iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dean Obeidallah

GET UPDATES FROM Dean Obeidallah
 

Do Women Really Deserve to Be Paid the Same As Men?

Posted: 06/06/2012 7:01 pm

What do you think the pay would be for two people working in the same workplace, doing the same job for the same length of time? If your answer was "the same," odds are you would be wrong if one of those two employees was a woman.

Women in America are in general paid less than men. That is a fact. And not just a few cents less, but women on average earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man is paid for the equivalent job. Think about this for a moment: Women will be paid almost 25-percent less than their male co-worker doing the identical job, not because one is better at the job but simply because one is a woman.

It's even worse for women of color. African-American women only earn approximately 62 cents, and Latinas only 53 cents, for each dollar earned by a white male co-worker.

That's the bad news. Here's the worse news: The U.S. Senate considered legislation that could have finally remedy this injustice, but Republicans in the Senate blocked the vote on this proposed legislation.

Here's my simple question: How can anyone be opposed to ending income discrimination based on gender? Do Republican Senators actually believe that America's working mothers, wives, and daughters are inherently less valuable than men? When the Republican Senators were raising their daughters, did they tell them that they should dream big but that because of their gender, they don't deserve to be paid the same as a man?

Senate Republicans opposed this proposed law for the simple reason that they stand with big business over the average American women. Taking their lead from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other big-business groups, they complained that this proposed law would have created additional government regulations. Indeed, the Chamber of Commerce states that they "vigorously oppose" the law while claiming that they have "no tolerance for discrimination." This only makes sense in the bizzaro world; how can you oppose discrimination and then oppose a law that would eliminate that very thing?!

The legislation at issue was entitled the Paycheck Fairness Act and was introduced by Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski. The proposed law simply sought to update the original 1963 Equal Pay Act, which first addressed this issue. While the gender pay gap has closed a bit since then, this law would have closed loopholes to further reduce, and hopefully eliminate, unfair pay practices.

Had it been enacted, the law would have provided, among other things, increased penalties against employers for violations, including providing a statutory right for women to seek punitive damages. It also would have clarified the acceptable defenses for employers and prohibited employers from retaliating against employees who revealed their income level.

President Obama was vocally in favor of this law. So what about the presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney? This bastion of "leadership" took no position on this legislation. Instead, he ducked the issue the best he could. This truly speaks volumes about the man who says he is the best candidate to be leader of the free world but refuses to stand up for the women of America.

I propose that every senator who opposed this legislation be paid only 77 cents for each dollar paid to their Congressional counterparts who supported the law. I know that this reduction in pay will not have a real impact on their lives, given that the estimated median net worth of a U.S. senator is $2.56 million, but it could be a teaching moment. Perhaps if these senators understood the feeling of frustration and powerlessness caused by discrimination, they would fight to eliminate it.

The Republicans in the Senate -- and Mitt Romney -- need to make it clear that they unequivocally oppose income discrimination based on gender and make clear whether they stand with big business or our nation's women.

 

Follow Dean Obeidallah on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Deanofcomedy

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:44 PM on 06/07/2012
Thank you for your support, Dean. This is what it takes - the GUYS have to step up and speak out against this. Women have been protesting it for decades with little action or change. One of the poorest groups in America is single women, especially older ones. They've made less than men their whole working lives, so their retirement is less, too, since pensions, etc. are usually based on income.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:31 AM on 06/07/2012
If the alleged 23% disparity in pay was referred to as a "hardship tax" to help men weather the storms of a lifespan that has them dying a decade before women, would Democrats support it?

I support a gender blind, race oblivious meritocracy, with equal pay for equal effort. That's right, effort, not results. Try that hat on for size.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Dehart
Vet, Conservative and Gun Owner
09:04 AM on 06/07/2012
Yet another gender baiter trying to perpetuate the old myth.
11:29 AM on 06/07/2012
If gender baiting is defined as accurately reporting an economic, provable fact...

As a chick, I would also say that I have noticed that women are terrible about asking for money. They tend to take what is offered, and not negotiate the way that I have seen from most men.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Dehart
Vet, Conservative and Gun Owner
02:28 AM on 06/08/2012
EverybodyKnows...THANK YOU!!! Finally some sense. So would you agree that 2 people...male and a female...hired for the same job with a similar skill set would have a pay disparity based upon their own choices in a salary negotiation and not as a result of discrimination and that it "could" be an underlying cause in the whole issue?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glowbeanie
09:33 PM on 06/06/2012
So where have all these White women been when it was clear that women of color were and are getting paid less than they were and are now? Why isn't the outrage placed equally by the "White" women, on not just that women get paid less, but that women of color are paid even less than they are? Sounds hypocritical of White women in places of privilege, to not speak equally for all women, not just for their own station in life. Same can be said about the poor White people, who would rather remain poor, than join people of color, to join the fight against inequality, injustice and poverty.
06:41 AM on 06/07/2012
Millions of white women have supported equal civil rights for all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glowbeanie
07:07 PM on 06/07/2012
Eric14, I hate to burst your bubble, but if millions of White women had supported women and men of color. We would be ahead of the haters in the ultra-conservative Republicans. The fact is that millions of White women and White men, both heterosexual and LGBT, didn't support and actually supported policies that kept and is trying to keep millions of people of color out of certain jobs, housing and even places of social gatherings across the entire USA.
photo
JayInDallas
Shredding talking points with facts since 2006
08:30 PM on 06/06/2012
Thank you Dean.