iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dennis A. Henigan

GET UPDATES FROM Dennis A. Henigan
 

For the NRA, It's All About Fear

Posted: 05/04/11 01:47 PM ET

From all reports, at its annual convention last weekend in Pittsburgh, the National Rifle Association, as usual, cloaked itself in patriotic themes, claimed special kinship with the Founders, and portrayed itself as the true protector of American values. There was much talk of "freedom". More than anything else, however, the NRA gatherings are celebrations of fear.

The NRA is the most accomplished marketer of fear in American political life.

There is, first, the fear of imminent violent attack. I'm not talking about a healthy concern for personal and family security. The NRA, and its gun industry patrons, need average Americans to believe that the threat of attack is constant and pervasive; that we are at serious risk all the time and everywhere we go. It's not enough to have a gun in the home for self-defense; you need multiple guns throughout your home so you're never too far from your gun. It's not enough to carry a concealed weapon outside your home; the law must allow you to carry it virtually anywhere an attack might conceivably occur, into restaurants, bars, sports stadiums, community centers and churches.

Indeed, NRA Executive Director Wayne LaPierre devoted much of his convention speech to reciting statistics about our continuing violent crime problem (which is interesting, given the NRA's competing message that crime rates are down because states have made it easier to carry concealed weapons). According to the gun lobby, even our college campuses (with murder rates 44 times lower than the national rate) are sufficiently unsafe to justify forcing universities and colleges to allow concealed weapons on campus. Legislation to enact this absurd idea into law fortunately has failed 51 times in 27 states in recent years, the latest being Governor Jan Brewer's recent veto of NRA-supported legislation in Arizona.

Second, there is the fear of government. The flip-side of all the NRA's talk of freedom is that the government is an ever-present threat to our freedom. The NRA has long maintained that the Second Amendment is not primarily about allowing individuals to pursue hunting or the shooting sports, or even for personal self-defense, but rather to allow the armed citizenry to resist abuses of power by government officials. As an NRA lawyer once put it, "the founders sought to protect arms from government interference, because those same arms might be needed to protect the people from government." In the NRA's world, our freedoms ultimately are ensured not by the right to vote, or to peacefully protest government policies, or by an independent judiciary providing legal redress against government abuse, but rather by armed citizens, constantly on guard for any sign that the time for violent resistance has arrived. Tragically, some, like Timothy McVeigh, not only internalize the fear, but act on it.

Third, the NRA never stops promoting the fear that government prohibition of guns is looming behind every attempt to impose restrictions on firearms. Every proponent of sensible gun restrictions is labeled a "gun banner". Over and over again, the NRA invokes some version of the "slippery slope to confiscation" argument, as it did a number of years ago when it wrote of "the plan" which is "now obvious to all who would see: First Step, enact a nationwide firearms waiting period law. Second Step, when the waiting period doesn't reduce crime, and it won't, enact a nationwide registration law. Final Step, confiscate all the registered firearms." The group's fear-mongering seems undiminished by the Supreme Court's recognition of a constitutional right to have a gun in the home. After all, the Supreme Court is part of the government, and the government must be feared, not trusted.

On the eve of the convention, the Violence Policy Center issued a report suggesting that the NRA's fear tactics may be resonating with a declining percentage of Americans. VPC reported the latest figures from the General Social Survey conducted by the University of Chicago, showing that the incidence of household gun ownership is at its lowest since the Survey began measuring gun ownership in 1973. In 2010, only 32% of households reported having a gun in the home, a sharp drop from the peak figure of 54% in 1977.

This remarkable decline sharply contradicts NRA and gun industry propaganda, which uses every imagined threat to gun ownership to feed the story (dutifully reported by the media) that more and more Americans are buying guns while they still can. It is true that the gun lobby's fear tactics periodically create a spike in gun sales (as occurred after President Obama's election, for example), but it is now clear that, even during those spikes, the primary purchasers of those guns are people who already own guns. Thus, the number of guns owned by the average gun owner is increasing, while the percentage of households with guns continues to plummet. Despite the intermittent periods of gun-buying frenzy, it seems undeniable that more and more American households are deciding against gun ownership.

This is very good news for public health and safety. Research shows that a high rate of household gun ownership is associated with higher rates of accidental gun deaths, higher rates of suicide and gun suicide, and higher rates of homicide and gun homicide. The continuing national decline in gun ownership is unquestionably a lifesaving trend.

I have no doubt that the gun lobby will not deviate from its strategy of promoting guns through fear. I also have no doubt that fewer and fewer Americans are buying what the NRA is selling.

For more information, see Dennis Henigan's Lethal Logic: Exploding the Myths that Paralyze American Gun Policy (Potomac Books 2009).




 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,892
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
07:11 PM on 06/14/2011
Is it right to send young men and women to fight some battle overseas and hand them an M16, but when they come back they cannot protect their own?
11:32 AM on 05/17/2011
I do not understand what all the fear is about guns is here. Without them there would have been no free America as we know it today. Ever think why there are so many gun crimes in American? Maybe because only those who do not respect the law have them in thier possession why those who abide by the law do not have that right. Type in FBI statistics of states which allow law abiding citizens to conceal carry compared to in states which people who do not have that right and draw your own conclusion before attacking the Second Amendment and gun owner's rights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:58 PM on 05/11/2011
Dennis Henigan: ... "the percentage of households with guns continues to plummet. Despite the intermittent periods of gun-buying frenzy, it seems undeniable that more and more American households are deciding against gun ownership.

This is very good news for public health and safety. Research shows that a high rate of household gun ownership is associated with higher rates of accidental gun deaths, higher rates of suicide and gun suicide, and higher rates of homicide and gun homicide. The continuing national decline in gun ownership is unquestionably a lifesaving trend.

I have no doubt that the gun lobby will not deviate from its strategy of promoting guns through fear. I also have no doubt that fewer and fewer Americans are buying what the NRA is selling."


NPR Reports: Florida Bill Could Muzzle Doctors On Gun Safety

NRA lobbyists helped write a bill that largely bans health professionals from asking about guns. Hammer says she and other NRA members consider the questions an intrusion on their Second Amendment rights.

"This bill is about helping families who are complaining about being questioned about gun ownership, and the growing anti-gun political agenda being carried out in examination rooms by doctors and staffs," Hammer says.

It's not just questions in the examining room that lead the NRA to charge pediatricians with a political agenda. Out of concern for the high number of firearms injuries among children and adolescents, the American Academy of Pediatrics is also on record supporting gun control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
06:09 PM on 05/11/2011
Too bad sales figures and the research says that there are MANY new firearms owners--after the Heller and McDonald decisions--it is Dennis and Paulie that are fear mongering (namely that they will have to go out of business when Kali, Illinois, NY, NJ and Maryland have their bans on functional carry taken away)
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
10:09 PM on 05/11/2011
There is no reason for doctors to ask about firearms and they only recently began doing so. The Florida bill would not stop doctors from giving out information concerning firearms.

All the bill prohibits is:

1) Recording informatio­n about firearm ownership

2) Inquiring about firearm ownership

3) Discrimina­ting based on firearm ownership

4) Harassment about firearm ownership

5) Denying insurance coverage or increasing premiums due to firearm ownership
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
11:56 PM on 05/11/2011
OE==has DW ever gotten the relevant facts correct in ANY discussion?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 AM on 05/14/2011
The NRA insinuates itself between the doctor and her patient.

Your comment/list is totally fallacious: another example of fakery.

The NRA wrote a bill for the Florida legislature that would make a doctor a felon for asking if a child's home had guns and if they were safely stored. For that question: 5 years prison or $5million fine. It was outrageous.

Doctors ask questions about safety measures when using bikes, pools, autos, guns in the home. They care about the health of our children and their families. That's what they do! Apparently, most manufacturers also care about family safety.

Not the gun industry. Selling guns is profitable -- no questions asked either at the time of sale or later in the doctor's office. What happens in all the ERs across our nation? Soon, the medical staff will mend bullet wounds, but no questions asked?

The NRA is running scared.
The bill will not become law the way the NRA wrote it. Ms. Hammer, former NRA president. But it may still present enough of an obstacle that a doctor may not adequately ascertain gun safety measures in the home, which could help save lives.

* 112 unintentional firearm related deaths in 2007, making it one of the top 10 leading causes of unintentional injury death in kids, according to the latest numbers from the CDC.

The NRA loses support once again for outrages such as this.
04:50 AM on 05/10/2011
The NRA endangers our freedom, They promote fear to destabilize society, How are they different from a terrorist group?
02:49 PM on 05/10/2011
How is your rhetoric different from propaganda?
02:51 PM on 05/10/2011
A clearcut example of radical fearmonfgering:

"The NRA endangers our freedom, They promote fear to destabiliz­e society, How are they different from a terrorist group? "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
12:18 PM on 05/09/2011
"One cannot legislate the maniacs off the street... these maniacs can only be shut down by an armed citizenry. Indeed bad things can happen in nations where the citizenry is armed, but not as bad as those which seem to be threatening our disarmed citizenry in this country at this time."
"Owning a handgun doesn't make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician."
"The police cannot protect the citizen at this stage of our development, and they cannot even protect themselves in many cases. It is up to the private citizen to protect himself and his family, and this is not only acceptable, but mandatory."
"Hoplophobia is a mental disturbance characterized by irrational aversion to weapons, as opposed to justified apprehension about those who may wield them."

-Jeff Cooper
04:32 AM on 05/10/2011
30,000 Americans being killed by gun use yearly, thanks to the NRA promoting gun proliferation. Our freedom is being diluted by fear. Owning a guitar doesn't make you a musician, owning a gun doesn't make you Rambo. Hoarding guns gives the illusion of safety.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
09:07 AM on 05/10/2011
Owning a gun and being an NRA member is not being a mass murderer...
02:52 PM on 05/10/2011
"30,000 Americans being killed by gun use yearly, thanks to the NRA promoting gun proliferat­ion."

Go ahead and try to substantiate this statement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
11:58 AM on 05/09/2011
Ban all high-capacity magazines. Timothy McVeigh wouldn't have been able to kill so many people if they were illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
01:49 PM on 05/09/2011
Is your "school" giving extra credit for being on a blog and posting gun proliferation comments during "school" time? Possibly home-schooled.....just asking.......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
06:20 PM on 05/11/2011
he does point out the futility of banning standard magazines--whatever number you want civilians to be limited to, LEOs should be restricted to for a trial period of 20 years FIRST
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
06:49 PM on 05/11/2011
how about some factual evidence instead of insulting snark E45
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:28 AM on 05/09/2011
The NRA has gone from a sportsmen's hunting lobby to the paramilitary arm of the extreme right wing. The door has been closed on their bunker for quite some time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
11:20 AM on 05/09/2011
Thanks to the work of the NRA iconic Harlon Carter...himself tried for murder before he left his teen years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
12:19 PM on 05/09/2011
And obviously not found guilty so that is irrelevant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
11:50 AM on 05/09/2011
Nothing paranoid about that statement... It sounds like a giant conspiracy man... The NRA is out to get me because somehow I matter more than the people in power.... That's it man....
photo
TexasTreader
Fluffy, the yard dog
10:24 AM on 05/09/2011
Here's something I don't get: Why are libs so doinked over fully automatic firearms? As a vet, I've got as much experience as anyone with these and they're notoriously unreliable. Besides jamming and overheating, you run out of rounds quickly with a huge majority of them missing their mark. It takes expensive training and experience to be even minimally effective with them. Even then, you stick out like a h00k er at a church social when you carry them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
11:48 AM on 05/09/2011
Well some of the antis are saying that a semiauto is more dangerous then a machine gun because they fire slower and can be aimed more precisely.. That led me to inquire why they do not advocate banning single shot weapons seeing they fire even slower then semi autos and generally much more accurately. My final take is that maybe they think we should legalize full auto because fewer people would be killed according to them...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ElmCreekSmith
I hunt the things that go bump in the night.
04:30 PM on 05/16/2011
One of the favorite tactics of their tools in the media is discussing semiautomatics and "high-capacity clips" while showing full automatic weapons firing, a tactic right out of Josh Sugarmann's play book.

ECS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
12:28 PM on 05/09/2011
It's not "libs." It's grabbers.

I'm a liberal. I support the Second Amendment.

Helmke, the Brady family, and Bloomberg are Republicans. They don't support the Second Amendment.
04:25 AM on 05/10/2011
The 2nd states "a well regulated militia", not hoarding guns for personal pleasure
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
08:28 AM on 05/09/2011
Just read a short blurb in the local newspaper this morning that, during a visitation for a gunshot victim, one of those in attendance at the mortuary was shot in the leg from a concealed weapon he had somewhere around his ankle.
08:47 AM on 05/09/2011
Citation please
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
08:58 AM on 05/09/2011
Lexington, Ky Herald-Leader......this morning....May 9, 2011.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ElmCreekSmith
I hunt the things that go bump in the night.
04:46 PM on 05/16/2011
http://www.wlky.com/r/27825643/detail.html

Actually it was a 17 year old carrying a .22 pistol in his pants in the parking lot of a Baptist church for a friend's funeral. His friend was "gunned down" in Lexington the previous week. Sounds like a gang-banger since it is illegal for 17 year old "children" can't get concealed carry licenses or even own handguns. No mention of an ankle holster.

http://www.kentucky.com/2011/05/03/1728016/sister-describes-lexington-shooting.html


"Although he looked rough, he was not the gang-banging type," Gerton said. "He always fought fair. He never used a gun on anyone."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
10:24 PM on 05/08/2011
Has it occurred to anyone that the reason only 100 million americans legally own weapons is that because those are the only ones legally qualified?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:44 AM on 05/09/2011
Are unreported wife abusers, untreated alcoholics, and drug addicts who claim otherwise on their background check paperwork included in that figure? Just wondering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
09:51 AM on 05/09/2011
You mean people who you cannot tell are actually doing something wrong without putting a camera in their houses???
04:48 PM on 05/09/2011
According to Wright Rossi study most men who kill their partners don't use firearms
09:25 PM on 05/08/2011
Like the abortion issue a lot of people are dependent upon the gun issue to make a living. Keep guns out of the hands of crazy people and don't allow the sale of fully automatic and military weaponry to the general public. Otherwise, enjoy your arsenal.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
09:38 PM on 05/08/2011
Full-autos are already very strictly controlled.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:05 AM on 05/09/2011
And, as we know, are not as effectively lethal as semi-automatics, which, on the other hand, can be bought at any gun show, for cash, without any restrictions or documentation whatsoever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:33 AM on 05/09/2011
What is the criteria for a class three permit? Is the background check so draconian that it could't be applied to other weapons as a standard?
05:54 PM on 05/08/2011
It is always better to have a gun and not need it, than it is to need a gun and not have it.
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
06:33 PM on 05/08/2011
Given the thousands of people, including children, killed each year by accident or out of anger or for some other reason in situations where absolutely nobody "needed a gun," you comment rings pretty silly.
07:15 PM on 05/08/2011
Given the fact that that thousands of children drown every year in swimming pools that nobody needs-your statement is silly. Not to mention knifings, clubbings, etc. You also ignore the 2 million or more times a year a crime is prevented by legal use of guns (Kleck, Howard Nemerov, John Lott, Migel Faria MD)
07:34 PM on 05/08/2011
Silly until a situation happens where a gun is your only means of survival or defense. How many are saved when an officer with a gun that is carried "in case of need" is called.
Smoke detectors and fire extinguishers are in the same light, you may never need them but it gives one a peace of mind knowing they are prepared for that time when your or someones elses life may depend on it.
05:49 PM on 05/08/2011
I know I will catch some flack for this, but, oh well, if everyone (except mentally ill and children) owned guns then people would respect each other more. Criminals would be fearful of attacking a person if the criminals know that a person was armed, how many times have you heard of a police car being car jacked or a officer being mugged in uniform, why not?, criminals know officers are armed. Is that not the reason you call police in the first place, to have an armed person come to protect you.
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
07:35 PM on 05/08/2011
"An armed society is a polite society"
photo
molly29451
The absence of proof isn't the absence of truth
08:52 PM on 05/08/2011
You won't catch flack with me. Bring back the Wild, Wild West. If everyone was armed, would-be perps would think twice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:16 AM on 05/09/2011
Criminals open fire on each other by the hundreds every day, in full knowledge that their opponent is armed. Do you think that they will be dissuaded from doing so if faced with the prospect of return fire from armed librarians or accountants?
05:42 PM on 05/08/2011
Gun bans benefit the money grbbing security system companies, greedy guard dog breeders, electric fence makers and others who make $$$$ when private citiznes are disarmed and have to rely on other means for self-defense
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
05:51 PM on 05/08/2011
Other means being they buy a gun even when banned. Much like chicago. Who here thinks that just because guns were nearly banned there that nobody had any even otherwise law abiding citizens...
08:31 PM on 05/08/2011
I agree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eljefefx
05:31 PM on 05/08/2011
Couldn't find anything original to type, Dennis?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaddeus Carpenter
Whiff of Grapeshot
05:52 PM on 05/08/2011
He does like to parrot...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
05:53 PM on 05/08/2011
I can not remember the last time a poster from the BC/VPC/CSGV/MAIG/LCAV put up an original post that bore any relationship to the truth
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:50 AM on 05/09/2011
True enough. Why can't those gun grabbers come up with something more original, you know, something along the lines of, "An armed society is a polite society", or "I'd rather have a gun and not need it, than need a gun and not have it"?