The Three Maharishis

Even though I last sat with Maharishi more than 10 years ago, he left an indelible impression, as he did on everyone. His extraordinary qualities are known to the world. Without him, it's fair to say, the West would not have learned to meditate. During the Cold War era a reporter once challenged him by saying, "If anything is possible, as you claim, can you go to the Soviet Union tomorrow with your message?" Without hesitation, Maharishi calmly replied, "I could if I wanted to." Eventually he did want to, and meditation arrived in Moscow several years before the Berlin Wall fell. In his belief that world peace depended entirely on rising consciousness, Maharishi was unshakable.

The Bhagavad-Gita declares that there are no outward signs of enlightenment. The point is underscored in many Indian fables and scriptures, which often take the form of a high-caste worthy snubbing an untouchable, only to find that the untouchable was actually a god in disguise. For his part, Maharishi had three guises, and perhaps in the end they were also disguises.

He was an Indian, a guru, and a personality. The personality was highly quixotic. Over the 50 years of his public life, Maharishi never lost his charm and lovability. He had these qualities to such an extent that Westerners took him to be a perfect example of how enlightenment looks -- kind, sociable, all-accepting, and light-hearted -- when that is far from the case. His presence was more mysterious than good humor can account for: you could feel it before entering a room. You could be walking down the hallway to his private apartments with the weight of the world on your shoulders and feel your worries drop away with every step, until by the time your hand touched the doorknob, by some magic you felt completely carefree. But if you were around him long enough, the older Maharishi in particular could be nettlesome and self-centered; he could get angry and dismissive. He was quick to assert his authority and yet could turn disarmingly child-like in the blink of an eye.

The Maharishi who was an Indian felt most comfortable around other Indians, with whom he chatted about familiar things in Hindi. He adhered to the vows of poverty and celibacy that belonged to his order of monks, despite the fact that he lived in luxury and amassed considerable wealth for the TM movement. What gets overlooked is that he viewed wealth as a means to raise the prestige of India in the materialistic West, which was both canny and realistic of him. In the end the movement's money went to preserve the spiritual heritage of India by opening pundit schools and building temples. Maharishi was deeply concerned that he might be the last embodiment of a sacred tradition that was quickly being overwhelmed by modernization.

In one way or another, for good or ill, these two Maharishis are the only ones that the outside world knew. If you came under the power of his consciousness, however, Maharishi the guru completely overshadowed every other aspect.

It's shameful to say, but gurus are a dime a dozen in India and are often treated like retainers by the rich and powerful. Nothing could be farther from the truth in Maharishi's case. He was venerated by the venerable and considered holy by the holy. His capacity to explain Vedanta was unrivaled, and if he accomplished nothing else in his long life, his commentary on the Bhagavad-Gita insures his lasting name, because with acute analysis he cuts through to the heart of every verse. Imagine that someone arose in the West who definitively settled all the disputes over the New Testament and went on to exemplify the nature of Jesus. Then you might get some idea of Maharishi's impact as a guru.

Around 1990 I was commissioned to write a book about him; it turned out to be the only assignment I could never complete. Even after spending hundreds of days in his presence, one could not capture him, either on paper or in one's mind. The Gita is right to say that there are no visible signs of enlightenment, but I would go further. The enlightened person ceases to be a person and attains a connection to pure consciousness that erases all boundaries. My deepest gratitude goes to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi for showing me that this state of unity exists outside folk tales, temples, organized religion, and scripture itself. To live and breathe in unity consciousness is unfathomable, but in at least one case, I am sure it is real.

Comments

[tublu]

thank you huffington post for hosting these lovely remarks and giving me the opportunity, during high flying political emotions, to take a breath.

[CatfishJohn]

...i would like to express sincerest gratitude to this man's life as a secular practitioner of transcendental meditation since 1975...although not as regular as i might be these past 20 years or so, i have absolutely no doubt as to the both subjective and scientific verity of TM as a reliably replenishing, mentally enhancing and on countless thousands of times spontaneously joyful experience.... the "relaxation response" research on the psychophysiological benefits from herbert benson at harvard and others very credible research over the years really doesnt do full credit to the actual process and ever-surprising experience of the subjective TM procedure...the $125 i shelled out as a poor college kid to learn TM was the best money i have ever spent...

[MagisterLudi]

Alas, the fee is now pushing $3,000 for a short intro, and one supposedly secret mantra word.

This is where the line separating Maharishi-the spiritually advanced being and Maharishi the leader of a global corporation becomes hazy.

[Dap]

Dear Dr.Chopra,

A wonderful eulogy, peace be with you. Agape.

[rjc116]

Thanks for these kind remarks. It is a great service to the many non-meditators in the world who did not have the good fortune to meet Maharishi or have not experienced the deeper knowledge of pure consciousness which Transcendental Meditation brings.

[oneraceoneworld]

This is a true breath of fresh air. Please keet posting more frequently.

[stevesrant]

Dr. Chopra: Thank you for your firsthand and succinct portrait of this mythic man. I am just old enough to remember when he gained the world's attention. Seperating fact from rumor is always problematic when considering people of such renown. Your humble final sentence rings especially true to me.