More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David Sirota

David Sirota

Posted: August 5, 2010 11:02 AM

In recent months, President Obama reversed his campaign promises on trade issues -- first by dropping his pledge to renegotiate NAFTA and then by pushing to pass NAFTA-style trade agreements with South Korea, Panama and Colombia. Now, with the unemployment crisis persisting, the key jobs question is once again front and center in American politics. Specifically: How do we create jobs here at home and build our most valuable 21st century industries?

The first and foremost answer is that our government should stop doing stuff like the program described in this stunning new report from Information Week:

U.S. To Train 3,000 Offshore IT Workers


Despite President Obama's pledge to retain more hi-tech jobs in the U.S., a federal agency run by a hand-picked Obama appointee has launched a $22 million program to train workers, including 3,000 specialists in IT and related functions, in South Asia.

Following their training, the tech workers will be placed with outsourcing vendors in the region that provide offshore IT and business services to American companies looking to take advantage of the Asian subcontinent's low labor costs...

The outsourcing program (is) sure to draw the most fire from critics. While Obama acknowledged that occupations such as garment making don't add much value to the U.S. economy, he argued relentlessly during his presidential run that lawmakers needed to do more to keep hi-tech jobs in IT, biological sciences, and green energy in the country.

Now look, I'm all for a robust foreign aid budget -- we don't do nearly enough to help the developing world. However, using foreign aid money to specifically help private corporations "take advantage of low labor costs" in the developing world -- that's not "aid," that's rank taxpayer subsidization of for-profit exploitation.

Right now, even if we do not reform our atrocious trade policies that incentivize the ongoing wage-cutting race to the bottom, the least we should be doing is investing every single available dollar we have in job training and job creation here at home. Doing the opposite -- actually using public dollars to intensify that wage-cutting race to the bottom -- is grotesque.

George W. Bush's administration was rightly criticized by progressives for publicly endorsing job outsourcing, and Obama's administration should be similarly taken to task for now putting taxpayer funds behind the previous administration's endorsement.

 
 
 

Follow David Sirota on Twitter: www.twitter.com/davidsirota

 
 
  • Comments
  • 198
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:25 AM on 09/08/2010
Is anyone seriously surprised that we have Bush-Lite in office now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JLeeGeorge
A disabled teacher of history.
12:36 PM on 08/16/2010
" he argued relentlessly during his presidential run that lawmakers needed to do more to keep hi-tech jobs in IT, biological sciences, and green energy in the country."

This is one of the most important statements made by President Obama. That he holds to the ideas that we know will bring us to that viable semi-social-democratic country we all pine for. The world must go this way or climately speaking, it will be gone in a few years regardless of our pititiful and childish behavior as progressives. It is very important to "get it" that if repubs regain power all the progress, however little, will be lost.

However, small we percieve our agenda's advancenent, many have been made that will be discussed as history; against a backdrop of the failure of conserative philosophies. I, for one, will still vote Democratic to continue the push began when the liberal front got up from their comfort zone and voted for something new, year 2008.
02:28 AM on 08/09/2010
Why isn't this story front page? I mean seriously. Obama is out giving speeches about creating jobs. Well here are some of the jobs he is creating....by offshoring the few jobs we have.

People need to realize that H-1B, offshoring, free trade, and NAFTA are the real job AND wage killers.
09:11 PM on 08/07/2010
"we have a one party system with two right wings," Gore Vidal was right.
07:31 PM on 08/07/2010
Columbia and Mexico what a mess, eh ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:16 PM on 08/07/2010
"George W. Bush's administration was rightly criticized by progressives for publicly endorsing job outsourcing, and Obama's administration should be similarly taken to task for now putting taxpayer funds behind the previous administration's endorsement."

Americans asked for a jobs bill. Obama delivered.

"Despite President Obama's pledge to retain more hi-tech jobs in the U.S., a federal agency run by a hand-picked Obama appointee has launched a $22 million program to train workers, including 3,000 specialists in IT and related functions, in South Asia."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
06:14 PM on 08/07/2010
OK, what I don't understand is why isn't this story on the front, business and political pages? Or at least in the sidebar!

There should be way more that 185 comments!!!

I guess Dave Sirota needed to mention the affects this would have on Lindsay Lohan, Lady Gaga or someone called Snookie...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
04:24 PM on 08/07/2010
Any jobs that are being created here, or at least many of them are being filled by cheaper foreignors on visas. Bill Gates must be proud of the way the government is doing for him. So Obama is now for the multi-nationals, no not now he always has been.
06:23 PM on 08/06/2010
The guy in charge of helping other countries through foreign aid is just doing his job.
And, apparently very well.
It is truly a shame that he was not told ahead of time to put American jobs first.

Of course, this is just another aspect...look at the fact that 79% of the 'green jobs' money went to foreign companies. The Dems tried to get a 'made in America' amendment attached to that bill, but couldn't get 60 votes for it in the Senate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
02:22 AM on 08/07/2010
They didn't even try. The Democrats lied and said it would start a trade war but that is just not true. There are provisions in every trade deal that allow for stimulus money in severe downturns to be domestically targeted. Every nation does it.

No the Democrats still follow Clinton ideology. Clinton started free trade with China, NAFTA, H-1B, and all these job killing regulations.
04:00 PM on 08/06/2010
As startling as this might seem, it is no surprise when one realizes how difficult it must be to perceive these affects upon the masses from the palace windows - be they Congress, Courts or the White House; one ruling party or another. Unfortuantely, when one gets past the smoke and mirrors the average voter has been effectively disenfranchised by its government. And the beat goes on until enough reject both party lines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
06:05 PM on 08/07/2010
Yup, and next will be some way to get us out of the election process.

I use to think only whack jobs expected the government to declare marshal law but not I'm starting to think they were just ahead of the curve...
01:35 PM on 08/06/2010
Look at this...8/4/2010

General Motors will invest $500 million to produce a new vehicle and eight-cylinder engines in a plant in northeastern Mexico, a company spokesman said on August 4.
$500 million of our tax dollars!!!

http://industryweek.com/articles/gm_to_build_new_vehicle__at_plant_in_mexico_22462.aspx
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
masher
software engineer
02:23 AM on 08/07/2010
The Obama bailout of GM just ensured that GM can offshore more US jobs. The only difference is we are directly paying for it now thanks to the Democrats.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hrpmap
Retired man still active..
04:27 PM on 08/07/2010
I blame both parties,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
11:12 AM on 08/06/2010
Typical Obama, promised one thing during the campaign and delivers the opposite when governing. The more time that goes by the less likely he will be able to be re-elected in 2012. He has done everything possible to lose the very voters that got him elected in 2008. Why does he think that is a winning political strategy? I am getting more and more disillusioned with each passing day. As I have said here on numberous occasions, 3rd Party candidates are becoming more and more realistic in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
04:01 PM on 08/06/2010
Right on! Democrats are just Socially liberal (sometimes) Republicans. There is no reason to vote for a Democrat over a Republican. Progressive third party or bust for me too.
10:56 AM on 08/06/2010
I know it's not a popular point of view, but I want Obama gone. Until the Dems can field a pro-consumer, pro-labor, trade-protectionist, demand-side candidate, we might as well elect folks who are honestly and openly Republicans. Ok, maybe I don't mean that. I just hate pretenders. I know you often have to pick the lesser of the evils, and we are getting better supreme court picks; but honestly, is this the best we can do? Either Republicans or Republican Light? I now understand why folks vote for Nader!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
04:03 PM on 08/06/2010
Your view is becoming more and more popular every day. I realized that Obama and his fellow Wall Street Democrats are a cancer that has taken over the Democratic party back in January. If you love Wall Street and everything it stands for, you have two parties to choose from now. If not, your only option IS a third party.
03:00 PM on 08/07/2010
Absolutely ! third party - thats going to be my vote in 2012
Cheers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
"Without a struggle, there can be no progress. "
06:48 AM on 08/06/2010
That is just disgusting.

Typical but disgusting.

:-]
04:54 AM on 08/06/2010
Who is going to still vote for a Dem or Rebug next election?

Who is still buying into "its going to be worse if the repugs are in charge?" "we have to vote Dem right?" "even Ben Nelson? right?"