More

Dean Baker

Dean Baker

Posted May 4, 2009 | 02:47 PM (EST)

Outsourcing Top Management: The Lesson of Fiat-Chrysler


The media coverage of the auto bailouts has focused on the need for union autoworkers to take big pay cuts, causing them to once again miss the real story. The Fiat-Chrysler deal shows that the pay problem is at the top, not the bottom. At the end of the day, the new Chrysler is still likely to be producing most of its cars in the United States. What the new company will be getting from abroad is technology and top management.

This big story was so easily missed because it runs against one of the main myths that our elites have cultivated about the US economy: that the country has a "comparative advantage" in highly skilled labor. In this story, the United States will continue to lose manufacturing and other "less-skilled" jobs as its economy becomes more concentrated in highly skilled sectors.

This story was convenient for our elites because it meant that the decline of manufacturing was a necessary, if sometimes painful, part of a natural economic progression. It also justified the growing inequality in US society that benefited not just Wall Street bankers and CEOs, but also millions of doctors, lawyers, economists, and other highly educated workers. These people took their six-figure salaries as a birthright, even as the pay of less educated workers stagnated or declined.

While this story of the US becoming a high skills center in the world economy may have been comforting to the elites, and was widely promoted by economists and the news media, there was never much truth to it. Highly skilled professionals did well in recent decades not because they succeeded in international competition, but rather because they were largely sheltered from it.

Trade agreements like NAFTA were explicitly designed to remove any barrier that made it difficult to export manufacturing goods to the United States, thereby placing US manufacturing workers directly in competition with their much lower paid counterparts in the developing world. Most of these restrictions had nothing to do with tariffs. Instead the key issues were rules protecting investment in the developing world along with limits on the ability of the US to exclude imports through safety or environmental regulations.

There has never been any similar effort to eliminate the barriers that prevent professionals from the developing world from coming to the United States and competing directly with their US counterparts as doctors or lawyers or in other highly paid professions.

The economists and the media somehow failed to notice that professionals were intentionally sheltered from international competition and instead just trumpeted them as the winners in the global economy. We were just treated to a beautiful example of this double standard when the media and the economists got all huffy about the "buy America" provision in the stimulus bill that might have protected a few manufacturing jobs in steel and other industries.

While this provision was roundly condemned and eventually watered down, the buy America provision in the Treasury's latest bank bailout bill went completely unnoticed. This provision requires that any investment manager taking part in the program be headquartered in the United States. Even though the argument against protectionism in financial services is identical to the argument against protectionism in steel, no one bothered to make the argument when Wall Street was the beneficiary of protectionism.

The end result of this protectionism for those at the top is a bloated overpaid sector of top managers, which is what we saw at Chrysler. If we compare wages for assembly-line workers in Europe and the United States, there would not be much difference between the pay of UAW members and their counterparts in Europe. However, there would be a very large difference between the multi-million dollar pay packages of the top executives at the US companies and their European counterparts. The pay gaps persist among the more highly paid engineers and management personnel.

Therefore, it was only logical that a bailout of Chrysler would seek to take advantage of the lower cost management and design skills available at a European car company like Fiat. In Chrysler, as in other companies, the high pay packages for these people are like an anchor dragging them down in international competition. If the US is to be competitive in the 21st century, we must either bring the pay of those at the top back down to earth or we should look to follow the lead of Chrysler and contract out for these services.

The media coverage of the auto bailouts has focused on the need for union autoworkers to take big pay cuts, causing them to once again miss the real story. The Fiat-Chrysler deal shows that the pa...
The media coverage of the auto bailouts has focused on the need for union autoworkers to take big pay cuts, causing them to once again miss the real story. The Fiat-Chrysler deal shows that the pa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
11:59 AM on 05/06/2009
Geez. About time.

Wasn't this kinda obvious around the second time Ray gen got elected?
photo
William1950
everything I say could be wrong
10:06 PM on 05/05/2009
someday there will be robot workers, robot programers, and robot managers... we humans will live in underground caves, or abandoned shopping malls... life will be great with medical care online free of cost and there will be robot doctors ... nobody will steal, nobody will want, and nobody will work... there will be no such thing as money... currency will be a smile... no crime and no hungry kids.
until then long live the union.
in reality, there is - or there are - rulers and there are workers and there are some who get in the way, here lately it seem that the middle class is getting in the way, the poor are expendable.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
07:37 PM on 05/05/2009
Yes, it seems there are a lot of people who have not had to compete with outside talent at less than half the cost. The club at the top has no interest in sharing, and will continue the game as long as the under classes allow it.
03:56 PM on 05/05/2009
It's just part of the overall oligarchy that has replaced our republic via capitalism. USA is the world's King George, and we aren't very good at it. We have an obsession with being rich at any cost instead of just being happy with being comfortable.
There is a reason for the bible passage about a camel passing through the eye of a needle. Being rich means you are selfish and self serving. These CEOs who got bailed out and then got bonuses could have put a little of that back into the community and then people would have money to put into their banks, thus giving themselves job security for as long as their community is prosperous. The problem is that these CEOs are multi-national and don't have a community.
This is why Argentina collapsed, the multi-national money holders just up and took off, leaving the communities and workers that made billions for the richies to suffer and rebuild (and once they're done you can bet the money holders will come back for more).
Fremon
Retired in Palm Desert CA
05:38 PM on 05/05/2009
We have had those elected "leader' willingly work for the corporation and wealthy of this country to the detriment of the workers. Higher profits by creating jobs overseas is not a prescription for a viable middle class. We are modeling ourselves after banana republics. I love Obama but I am concerned about his green job mantra's. We may fund companies and or research in this vital area, but once the time is right will we outsource hardware and intellectual resouces in the name of profits and only use American workers for installation of these products? Think about it. It use to be that a majority of profits in this country was made by manufacturing. Today, or recently, 40% of profits were in money transactions by banks, brokerages, etc. Those people get paid well but there are less of them than those employed in manufacturing.
07:08 PM on 05/05/2009
Being rich does not mean someone is "selfish or self serving", far from. Anyone can be selfish and self servicing, no matter rich or poor. Is Warren Buffett or Bill Gates, America's richest people and both CEOs, selfish and self serving? Both, in fact, are some of the most charitable people in the world. And there are many very poor folks that are extremely selfish and self serving, many refuse to work and feed from the govt trough.
12:38 PM on 05/05/2009
My entire office folded almost 4 years ago. Instead of continuing, my company...Panasonic decided to sell our office to an American firm who then promptly outsourced our jobs.
Through that last year, from the downsizing to the closure we lost 75 jobs...
It was done quietly...

But I'm NOT going to be quiet about this.

Somebody is going to pay for this baloney and will.

Here in Pennsylvania, that's going to be "Republican turned Democrat" Arlen Specter.

The use of H 1-B Visas, and Outsourcing is only good for one entity...the CEO's and the other executives of the corporations. The reality is that they just don't want to pay a fair livable wage so they go and hire foreigners and half the wage or move the entire operation overseas still offering half or less than half the wage paid to American workers.

Using H 1-B Visas and Outsourcing is against our very way of life because our ancestors came to America to build a better life....

The use of H 1-B Visas and the practice of Outsourcing is Treason against the people of the United States and nothing less.
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
07:32 PM on 05/05/2009
Some really good points here, the article was excellent. The only things that made people hesitate before were re.vo.lut. shun. ists.. Is it time yet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
11:49 AM on 05/05/2009
That is the truth. At my operation, an auto plant, we were on three shifts last year. Due to the current economic conditions, we are now on one shift. The ironic thing is we still have the upper management for three shifts. I do not understand how this is not rectified. It just seems the low level workers always take it in the shorts and the "elites" somehow skate by. Oh well, so far I still have a job.
09:06 PM on 05/05/2009
This is the same situation at the GM plant I work at. We went from 2 shifts to 1 shift last year. Over 150 hourly people were laid off, yet the plant had the exact same amount of management, engineers, etc. as they did with 2 shifts. Our plant has lost half of our hourly workers in the last 2 years. No management positions were cut until 2 weeks ago when GM eliminated those 1600 white collar jobs. At out plant we have just over 400 hourly production workers and just over 300 salary workers. I am not for anyone losing their jobs, but if us union workers are constantly losing our jobs or being laid off when they no longer need us, then its about time management starts taking cuts too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
11:37 AM on 05/05/2009
Some very good points. It is interesting to note that this professional class has been traditionally on the side of the top 1% that rule our country. It seems to me they will sooner or later realize they have more in common with the bottom classes than the very top. What will that do to our politics? When are we going to realize that our government has very little legitimacy left when all it does is the bidding of the capitalist class? It isn't just that the governmental policies benefit the capitalist elites but that they are simultaneously detrimental to the rest of Americans. Yes, our democracy ain't a democracy at all. They just want you to believe it is because a sham democracy is much cheaper to run than an overt tyranny. Our government rules by the "consent of the governed". It is time to make it clear that we no longer consent to this thieving system and demand real reforms of our system. Let's give a real democracy a chance for a change.
11:09 AM on 05/05/2009
Dr. Baker is so full on common sense and understanding of all the issues at hand. He continuously offers solutions to the economic problems as well as defining the problems. The upper management always seems to protect their incompetent positions while regularly place the blame upon the workers who are told what to do by those incompetent administrators. It is more of the Nanny State protectionism while sacrificing labor.

http://eye-on-washington.blogspot.com
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
07:31 AM on 05/05/2009
you are so right about the fact of the bloating being at the top..

Anyone who compares any autoworker in the Euro Zone to American autoworkers, knows that American autoworkers are working at least 15% more hours and getting either the same OR lower pay than the autoworkers in Europe... (They still remember revolutions where kings were shot or killed.) and they always have healthcare and their pension/social security system kicks in earlier and with more money...

The only way they afford this is because they are not afraid to make the rich pay their fare share....here we are loosing 50 billion dollars at least each and every year in taxes on the millionaires...see IRS infor on TPM and run the numbers...and the 400 richest are paying 17% in taxes...It is time to take the cap off of Social Security and call the surtax Public Health Financing.and to make all income subject to income tax....I really would not mind seeing capital gains taxes cut for people with incomes less than 50 grand and increased for the incomes over 250 grand...
09:32 AM on 05/05/2009
What you say is true of anyone in the Euro Zone. Higher pay and shorter hours are a general problem in Europe, which makes international competition even harder for Europeans than Americans. European success, where it exists, lies in management and work efficiency, which have to be much better in Europe than the US.

It's not the rich who pay for the perks of the poor around here, but the middle class. Of course, there is a significant amount of middle class in Europe, whereas the US has decided that it does not need that many well educated, grown up people to run things. They still think they can get away with fools at the bottom and jerks at the top.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sposton
right to tell what they don't want to hear
11:26 AM on 05/05/2009
I agree with your assessment.
07:11 AM on 05/05/2009
Fixing the trade deficit with China and Nafta were issues that President Obama had on Change.gov, but never carried over to the Whitehouse.gov. Now the official word is "we will not pursue protectionism". In other words "We will not attempt to protect domestic industry and workers". Trade tariffs have been used since the beginning of recorded history to protect domestic industry. Add to that the cost of healthcare that businesses have to pay for employees in America. We need universal single-payer government provided healthcare, and we a politician to step up and protect American jobs. We need American manufacturing. A job at McDonald's does not equal a decent paying manufacturing job. But I guess when you are wealthy that isn't much of a concern.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:48 AM on 05/05/2009
I would like to respond to your statements about law. While there are some lawyers making six figure salaries, they generally represent the highest wage earners in the profession. Many lawyers struggle to pay six figure student loan debts on $45,000 salaries, if they are fortunate enough to be able to find work. Law schools are making good money hiding this fact. Also, lawyers do compete with outsourcing. Work traditionally performed by young lawyers is now being outsourced to India. Indian lawyers, who are not licensed in any state in the U.S., are sent the aforementioned tasks, and the work is then returned to the U.S. firm that outsourced it where it is "reviewed," and then a licensed lawyer slaps his bar license on the document. According to many state bars, the firm can claim the unlicensed Indian lawyer is not doing legal work, just the work of a paralegal under the supervision of a licensed lawyer. Large firms stand to make a lot of money from outsourcing, because they can save quite a bit of money by paying an Indian lawyer very little, pass a small cost savings on to their client, and keep the lion's share of the savings for themselves. The big loser is the U.S. law graduate who paid six figures for an ABA accredited law degree, and studied for months to pass a state bar, only to find their work is now being sent overseas to an unlicensed Indian lawyer.
06:48 PM on 05/05/2009
You're rilght au6553; there are very few jobs that cannot be outsourced at lower cost, but of course management, which is in charge of outsourcing will not outsource themselfs even though it would save their companies money. And of course the idea that free trade enriches all nations is nonsense; it enriches international corporations at the expence of workers around the world. 99% of everything we import could be made in the US. Those things might cost a little more but that would be more than made up for by higher wages and better jobs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeBelAge
04:52 AM on 05/05/2009
Outsourcing Management. Lets see how they like it.
photo
William1950
everything I say could be wrong
11:24 PM on 05/04/2009
Thank You Mr. Baker... I have said it a thousand times that the workers of this country were not overpaid and deserved every bit of what pay they get...
I believe the term for most corporate management is..... R.E.C.T.U.M. management...
Random Emergencies Created Through Unqualified Management.... don't be a rectum manager.

overturn nafta,
Term Limits Now...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Articulator
10:59 PM on 05/04/2009
Free trade agreements like NAFTA and H1B visa's are killing American jobs. I am willing to bet you can have free trade agreements that are written so the benefit American workers too. They current versions are heavily influenced by those big money interests that want to exploit cheap labor overseas. Allowing H1B visa holders to move around the country and apply for any job once they are in would help the American worker. They would be free to ask for the prevailing wage and benefits and it would be less beneficial to kick American workers out of their jobs.
07:14 AM on 05/05/2009
They need to just cancel the H1B visas. If your family is starving, do you buy dinner for the neighbor? The average American has very little voice in Washington.
09:35 AM on 05/05/2009
They won't cancel his H1-B. Keep dreaming. Without H1-Bs this country would go down the drain twice as fast.

"The average American has very little voice in Washington."

The average American voted for Bush... twice. I think that says it all.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
07:35 AM on 05/05/2009
I can tell you that they are INSOURCING software engineers and nurses (nurses have been coming in since the 1970s at least)...

Don't you know it is cheaper to educate them in the low cost countries and it keeps the wages down when we have can keep bringing them in...This is nothing new...
09:38 AM on 05/05/2009
Of course it is cheaper to educate people in foreign countries where education has not been made into big business but is looked at as an issue of national pride and national security. Schatsie, EVERY problem mentioned here is home made. The US has made one poor decision after the other over the course of the last 30-50 years. The chickens that have been visible for miles and miles are simply coming home to roost. But if you had listened to those voices in the past which kept pointing out what a mess you are making of your own country, things would be considerably better.
09:48 PM on 05/04/2009
It was only a matter of time before NAFTA started to errode white collar jobs as well. Amazing how arrogant higher ups can be, isn't it? They thought their jobs were secure, while only blue collar jobs evaporated. Now they're feeling it too and suddenly it's a crisis. Unbelievable.
09:39 AM on 05/05/2009
NAFTA hasn't eroded any white collar jobs. We have plenty that we can't fill except with foreign engineers and scientosts.