EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Dawn Teo

Dawn Teo

Posted: October 5, 2009 05:38 PM

"Toughest Sheriff in America" Stripped of ICE Agent Status

What's Your Reaction:

PHOENIX, AZ -- Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced Friday that he is "furious" about the new 287(g) agreement between the Maricopa County Sheriff's Department (MCSO) with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). According to a statement released by MCSO Monday evening, the new 287(g) agreement has "stripped Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's deputies of their ICE agent status to act as federal immigration authorities."

The 287(g) program allows agreements to be made between local law enforcement agencies and DHS under 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under previous 287(g) agreements made between Maricopa Country and ICE, federally trained and supervised state and local law enforcement officials to investigate, apprehend, transport, and detain people who are living and working in the country without authorization.

The 287(g) provision has been one of the most controversial aspects of the immigration debate because of allegations that law enforcement officers use 287(g) authorization to investigate the immigration status of individuals who have not committed serious crimes. Arpaio's critics maintain MCSO routinely engages in racial profiling, while Arpaio steadfastly refutes those claims.

The new 287(g) agreement, according to Arpaio, only authorizes MCSO deputies to screen inmates already booked into MCSO jails. Arpaio said MCSO attorneys tried to get clarification from DHS last week on non-detention immigration enforcement activities but did not receive a response from DHS. Arpaio called DHS officials out, saying, "It looks like they're taking away my authority on the streets for political reasons. They don't have the guts and the courtesy to even come back and say in writing, 'We are not going to continue.'"

After saying that he felt like taking the agreement and ripping it up, Arpaio added, "On the other hand, I feel it is very critical to have the jail."

In response to the news, Vice President of Government Relations for the grassroots immigration control organization NumbersUSA said Monday afternoon, "State and local law enforcement officers have the inherent authority to enforce all the laws of our land, including immigration laws, with or without 287(g) agreements ... society as a whole benefits if officers have the training they need to identify immigration violators wherever they may encounter them ... NumbersUSA will continue to encourage state and local law enforcement officers to use their inherent authority and their common sense to enforce our immigration laws."

Although Arpaio says the new agreement is a setback, he also says MCSO will continue to enforce immigration laws under Arizona state laws. Most notably, the Arizona legislature passed a state law a couple of years ago that allows immigrants who are willingly trafficked into the country to be charged as co-conspirators of human trafficking.

Arpaio was defiant Sunday night on local conservative radio station KTAR, "I'm going to tell you something, Jay," he said to Lawrence. "I don't need the feds to do my crime suppression to opt to arrest illegals. I can do it without the federal authority, and I'm going to continue to do it. It makes no difference. It helps us. Because I don't have to do all the paperwork for the feds, number one. And number two, I won't be under their umbrella, their guidance. So I will operate the same way, nothing is going to change." He added later in the show, "They just don't want me, I'm the poster boy."

Arpaio continued, telling the radio host, "Nothing changes because pursuant to our duties in these crime suppression [sweeps] we arrest anybody that violates the law. If we find during the arrests that that there are illegals, we arrest them. Now the only difference [is] we're going to take 'em down to ICE. I hope they accept them, if they don't, I'll bring 'em myself to the border. So nothing really has changed. This is all politics. They want to use me to get rid of this 287 agreement across the country."

DHS officials have refused to comment on the new 287(g) agreements, saying they would not discuss the agreements while they are still pending through October 15, but at least two FOIAs were filed last week (by opposing sides) asking for the new standardized Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). Judicial Watch filed its second FOIA on the matter (see their FOIAs here and here). Last weeks' FOIA from Judicial Watch asks for the following:

  • The new standardized Memorandum of Agreement used to enter into 287(g) partnerships, as announced by Secretary Napolitano on July 10, 2009, as well as any documents containing information on the development of the agreement
  • All new 287(g) agreements entered into with law enforcement agencies
  • All documents concerning the decision to standardize the Memorandum of Agreement and/or create new 287(g) agreements
  • Media and congressional notification plans concerning 287(g)
  • And all email correspondence concerning the new 287(g) agreement between Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Border Security "Czar" Alan Bersin, and White House Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Munoz, among other government officials

Tom Fitten of Judicial Watch says, "The vast majority of Americans want federal immigration laws enforced. Local law enforcement officers can contribute to this process and they have every legal right to do so. You can be sure that 287(g) is under attack because Obama appointees have an "amnesty" agenda at odds with enforcing the law."

The National Day Laborer Organizing Network also filed a FOIA requesting similar information.

Salvador Reza of Puente Arizona had strong words about Arpaio's 287(g) program, "Sheriff Arpaio's rampant racial profiling and civil rights abuses under the 287(g) program is but one example of a national disgrace. It is high time for the President to put an end to the racial profiling, terror, and the suffering of our communities by terminating the agreements once and for all."

Indeed, Arpaio's critics have been steadfastly asking the federal government to end all 287(g) agreements. Arpaio is used as an example in virtually every complaint. After pressure from numerous advocacy groups and elected officials, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently investigating MCSO for alleged civil rights violations (racial profiling).

In September, the Hispanic Congressional Caucus sent a letter to President Barack Obama asking him to immediately terminate all 287(g) agreements and end the program, saying, "misuse of the 287(g) program by its current participants has rendered it ineffective and dangerous to community safety." The letter, which specifically cites Arpaio, contends that the 287(g) program lacks oversight, is mismanaged, deteriorates public safety, diminishes trust between communities and local law enforcement, diverts scarce resources, and is abused to target minorities.

Following a closed-door meeting in August in which President Barack Obama, administration officials, and nearly 100 immigrant rights leaders discussed plans for comprehensive immigration reform, a coalition of 521 organizations signed an open letter to Obama criticizing the Presidents inactivity on immigration reform. According to a source who attended the White House meeting, the organizations' leaders were upset at what they deemed a lack of action primarily on the 287(g) program, especially in regards to perceived abuses by Arpaio.

After gathering input from elected officials, law enforcement agencies, academic researchers, and business leaders, the U.S. Southwest Border Task Force recommended to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that the 287(g) program "be limited to identifying illegal immigrants in state prisons and county jails and exclude any efforts to track them down outside of criminal investigations."

Arpaio also told KTAR that his office will conduct another neighborhood immigration sweep "very soon to show Washington and everybody else I'm not changing, I will not be intimidated by Congress, by alleged racial profiling investigations by the Justice Department, by all these demonstrators, these politicians, all trying to keep me from doing my job, so nothing will change. Stay tuned."

"If Secretary Napolitano is serious in her announcement today that she will reform detention conditions,” stated Salvador Reza of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, "the first step she should take is the immediate termination of Joe Arpaio’s 287(g) agreement."

Arpaio remains a popular figure throughout Arizona, despite clamoring critics. The Maricopa County Democratic Party said in a statement late Monday, "MCSO and County Attorney’s Office officials have been caught wasting thousands of dollars on unnecessary junkets and equipment.  Arpaio uses his deputies to arrest newspaper owners and writers who criticize him and harass dishwashers and corn vendors while 40,000 felony warrants go un-served."

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meets Wednesday and will vote on the new agreement signed by Arpaio and DHS.

UPDATE 8-AM 10/6: The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was released by DHS this morning (see the PDF here). The MOA has been signed by Arpaio and a representative from the County Attorney's office, but no one from DHS or ICE has signed it. Stephen Lemons at the New Times reports that, according to his sources, Arpaio did not consult with DHS/ICE prior to releasing information about the MOA, which is a violation of the terms:

The MCSO hereby agrees to coordinate with ICE prior to releasing any information relating to, or exchanged under, this MOA, including any SOPs [Standard Operating Procedures] developed for the implementation of this MOA.

The MCSO hereby agrees to coordinate with ICE regarding information to be released to the media regarding actions taken under this MOA.

The new MOA also institutes a new requirement that MCSO actually persue charges against those detained under 287(g), "The MCSO is expected to pursue to completion all criminal charges that caused the alien to be taken into custody and over which the MCSO has jurisdiction."

 

Get HuffPost Eyes&Ears on Facebook and Twitter!

 

Follow Dawn Teo on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dawnteo

PHOENIX, AZ -- Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced Friday that he is "furious" about the new 287(g) agreement between the Maricopa County Sheriff's Department (MCSO) with the Department of Homeland Security ...
PHOENIX, AZ -- Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced Friday that he is "furious" about the new 287(g) agreement between the Maricopa County Sheriff's Department (MCSO) with the Department of Homeland Security ...
 
  • Comments
  • 466
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:50 PM on 10/09/2009
Not everyone in AZ thinks Sheriff Joe's wonderful - check out this cartoon from today's Arizona Republic:

http://www­.azcentral­.com/arizo­narepublic­/opinions/­benson/

And for those of you who think the sun shines out of his backside:

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/J­oe_Arpaio#­Controvers­y_and_crit­icism
05:34 PM on 10/07/2009
Dawn's article is one of the better ones out there concerning 287(g) except for one thing -- she politicize­s the issue too much by using Arpaio as the only example.

Here is the depressing news: 287(g) is being stripped FOR ALL LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMEN­T agencies. The authority to arrest criminal illegal aliens is simply being taken away from police officers.

Arpaio is actually better off than most sheriffs because Arizona has some strong state laws that he can use to continue his campaign to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens. Most sheriff and police department­s won't have the law or the guts to oppose the feds, so the illegals will be let loose on the American public.

Simply put, we are on track to become a sanctuary nation. I know that's happy news for most Huffington readers because they are driven by a maniacal hatred of Arpaio, but giving away our sovereignt­y is not worth the short term pleasure of getting petty revenge. None of you will like the results when your law enforcemen­t officers are prevented from protecting you from the criminals.
02:21 PM on 10/07/2009
As a resident of Arizona, my opinion of Joe Arapaio is that he is an old fashioned bully who picks on people who can't defend themselves­. He gets elected by the same kind of people who like cowboy justice and Dirty Harry. These people also give us the worst state government in the nation.
01:03 PM on 10/07/2009
It never ceases to amaze me that people complain about a law enforcemen­t organizati­on, enforcing the law. Illegal is illegal, no matter how much lipstick liberals try to put on it to make it look like discrimina­tion. don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

Doing time in Joe's jail is not fun and it shouldn't be fun. Pink underwear, chain gangs and baloney sandwiches for criminals are fine with me. Those criminals are living better than my G'sons who are protecting their a$$e$ fighting in Iraq.

Finally, Joe's department is very hard on anyone who is cruel to animals and that alone makes him a hero.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my own religion
01:31 PM on 10/07/2009
the usual..huh­!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:47 PM on 10/09/2009
You seem blissfully ignorant of the fact that the vast majority of people in Joe's custody are awaiting trial - by US law, that means they're innocent until proven guilty. so Joe's abusing a lot of innocent people.

Regarding the cruelty to animals, how come Joe never discipline­d the deputies that sprayed mace in the face of a small puppy that was attempting to flee a burning house, and then laughed out loud when the puppy ran back into the house and burned to death?

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/J­oe_Arpaio#­Controvers­y_and_crit­icism
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
supertim
12:41 PM on 10/07/2009
Maricopa Citizens for Safety and Accountabi­lity (MCSA), a coalition of community based organizati­ons, labor unions, religious leaders, students and elected officials, concerned about safety in Maricopa County and how tax dollars are being wasted and/or misappropr­iated by Sheriff Arpaio.

http://sto­parpaio.or­g/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kannita
Never be underestimated, marginalized
12:25 PM on 10/07/2009
You reap what you sow!!
12:22 PM on 10/07/2009
LOVE YOU JOE!!!!!
01:06 PM on 10/07/2009
Me too. Love that Sheriff Joe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my own religion
01:38 PM on 10/07/2009
yeah yeah
11:38 AM on 10/07/2009
Sherriff Joe has done some great things to help animals. For that, he's okay in my book.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Genep34
stop the nightmare, end the GOP
12:39 PM on 10/07/2009
Yeah that is typical - you like him even though he treats human beings horribly. Tea bag logic.
06:26 PM on 10/07/2009
Arpaio puts animal abusers in tent city and the dogs they abused in air conditione­d cells. I would bet money that the dogs that get rescued by Arpaio consider this to be a very just arrangemen­t. So do I except I think the animal abusers should be fed cheap dog food instead of green bologna!
11:32 AM on 10/07/2009
They're racist! That's what it is!
12:21 PM on 10/07/2009
Love it when people scream racist.. when they don't know what they are talking about.. "I don't like him.. there for I crown you a racist!!"
01:01 PM on 10/07/2009
Their actions have been shown to be racist, i.e., racial profiling minorities­.
So NO I'm not "screaming­" racism. I'm calling out what the truth has been shown.
I'm sure lilly white citizens weren't being pulled over and asked to verify their status...e­ven though there are plenty of European immigrants living in the U.S.
09:04 PM on 10/07/2009
Arpaio is an equal opportunit­y law enforcemen­t officer. The only racists are the ones that complain about being arrested.
10:40 AM on 10/07/2009
One thing confuses me here.

Several times they state that a police officer "inherentl­y" has the right to enforce any law.

I don't think that's right... is it? At least not from the standpoint of opening up a special operation or investigat­ion (like his "immigrati­on sweeps").

Yes, a regular city cop can arrest someone who is say... counterfit­ting money... who they run across as part of their normal job. But the job of investigat­ing counterfit­ters falls under the secret service. I would think that while in the course of "normal operations­" they can arrest illegals and send them to ICE, they would NOT be allowed to plan specific operations to target illegals..­. because they are no longer charged with investigat­ing that crime.
10:02 AM on 10/07/2009
This unstable, huckster with a badge left Massachuse­tts in disgrace and found asylum in AZ.
What does it say about the phony sheriff, AZ or both?
12:35 PM on 10/07/2009
He saw Orson Welles' nasty sheriff in "Touch of Evil," and the rest is history.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stagebandman
09:47 AM on 10/07/2009
Joe's biggest fan is himself, and every interview I've seen is about Joe. Not the law. Not right and wrong. Just how great Joe is. It's really over.
09:41 AM on 10/07/2009
http://www­.youtube.c­om/user/Hu­manleague0­02

Apparently Sheriff Joe Arpaio needs more manpower for his "workforce­" I wonder how much money he and his people are making off of these so-called criminals.­.
08:57 AM on 10/07/2009
The only thing this does is strip Sheriff Joe of his federal agent status. He is still the elected sheriff of Maricopa county and nothing is going to change with the way he handles immigratio­n arrests.
Sheriff Joe, last night, said that it actually takes away some of the bureaucrac­y.
Arpaio is doing his job! Its about time the feds do the same!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Godweiser
The eyes have it.
09:26 AM on 10/07/2009
Really, that's why crime is way up in Maricopa county?
09:36 AM on 10/07/2009
If you live in Maricopa county, you should know that a large portion of the crime is committed by illegal aliens. Kidnapping­s, drugs, murder, home invasions, etc... That's all related to the border.
Phil Gordon and Jack Harris sure dont help the problem. What are you getting at?
01:45 AM on 10/07/2009
Why do we have this issue? It's because our Congress and others turned their back on illegal immigratio­n from Mexico for years. They did so because businesses wanted the cheap labor. But having this group of people living in the USA who are not citizens for the purpose of cheap labor leads to problems. They have raised families, contribute­d to the community, paid taxes. You cannot now simply pick them up and ship them back to Mexico. Congress needs to work out an amnesty bill....gi­ving people who came here from Mexico US citizenshi­p (without blackmaili­ng them out of money). They also need to pass laws that would stop future Mexican nationals from coming here illegally. Maybe tougher border security and a guest worker program. We also need to allow any law enforcemen­t official to ask for a person's documentat­ion showing they are a citizen or a non citizen here legally: at any time and for no reason. If you do not have the documentat­ion, they ship you back home. Then Sheriff Joe would not be in this mess. Maybe instead of picking on Sheriff Joe for dealing with want goes on in Maricopa County, we address the politician­s who created the mess, and tell them to fix it.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:24 AM on 10/07/2009
"We also need to allow any law enforcemen­t official to ask for a person's documentat­ion showing they are a citizen or a non citizen here legally: at any time and for no reason."

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

That would be the last nail in the coffin of "free country" and the certain open declaratio­n that we are a "police state." I would thereby lock in that fact - which we right now have a small window of time to un-do.

Your presumptio­n of guilt is appalling and VERY un-America­n.
.
12:23 PM on 10/07/2009
"We also need to allow any law enforcemen­t official to ask for a person's documentat­ion showing they are a citizen or a non citizen here legally: at any time and for no reason."

As long as they're stopping folks of every ethnic background in proportion to demographi­c data. That means you'll have to have your papers on hand at all times to prove your citizenshi­p. Yup, it's time that everybody carry their papers in Maricopa County--th­e deputies will have regular checkpoint­s. instead of DUI checkpoint­s, they'll have citizenshi­p checkpoint­s and anybody without proper paperwork-­-white, black, brown, red--goes to jail...it'­ll be fun!