David Sloan Wilson uses evolutionary theory to explain all aspects of humanity in addition to the rest of life, as he recounts for a general audience in Evolution for Everyone: How Darwin´s Theory Can Change the Way We Think About Our Lives (Bantam 2007). He is a distinguished professor of biology and anthropology at Binghamton University, part of the State University of New York. He publishes in anthropology, psychology, and philosophy journals in addition to his mainstream biological research. His academic books include
Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior
(with Elliott Sober, Harvard 1998), Darwin´s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society (Chicago, 2002), and The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative (co-edited with Jonathan Gottschall, Northwestern 2005). Wilson also directs EvoS, a campus-wide program that uses evolutionary theory as a common language for the unification of knowledge.

Blog Entries by David Sloan Wilson

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection XV: Group Selection in the Wild

Posted September 18, 2009 | 10:12 PM (EST)


In T&R XIV I showed that prejudice against group selection is impervious to evidence from laboratory experiments. It is also impervious to evidence from the wild.

I will focus on one of many examples that can be provided. In 1995, Robert Heinsohn and Craig Packer published an...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection XIV: Group Selection in the Laboratory

15 Comments | Posted August 23, 2009 | 05:16 AM (EST)


In the storybook portrayal of science, theories are tested by experiments, which are conducted in laboratories so that the conditions can be rigorously controlled.

How would group selection be tested in the laboratory? Let's begin with the thousands of selection experiments that have already been conducted in the laboratory...

Read Post

Evolution and War: Basic and Advanced

33 Comments | Posted August 17, 2009 | 01:24 PM (EST)


John Horgan, whose article on evolution and war was the subject of my last blog, has written a blog in reply and informed me of a second article that he has written on the subject. Since I accused him of flunking Evolution 101, I shouldn't be...

Read Post

Evolution and War: Back to Basics

19 Comments | Posted August 12, 2009 | 10:27 AM (EST)


War has been part of the human condition throughout recorded and archeological history. Violent between-group conflict is also part of nature, from epic battles between ant colonies, to the territorial conflicts of lion prides, to the raiding parties of chimps.

Is war part of our nature? That question has...

Read Post

Evolutionary Psychology and the Public Media: Rekindling the Romance

5 Comments | Posted June 25, 2009 | 12:13 AM (EST)


Evolutionary psychology, once the darling of the public media, has been dumped in a recent Newsweek article by journalist Sharon Begley. Return accusations are beginning to fly from evolutionary psychologists, who accuse Begley of willful distortions and scientific incompetence (e.g., 1,2).

As usual for romantic quarrels,...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection XIII: Hamilton Speaks

12 Comments | Posted May 21, 2009 | 09:59 AM (EST)


Pity people who become icons. Once they represent an important idea in the minds of others, they can't change their iconic status, even when they change their own minds.

Such was the fate of William D. Hamilton, the legendary founder of inclusive fitness theory, which was dubbed kin...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection XII: Multilevel Selection Theory, Salsa Style

6 Comments | Posted May 13, 2009 | 01:38 AM (EST)


Meet Athena Aktipis--evolutionist, mother of two, and salsa dance instructor in her spare time. Perhaps it was the dancer in Athena that caused her to teach multilevel selection by having the students get up and move.

Each student is given a wooden stick with an A (for Altruistic)...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection XI: Dawkins Protests (Too Much)

Posted April 22, 2009 | 11:17 AM (EST)


Richard Dawkins did not invent naïve gene selectionism (see T&R X) but he spread it far and wide with the publication of The Selfish Gene. Let's follow his logic, beginning on page 6 of the 1989 paperback edition:

This book will show how both individual selfishness and individual...
Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection X: Naïve Gene Selectionism

Posted April 19, 2009 | 11:36 AM (EST)


Naïve group selectionism (see T&R III) is the unquestioning belief that adaptations can evolve at all levels of the biological hierarchy--for the good of individuals, groups, species and even ecosystems--without requiring special conditions. Many people are prone to naïve group selectionism, today no less than in the past. That...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection IX: Anatomy of a Model (continued)

Posted April 17, 2009 | 10:04 AM (EST)


The haystack model (see T&R VIII) includes many assumptions but one was especially biased. Recall that each haystack is colonized by a single fertilized female bearing four genes coding for docility or aggressiveness--two of her own and two from her mate. Maynard Smith assumed that if even one of...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection VIII: Anatomy of a Model

Posted April 10, 2009 | 11:01 AM (EST)


Group selection was decisively rejected on theoretical grounds, according to the patriotic history of individual selection theory. Richard Dawkins declared in 1982 that group selection had "soaked up more theoretical ingenuity than its biological interest warrants" and compared further inquiry to the futile search for a perpetual motion machine. Richard...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection VII: If You Make A Mess, Should You Clean It Up?

Posted March 23, 2009 | 08:50 AM (EST)


One memorable Christmas morning, as our kids were gathering around the tree, I was on my way upstairs to get a sweater when I smelled something really bad. I knew that smell. Our cat had diarrhea and had deposited a wet one somewhere. I walked all over the house trying...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection VI: Individualism

Posted March 6, 2009 | 01:01 AM (EST)


Most people are prepared to admit that we are influenced by our cultures in ways that we don't understand. As a proverb puts it, the hardest thing for a fish to see is water. Part of the "water" of Victorian culture was an assumption of European superiority. Darwin was progressive...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection V: The Patriotic History of Individual Selection Theory

Posted January 25, 2009 | 12:33 PM (EST)


One reason that I don't spend a lot of time bashing religion is because there are so many other flagrant departures from factual reality to pick on. Take the patriotic history of nations--the leaders who can do no wrong, the noble "us" and evil "them"--who needs supernatural agents when we...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection IV: The Great Reckoning

Posted January 13, 2009 | 10:15 PM (EST)


By the 1960's, evolutionary theory had settled into a comfortable paradigm called the Modern Synthesis. With other major issues apparently settled (go here for an update on the Modern Synthesis), the issue of group selection began to occupy center stage. George C. Williams was not the only critic...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection III: Naïve Group Selectionism

Posted January 6, 2009 | 08:59 PM (EST)


In their book Darwinism Evolving, David J. Depew and Bruce H. Weber make the interesting point that pre-Darwinian notions did not come to an abrupt halt with the advent of Darwin's theory. Instead, they often became repackaged in superficially Darwinian terms.

That certainly applies to notions of adaptation...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection II: The Original Problem

Posted January 1, 2009 | 01:37 PM (EST)


Consider some standard examples of design in nature: the aerodynamic wing of the bird, the concealing coloration of the moth, the dense fur of the polar bear. Darwin's insight was to explain these adaptations as a product of natural selection: individuals vary, some survive and reproduce better than others, and...

Read Post

Truth and Reconciliation for Group Selection I: Why it is Needed

Posted December 27, 2008 | 12:54 PM (EST)


The phrase "truth and reconciliation" describes a constructive process for coming to terms with a troubled past. It has been used to resolve bitter political conflicts and achieve national unity, starting with South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission in 1995. I would like to initiate a similar process to resolve...

Read Post

Science, Evolution, and Current Human Affairs

Posted September 25, 2008 | 08:29 PM (EST)


Two of my colleagues, Massimo Pigliucci and Larry Arnhart, have objected to my declaration that the invisible hand is dead. They also disagree with each other, giving the impression that scientists and evolutionists are no better at reaching a consensus than political spin doctors. Massimo's comments go...

Read Post

The Invisible Hand is Dead. Long Live (Smart) Regulation.

Posted September 21, 2008 | 09:17 AM (EST)


I hope that our economy recovers, but the time has come to declare its guiding metaphor dead. This is the metaphor of the invisible hand, which makes it seem as if the narrow pursuit of self-interest miraculously results in a well-functioning society.

The invisible hand metaphor originates with Adam...

Read Post