iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. David Washington

Dr. David Washington

Posted: September 15, 2010 06:04 PM

Today at the White House President Obama is launching Change the Equation (CTEq), a unique and promising partnership coalition of over 100 companies ranging from Facebook and Google to Dow Chemical and Merck, all dedicated to improving science, math, engineering, and technology (STEM) education performance in order to solve America's innovation problem.

The announcement comes not a moment too soon. American students rank 21st in science and 25th in math compared with students around the world.

Fittingly, yesterday in D.C. was the red carpet Hollywood-style premiere of "Waiting for 'Superman,'" a powerful new documentary about the public education system directed by Davis Guggenheim, Academy Award winning Director of "An Inconvenient Truth."

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman wrote an Op-Ed a few weeks ago applauding "'Waiting for 'Superman'" for demonstrating that Harlem Children's Zone founder Geoffrey Canada's "point is that the only way to fix our schools is not with a Superman or a super-theory. No, it's with supermen and superwomen pushing super-hard to assemble what we know works: better-trained teachers working with the best methods under the best principals supported by more involved parents."

As the film clearly points out, this is an issue that is far from foreign to residents of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. In fact, one of the most powerful moments for me was watching the montage of Presidents who have tried in vain to tackle the challenges of education reform in this country. While Presidents Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, and Bush Jr. all tried to address education shortcomings, here we are years and decades later still talking about it while our country continues to fall farther behind other nations in science and math performance metrics.

Without looking at any data at all, you probably intuitively know this. While almost no American would casually say, "I can't read," many folks (even myself on more than one occasion) have comfortably admitted, "I'm terrible at math" or "I don't do science."

That's the equation we need to change, and there is no time like the present.

I admit that I am no expert in education, but if it weren't for my second grade teacher Mrs. Dollase -- whose cursive 'D's I still try to emulate but haven't quite mastered -- who helped me to believe I could do whatever I put my mind to, I wouldn't be where I am today. Almost everything I have achieved is because of a teacher's extra nudge and tireless dedication. I am continually amazed at the parents, students, administrators, policymakers and community leaders working ridiculously hard every day trying to help children succeed.

Yet many of us have followed this conversation long enough to recognize there is something systemically wrong with the current education system. Real change cannot take hold in this battle without a fresh perspective and new incentives for everyone to get involved in finding solutions.

There's a poignant moment in "Waiting For 'Superman'" -- when President George W. Bush and the late Senator Ted Kennedy came together on the No Child Left Behind Act -- demonstrating that real change seemed within grasp just a few years ago. But for a variety of reasons the promise many once felt has been lost.

Now Bush's successor, President Obama, has shrewdly approached education reform in a unique manner, reaching beyond the U.S. Treasury for help, going straight to the companies that need America's education system to produce qualified candidates for the technologically advanced jobs of the future.

Unlike efforts of past Oval Office residents that have fallen short, President Obama secured the funding first -- $4.3 billion in fact -- and his tireless team at the White House is constantly looking for partners in the private sector, fully aware that the solution doesn't solely rest in government's hands.

Another promising sign that suggests things might turn out differently this time around is that the President has been successful in inspiring the corporate community to step up in a highly coordinated and strategic fashion.

You can tell something big is happening when top companies -- including Facebook, DreamWorks, Viacom, Cisco, Google, Microsoft, E-Line, Ogilvy, Tesla, Activision and Epic Games to name just a few -- are all united around the single objective of improving the STEM performance and overall innovation prowess of our country's children.

The business community is coming together in an unprecedented manner to form partnerships for purpose, not simply because it feels good or is the right thing to do, but because they know it is the only way to ensure the future workforce is prepared for the types of STEM jobs increasingly in demand in the private sector. They also want to inspire America's next generation of innovators.

"Our mission is to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected - and we need to find the best talent to get there," said Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook founder and CEO. "I had great classes and teachers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Everyone should."

Although no one is pleased with how everything is going in Washington at the moment, there is a need to step back and recognize when good things do happen, and the launch of Change the Equation is such an occasion.

Change The Equation is a true public-private partnership inspired by President Obama's vision and his ability to convene foundations passionate about STEM, such as the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and key business leaders like Craig Barrett (former CEO of Intel), Glenn Britt (Time Warner Cable), Ursula Burns (Xerox), Antonio Perez (Kodak), Sally Ride (Sally Ride Science), and Rex Tillerson (ExxonMobil), who all united together after being inspired by the President's "Educate to Innovate" initiative last Fall.

Change the Equation is a 501(c)3 non-profit whose primary purpose is to make sure the corporate sector's role in improving STEM achievement is as coordinated as it possibly can be. The leadership of Change the Equation knows there are many premiere efforts in the STEM space but that more could be done to maximize the dot-connecting and leveraging of corporate resources.

CTEq is positioned to serve at the apex of a bi-partisan CEO-to-CEO peer network engaged in public-private partnerships with the White House, US Department of Education, National Governors Association, Business Roundtable, US Chamber of Commerce, and the philanthropic community with the ultimate goal of improving the STEM achievement of our country.

Of course the proof will be in the pudding. Nobody knows whether this coalition of Fortune 500-type organizations can truly move the dial on STEM and restore America's reputation as a leader in innovation. But it sure feels like they're poised to do just that, especially given the motivation and track records of many of the leaders in the coalition.

With the President's bold announcement today echoed by the enthusiasm from the business community coming together like never before to form partnerships for purpose, none of these leaders are waiting for 'Superman' to do their part in tackling the education crisis.

Are you?

UPDATE: President Obama issued the following statement about Change The Equation today:
"Our success as a nation depends on strengthening America's role as the world's engine of discovery and innovation," said President Obama. "I applaud Change the Equation for lending their resources, expertise, and their enthusiasm to the task of strengthening America's leadership in the 21st century by improving education in science, technology, engineering and math."

And here is a video featuring Energy Secretary Steven Chu and business leaders explaining the importance of efforts to improve STEM education:

 

Follow Dr. David Washington on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drdwashington

Today at the White House President Obama is launching Change the Equation (CTEq), a unique and promising partnership coalition of over 100 companies ranging from Facebook and Google to Dow Chemical an...
Today at the White House President Obama is launching Change the Equation (CTEq), a unique and promising partnership coalition of over 100 companies ranging from Facebook and Google to Dow Chemical an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 200
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
tutormentor
Linking Volunteers, Ideas & youth
01:28 PM on 09/20/2010
I encourage you to review the ideas in this pdf and expand the way companies encourage employees to be involved in schools, and non-school, tutoring, mentoring and learning programs in places where they do business and have customers.
http://www.tutormentorexchange.net/images/PDF/consulting%20role.pdf

See more ideas like this along with maps and a Chicago tutor/mentor program locator at http://www.tutormentorexchange.net

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of places where corporate volunteers already connect with kids living in high poverty neighborhoods. However, most of these places are not supported with anywhere near the level of support that companies use to put branch banks, food stores, and retail outlets near potential customers.

I hope that Changing the Equation means more support for the organizations already in the field, rather than more support for a few, and more completion for the rest.
12:18 PM on 09/19/2010
Collaborate with corporations? I have a better idea... how about actually making large corporations pay fair taxes so that the government can afford to run effective programs that are in the best interest of the people, instead of letting corporations have such a big say in education policy?
05:33 PM on 09/19/2010
Yes because we all know that government policies are so efficient and effective. They run the school system so well we should just give them more money. Screw vouchers and choice in education, lets just let the government have a virtual monopoly on education because we all know how efficient monopolies are. Those private schools with lower funding and better results are frauds. We should simply turn over more money to the public schools and teachers unions because that will solve the problem.
08:14 PM on 09/18/2010
My daughter attends public school (first grade) in Douglas County, Georgia. If the public school system would even pretend to be advocates for our children, they would provide more opportunities for more children to have access to science and technology programs outside the classroom (at low cost) if they aren't going to do their jobs in the classroom. As it stands now, they try to reserve those opportunities for children in gifted programs (my daughter is in the gifted program), but it is a shame that labels are placed on our children such that only those students who administrators and some teachers think are "smart" are the only ones who should have access to such opportunities. I shouldn't have to pay tens of thousands of dollars for my daughter to attend a private institution for her to get the education she and all children deserve. Yet, I see I will have to spend most of my time (outside of my own job teaching at a top, expensive, private secondary institution) advocating for her to get the opportunities she and others deserve. Our children are our future. If we're not willing to invest in them now, then I fear where our country will be even five years from now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjaco
02:50 PM on 09/18/2010
Why Civil Rights Groups Oppose the Obama Agenda + On Not Letting Facts Interfere With a Good Argument from the Bridging Differences EdWeek blog, an online dialog between Diane Ravitch & Deborah Meier | http://bit.ly/1TYs2t
An here in a nutshell:
http://4lakidsnews.blogspot.com/2010/09/dianedeb-why-civil-rights-groups-oppose.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjaco
01:13 PM on 09/18/2010
Read Diane Ravitch's The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education (New York: Basic Books, 2010).
WFS is an over-simplistic film that sensationalizes the current Ed reform - based on half truths and hearsay. The propaganda ignores the facts, and panders to the oligarchs who are funding the reforms - along with the hedge hogs of Wall Street who brought down our economy - also financed this film, have a stake in charter schools and want our tax dollars.

The repetitive rhetoric is straight out of the Rove playbook. Don't be a fool.

Simply, corporations are advocating for privatizing public education, charters are good, unions are bad, and it's the bad teacher's fault. I am posting a few good reads by experts in education, not politicians, foundations, or the hedge fund managers that are driving these reforms. I hope you become enlightened:
The experts on school reform: http://zhaolearning.com/2010/09/03/master-of-myth-what-arne-duncan-says-and-does/
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/diane-ravitch/ravitch-welcome-back-to-school.html
The reviews by experts: http://teacherrevised.org/2010/06/30/movie-review-waiting-for-superman-or-just-another-clark-kent-playing-dress-up/
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/01/philanthro­capitalist­s-go-hollywood-with.html (follow the money)
The truth: http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/09/obamas-charters-profit-centers-for.html and http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/09/is-there-crisis-in-mathscience.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjaco
02:56 PM on 09/17/2010
am glad that President Obama is doing something. Universities are generally a scam - both public and private. They are not primarily about education - they are primarily about making money. While attending university, I knew that I was being pick-pocketed.
06:59 AM on 09/17/2010
Several commenters have mentioned money and indicated there is a negative correlation of money spent to outcomes achieved. First, the argument is silly on its face - would you apply it to any other government service such as police protection, road repair, public libraries, or the military?

Second, it is so strange to me that people who tell us out of one side of their mouth that $250,000 is a "middle class" income tell us out of the other side of their mouth that $50,000 for a teacher is an exorbitant salary.

Third, look at the rankings of public spending on primary and secondary education for the countries which outscore the US on TIMSS testing of science and math (looking at total GDP percentage for education spending gives a distorted picture because US private schools and college costs are so expensive).

There is clearly a correlation between making public education a fiscal priority and high test results.
08:13 PM on 09/16/2010
How many of you people are in highschool or middle school right now? It's hard to really know what's going on when you're not right in the mix. I'm in highschool right now, and I'd have to say there is no problem with the teachers I have or the funding my school receives - and of course before anyone accuses me of going to a "good" school, I'll let you know I'm attending one of the most "ghetto" schools in the greater Denver area. The problem I see with most students is a complete lack of appreciation for the education they're receiving. Several people commenting here have brought up that a lot of the blame lies with parents, and with that I'd have to agree, but only partly. It's hard to succeed without support at home, but it is possible, it only takes a student that's dedicated to themselves and their goals. The problem is so many students don't have goals, they don't have any motivation to excel in life, and they think it an always be put off until tomorrow. Codling our children with fantasy like most people and society does is probably the most detrimental - how are you going to be able to handle life properly if you were never taught anything about real life? Screw STEM, how are we supposed to build mathematical foundations in elementary school if there is no common sense or ability to properly reason?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
01:31 PM on 09/26/2010
Fan # 1!

How convenient to blame TEACHERS for the lack of learning- what about the STUDENTS?

When I was a student, we didn't blame the TEACHERS for our lack of learning- it was OUR fault, accepting personal responsibility for our success or failure. time to put the onus for learning BACK where it belongs, on the students, and stop making excuses for them.
02:39 PM on 09/16/2010
Well my comment did not post... nothing rude or lewd in it...


Anyway, how do I log out?
02:22 PM on 09/16/2010
"I admit that I am no expert in education...". Exactly. So why should businessmen dictate how children should learn? Do hedge fund managers tell doctors how to practice medicine, or lawyers to to practice law?
If you think the reforms are about "saving" poor kids, think again. 'Waiting for Superman' is part of the corporate media's propaganda to mask hedge fund managers/investors influence over public schools. It's shameful they are using poor, inner city students to feed their naked greed.

http://blackagendareport.com/?q=print/content/freedom-rider-charter-school-lobby-buys-elections
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
01:34 PM on 09/26/2010
Probably because the teaching profession is still mostly dominated by females, and the salaries are low, compared to other professions - and teaching is still considered to be an extension of Motherhood by many people. ANYONE could do a better job of it, or so the thinking appears to be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:47 PM on 09/16/2010
1) Too many teachers are themselves uncomfortable (and in some cases don't really understand the concepts) with mathematics and science to teach them effectively - especially in primary and middle school levels.

2) Teachers and students both need TIME to work through math and science concepts together and revisit them over and over until the concepts are understood. This is important because many concepts are sequential (a new idea cannot be understood until the old one is fully grasped). Teachers these days have to "stay on schedule" to cover the curriculum which forces teachers and students to hurry through material.

The bottom line is we need to teach more by "covering" less. Learning demands context. If the context (connecting ideas to other ideas) is not there, the student feels lost and cannot progress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MontanaSouth
Montanan in Tucson
02:08 PM on 09/16/2010
I agree. Knowledge has been expanding exponentially in the fields of science and mathematics. We cannot teach our students "everything they need to know". We need to teach them facts in context with problem solving skills. They need to be perpetual learners and need the skill to find information and use it. They don't need to memorize a body of facts and repeat them. There are always the basics that must be taught. However, once those are mastered, students really need to hone their skills at tackling a new problem that requires them to identify the pertinent issues, seek information that will clarify the problem and develop hypotheses to test as they attempt to find a solution to the problem.
photo
AmigaMan
Your micro-bio will never meet our guidelines.
03:58 PM on 09/16/2010
Do you know what ruined mathematics education in the United States? I do. It all has to do with the progressive agenda in education in wanting children to "discover" (I use that term very sarcastically) mathematics through doing problems. There is no time to teach basic concepts in the progressive math world.

A child has to learn mathematics the right way - teach the basics and reinforce through repetition. Worked for me in that place called Canada. Some of the classes I substitute teach in are Math classes. I can tell you that I am appalled at what I've seen at the high school level. In my four years of teaching so far, I've seen high school students unable to add a column of numbers, do long division, multiply single digit numbers, etc. Something is seriously messed up here in America...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Venicelady
Ignorance is NOT bliss.
01:37 PM on 09/26/2010
Blame it on such concepts pushed ( or bought) by the schools such as the "Workshop Model", and "co-operative learning", where the students themselves are supposed to learn the discovery process from each other, while the teacher is now called a "facilitator" of knowledge.
photo
Trudy Trejo
Corporation = People = Romney = Obama = Perry = Cl
01:22 PM on 09/16/2010
Sounds like another well meaning disaster brought to you by the collusion of big business and government.

How about we do something real simple that doesn't require a bunch of CEOs determining how they can mold America's youth into being the perfect employees for their giant corporations?

How about we introduce true competition into the school system with vouchers instead of public school zoning? Let parents pick and choose the best schools and what they want from a school. We'll still have "free" public education but competition will create lower costs and better education programs. Tenure has got to go. Why should teachers not be held to the same market forces as the rest of us that keep them working hard and doing their job?

How about we go back to classical education with a strong focus on english, math, science and history?

We are holding our children back. Children are capable of learning at an incredibly rapid rate and we are holding them up in these prisons we call schools until they're 18 years of age.

This is just another big government, big business circle jerk that will condemn our children to another decade of inaction on the crisis in American education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MontanaSouth
Montanan in Tucson
02:26 PM on 09/16/2010
Perhaps not. The jury is still out on whether or not school vouchers actually do what they are targeted to do - enhance schools that do a better job educating children. As an example of a business - education coalition, several large corporations that depend on qualified veterinary pathologists have partnered with veterinary schools who train pathologists to increase the funding for training positions. The companies do not have any input on how the residents are trained and the residents do not commit to working in industry. It is purely a financial backing that became necessary because federal and state funding for training was becoming more and more difficult to obtain. It is working well. We need to educate better teachers, pay them a salary worthy of the role they play in our children's lives and identify outcome measurements that actually measure the level of education being offered. I have always supported making teaching a true profession with a certifying examination. Doctors, veterinarians, nurses, medical technologists, CPAs, lawyers, etc all have to pass an exam in order to practice. Teachers should too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
01:18 PM on 09/16/2010
I detect the same old flawed ideas that more money will improve education. Demand for better trained teachers is evidence. Funding from the federal, and even the State levels typically only money gets used for salaries, counting heads, administering standardized tests, magic whiteboards, Wii Fits, and new buildings. None of this teaches children, or measures their knowledge or ability to solve problems.

Ben Chavis, John Taylor Gato have some different ideas on how to fix these problems.
12:13 PM on 09/16/2010
If you don't let parents have control of their kids education nothing will change. It's that simple.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:37 PM on 09/16/2010
I'm not sure what that means. Home schooling? School vouchers?

You can do that in the current public system if you stay connected with the teachers, which is a lot easier in the days of email and texting. Then stay connected to the child's homework to know what they're learning. If you think there are gaps, you have plenty of hours outside school to work on those yourself with your kids. It's like a second job, but it works for us.
photo
Trudy Trejo
Corporation = People = Romney = Obama = Perry = Cl
01:34 PM on 09/16/2010
I agree. A lot of the blame lies on the shoulders of parents themselves. They should be monitoring their children's education. They should be helping their children learn and doing supplemental home schooling.

Unfortunately, reality does not make that possible for many families where both parents are working full-time jobs. It's not too much to ask for a public school system that actually works and gives American children a solid formal education. America used to do that y'know.

Go and look at the kind of material children learned in America 100 years ago.
07:05 AM on 09/17/2010
Great point. Families: instead of spending thousands of dollars to send them to private schools, use a fraction of that to hire a tutor or go on educational family vacations, or donate the money to help public educational institutions in your area (libraries, museums, schools, etc.) create awesome educational opportunities for your kid and others. Instead of spending 8 hours a day homeschooling, send them to public school and then spend a few hours a week purposely filling in whatever gaps you perceive, or working with them to review what they're learning.