David Vines

David Vines

Posted: November 21, 2009 01:50 PM

If It Were Me, I'd Be Embarrassed

What's Your Reaction?

It's nice to see that even after the election, conservatives are still playing the "liberal gotcha media" card every time they expose themselves as being shamefully ignorant regarding the issues they care about most.

Last Wednesday, a media firestorm erupted after a seventeen-year-old girl named Jackie was interviewed by MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell while standing in line during Sarah Palin's Michigan book signing. Jackie, wearing a shirt that read, "The US government handed out $700 billion in Wall Street bailouts and all I got was this lousy t-shirt," was caught off-guard when O'Donnell informed her that Sarah Palin was on record as supporting the bailout.

You can see the exchange below:

It didn't take long for Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck to feature this clip on their respective shows and praise Jackie while condemning O'Donnell for her pesky questions backed up by fact-based research. Then, Jackie was given a platform to tell her side of the story by the blog, Red White & Conservative.

To summarize:

This all started as me, a young 17 year old American going to see a woman I admire and turned into this crazy event hah I'll start at the very beginning.
She had me read my shirt and then proceeded to ask me "Did you know Sarah Palin supported the bailout" to be 100% honest I was like, are you kidding me? She is trying to use my shirt against me. I was so shocked by the craftiness she had that I was truly stumped. I asked her where she got her fact and she read her little note. Then she asked me what I liked about Sarah, and I talked about the Constitution.
In one day I met a role model, and met the liberal media and their crafty schemes. I fell prey to liberal bias, but I'd like to think I did an okay job.

As a fellow high school senior, I feel a strong urge to respond.

This notion that a reporter is being "crafty" and "biased" when they correct factually inaccurate statements is ridiculous. Sure, Jackie might have a point if O'Donnell ran up to her at random and stuck a microphone in her face as she was walking down the street, but that was not the case. This girl was at the book signing of a prominent politician, wore a t-shirt indicating that she had strong political views, agreed to be interviewed, and failed to answer a very simple and straightforward question.

The job of a good reporter is not to ask softball questions or cast everybody they speak to in a positive light. A reporter's job is to collect facts and seek the truth. So, while some may object to O'Donnell's speaking to a seventeen-year-old girl, nobody can accuse her of reporting anything but the facts.

Which brings me to my final point: Jackie is seventeen-years-old, she's not seven.

In her piece for Red White & Conservative, she feels the need to drive home the fact that she's only seventeen four separate times, as if that were some sort of defense.

Now, I understand that much of the electorate is made up of low information voters who don't closely follow politics. That's fine -- it's not ideal, but it's perfectly understandable.

But according to her school profile, Jackie is very politically involved. She is an intern with the Michigan Republican Party and is clearly excited and passionate about what her political "role model," Former-Governor Palin, represents. And yet, when she cannot correctly identify one of Palin's most basic political positions, she plays the victim and blames everybody but herself.

Then, conservative members of the media take the bait and praise her as some sort of Republican hero. They are more than happy to glorify this culture of ignorance and hide behind the veil of "elitism" and "media bias" when anyone approaches them with facts.

All I can say is that if Glenn Beck had heard me express my political views and then assumed that I was a thirteen-year-old, I would not lift the paper bag off my head for quite some time.

*Correction: It has been brought to my attention that Red White & Conservative is Jackie's own blog. It is not, as I had previously written, the blog of someone else who had given her a platform to speak.*

 
It's nice to see that even after the election, conservatives are still playing the "liberal gotcha media" card every time they expose themselves as being shamefully ignorant regarding the issues they ...
It's nice to see that even after the election, conservatives are still playing the "liberal gotcha media" card every time they expose themselves as being shamefully ignorant regarding the issues they ...
 
Comments
713
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next ›  Last »   (22 pages total)
Show: 
republicanpride   10:08 PM on 2/14/2010
I don't think the shirt had anything to do with Sarah Palin's beliefs but was just to show the girls opinion. Why don't people just report the news instead of trying to embarrass teens?
harrybailey   05:25 PM on 11/25/2009
Off topic--apologies. Two things. Why does MSNBC continue to employ Gen. McCafferty. After the NYTimes expose, he has no credibility at all with me, at least. Secondly, it concerns me when a national reporter asks the President a question, (Mark Knoller of CBS), "Can you tell us..." That's Journalism 101 stuff. Obama was gratuitous. He easily could have said: No.
photo
MixinUpMedicine   04:30 AM on 11/25/2009
Ok, I stomached the Glenn Beck clip, and 2 things struck me. First, he hammered home the 13 yr old aspect, which apparently is way off base as she seems to be 17 as reported here. Glenn MENTIONED her SUPPOSED AGE of 13 ELEVEN TIMES, while the chuckling sidekick (who we'll call Chuckles) chimed in another 3 mentions to a "13 yr old". In a 7 min clip, they got in 14 mentions that she's only 13. Way to drive that point into the mindless heads like a Snuggie commercial Glenn.

Second, how Glenn spun this into a supposed rape of this girl to make it seem even more heinous. Per Glenn " 'Look at the way she was dressed. She wanted me to attack her. She deserved it.' " As if that was what the reporter was actually doing.

Hey Glenn, aren't you the one who like to ask questions? But you don't like it when someone else asks tough questions.

Also, Glenn, I'm not sure what else Sarah said during the campaign she didn't really mean, maybe you can help me w/ that. Since clearly it's ok to say things you don't really believe in, JUST HOPING TO GET ELECTED.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Vines   09:00 AM on 11/25/2009
"Hey Glenn, aren't you the one who like to ask questions? But you don't like it when someone else asks tough questions. "
------------
That's a great point. To Beck, a question means "is our president a Kenyan born secret-Marxist?" but any questions that are based off a fact is disregarded as far as he's concerned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bracken   11:14 AM on 11/28/2009
See, now the discussion will revolve, not around the lies of Sarah Palin or the ignorance of her followers, but around whether the girl was 13 or 17, and was this poor child a RAPE victim? I heard she was 17. I heard she was 13. I heard she was raped, and that this woman attacked her for being raped or something. That's how the great game of punditry telephone plays. The whole things just bounces in like that ping-pong ball in a room full of mousetraps and sets off competing noise.
goodrosie   07:07 PM on 11/24/2009
Great points David Vines. Thanks. I wish that such exposure (an exchange of 15 minutes or more of fame built on proud ignorance) was a historical relic and that people would be more inclined to think carefully about what they say publicly. Clearly, you do. I had not seen the clips prior to reading your piece and I felt that all players were embarrassing in different ways. Keep up the good fact finding, reflecting, acting, work.
alexeipg   04:55 PM on 11/24/2009
"[Jackie] plays the victim and blames everybody but herself. "

So maybe that is why this girl sees Sarah Palin as a role model.
thehummelr   09:59 PM on 11/26/2009
Exactly what I was thinking.
jelliebean   04:55 PM on 11/24/2009
Ah yes....the crafty liberal media made me say stupid stuff on tv defense. I guess the conservative mantra about personal responsibility is a thing of the past.
At least she can paint a new t-shirt : I said stupid stuff on tv and Fox News made me a hero.
photo
chariotdrvr14   02:58 PM on 11/24/2009
Trying on some celebrity 'victimhood' there, Jackie?
Now you get to feel just like your new "role model"... isn't that just marvey!

The era of applying the adjective 'whiny' to liberals is over.
Seeing as that's all conservatives seem to do these days.
photo
BLSabob   02:29 PM on 11/24/2009
Excellent piece. Thank you for contributing.
twopac   02:26 PM on 11/24/2009
Jackie‘s quote,
“She had me read my shirt and then proceeded to ask me "Did you know Sarah Palin supported the bailout" to be 100% honest I was like, are you kidding me? She is trying to use my shirt against me. I was so shocked by the craftiness she had that I was truly stumpedâ€.

I can understand why Jackie idolizes Palin… What do they have in common? Well if I closed my eyes and somebody read Jackie’s explanation to me, I would swear that was Palin giving an excuse days later for not knowing the answer to a question.

Trying not to look stupid, they both used somebody else for an excuse,
Palin used Katie Couric for her so called “Gotcha Question†and Jackie used Norah O'Donnell for her so called “Gotcha Questionâ€.

Sarah and Jackie, if you are going to be interviewed on national TV, you have to know your limits… if you are not educated on the subject, do not agree to do interviews and on top of that, don’t blame somebody else if you come across as a buffoon.

Consider this a lesson for Jackie, do not be like your idol… go to school!
photo
cdouglas   02:09 PM on 11/24/2009
For someone who obviously uses a computer, it is amazing she didn't do a simple Google search on Palin and TARP. Republicans have no interest in seeking the truth or informing themselves on anything other than Fox narratives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929   08:44 AM on 11/28/2009
Playing a victim is easier and much more effective with the right wing crowd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElBruce   01:48 PM on 11/24/2009
Ah yes, us liberals and our "crafty schemes." Like knowing facts. Or walking and chewing gum at the same time.
photo
JaxReader   01:45 PM on 11/24/2009
When did it become OK for 17 year olds to be dumb? If you decide to wear a T-shirt you think is politically witty, you should probably know politics behind it as well...

Its like wearing a "Save Darfur" T-Shirt at an al-Bashir book signing, and then getting offended when your asked a question about genocide.

The reporter did nothing wrong. She is 17 years old... that's less than a year before she can actually vote. Maybe its time to learn about facts and how they work.... she's got a blog, I'm sure its too late.
twopac   02:33 PM on 11/24/2009
In the video, Jackie is carrying two books... Jackie, bless your heart... save your $58 and stay in school.

I hope that is not her relative carrying two books standing next to her.

I'm sure Sarah and her family are very thankful for your family's $116...
temon00   01:28 PM on 11/24/2009
I could almost make out the spoon that her dad force fed her republican ideals with
cooperc83   12:43 PM on 11/24/2009
Kudos to Mr. Vines for proving that not all high school students are vapid, inane morons! His commentary illustrates that with some basic fact checking the truth will be told. Thank you!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MsMassachusetts   12:35 PM on 11/24/2009
Congratulations. I think you are well on your way to a great career as a writer. Your parents should be very proud of you. Very impressed!
mvines   01:12 PM on 11/24/2009
We are. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisalovesamelie   02:02 PM on 11/24/2009
Too cute!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
David Vines   02:23 PM on 11/24/2009
aw, shucks.
photo
JaxReader   01:34 PM on 11/24/2009
Definiteyl! Great article, and it restores my hope for our future! :)

Twitter Edition