More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dexter Rogers

Dexter Rogers

Posted: September 15, 2010 03:18 PM

Reggie Bush has decided to give his Heisman Trophy back in light of the anticipated meeting of the Heisman Trust. It's been widely speculated the Heisman Trust would strip Bush of his 2005 award. I guess he decided to give up his trophy rather than have it taken away.

Bush issued the following, "Each individual carries the legacy of the award and each one is entrusted with its good name. It is for these reasons that I have made the difficult decision to forfeit my title as Heisman winner of 2005."

Bush should have kept his Heisman Trophy.

That's right.

He should keep his Heisman Trophy because he earned it.

If Bush was forced to give up his Heisman Trophy then former USC head coach Pete Carroll, former Athletic Director Mike Garrett, and the university President should have to forfeit their salaries for 2005.

Furthermore, every dime USC made off selling Bush's jersey and the money they generated from ticket sales in 2005 should be forfeited as well.

Those funds can be utilized as seed money to set up a fund to provide collegiate athletes with a monthly stipend from here on end.

Meanwhile Carroll stated, "It is my hope that this situation serves as a teachable moment to all involved, especially for the young athletes and university and high school administrators of tomorrow."

Give me a break.

Don't fall for the mainstream media drama folks. Look beyond what's being reported and see what's really transpiring here: Bush has been unfairly targeted to draw individual attention to him while keeping the spotlight off those on whom it should shine.

Just because Carroll wins his first game with the Seattle Seahawks and issues a bogus statement about a "teachable moment" means he's exempt from blame?

Just because Mike Garrett resigned as the Athletic Director means he's doesn't get mentioned anymore in the media?

Then there's the USC president and the NCAA. They have wiped their hands clean of this mess and Bush is being utilized as the towel. He's being portrayed as the poster-boy for cheating while the real cheaters escape discipline or sanctions.

Bottom line: College athletes should be paid.

If players were paid perhaps athletes like Bush wouldn't have to be on the take. Perhaps if athletes like Bush were shown some appreciation for generating the revenue to pay the likes of Texas Longhorn coach Mack Brown $5 million dollars per season to coach this situation wouldn't be such a big deal.

The NCAA is a mirror image of the historical legacy of the judicial system in America: Throughout its existence the American legal system had been substantially more hypocritical than it has been just towards the oppressed, particularly African-Americans.

In society, African-Americans historically have been the recipients of inequitable justice beginning with the rise of American slavery. In the realm of American sport the some holds true but in this particular case I believe all collegiate athletes are treated like slaves.

Athletes are expected to work their collective butts off to generate billions of dollars in revenue yet are not compensated. That is why athletes like Bush are made examples of so the real crooks can camouflage the real problems with the current system.

Those who hold power positions in collegiate athletics are given a pass while the athletes aren't.

How can Kentucky head coach John Calipari have two Final Four appearances wiped off the books and escape any type of discipline?

How can Louisville head coach Rick Pitino bring shame to himself and the university by having sex outside his marriage in a public restaurant, go to trial and testify about his behavior yet not sanctioned?

But there's Dez Bryant who has a meal with Deion Sanders and lies about it out of fear. Then the NCAA strips him of his Junior eligibility at Oklahoma State.

Last week University of Georgia wide receiver A.J. Green was suspended for four games by the NCAA for selling his bowl game jersey for $1,000 dollars.

It is fine for others to profit from Green's talents and jersey but not him?Please.

I also fault the media for aiding in socially engineering the public from what's really going on. The mainstream media, more recently Yahoo Sports, created the atmosphere necessary for Bush to be targeted. They released a recent story that, in my opinion, forced Bush to relinquish his trophy.

Slice the pie as you wish whether Bush was on the take or not he was the best player in the country in 2005. Whether he was on the take or not he still would have been taken very high in the NFL draft.

So why does the NCAA, mainstream media and USC continually attempt to damage Bush's reputation?

The latter entities meticulously work together to create a dark cloud around Bush to divert the public from focusing on the real problems that reside in collegiate athletics.

Like always, I will keep it real. If it was me and I had the opportunity to take money that could help my family I'd likely be on the take it like Bush. I would grow weary of seeing my jerseys worn, fans coming to see me perform while USC earns millions of dollars per game and I receive nothing.

I would grow weary of seeing my head coach living in a beach house on scenic Malibu while making millions of dollars and I receive nothing but a series of four one-year contracts called an athletic scholarship.

The NCAA by definition is a Non-For-Profit entity but we all know they are raking in billions of dollars.

Where does the money go?

We know the athletes aren't getting paid but the universities, coaches, and conference commissioners are all rich yet the most integral part of the athletic experience are kept from getting money.

Hypocrisy at it's finest.

Bush should issue a statement outlining why he was on the take. He should use his platform to talk about that big elephant in the room everyone seemingly wants to ignore.

As I stated before, look beyond the fact Bush was forced to give back his Heisman Trophy: Look at why he and many other collegiate athletes over time were on the take. More importantly look at how the NCAA operates on an antiquated system that needs to be revamped.

Pay the athletes.

Email Dexter directly and follow him on Twitter. Please read about Sports & More from Dexter. For Media Requests please contact Public Relations.

 

Follow Dexter Rogers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DextersVPoint

 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doughnut70
11:25 PM on 09/15/2010
You still miss the key point. If college athletes were paid, no one would go to their games. It would be just like minor league baseball. Fan's wouldn't care. The reason people show up for college games is that they think they are watching full time students who are playing in their spare time. This of course isn't true, but what really needs to happen is for the rules limiting practice time etc. to be enforced to that players can be real students and enjoy the benefits of a free education. If you want to start a football league where you pay the players, go right ahead. But if you want the team to be a part of a student's college experience, you cant do that.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dexter Rogers
12:25 AM on 09/16/2010
They can be paid. All the NCAA has to do is ration out a portion of the money they make and set it aside for the athletes. Football and basketball players will get more because they do more. Tie in a designated stipend amount to their scholarship. It's not hard. It's a matter of doing the right thing.
05:13 PM on 09/15/2010
Where does the money go? Why is this hard for people to understand... There are only 2 revenue sports, football and basketball. Where do you think the money comes from to pay for scholarships for women's track? Softball? Gymnastics? Water polo? Diving? ANY other sport? Not only are there thousands of scholarships offered each year to non-revenue producing athletes, but hundreds of postgraduate scholarships offered to student athletes who excelled in academics. All of these are paid for by the revenue distributions of the NCAA. Yes, the administrators overseeing billions of dollars and thousands of institutions, as well as those responsible for coaching the sports that bring in the revenue, are all making a lot of money. How is that unfair? They have an enormous responsibility.

If you want Reggie Bush to get paid, you have to realize that someone hoping going to college to play tennis just lost a scholarship. But I'm sure that's fair... The NCAA promotes Reggie Bush and he makes millions before playing a down because of the branding he received for free by the NCAA. But it isn't enough. Someone who will graduate and take an entry level job making $35k should lose their scholarship to make sure Reggie has incentive to follow the rules.