THE MCCAIN NEGATIVE WORDCLOUD |
| blog |social network | collaboration | hyperlink | democracy | google | wikipedia | open access | open source | standards | gnu | linux | BitTorrent | anonymity | facebook | wiki | free speech | games | comcast | media concentration | media | lolcats | |
McCain has delivered his tech policy. And it's clear: This election will determine whether America willfully becomes a third-world participant in the online economy and culture.
Much of the McCain policy is the expected stuff about public-private partnerships, educating the workforce, and providing incentives to reach under-served populations, etc. But he shows his hand on three issues:
1. He's flat against Net neutrality.
2. He wants to see copyright extended and enforced more vigorously.
3. He thinks the current infrastructure only needs a couple of tweaks.
In sum, our Internet policy should be the same as our energy policy: Hand a key resource off to big corporations whose interests are fundamentally out of alignment with ours as citizens.
Let's assume that this is not because McCain is a tool. Let's assume he has the best intentions and that his policy accurately reflects how he thinks about the Internet.
To McCain, the Internet is all about business. It's about people working and buying stuff. There is nothing — nothing — in his policy statement that acknowledges that maybe the Net is also a new way we citizens are connecting with one another. The phrase "free speech" does not show up in it. The term "democracy" does not show up in it. What's the opposite of visionary?
Further, the Internet to McCain is a set of tubes for delivering content to an awaiting public. Jeez, does he not have anyone on staff under the age of 25 who could have clued him in on what the Net is about?
It gets worse. Even if we ignore the cultural, social, and democratic aspects of the Net, even if we consider the Net to be nothing but a way to move content to "consumers" (his word), McCain still gets it wrong. There's nothing in his policy about encouraging the free flow of ideas. Instead, when McCain thinks about ideas, he thinks about how to increase the walls around them by cracking down on "pirates" and ensuring " fair rewards to intellectual property" (which, technically speaking, I think isn't even English). Ideas and culture are, to John McCain, business commodities. He totally misses the dramatic and startling success of the Web in generating new value via open access to ideas and cultural products.
The two candidates' visions of the Internet could not be clearer. We can have a national LAN designed first and foremost to benefit business, and delivered to passive consumers for whom the Net is a type of cable TV. Or, we can have an Internet that is of the people, by the people, for the people.
Is it going to be our Internet or theirs?
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Republicans in an act of sheer desperation to prove that John McCain is not technologically inept, takes credit for Microsoft Word forcing users to correct Obama to Osama in the Spell-check.
it's as simple as this 15 second video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GXDV7psYAU
please watch and forward along!
He really asking for it. This might be the first Presidential election that the NET will make or break a candidate and the fool got no idea what coming. McCain is a babe in the woods when it come to the NET he his going to get YouTubed, Twittered and Blogged out of this race and he does not even know it! Just ask Hillary where and how did she really lost the nomination.
tel8034: at first I laughed and really liked your thought of McCain as a TIMEX WATCH in a DIGITAL AGE.
Then I realized that a TIMEX is modern compared to where McCain is stuck!!
"What's the opposite of visionary?" Republican
McCain is a TIMEX WATCH in a DIGITAL AGE.
And you clearly didn't get past them at the top of the article -- missed the point entirely!
"To much tech writing and thinking consists of the recitation of buzzwords."
Technically speaking, that isn't even English.
These are not just the philosophical musings of a new...
Two significant comments in the past two days by...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
Jim Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for...
Don't write off Saint Sarah all you political pundits,...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
Posted August 15, 2008 | 12:05 PM (EST)