They will be white, Democrat, and have voted for McCain.



Loading comments…
Posted April 7, 2008 | 11:53 AM (EST)