More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Del Phillips

GET UPDATES FROM Del Phillips
 

Take a Chance on the Unemployed

Posted: 02/15/2012 10:55 am

The results of a United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection poll were just released and they are surprising to read. Americans appear to have mixed thoughts about helping their fellow Americans. For a country that prides itself on its generosity, this survey may indicate how secretly selfish we may be. If a discussion is to continue about the future of a social safety net, there must also be a discussion about what to do with those utilizing that safety net. It's time to talk about hiring the unemployed.

Let's face it: hiring any new employee is always risky. A candidate can tell you anything she wants as to why she is leaving her current organization (no room for growth, seeking more challenging work, etc.) in an effort to shed the best light on herself. That's obvious. Yet, for all you know, her boss was on the verge of firing her for a consistent lack of productivity. Although your organization tries to establish a process to mitigate hiring risks, it's never a perfect formula and your process may likely never uncover that she was a poor performer, but you'll hire her anyway because of her eager attitude and impressive titles.

If the circular file is not an official part of the selection process for unemployed resumes, being unemployed surely holds a negative bias in our collective brains. It is often equated to being lazy, lacking drive or having a preference to 'mooch' off the system. These are just a few characterizations and judging by the reaction of the audience at Republican debates in response to jabs by the candidates at the unemployed, many Americans agree with them.

It's time to throw out the stereotypes!

Today's "unemployed generation" is NOT lazy. It's frustrating to hear those who talk about a friend of a friend who once "loved being unemployed for 8 months." I don't love it and reading stories like these leads me to believe there are millions of others who don't either. I, like the millions of others, have gone from a credit score in the 800s to complete ruin through bankruptcy and foreclosure. We have applied to the online ads, attended the networking events, used social media and crafted multiple iterations of our resume based on each new blogger's opinion. There are even those of us attempting to gain additional skills. We're eager and ready to get back to work.

I can attest first-hand to the determination of the unemployed as a participant in the Chicago Career Tech program -- a retraining program that includes both classroom training and hands-on learning experience, initiated by former Mayor Richard M. Daley and supported by the business and non-profit communities of Chicago. My colleagues in this program are just like me and we all hang our hopes to this program to give us the valuable skills needed to meet the demand of today's workforce.

At first we were encouraged by the words of Shelley Stern, Citizenship Director for the Microsoft Corporation and Chair of the CCT Board of Directors, who recounted how CCT was born out of a realization by the business community that many jobs, including at Microsoft, were going unfilled over the past few years, despite high unemployment. This was not due to a lack of labor, clearly, but rather a lack of necessary skills on the part of that unemployed labor. This program seeks to supplement the already valuable skills possessed by the unemployed for high-demand industries.

Despite the efforts of CCT and our new skills obtained, we continue to find it difficult to land a position. The rejection continues for a lot of previous participants and despair is setting in. We ARE trying and we ARE being interviewed, but we continue to be told that we do not have enough or the "right" experience.

Instead of a discussion about removing or reducing the social safety net, thereby creating a deeper problem, let's talk about how we all can help Americans get back to work.

Here are my challenges: First, I challenge the president and Congress to re-enact the tax cuts to businesses for hiring the unemployed. Although we are no longer in an official recession, there are millions of Americans who have been unemployed longer than 8 months. That's an awfully long time to go without work when there are bills to pay and mouths to feed. This may help alleviate long-term joblessness. If it doesn't, businesses can no longer complain that they pay too much in taxes, if they pay them at all.

Next, I challenge the Republican nominees to do more than talk. They are out there each day shaking hands with the unemployed. Has one of them offered to put them in contact with their influential friends who are likely to be hiring managers with open positions? If they want us to vote for them and believe they are the one to get the country back to work, start showing us you have experience doing it.

Third, I challenge business owners, HR managers, hiring managers and decision-makers to re-think the old notion that someone who has been unemployed is lazy or unproductive. Take the risk; you may be pleasantly surprised with the results!

Finally, I challenge all Americans to help their fellow unemployed American. Patriotism isn't just putting up a flag on holidays and singing the National Anthem at sporting events. Patriotism is also supporting your fellow citizen. FDR wrote: "In our personal ambitions we are individualists. But in our seeking for economic and political progress as a nation, we all go up or else all go down as one people. "

President George W. Bush was criticized for not asking Americans to participate in the "war effort." So here's how you can participate in the "unemployment effort": Check your company's website to find out what positions are available. Post them to Facebook or Twitter (use #jobs, for example). Forward replies to your HR department. This is just one of many examples easily implemented and that helps move us all forward together.

Help a person, help a family, help the country, gamble on the unemployed!

Cross-posted from Reframe Shame.

 
The results of a United Technologies/Natio...
The results of a United Technologies/Natio...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 57
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:00 AM on 03/10/2012
The unemployed were often cut because they were very simply,the more tenured, higher paid employees and the market is right to switch them out for cheaper help. I don't know why this isn't obvious to everyone. This was the case with my company, a Fortune 50 telecommunications goliath. They have been going through a merger w their parent company ( who just happened to have a union and a pension) and are obvioulsy eliminating ALL employees who would auto-vest into the pension plan and get that cheaper help at the same time.

These are the things that go on in corporate America. And we are the unfotunate victims. It has nothing to do with ' productivity" or " lack of skills" ( think TV based thinking like the " weakest Link" and " Survivor" ) and we , the unemployed are getting tired of the excuses. I think in most cases, we are simply 1. more experienced than they and 2. lack the 'robot' mentality that they are used to managing, ie: we actually participate & contribute to our jobs, which leads back to point 1. I have been told I was over qualified more than once and obvioulsy more qualified than the interviewer

If we are to get America up & running again, we need to dump these adolescent idealogies,biases and excuses and get moving.
06:06 PM on 02/17/2012
In many case, those who are uenmployed are more skilled, more talented and more innovative than those kept by corporate America. They are often also more skilled than those who currently run these corporations. So, why are they on teh otuside looking in? Gauging from the many excuses I have personally heard for lay offs, these run rampant: "my management was afraid of me because they ahd no idea what I did - some couldn't even pronounce my job responsibilities," "the 30 something I worked for couldn't understand how I could get anything done that wasn't on a computer," or my personal favorite (as this actually happened to me), "my job was coveted by the girlfriend of a boss so I went out the door and she got my job." We have a problem in this country that falls into the category of quality control or really the lack of it. Too often the real quality is on the unemployment line, not in the front office.
11:06 AM on 03/10/2012
I agree. I think that the current ( and I hate to say, much younger) 'management' base are scared of us., especially the over 40 crowd. I've heard every excuse in the book and am getting tired of it. it's very simple, we are unemployed because you are not hiring us. Why doesn't that equation compute?
11:49 AM on 02/16/2012
I don't think employers view someone who is unemployed as "lazy or unproductive". I think they may have questions about why they are unemployed but as long as the candidate has an answer that makes sense they should be fine. I think where most job seekers go wrong is by applying to opportunities where they are not a match. Read the job description closely and make sure your resume fits what they want; it is that simple. If you want to learn how to strategically tailor your resume checkout the link below.

http://recruitermikec.blogspot.com/2012/01/dont-commit-career-suicide-learn-job.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
delphillips
03:49 PM on 02/20/2012
I've actually heard from friends in HR about how their colleagues in other organizations openly speak about the lack of desire to hire someone who is unemployed simply based on their resume. So, while a candidate may have a very logical explanation for a lay off, they won't have the chance to explain that face to face to anyone because HR won't contact them.
10:36 PM on 02/20/2012
There was a recent CBS 60 minutes clip, http://bit.ly/wTVLxn, on this topic that was posted yesterday about discriminaiton against the unemployed but I think it is a case by case and not a general rule. If a hiring manager or a HR professional finds talent that has the skills and is an organizational "fit" I think they will move forward with that person because it is in their best interest to do so.

With that said, if the person has been unemployed for more than a year it will raise serious quetions about the candidates profile (ie accomplishments, experience, etc.) but there are ways to position the job search to minimize these types of concerns as well resources to tackle those questions directly. If interested in learning more about job search best practices please checkout http://recruitermikec.blogspot.com.

One final note, althoug unfortunate, I think this type of discrimination is disproportionately targeting older workers.
09:54 AM on 02/16/2012
Its clear America has lo st its mo ral compass. Young girls look up to the likes of Lady GaGa, Miley Sirus, and Whitney Houston. It seems there are no role models for males to look up to. They're all criminals, even the white guys, they're stealing billions, trillions*, from the masses, "innocent". Our society has said it is more important to get to the top and drive a Ferrari, live in the Hampton s, and get wasted all the time. And who cares who you step on to get there, the ends justify the means, right? Well look what our Darwinian and capitalist beliefs have brought us...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sarah Trickey
love, luck and lollipops. Narf!
11:19 PM on 02/15/2012
Beautiful!
May all who are looking, find what they need
09:09 PM on 02/15/2012
Businesses exist to make money for their owners. Businesse only hire people so long as they expect that hiring more people will help them make more money. Under the current economic and government environment, businesses are holding off on hiring. Two of the main reasons cited by small businesses for not hiring are the massive explosion in government regulations since 2008 and Obamacare:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/sallypipes/2011/09/19/the-best-jobs-program-full-repeal-of-obamacare/


Here's the money quote: "..Since the law’s enactment, job growth has fallen to rates one-tenth of what it was beforehand. From January 2009, the lowest point of the recession, through April 2010, employment numbers were improving by an average of 67,600 new jobs per month.

After April 2010 — mere weeks after President Obama signed his reform measure into law — job creation came to a screeching halt, tumbling to a rate of just 6,500 new jobs per month.

That’s no coincidence. The law deters hiring by raising the costs of employment and by fomenting uncertainty for American businesses..."

and this:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/georgia-businessman-refuses-to-hire-until-obama-is-fired/

Looman, whose company operates cranes at construction sites, said he has had to lay off three of his nine employees because of the bad economy. He said overregulation and the cost of complying with federal mandates has caused many of his customers to shut their doors..."
09:58 AM on 02/16/2012
Vote Ron Paul. The reason we are failing is the because the government is involved at all. Its not a free market when the book of regulations is three volumes and we cannot keep the government from stealing our money, small business money; local money that has to stay local to spur growth. However, Obama to the tune of trillions gave that money to Wall Street. This is fa sc ism, not capitalism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
delphillips
03:53 PM on 02/20/2012
Regulations or lack thereof are not the excuse. Many more regulations existed in much more prosperous times in our country. Regulations must exist for many reasons. Take a simple example of cell phone companies. If they had their say, they would buy out each other in the name of competition all while the consumer has less competition. How would ATT buying Tmobile INCREASE competition? Same for the recent NYSE merger with the German stock exchange. Some regulation helps keep the playing field level for you and me, the average citizen. Unchecked capitalism would result in monopolies wild greed!
06:09 PM on 02/17/2012
Life is not an economics textbook. The people getting laid off are too often being screwed simply because they didn't suck up or say yes 'em boss loud enough and often enough. Nothing more than that! It comes down to one thing: the immature people who too often run things are prone to say "I'm the boss and you're not" and reinforce that by getting rid of everyone and anyone who is a threat (real or perceived).
08:28 PM on 02/15/2012
I was unemployed for two years, two months. I sent out thousands of resumes. I took several jobs that were commission only and did not make a dime; people need money to spend money. My home is in foreclosure. My children tried to maintain a positive attitude despite the fact that some days we had no food. We stayed in our bedrooms to avoid heating the house and wrapped ourselves in blankets.
Finally, I received a call from a company and have been working since October. It was one of the first applications I had completed in 2009. I am thankful that they did not consider me unemployable or lazy. I am neither.
It is time for companies to WAKE UP! The people that have been unemployed for long periods of time are probably like me, older workers lacking some of the skills needed in today's market. However, we are the workers that are loyal, show up everyday on time, ready to work.
The fact that companies are allowed to look at the credit ratings of people that have been unemployed is ridiculous and should be illegal. Of course my credit rating is horrible, I was suddenly terminated without warning or provocation. I, like all the other people in my former company were let go because we made the most money.
If American companies have the ability to put people back to work the first candidates they should consider are the long term unemployed, they need the jobs the most.
11:00 AM on 02/16/2012
The fact of the matter is, companies do not care about their workers or what they are selling. Most of them only care for quarterly profits and their stock growth, esp. the larger corporations. Its all about the benjamins. I blame pop culture.
11:30 AM on 03/10/2012
This is very true, however we don't have a currnet corporate management base that doesn't have the mindset to think in numbers or use the most obvious denominators. America is in big trouble now and in the future.
06:52 PM on 02/15/2012
Your first problem is looking for a job in Illinois, the worst performing economy in the nation.
alunsulen
Digging the liberal hatred!
03:22 AM on 02/16/2012
LOL it's been a year since Illinois raised taxes. Doesn't seem to have helped the libs much :P
06:38 PM on 02/15/2012
I work for a permanent job placement organization. I can say that there is for sure an employer bias against long-term unemployed candidates. However, it's important to know that there are things that long-term unemployed individuals can do counter that bias. Here are just a few suggestions:

- Work temp jobs whenever possible (btw, 25% of temp jobs go permanent)
- Take continuing education/certification/designation courses and exams within your field
- Take general education (or in areas of personal interest) courses at local colleges or online.
- Volunteer your time to organizations and charities whose mission you support.
- Work on improvement projects around your home
- Teach yourself new skills or hobbies from information available online
- Other productive endeavors that you can engage in

The key is to keep yourself busy during your downtime - It improves your employment chances significantly and increases your level of confidence and self-worth. Most employers are reasonable and understand the difficulty in finding a job in this market. The above suggestions (or other ideas you come up with to manage your unemployed time productively) are responded to very positively by employers. It shows that you are motivated, interested in personal growth, and enjoy challenging yourself... and employers respond to that.
11:45 AM on 03/10/2012
Pete, but none of these have worked for me. I volunteer, I am fixing up my home (Currently For sale - dont know where i'm going after that ) , have spent alot of time furthering my education ( to no avail & a huge monetary loss) and am working on starting my own businesses. So far these haven't worked. Oh,well... but thank you for the tips. However,with so many former workers/homeowners living on the streets, I think this needs to be taken much more seriously.

Right now people are lving in cars, tents & on the streets. Really. I know a few personally and am headed there myself. I have NEVER been without a job in my life, most of the time working 2 jobs. I was with my last company for 13 yrs, so obviously I was not a bad employee.I simply do not deserved this.

Remember everyone is just one paycheck away from facing the same plight & unfortunately that may be what it takes to wake this country up. This is a very serious situation for this nation. Although, I appreciate the contribution of your ( and your peers) viewpoints, I am no longer humored by them. I think i can speak for everyone on this point. At this point in time we need to stop with the 'games & excuses' , which is what they are, and get America back to work..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
katocat
Dept. of Mousing & Purrin' Development
06:19 PM on 02/15/2012
IF anyone is unemployed in the Portland Oregon area and has customer service or computer experience, there is a company called "Stream Global" in Beaverton hiring for about 100 new positions.
04:35 PM on 02/15/2012
It doesn't really matter if any particular employer hire the unemployed or not. If the number of jobs is expanding, or people are retiring, then someone, somewhere is hiring the unemployed. They may get the less desirable jobs, but it the employed workforce is expanding, they will get some job.
01:57 PM on 02/15/2012
...but please, let's concentrate on the women's reproductive system and birth control because that is so much more important than jobs.
alunsulen
Digging the liberal hatred!
03:24 AM on 02/16/2012
Or just raise taxes like Illinois did a year ago. The libs there have dug themselves a nice hole :P
01:10 PM on 03/10/2012
They're going to have to raise taxes all over as there is a herd of us tax payers coming off the lists. I can hear the whining now...
photo
CSDofNM
I speak lolcat
01:48 PM on 02/15/2012
So much truth in this article, it is scary.

My wife was laid off two years ago, after the company she had worked at for 15 years was bought out by a bigger company and the decentralized office operations were consolidated at the new company's headquarters. No offer to move, they had all the people they needed, just laid off.

Being middle aged, even with good computer, office, and customer relations skills, she was on unemployment until the end of January. New Mexico then cut her off of benefits.

She has been diligently looking for work every week, going on interviews, taking tests, and filling out mind numbing online applications. Yet while our state is 3% less than the national rate, there are no jobs for her.

You try replacing the three thousand dollar a month hole her being laid off put in our budget, or the two thousand dollar a month hole being cut off of unemployment left us with, then explain what happened to all of our savings. Then tell her she is "lazy" and not looking for work.

Be sure to do it to her face so you can end up on the ground seeing stars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
06:00 AM on 02/16/2012
So your wife packs a mean punch, I guess. That sort of talk will get you exactly nowhere.
photo
CSDofNM
I speak lolcat
12:07 PM on 02/16/2012
If you want to lie about us, be prepared to do it like a man and to face the consequences.

Supporting the Republican't idea that people are out of work in a ruined economy (that they ruined) because they WANT TO BE is just a stupid thing to do.

Step up, if you believe what you say is true.
12:36 PM on 02/15/2012
As a small business owner, I guarantee you I would not hire any who is unemployed. Been there, done that, not again.
photo
TitaniumAvatar
Sinister yet Dexterous
12:44 PM on 02/15/2012
How kind of you to lump all the unemployed into the unworthy for employment category.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
06:00 AM on 02/16/2012
But that is his/her right as an employer, is it not?
alunsulen
Digging the liberal hatred!
01:12 PM on 02/15/2012
It may have been true in the 1990s when there were plenty of jobs and a lot of the unemployed were so by choice. But today, you'll find there are many more unemployed people and most of them are eager to work - they lost their jobs due to the economic downturn and weren't fired due to laziness. If you look at their resumes and interview a few of them, you can find really talented people willing to work at competitive pay.
11:54 AM on 03/10/2012
@ alunsulen... unfortunately this is the mindset that is out there. I'm sure it has nothing to do with HIS lack of skills in choosing an employee though. I also notice that none of these companies have the guts to show their names to America.
jerseyjoe99982002
less government means more in my pocket
12:16 PM on 02/15/2012
lets build the pipeline,and put some of these people back to work
photo
CSDofNM
I speak lolcat
01:56 PM on 02/15/2012
Let's build the pipeline if and only if it is the right thing to do.

Build a memorial to "The Runaways" if all you want to do is make jobs.

Better yet, fix our roads, bridges, and schools. Oh, wait. Obama support that, so you can't do what is right for the country, you have to do what is right for your party.
08:18 PM on 02/15/2012
Whaddaya mean, "let's"? I don't want any part of your pipeline. You want to build something, go do it, but don't presume to speak for me or spend my money on it.