iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Derrick Kitts

GET UPDATES FROM Derrick Kitts
 

"Oregon, Oregon, Oregon"

Posted: 07/05/2012 2:41 pm

"Oregon, Oregon, Oregon." Yes, you read that right... Oregon. Tim Russert famously boiled the 2000 presidential contest between George W. Bush and Al Gore to "Florida, Florida, Florida" but believe it or not, 2012 is shaping up to be all about the Beaver State.

The fact is, most states are already slotted into predetermined red or blue columns. The "swing" states that pundits always talk about are virtually non-existent. Hence, the presidential candidates must look beyond the usual suspects in order to secure the required 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency. As such, I say, "Go West, young man." Oregon is rich with electoral opportunity.

Forget Ohio. Obama will win there. Governor Kasich has plummeting poll numbers reaching near 50% disapproval in the latest PPP poll. Combining sagging poll numbers with the likely reelection of Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown and Romney's position on the auto bailout, Ohio seems likely to kick Romney off his path to the White House. Not to mention The Buckeye State cannot be fond of a person claiming to be a native son of rival Michigan.

Forget Pennsylvania. Obama will win there too. The GOP candidate has lost The Keystone State in the last five presidential contests. With no compelling reason for Pennsylvania voters to buck this trend, and Senator Bob Casey facing minimal opposition, the pro-life Catholic swing votes will not be enough to tip the scales in favor of the pro-life Romney.

Nevada is always a gamble. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid survived a close reelection scare in 2010 in the face of the Tea Party and GOP landslide. Thus proving that Nevadans refuse to simply elect a person for the mere reason their name appears on a ballot. In 2010 the voters of Nevada chose Republican Brian Sandoval, the first Hispanic governor elected in Nevada, over the son of Senate Majority Leader Reid. The GOP further strengthened their position in Nevada, forcing the resignation of Senator John Ensign prior to his reelection bid; instead appointing a well-known face to Nevada politics in Dean Heller. Heller has been elected statewide (3 times) and is up for reelection in 2012. With the GOP governor campaigning full time, combined with the tremendous amounts of money the popular Heller will bring into the state to fund his well-oiled get out the vote (GOTV) machine, and the high Mormon population (4th highest as a percentage with 7.4%), it appears as though the odds favor Romney.

North Carolina goes Romney. Despite Charlotte playing host to the Democratic National Convention, Obama has upset his base in the Tar Heel state. With North Carolinians overwhelmingly supporting a gay marriage ban with 61% of the vote, the president showed political courage, rebuking the election results by coming out publicly one day after the successful constitutional ban in support of gay marriage. The president and his reelection team committed a political fumble. Obama should have shored up his political support nationwide with his position on the issue of gay marriage. Instead, the president sent a message to political allies in states like North Carolina that he is with them. The problem is that, his message arrived a day late. Furthermore, his position on the issue puts him at odds with a very evangelical and a very motivated 61% of NC voters. In other bad news for the president, the open NC governor race is trending heavily in favor of the GOP candidate. For these reasons, NC will swing red and Romney will win.

Colorado is trending blue and staying blue, Obama wins. With two incumbent Democratic U.S. Senators and not a single targeted congressional seat in the fall the momentum and ground game are clearly advantage Obama.

Wisconsin has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1984; 2012 will be no different. Obama wins. The recent failed recall effort of Governor Scott Walker should not be indicative of a pro-GOP trend. Walker's victory was recall is evidence the people of Wisconsin do not want democracy by recall. Because Wisconsin's primary election is held so late (August 14) whoever emerges out of the GOP primary (Democrats have united behind former Representative Tammy Baldwin) could be damaged with little time to reinvent themselves and raise the funds necessary to be competitive in the fall. Should the GOP nominate former Governor Tommy Thompson combined with the popularity of Representative Paul Ryan amongst the GOP base, Wisconsin could be in one of the most pivotal states in 2012. Obama should win, but he cannot take the Badger State for granted.

Iowa goes to Romney. The GOP in Iowa is highly motivated, evidenced by Rick Santorum's surprising caucus victory. With popular Governor Terry Branstad back in the governor's mansion and not a single notable congressional or senate race in the fall, The Hawkeye State will be tough sledding for the president.

Missouri, like Wisconsin, is tough to call. However, with most recent polls suggesting Missouri voters are poised to unseat incumbent Senator Claire McCaskill, the battle boils down to the GOTV effort on the ground. Hence, should the senator lose, Obama will likely lose as well. The vulnerability of the president in Missouri is further evidenced by the fact Senator McCaskill recently indicated she will not participate in the Democratic Convention in September. Crossroads is playing heavily in The Independence Show Me State, hence Crossroads and Romney win Missouri.

Michigan goes for Obama. The "My father was governor" argument for Romney does not translate to victory come November. Romney's position on the auto bailout will come back to haunt him in November. Blue collar union voters, combined with the president's African American constituency, make Michigan a tough road to hoe for Romney. Ask John McCain just how tough Michigan can be. Senator Debbie Stabenow appears set for an easy victory in the fall as well.

The Sunshine State is not so bright sunny for Mitt Romney. The GOP is slogging through a tough primary election. Waiting in the wings is U.S. Senator Bill Nelson. Nelson lacks the charisma, pizzazz and charm of most Southern politicians. However, Nelson possesses the intelligence and work ethic required to do the job. Nelson's lack of campaign charisma may impede his ability to motivate the base, combined with the president's struggling with some in the Jewish community over his position on Israel, may prove to be a fatal weakness. Popular former governor and conservative favorite Jeb Bush and current Senator and conservative darling Marco Rubio are often tossed about as VP choices... duh. Both Bush and Rubio provide inroads to a much needed Hispanic community; however, one has said NO and the other may not be ready for primetime (can you say 'Sarah'?). In the end, the Sunshine State will be close, but in the end, not Florida, Florida, Florida, but Romney, Romney, Romney.

New Hampshire, yet another of Romney's "home" states, should go to him. George W. Bush was the last Republican to win the Granite State in 2000. However, the president's recent polling numbers show him struggling against Mitt Romney. New Hampshire voters gravitated toward Romney early on, giving him a resounding 39% victory in the primary election. Popular Senator Kelly Ayotte has been mentioned as a potential VP candidate to Romney. Obviously Romney is well aware of how important the four granite electoral votes will be come November. Romney wins.

Virginia is critical to a Romney victory in November. George Allen and Tim Kaine are locked in a dead heat for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Senator Jim Webb. In 2004, George W. Bush won 9 of 11 congressional districts. Virginia has voted Republican every year since 1952 with the exception of the 1964 trouncing and the Obama victory in 2008. Virginia 2008 was historic for the president, not the start of a blue trend. Allen wins the Senate seat and Romney squeaks out a victory as well.

And then there's Oregon....

In 1966 Oregon saw the election of Republican Senator Mark Hatfield. And for the next 42 years Oregon maintained a Republican presence in the U.S. Senate until the defeat of Senator Gordon Smith in the Democratic sweep of 2008. From 1968-1984 Oregon voted Republican for president. 1984 also saw the last election of a GOP governor. However, the 2000 presidential election showed a resurgence of GOP strength as Oregon went for Al Gore... by less than 1%!

The 2008 U.S. Senate election between Gordon Smith and Jeff Merkley was not decided until three days after the election with Democrat Jeff Merkley squeaking out a victory fueled primarily by absentee vote returns. The 2010 governor's race between GOP political newcomer Chris Dudley and former two-term Democratic Governor John Kitzhaber again saw a GOP election night victory evaporate with the counting of absentee voter ballots five days after the election. A superior GOTV effort by the Oregon Democrats (note to Romney) dismantled the GOP victory in both elections.

Oregon in 2012 will showcase a grassroots battle that could determine the presidential outcome. With the Oregon House of Representatives deadlocked at 30-30, the GOP is clamoring to regain control of the chamber they held until the Democratic landslide of 2006. Also in 2012, Oregon voters will see neither a race for senate or governor nor the money that goes with such elections for Party GOTV efforts. Furthermore, all five congressional districts seem locked in to reelect the incumbent due to a lack of credible challengers fielded by either side.

However, Oregon will see two statewide races, one partisan and one non-partisan: Secretary of State (SoS) and Bureau of Labor and Industry (BOLI). The SoS race features incumbent Democrat Kate Brown pitted against political newcomer Knute Bueller. Brown has had her share of political controversies, painting her as a partisan warrior in an increasingly independent-minded state. This race will be one to watch. The race for BOLI is very interesting; BOLI is a non-partisan position with two seasoned political veterans squaring off in Democrat Brad Avakian and GOP Senator Bruce Starr. Two current polls show Republican Starr leading the Democrat Avakian.

With such innocuous races for the Oregon legislature and an under the radar non-partisan race for statewide office, Oregon is the sleeper state up for grabs in 2012. The president's numbers are below 50% in a state he won by 17% in 2008. For these reasons, Oregon will prove to be the decider of the 2012 presidential election. Should such results prove accurate, the electoral count would stand at Obama 267 to Romney 264.

Go West, young man, go West!

Kitts is a former Oregon State Representative and House Majority Whip. Kitts was the 2006 GOP nominee in Oregon's First Congressional District. Currently he resides in New York City and works for msnbc.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
"Oregon, Oregon, Oregon." Yes, you read that right... Oregon. Tim Russert famously boiled the 2000 presidential contest between George W. Bush and Al Gore to "Florida, Florida, Florida" but believe ...
"Oregon, Oregon, Oregon." Yes, you read that right... Oregon. Tim Russert famously boiled the 2000 presidential contest between George W. Bush and Al Gore to "Florida, Florida, Florida" but believe ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:17 PM on 07/06/2012
This election is about SCOTUS seats. Antonin Scalia age 76. Anthony Kennedy age 76. Ruth Bader Ginsburg age 79. This is an opportunity to get money out of politics once and for all. We need to repeal Citizen's United and put people back into politics, not corporations. America needs publicly funded elections.
01:06 PM on 07/06/2012
A survey of Oregon voters showed 76% overall support for a national popular vote for President.
Support was 82% among Democrats, 70% among Republicans, and 72% among independents.
By age, support was 67% among 18-29 year olds, 68% among 30-45 year olds, 82% among 46-65 year olds, and 76% for those older than 65.
By gender, support was 81% among women and 71% among men.

Most Americans don't care whether their presidential candidate wins or loses in their state. . . they care whether he/she wins the White House. Voters want to know, that even if they were on the losing side, their vote actually was directly and equally counted and mattered to their candidate. Most Americans think it's wrong for the candidate with the most popular votes to lose. We don't allow this in any other election in our representative republic.

NationalPopularVote
01:05 PM on 07/06/2012
In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state. Support for a national popular vote is strong among Rs, Ds, and Independent voters in closely divided states: CO – 68%, FL – 78%, IA 75%, MI – 73%, MO – 70%, NH – 69%, NV – 72%, NM– 76%, NC – 74%, OH – 70%, PA – 78%, VA – 74%, and WI – 71%; in Small states: AK – 70%, DC – 76%, DE – 75%, ID – 77%, ME – 77%, MT – 72%, NE 74%, NH – 69%, NV – 72%, NM – 76%, OK – 81%, RI – 74%, SD – 71%, UT – 70%, VT – 75%, WV – 81%, and WY – 69%; in Southern and Border states: AR – 80%,, KY- 80%, MS – 77%, MO – 70%, NC – 74%, OK – 81%, SC – 71%, TN – 83%, VA – 74%, and WV – 81%; and in other states polled: AZ – 67%, CA – 70%, CT – 74%, MA – 73%, MN – 75%, NY – 79%, OR – 76%, and WA – 77%.

NationalPopularVote
01:00 PM on 07/06/2012
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country.

The National Popular Vote bill changes the way electoral votes are awarded by states in the Electoral College, instead of the current 48 state-by-state winner-take-all system (not mentioned in the Constitution, but since enacted by states).

Under National Popular Vote, every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in every election. Every vote would be included in the state counts and national count. The candidate with the most popular votes in the country would get the 270+ electoral votes from the enacting states. That guarantees the candidate with the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC wins the presidency.

The bill uses the power given to each state in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for President. Historically, virtually all of the major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have been by state legislative action.

The bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers in 21 states (including OR). The bill has been enacted by 9 jurisdictions possessing 132 electoral votes - 49% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.

NationalPopularVote
Follow National Popular Vote on Facebook via nationalpopularvoteinc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nopinky
11:48 AM on 07/06/2012
The issue is that Oregon isn't really one state. There's the metro area which is solidly blue-to-progressive and where most of the people live, but the rest of the state is still pretty cowboy christian-to-libertarian. The "deadlock" and "tension" is really just the balance of these two voices being heard in one state. Instead of studying the trends and imagining the implications, maybe what pundits and politicians should do is consider how Oregon frames the real intent of the founders in designing Congress. It's about cooling impulses and balancing goals by giving everyone a voice. This isn't conflict - it's American government on display. If candidates want to run a country of differing opinions, they need to be able to represent all of us - something that's been lost in the partisan Red Rover of late. That may be the best lesson of Oregon ... learn how to talk to ALL of us - not just Portland or Vale. Stop running numbers and charts and TALK to us! Or better yet, listen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro Ă© agora.
10:28 AM on 07/06/2012
When did Oregon last go for a Republican president? McCain? Bush?

Look, you are twisting yourself in pretzels trying to justify this view. You really are just slamming the good people of Oregon in doing so.

Bush's policies led to the great recession. Romney's policies are the Bush policies on steroids. You really think Oregon is going to vote for the Great Depression? Please.
08:20 AM on 07/06/2012
Well gee.....
That was a fun little article.......
Utterly unrelated to reality, of course
But still fun...thanx for playing!
TM Eugene
07:29 AM on 07/06/2012
"The Beaver State."

Heh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt Mundt
Interesting world we live in, eh?
05:00 AM on 07/06/2012
When Mr. Obama campaigned here, it was a public event that drew 70,000 people. Mr. Romney has been here just once, for a private fundraiser that drew more protesters than it did donations. Mr. Romney is not popular here, and there are too few republicans. The Bus's called Portland "Little Beirut" - neither one was especially welcome in Portland. The state is kind of pinkish - red over the Cascades, but blue in the Willamette Valley, where most of the voters live The better bet is for the President, not some 1%er.
overcat
My micro-bio is so full, it's bursting at the seam
02:54 AM on 07/06/2012
So far off the mark it's laughable.

A republican expressing his wishful thinking.

Oregon votes by mail, there are no "absentee ballots", except for perhaps those of people in military service, but even those are all mailed in JUST LIKE ALL OREGON BALLOTS.

A pathetic twit like Romney hasn't got a prayer in Oregon. Oregon republicans, for the most part, aren't like most republicans in other parts of the country.

Oregon will go for President Obama this November.
02:17 AM on 07/06/2012
Yeh, well so much for speculating there you faux hack.
You couldn't be further from reality on Heller from NV and certainly Oregon.
Iowa is another state you're hoping this article will help sway. Won't happen, elephant breath.
So go bury your head in the sand of a red state and come up with something more likely. Ah, yeh, since the fires are burning up the red states, be careful, you might get burned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Shaun Alexander
12:12 AM on 07/06/2012
I don't agree with this article generally speaking, but it is rather nice to have the spotlight swung off of the "usual suspects."
11:53 PM on 07/05/2012
As an Oregonian for the past 33 years, who lives on the far east side (conservative) and who works on the west side (liberal) I can tell you categorically that Obama will easily win Oregon. Independents here are sour on Obama for not delivering on many of his campaign promises, but will never vote for Romney. The progressive base is huge in numbers on the west side and will come out in support for Obama, although many will hold their noses when they fill in their ballot for Obama. The conservative from the east side of the state are more libertarian than republican, with no love for Wall St. banksters like Romney and his billionaire sponsors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GoldwaterKid
Vote Person, Not Party
11:53 PM on 07/05/2012
Senator Wyden from Oregon is making both sides of politics talk about issues they don't want to talk about.

He is doing a great job of showing what being a member of Congress who thinks and acts without partisanship being more important than the issues.

Southern Oregon has been coming back to the GOP for many years and he knows it.
04:46 AM on 07/06/2012
Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, sure. Romney, no way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WestSeattle8
O futuro Ă© agora.
10:34 AM on 07/06/2012
I kind of liked Wyden. Until he voted for the Paul Ryan budget disaster.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 PM on 07/05/2012
Reality check.
It would be nice for The GOP to spend millions in Oregon. It would change nothing, but put a little more money into circulation here.The GOP has as much chance of winning any national seat here as the Democrats do of sweeping Mississippi.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt Mundt
Interesting world we live in, eh?
05:06 AM on 07/06/2012
We'll take the money and the national news spotlight, but Romney has no chance here at all.