More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Deborah Burger

GET UPDATES FROM Deborah Burger

The War on Women's Health

Posted: 03/08/11 07:28 PM ET

The far right and their representatives in Congress and many state houses sure have a unique way of celebrating the centennial anniversary of International Women's Day.

News that the Texas House of Representatives last week approved a bill, already passed by the state Senate, to force women seeking an abortion to first get an ultrasound test is one of a number of attacks on women's health in the works.

Nationally, the U.S. Senate is likely to act this week on a decision by the House last month to bar Planned Parenthood health centers from receiving any federal funding. That would deeply cut into the broad array of health services provided by Planned Parenthood including not just abortion, but also birth control, cancer screenings, HIV and STD testing, and more.

All this week, Planned Parenthood is holding events in multiple cities to encourage people to lobby their Senators to stop this unwarranted and dangerous assault.

The budget cutting attack doesn't stop there. Republicans also want to slash $1 billion from Head Start, which, as Melissa Harris-Perry writes in The Nation, threatens to bar 157,000 children from pre-school, a handy way to keep many women in the home, rather than the work force, which many social conservatives would apparently prefer.

Presumably that would suit some of those on the right just fine. Looking at some of the bills offered or advancing in many states it is hard to draw other conclusions.

The Texas bill, for example, hardly has any medical purpose. Scans would be dictated not for health reasons, but political ones. Any test, it should be recalled, can be painful and is subject to potential complications. Also, who bears the costs of the additional tests required? The state who mandates it or the patients?

There's the now infamous Gov. Scott Walker in Wisconsin. While most of the national attention has understandably been on his campaigns to end union rights for public workers (the majority of them, by the way, women) and to eviscerate public education, is also proposing a big attack on women's health.

Walker's budget would repeal a state law mandating insurance companies provide prescription birth control coverage. That goal has been pushed for years in Wisconsin by anti-abortion groups, but where's the logic? If you bar prescription birth control, won't there just be more unwanted pregnancies and even more incentive for women to seek abortions? And what about women who should not get pregnant, like diabetics and epileptics, and cancer patients on certain medications?

It hardly makes sense for avowed budget-cutters either. Unwanted pregnancies, whether they lead to abortion or children with health and other needs have huge economic consequences. The purpose of such initiatives are social and ideological, not budgetary.

Or take South Dakota, where rightwing legislators proposed a bill justifying homicide in the event of "imminent threat" to a fetus, a bill widely considered encouraging the murder of doctors who provide abortions, and other health care professionals who participate in the counseling and the procedures.

There's Ohio where opponents of reproductive choice wanted to have a fetus "testify" on behalf of a "heartbeat bill," that would bar women from ending pregnancies after a heartbeat is detected.

That bill threatened to set off a costly legal fight in a state which, like Wisconsin, that has multiple other attacks on working people and families. "Our state is facing crushing budget deficits and talking about slashing Medicaid funding for thousands of Ohio women, yet these politicians are focusing on an extreme and unconstitutional bill that, if passed, would entangle our state in a costly legal battle," said Kelly Copeland, director of NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio.

And there's New Jersey where Gov. Chris Christie, darling of the national media talk shows, seeks major cuts in women's health services.

But the award for the most extreme may have to go to Georgia where state Rep. Bobby Franklin who wants to criminalize not just abortions but even miscarriages, potentially punishable by death. As Jen Phillips wrote in Mother Jones, "basically, it's everything a 'pro-life' activist could want aside from making all women who've had abortions wear big red 'A's' on their chests."

This is the same Franklin who last year pushed legislation that would redefine rape victims as "accusers," in an apparent attempt to generate sympathy for rapists.

Harris-Perry notes that reproductive services have in the past century provided tens of millions of women far more choices and control in their lives, and helped encourage educational and professional opportunities for women. She writes:

"Women who can't control their fertility will be unable to compete for degrees or jobs with their male counterparts. Likewise, without affordable childcare women would be less likely to work outside the home. And without basic rights to organize, women teachers, nurses and other public sector workers would be compelled to accept lower wages and harsher working conditions, shoving many women out of the workforce altogether. In the Republicans' future America, women will be encouraged to marry younger, to stay in difficult (even abusive) marriages and to rely on male wages."

She calls the current rightwing crusade a war not just on women's health, but also on women's futures.

That's a message for all of us to take seriously on this year's International Women's Day.

 

Follow Deborah Burger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NationalNurses

The far right and their representatives in Congress and many state houses sure have a unique way of celebrating the centennial anniversary of International Women's Day. News that the Texas House of R...
The far right and their representatives in Congress and many state houses sure have a unique way of celebrating the centennial anniversary of International Women's Day. News that the Texas House of R...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:53 PM on 03/28/2011
As an expat, I'm gobsmacked at how far right America has become. Regarding the right to choose, why is it that no credible news agency or Planned Parenthood itself has not responded to/commented on the right wing 'documentary' "Blood Money"? I haven't seen it and the only info I can get about it is from Christian, Catholic and far right web sites. Is it a big deal in the mainstream press or the right preaching to itself?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bluelynx
09:48 AM on 03/09/2011
What Repugs call the future sounds like the '50s to me. I remember the incredible pressure on women to marry, make babies, be housewives, quit jobs, quit college, quit everything! Truly, a sad time.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
10:40 AM on 03/09/2011
Only in the 1950s our policies were (more or less) set up to support the society that we HAD in the 1950s.  Putting 2010 America into their social program is like putting ballet slippers on a hippo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
outsidethemainstream
01:10 PM on 03/09/2011
more like the late 1800's, complete w/ sweat shops and 80 hr work weeks for children w/ no worker safety laws
09:36 AM on 03/09/2011
"Walker's budget would repeal a state law mandating insurance companies provide prescription birth control coverage. That goal has been pushed for years in Wisconsin by anti-abortion groups, but where's the logic? If you bar prescription birth control, won't there just be more unwanted pregnancies and even more incentive for women to seek abortions? And what about women who should not get pregnant, like diabetics and epileptics, and cancer patients on certain medications?"

He isn't barring perscription birth control, he is removing it from insurance. Why should I have to bear the cost for you to intake hormones and chemicals into your body? You will more unhealthy in the long run and my insurance premium will increase.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
10:31 AM on 03/09/2011
You don't understand insurance do you?
photo
Debbie Shoemaker
bleeding heart and proud of it
11:15 AM on 03/09/2011
Why should a woman "bear" the cost of you leaving a "deposit" inside her body, it will only make her less healthy in the long run and her insurance premium will increase.

Why don't all men get vasectomies? No need for birth control then, problem fixed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
daveat1910
09:15 AM on 03/09/2011
FREEDOM*
* except for women
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
10:32 AM on 03/09/2011
Actually "Freedom to make the choices I say you should make."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
08:45 AM on 03/09/2011
A woman who votes Republican is not only voting against herself but her children also.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
10:32 AM on 03/09/2011
Ditto for 98% of the voting population of America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbishop76
Left of liberal Texan.
07:56 AM on 03/09/2011
Government so small it fits in my uterus.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolyn LeBeauf
07:40 AM on 03/09/2011
It is just astounding how Rick Perry and the rest of thses republican tea baggers just love how to be all up in a women's womb.
02:49 AM on 03/09/2011
Again I say.... GOP, stay out of my uterus! Focus on Jobs!

The mere idea that these 'thugs' are targeting useful social programs like planned parenthood and headstart just cements my utter disgust towards them.

I think this surge in non- jobs related rhetoric by the GOP is a means of deflecting the fact that they have no real agenda other than rallying their base and trying to defeat Obama in 2012.

By focusing on bills that play only on the ignorance and fears of their supporters, they get a win here and there, but at the same time destroy programs that benefit the underserved and tread on basic rights of many in this country.

May they all rot in h$ll.
whochi
This space for rent.
07:26 AM on 03/09/2011
Again we say...we will stay out of your uterus if you stay out of our wallets! If you want (a decent chance) at a job, then exercise responsibility when it comes to that 'body' you say you want control over (but just like a Wall St. Banker, when you get in trouble, you want the taxpayer to bail you out!)
09:20 AM on 03/09/2011
Planned Parenthood doesn't use government funding for abortions. All these places are not allowed to, remember? However they are allowed to use funding for those responsible, preventative things, like birth control and health care.

It's disgusting that all those politicians require unnecessary, invasive, and expensive procedures, yet don't provide the funding for their demands. They want it, they should pay for it, right? Like they demand women to pay for their own abortions?
12:57 AM on 03/09/2011
It's a frightening list. I keep thinking that someone needs to point out to those fans of the GOP who love them for their allegedly "pro-life" stance should realize that cutting funding to Planned Parenthood deprives poor women of prenatal care. The risk of stillbirths (post 20 week miscarriages) increases 5x without prenatal care. These are more developed fetuses than those who die in abortions and they are WANTED babies. I wish I knew a way to do a statistical study to find out just how many fetuses these GOP polices put at risk. I suspect the number would be chilling.

I can't help but wonder - if the Georgia law goes through making miscarriages homicide, would these law makers be accessories since their policies are in fact increasing miscarriages and still births?

In any case, it's pretty sick to read the list of attacks on women presented here. I'm sure there's more to come. It's a war on the poor and on women. Oddly, with Planned Parenthood, it's also a war on the unborn.
11:37 PM on 03/08/2011
There is definitely a war against women, taking us back before women were allowed to vote. So many of our right-wing politicians would love just that. I can't understand the craziness nor logic of the house and their decisions that affect women. I follow what they say about needing to bring the budget in line, but then they turn around and do something like the decision on Planned Parenthood and "When is it Rape". Does that really help our budget - who is going to pay for all of those women who can longer get support with their medical issues? Ex. A woman gets stage 4 cancer and can't take the pain any longer knowing that she doesn't have insurance. She walks into the emergency room, they hospitalize her, and then begin treatment. Now how much do we think that will cost tax payers! Prevention costs much less in the long run. I wonder how these men would feel if they didn't have insurance and their penis has some terrible disease where it falls off. Do you think they would wish they had a Planned Parenthood? Duh!!! The vote would certainly be different, wouldn't it!
11:37 PM on 03/08/2011
Excellent article...as a Texas woman I am furious with our legislature for putting anti-woman's rights bills ahead of dealing with our massive state budget deficit!
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
10:53 PM on 03/08/2011
time to get out the shirts with the Big A on them,,,,just like Annie Lenox did for AIDS.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IrishEyes21
Where are the games on this thing?
10:12 PM on 03/08/2011
Womens liberation was not about working outside the home - it was about the right to make decisions about our own lives - be it working or not, medical treatment, birth control, etc. How can any woman be okay with someone else telling you what you can or cannot do with your own body?

Women fought long and hard to get fair and equal treatment in the workplace and in medical care. We should not be forced to give that up because someone tells us we no longer have that right. Pro-lifers are not pro-life, they are anti-abortion. They are not the ones who will have to care for that child when it is born. The impact to them is nonexistent. There are thousands of children in foster homes who need parents, why add to that number with more babies? What happens to the system then when instead of shelling out a few hundred a month per woman for birth control they have to start shelling out a few thousand to care for the child that got abandoned? People have sex - limiting access to birth control is not going to stop that, but it will stop people from being able to prevent pregnancies.


Reproductive issues aside - eliminating HeadStart? The mothers aren't the ones who benefit from Head Start - the kids do. Children who participate in Head Start are more likely to suceed when they begin Kindergarten.


My uterus = none of your business.
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
10:55 PM on 03/08/2011
Great comment specially the last line.....republicans pro-viagra anti-contraceptive....sounds like sharia law to me.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
07:20 AM on 03/09/2011
Very good post. What amazes me is that in the 2010 elections, 48% of women voted Republican. I also wonder what the wives, daughters, and sisters of these anti-choice, anti contraception Republicans say to them?