iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dean Baker

GET UPDATES FROM Dean Baker
 

Keystone Jobs Versus Competitive Dollar Jobs

Posted: 01/02/12 01:23 PM ET

The new Great Hope for job creation in Washington is the Keystone Pipeline, a plan to create a pipeline that would transport oil from Alberta, Canada as far as New Orleans. According to the Republican leadership and other proponents of the pipeline, it is expected to create 20,000 jobs in construction and supplier industries.

There have questions raised about this number by the State Department, which must approve the pipeline, and other analysts. It seems that this 20,000 number refers to "job years," not jobs. This means that if a construction worker is employed for 2 years working on the pipeline, she would count as holding two jobs in the 20,000 jobs number. The number of jobs created at a point in time would likely be closer to half of this figure, perhaps less than 10,000.

It's also likely that many of these jobs will go to Canadians. This is good for them, but beside the point if the goal is to create jobs for people in the United States.

But even 10,000 jobs would be better than nothing, the question is how much better? Without some context the public is not well-positioned to assess the economic argument for the pipeline.

One basis of comparison is the economy's normal rate of job creation. Back in the late 1990s the economy created 3 million jobs a year for 4 years. At this pace, the jobs created by Keystone Pipeline would be equal to about 30 hours of job creation.

Of course the economy created jobs at an even more rapid pace in the recoveries following the 1974-75 and 1981-82 recessions. If we were to see the sort of normal recovery that is expected after a steep downturn that Keystone Pipeline jobs would be equal to around 20 hours' worth of job creation.
But we can't just snap our fingers and get the economy back into a job creation mode. The question is how the Keystone measures up to other potential job creation policies.

One that should be on the agenda is lowering the value of the dollar. If the dollar falls in value it will make our exports cheaper to people in other countries, causing them to buy more U.S. exports. Similarly, imports will be more expensive for people living in the United States, leading people to buy domestically produced goods instead of imports.

Suppose that the dollar fell by an average of 10 percent (adjusting for differences in inflation rates) against the currencies of our trading partners. Economists often assume that the change in the quantity of imports and exports will be roughly twice as large as the change in relative prices.

This means (using some simplifications) that if the dollar fell by 10 percent, then our exports would rise by 20 percent and our imports would fall by 20 percent. Since most of the items traded are manufactured, this would translate into a huge increase in the output of our manufacturing sector.

Working off the 2010 trade data, this decline in the value of the dollar would imply an increase in manufacturing output of more than $500 billion a year. This is equal to almost 44 percent of current manufacturing output. If employment increased proportionately, that would translate into more than 5 million additional manufacturing jobs.

Comparing this to the Keystone Pipeline, we could say that a 10 percent reduction in the value of the dollar would have roughly the same impact on employment as 500 Keystone Pipelines. Since the effect of the dollar on exports is roughly proportionate, even a 1 percent drop in the value of the dollar would create as many jobs as 50 Keystone Pipelines. A drop in the value of the dollar of just one-tenth of one percent would create as many jobs as 5 Keystone Pipelines.

Of course these calculations are oversimplifying issues considerably. First, trade flows will not adjust immediately to changes in prices. It will likely be many months after a change in currency prices before we see any effect and close to two years before most of the effect is felt.

Furthermore, these numbers assume that no steps are taken to offset the decline in the value of the dollar. For example, importers may squeeze their profit margins rather than lose market share. On the export side, our trading partners may impose tariffs or other barriers to keep out U.S. made goods, especially in countries that are still reeling from the recession themselves.

But the general story is right. If we want to create jobs and have put the stimulus genie off the table for superstitious reasons, a more competitive dollar provides an excellent alternative to the Keystone Pipeline. It can create many more jobs and it won't threaten the environment.

 

Follow Dean Baker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DeanBaker13

The new Great Hope for job creation in Washington is the Keystone Pipeline, a plan to create a pipeline that would transport oil from Alberta, Canada as far as New Orleans. According to the Republican...
The new Great Hope for job creation in Washington is the Keystone Pipeline, a plan to create a pipeline that would transport oil from Alberta, Canada as far as New Orleans. According to the Republican...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 161
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:39 PM on 01/07/2012
By putting Solar Energy Panels (PV) on your Home and work roof and car ports you can drive

50 to 90 miles or more each day FREE. Energy From the Sun. Many are doing so all over the Earth.

Electric Cars and Hybrids Cars that run on Electric and some other fuel will soon out

sell all others. With the Help of Solar Energy and People around the Planet getting more

knowledge every day of it on the news and seeing it on more roofs everywhere. Those that

have the intelligence to see the good in Solar Energy are growing every day.

Solar Energy this year will out pass most all other forms of energy.

Under Solar Energy there is 19,000,000 websites and under

Images 1,520,000 for Solar Power plants.

For Coal power plants 1,290,000 under images.

For Hydro Power Plants 3,690,000 websites and 1,5000,000 under images.
12:38 PM on 01/07/2012
Most in the World are retooling to make Electric Hybrid Cars.

Iran is a Little slow do to its export of crude oil, oil is number one in that country

right behind that is their gas guzzler cars.

Now Israeli is making a Electric Hybrid that you will be able to drive anywhere in Europe

and in one tenth the time it would take to put gas in your car you can drive up and away

with a recharged Battery Pack. Like a cordless drill or Cordless Tool it would take out the

old and put in a recharged one back in in less then a minute in seconds just like the

Cordless Tool. You would pay for only the electric used the battery packs are owned by

the car manufacturer.

No more oil change stations or gas it will be a Battery exchange

station. For those that are driving cross country the rest will be able to recharge at

home or at work.
12:36 PM on 01/07/2012
Free from the Sun Energy Solar Energy (PV). This kind of car is going to

put and end for the need of OIL for most world wide very soon. The day will come when many

will use the Sun’s Energy from our roof tops through solar panels to split the tap water

into Hydrogen and store it in tanks by our home to refill our cars to run on. This

system of Solar Hydrogen will run our cars heat our homes and we will cook our food.

The ability to use the Sunlight Solar Energy to split water and make Hydrogen and store it.

Hydrogen Hybrid Vehicles like the one Dr. Addison Bain built for NASA Years ago.

And his First in the World Home Solar Hydrongen Refueling Station will more then help put an end,

for the need and high demand of Dirty Oil.

Solar, Wind, Hydroelectric and Geothermal Energy. Now are the leading froms of Energy in the World

wanted by most all. Clean safe Energy and Clean Cities.

The Lord’s Little Helper
Paul Felix Schott

PS
Oil from Canada is going to be far better then giving our money to the Middle East.

No one wants to see more fighting or more wars in the Middle East. Have not our

United States of America lost enough service men and women from all branches of the military there!

Support us The United States United We Stand in GOD We Trust.
08:54 AM on 01/05/2012
the pipeline is good jobs at a time we need it most. and its good energy policy. to not do this is as stupid as it gets...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larrystalcup
12:39 AM on 01/07/2012
just a suggestion....the actual ramifications of the pipeline might not be as they appear!.....ls
photo
4eva
.-.. --- ...- . --..-- / -. --- - / .... .- - .
06:50 PM on 01/04/2012
A strong dollar will only help in as much as we can pay for more energy (which is what ultimately drives production and GDP growth). There is a point of diminishing returns with this, however.

A discussion of increasing production and imports without consideration of the cost (all the costs) of energy is meaningless.

I don't support the pipeline and the pipeline would not reduce our cost of energy, but neither will a "competitive dollar" in the long run. Ultimately we are looking at slower 'growth' due to high energy costs.
08:53 AM on 01/05/2012
yes. and thats one reason we need the pipeline. it will work to keep energy cost increases lower
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larrystalcup
12:57 AM on 01/07/2012
that is hard to understand since the refined product from the pipeline is primarily destined for export to higher priced world markets....ls
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
12:34 PM on 01/04/2012
Keystone makes as much sense as other Republicant proposals. More lies from the party of lies. This figure is very temporary workers, but most important, it will do no good if Republicant policies of ending regulation allows this to be built haphazardly and spills cause extensive damage to our environment. Just look to the Gulf of Mexico to see Republicant regulation policy's effectiveness.
04:40 PM on 01/03/2012
The Keystone XL pipeline is money-in-the-bank on both ends of the pipeline for the conservative, pro-Republican funders, the Koch Brothers, according to a U of N-Lincoln economistin a recent local newspaper story. Also, talking about JOBS here in Nebraska...the same local paper today reported that a wind turbine builder in Columbus, Nebraska, Katana Summit, has openings for some 90 welders but is having trouble finding 90 qualified available welders. Now, as I recall, during the many public hearings here in Nebraska about the Keystone XL, many of the Union representatives bussed into Lincoln for those hearings were welders and metal workers! My impression of those Unionist here were they weren't necessarily FOR the XL, they just want to build something, anything that will give them work and I'd hope they'd choose Wind and not Tar Sands.
08:56 AM on 01/05/2012
good jobs and lower energy prices. this is the pipeline and we need it now. to not do it is just stupid policy
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
03:53 PM on 01/03/2012
The keystone pipeline is simply pure greed and a give away to the oil companies by the republicans. This pipeline would do nothing for the people, country or this economy, yet it would put this whole country on enviro risk of spills. it would create another target for terror, it would pollute out water, land and air, all this and the pipe line doesn't nothing for this country. i really hope and we should pressure the president to decline this pipeline.

for the amount of money used to build this pipeline, we could repair 100's of school, which would create jobs for construction workers, increasing their demand and providing our kids with a better place to learn.
photo
KenGirard
"American" is my religion. I have faith in it.
05:51 PM on 01/03/2012
Why exactly would a Canadian oil company spend a penny to help repair an American school?
Last I heard, American taxpayers pay to fix US schools, and we are not giving Keystone any money to build a pipeline.
Please come up with a better example.
08:57 AM on 01/05/2012
look up big oil spills and you will find that most were form TANKERS. the idea that a pipeline is a major risk is nonsense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gingersaff
feelings are not facts
12:05 PM on 01/03/2012
Absolutely no one is telling the truth about domestic oil production and refining. We export large amounts of both crude and refined product, and the push to build Keystone is simply a way to leverage the large refining capacity of the Gulf Coast in order to boost exports and make the massively profitable oil business even MORE massively profitable. It has nothing whatsoever to do with making us "energy independent" or with homeland security or with job creation. The actual rulers of this country, those who have bought and paid for our political leaders, see this as an opportunity that once seized cannot be restricted, downsized, constrained, or regulated. We aren't addicted to oil: I believe that US citizens are willing and eager to accept energy options. But unfortunately our political system is addicted to big money. I predict that the pipeline will be built and that consumers here will end up paying higher prices at the pump to pay for it with a minimal impact on job creation, and that oil companies will realize a huge windfall as a result. And safety/environmental regulations? Fugghetaboudit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
03:56 PM on 01/03/2012
you are absolutely right. however i believe that we must continue to fight in everyway not to allow this pipeline to be built. it is time we the people fight for all that we want and our country. i would really love for someone to answer this question. why didn't canada build this pipeline to either of it coast?
photo
KenGirard
"American" is my religion. I have faith in it.
05:58 PM on 01/03/2012
Because they do not have large refineries already built and sitting at docks like America has. So they'd have to build a refinery and a pipeline. Piplines are easy to build, refineries are not. Most of Canada is not really a good place to use as a port in the winter, plus cold oil is hard to move.
09:01 AM on 01/05/2012
they will if we don't take it. then the oil goes to China or comes to US on far less safe tankers - that have far greater spill risk. we get first shot at this because we are Canada's biggest trading partner and it just makes sense.

but this administration has had such an idiotic energy policy I am not surprised Obama is against it as he tries to satisfy the environmental left nuts
photo
4eva
.-.. --- ...- . --..-- / -. --- - / .... .- - .
06:54 PM on 01/04/2012
While I agree with what you say, the first part is misleading.

We are net importer of oil.
We are a net exporter of refined products from oil.

Utlimately the cost of importation will affect the ROI of refining oil, even with such a 'large refiining capacity' that we have.

The pipeline won't change this equation whether it is built or not built, so I think it is being used to obfuscate the real issues here. High energy costs into the foreseeable future.
09:03 AM on 01/05/2012
the pipeline will reduce the cost of imported oil and give us more oil from Canada so we can buy less from people who hate us like Venezuela and the ME.

in fact if we had a brain we would be drilling everywhere to increase world oil supplies and keep prices from rising as fast as they are sure to as the recession ends...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
11:40 AM on 01/03/2012
I like the idea of devaluing the dollar to create jobs. But it's doubtful if government will go along with it...since Congress has sold out to corporations years ago...they won't want to devalue their reserves as another writer alluded to. We could also mandate American content and apply import duties...that this country has always done...but again, one cannot change the mind of a corporate Congress.
Neither party gives a damn about the people. It's about fulfilling corporate desires only, and if the people get hurt...tough luck. It's governmental genocide of the population.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
03:59 PM on 01/03/2012
devaluing the dollar would hurt the economy more than help it. remember every major thing is valued in dollar, lower dollar means high oil, high corn, high wheat, etc etc. what the govt and the people need to do, is make sure our trade agreemend as enforced. china is dumping on this country, yet we do nothing to them. china just put a massive tax on america trucks, yet we allow china to flood the market with cheap solar panels. enforce the trade agreement, reward small business and corporation that produce and hire in this country, reduce our dependency on oil, and invest in renewable energy, a growing national industry.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
09:15 AM on 01/04/2012
Devaluing would not increase internal costs...it would increase costs only on products produced outside the US. Wheat, internal oil and corn etc. produced here would not be affected.....cars would go up somewhat because of their imported content. In fact it would reduce the cost to countries outside the US and create more demand. Though It could lead to other counties doing the same thing to stay competitive.
I agree %100 with everything else you suggest...but I doubt if Congress would do anything that is good for the American people....while they remain on the corporate payroll.
09:06 AM on 01/05/2012
devaluing the dollar is good for exports and bad for imports. mandating American content and using duties raises the cost for consumers and hurts the economy.

the right moves were made by Reagan. lower taxes to spur demand and close tax loopholes to increase revenue. don't look to Dems for this - and even Republicans seem to not want to close the loopholes
satyrday
If my micro-bio is way too long, will it be trunca
10:33 AM on 01/03/2012
The Canadian oil currently flows to 3 internal U.S. cities, who have no problem processing the entire quantity. Keystone would send it to coastal refineries in Texas, and then export it.

Wasn't domestic drilling supposed to help the U.S.? If so, the Keystone pipeline goes against that.

Please wise up, republican voters.
photo
lcr999
scientist
11:54 AM on 01/03/2012
In case anyone is still confused about the purpose of the pipeline

“http://www­.reuters.c­om/article­/2012/01/0­3/athabasc­a-idUSL3E8­C36LL20120­103

Athabasca to sell 40 percent of its Oil Sands project to PETROCHINA­!. Any doubt about what the pipeline is for now !!”
02:48 PM on 01/03/2012
"Please wise up, republican voters."

lol...I wouldn't hold your breath
photo
ausmth
All things merge into one and a river runs through
09:40 AM on 01/03/2012
My union welder friends and heavy equipment friends want the pipeline. How quickly would they vote Republican if the Dems didn't pass the pipeline? Heartbeat!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
10:23 AM on 01/03/2012
They would support a party that continually turns its back on the working and middle class - for temporary jobs? Isn't that the problem with the electorate in this country - that it constantly votes against its own economic best interests? Seriously, people making less than $250,000 a year have no business in the republican party. Why are the dumb, poor states, overwhelmingly republican? Because of social wedge issue that politicians use against the voters...and they buy it time after time. It's mind bogglingly frustrating - and is the main reason things have gotten progressively worse for working Americans over the last 30 years. Thomas Jefferson speculated that an uninformed and duped citizenry is the greatest threat to democracy. How right he was!
photo
ausmth
All things merge into one and a river runs through
04:06 PM on 01/03/2012
They would punish a party that would choose environmentalists over their jobs. It's happened before. The social wedge issues work both ways. Why else did women continue to support the sexual predator in chief Bill?
09:11 AM on 01/05/2012
Utter nonsense. its democrats and the poor that vote against their interests. Obama come is and showers hundreds of Billions on Unions and friends - what do the poor get -MORE unemployment, cuts to Medicare, and massive deficits their kids will inherit

the stupidity of falling for Democrat lies for decades is staggering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlie smerlick
the dog barks but the caravan still moves on
11:36 AM on 01/03/2012
I'm a union construction worker--ask your welder friends if the pipe their going to weld is made in the U.S. ( hopefully union made) and ask both of them what will happen when this pipeline springs a leak ( not to put down the quality of their work ) and destroys an aquifier that provides water for millions. Oh ask them why Canada is still reviewing the safety of building one towards it's own west coast when they are all for ramroding one down our throats.Maybe stepping back to make sure this pipeline is built safely is in everyone's best interest--healthwise and jobwise...
photo
ausmth
All things merge into one and a river runs through
12:43 PM on 01/03/2012
they are pressure vessel certified. Their welds won't break! Pipelines are the safest and most cost effective way to transport liquids.
09:14 AM on 01/05/2012
so how many aquifers that supply water to million have been destroyed by the existing thousands of miles of pipeline? Duh.

Do you know the source of the worst spills? TANKERS
09:03 AM on 01/03/2012
A weaker dollar lowers the value of the 2+ trillion American business is currently hoarding. Not gonna let it happen...
08:49 AM on 01/03/2012
I think you are making a valid point about the true number of jobs that would be created by the pipeline but are missing the big picture. The real significance of the pipeline story is what is happening to the ecology of Alberta. The real story of the devastation occurring there is not being exposed to the public. The media needs to simply show the rampant destruction and toxic pollution being caused by this reckless method of 'mining' oil sands.
09:17 AM on 01/05/2012
ya sure lets try to tell Canada what to do. silly idea - and failed. this tar sands oil would not be needed or competitive if the big pig in oil usage - the US drilled for its own oil. But we let the nutty environmental lobby stop that so now we have made tar sands oil competitive - and the environmentalist lobby owns it...
photo
unionave
Old Codger
07:39 AM on 01/03/2012
There is another way of looking at this . That oil is going to get to the refineries no doubt about it . By any means available . Today oil is King and will be for decades in to our future .

The SAE has announced that petroleum burning vehicles are on their drawing boards for the next ten years . Many of those vehicles will be on our roads 30 years from now burning petroleum and polluting . Which means we will be having oil spills large enough to wreck any ecology for decades in to our future .
There are no laws mandating that we buy these vehicles but our egos , as usual , will get the best of us .
09:19 AM on 01/05/2012
oil spills because of what? How many have we had in the last 50 years? What the heck are you talking about.

And ya you can choose to not by gas cars - good luck with your choices....