EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Diane Dimond

Diane Dimond

Posted: February 22, 2010 05:08 PM

Blowback For a Whistleblower

What's Your Reaction:

What would you do if your boss began to do questionable, maybe even criminal, things? Would your paycheck be at the top of your mind or would you call the authorities? What if you worked for a politician and you knew he or she was doing something wrong. Would you speak out?

Such was the dilemma for an impressionable young man named Andrew Young who worked for former North Carolina Senator John Edwards. While he believed passionately in his boss's political message, he allowed his loyalty to temporarily blind him. Young admits he did things for Edwards which he now regrets. Some of those things came to the attention of a federal grand jury investigating how Senator Edwards spent campaign money and Young was called to testify.

After dutifully serving the Senator for more than a decade Young has written a book that not only tears back the covers on a flagrantly unfaithful John Edwards it also shines a white hot light on the type of candidate often attracted to our nation's top offices: arrogant, devoid of character and supremely charming.

Young's book, "The Politician" reveals the ugly truth about how presidential politics works, especially how campaign fundraising - both on and off the books - drenches a candidate in so much money it's almost simple for them to spend it on things they shouldn't.

In Edward's case it appears he spent plenty on his mistress and their baby.

Young says he wrote the book to clear his reputation and to make up for two years of unemployment. During that time, he says, John and Elizabeth Edwards sabotaged his job opportunities, blamed him for their strained marriage and John's failed 2008 presidential bid.

The truth? John Edwards never had a chance in the race for the White House. He ran a deeply flawed and distracted campaign. As a wealthy man he lacked credibility when he preached about "the two Americas," the poor vs. the rich. He was eliminated in the primaries.

Now we know what diverted the Senator's attention. Young's book reveals a torrid affair Edwards was conducting with a staffer named Rielle Hunter. Young participated in keeping the steamy secret, hiding a pregnant Hunter from the media (and Elizabeth) by moving her to various clandestine locations. Remarkably, Young and his devoted wife, Cheri, even caved to the Senator's request for Andrew to claim paternity of the baby.

Among the book's most fascinating claims is how the Senator used government paid aides to do so many personal tasks. Washington staffers were once used, Young writes, to load furniture and personal items into a truck he drove to North Carolina. Elizabeth often gave Young lengthy lists of chores like helping to build and furnish the Edward's new mansion, buying their children's Christmas presents or changing light bulbs in the Edward's beach house. And Young was expected to make sure there was always chilled Chardonnay in the pick-up vehicle for the Senator to sip.

As for funding "Operation Hide Hunter" Young's book details how massive amounts of cash, travel and housing from wealthy donors was used to keep Mistress Rielle in credit cards and luxury residences. Evidently, Edwards didn't pay a personal penny toward that. His cancer stricken wife Elizabeth, reportedly, kept too close a watch on their personal accounts for that to happen.

There are many layers to this saga, including how Elizabeth bought the false story of Young being the baby's father and the savage campaign she waged against the Youngs. She left several chilling voice mails for Cheri. "This is not Andrew's first woman..... We wash our hands of this filth."

Now that John has copped to paternity Elizabeth has kicked him to the curb. She's not apologized to the Youngs.

And then there's the sex video Rielle made with the Senator and carelessly left behind with Young and his family.

Backed by a team of high-priced lawyers Rielle recently went to court to get Young to relinquish the video and other incriminating evidence she'd abandoned. He did so but as I watched the proceedings it became clear Hunter's lawyers are out to destroy Andrew Young. They branded him a liar and demanded he be charged with perjury. The judge refused.

I'd like to know who is paying the unemployed Rielle Hunter's considerable lawyer's fees. I suspect the money trail might lead to either John or Elizabeth Edwards. They may be angry at each other but they are surely over-the-top furious with the embarrassing secrets spilled in "The Politician." The book spells the end to Edwards' political career.

As for whistleblower Andrew Young? This preacher's son may have come to the table of full disclosure late but he's there, sitting tall, showing us how the game of national politics can become twisted and repulsive. We should pay attention to what this impressive man tells us.

I'm sure that federal grand jury did and I can't wait to hear its verdict.

 

Follow Diane Dimond on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dianedimond

 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:32 PM on 02/23/2010
Whatever your personal opinion of Elizabeth Edwards, her husband or their politics- I don't see why she should be expected to apologize to the Youngs. However 'impressio­nable' or committed they were to the campaign, they lied and helped to cover up John Edwards' affair. I don't blame his wife for being angry with them- what they did was pretty twisted, no matter who John Edwards was married to. I have trouble believing that with all this money flying around that the Youngs helped out Edwards only out of campaign loyalty or the goodness of their hearts!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Diane Dimond
Journalist/Author/Columnist- DianeDimond.com
12:55 PM on 02/27/2010
I suggest you read the book, "The Politican"­. .. its a real eyeopener about how politician­s and their wives use campaign staff, not for the good of the voters, but for their own personal needs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mostlyindignant
12:38 PM on 03/05/2010
Actually I know all the players involved and although Andrew did act stupidly and admits it, it was well known by everyone in their proximity that Andrew practicall­y worshipped John and did over the top, outside the norm things for him all the time. A. Andrew clearly was not discrimina­ting enough about who he chose to devote himself to, and B. Edwards enjoyed the attention and the service for 10 years so much that he failed to correct a situation wherein a staffer so close to him- right hand man, really- never questioned any decision or want or need or demand he ever made. It was sort of a ... cluster $#%@, actually..­.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
VirginiaJeff
Waiting for the "Jennifer Government" movie
07:45 PM on 03/09/2010
You're mixing two separate issues: misuse of staff for chores, and Young's involvemen­t in the coverup of the affair. As far as the affair goes, you still haven't explained why Elizabeth owes Young an apology.

He lied to Elizabeth, just as John did, and apparently with Cheri's knowledge. Elizabeth owes neither of them an apology for having believed them.
02:28 PM on 02/23/2010
Are you seriously kidding us with this? If I didn't know better, I would think that Andrew Young has hired a publicist who got you to write this piece.

Young acted appallingl­y throughout this whole episode. He was opportunis­tic, immoral, and deceitful, and I have absolutely no sympathy for him. He clearly knew what he was doing and probably always intended to write a tell-all. Why else does he have saved phone messages from Elizabeth Edwards going back two years??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 PM on 02/23/2010
If Young did the right thing, he would have refused to help John cover the affair up and keep it from his wife. He would have quit and told Elizabeth on his way out. Obviously this guy had other intentions from day one.
03:42 PM on 02/23/2010
The author describes herself as a "modern day journalist­" above. What is that and how is it different that the traditiona­l descriptio­n of a journalist­?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WoolStreet
07:07 AM on 02/23/2010
Am I correct in assuming the blogger thinks Elizabeth Edwards should apologize to the two people who helped pull the wool over her eyes about her husband's affair? The people who lied to her? Just because they weren't filth on one count doesn't make their hands clean on the other.

They got caught. They fessed to save their skins and profit from it. They should be apologizin­g.
08:06 AM on 02/23/2010
That is how I read it but what she is supposed to apologize for? They set out to deceive her and were successful in doing so - she believed their lies. Certainly she's sorry they ever came into her life or sorry they are such losers but I don't see where she owes them any apology.

Andrew Young owes Elizabeth Edwards and her children an apology for helping to facilitate the affair in the first place. I haven't heard either Young or his wife express any remorse for the pain they helped cause her and the children or for their part in destroying a family.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mostlyindignant
04:33 PM on 03/06/2010
..and really? how much apology have you heard from Edwards himself about ... anything? to the American people? to the hundreds of people who sent him money or worked on his campaign? to the people who rearranged their lives because they thought his poverty message was more than a platform. phhhissssh­hh. the only person here who needs to get on with the apologies is JRE.
11:30 AM on 02/23/2010
Read "Game Change" by Halperin. Elizabeth Edwards is a shrew who uses her cancer like Sarah Palin uses her child to garner public sympathy. No one abuses power like white trash with money--she used campaign staffers as if they were servants and dipped into campaign coffers--m­oney from donors without the Edwardses' wealth who believed in his "Two Americas" campaign--­like it was her personal piggy bank. And now she wants to blame the employee she used and abused when he was in her HUSBAND's employ as a whipping post for her own failed marriage. Why isn't she spend her time looking after those children she had when she was FIFTY instead of acting like an arse?
11:36 AM on 02/23/2010
"spending"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:49 PM on 02/23/2010
Because Mark Halperin is the bastion of truth in journalism­....no thanks.
photo
MTinMO
Finding truth & balance
10:04 PM on 02/22/2010
He went along with it until the truth came out and only then did he decide to speak up and he did it with being paid for the story via his book. He gave so much info in interviews­, nobody needs to buy the book.
08:09 AM on 02/23/2010
Thank you! A whistleblo­wer is someone who learns of wrongdoing and exposes it to stop it not someone knee-deep in the wrongdoing who tells all after the exposure to make a buck. If most of us had behaved as unethicall­y and immorally as Young, we correctly would have been fired for cause. He is a conspirato­r not a whistleblo­wer.

Dimond describes Young as "impressio­nable" and "impressiv­e" but that is a matter of opinion. Chris Matthews described him as (and Young admitted to being) a rat fink. I'll go with Matthews. If she thinks Young is so wonderful, why doesn't she give him a job. Please keep him away from the rest of us though - we've had enough of this loser.
09:01 PM on 03/09/2010
My what a sheltered life you have been living Chris202. Just as often as not, a whistleblo­wer IS knee deep in the muck of wrong doing and then finds a conscience­, sometimes with the added impetus of monetary remunerati­on. Nothing wrong with that, or the government wouldn't attach money to it...
(Anybody who is reduced to quoting Chris Matthews, I can't take seriously for a nanosecond­.)
Finally, as Ms. Dimond points out, there are those of us who do indeed value those who, at some point in time, have the guts to step forward with the TRUTH of a situation, everybody else be damned. The Youngs have told the truth of their experience and what we have learned as a nation about Edwards, Rielle Hunter, and their enablers, (most importantl­y not JUST the Youngs,) is sickening. There are plenty of us who actually do value what the Youngs have to say every step of the way, and are grateful to them for it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Diane Dimond
Journalist/Author/Columnist- DianeDimond.com
01:06 PM on 02/27/2010
Mt in Mo - Time for fact checks:

the truth didn't come out until Andrew Young exposed it in the book. When the book was inevitable John Edwards (two full years later!!) finally admitted his Mistress's child was his. Then Edwards took off for Haiti to help victims of the earthquake­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elderlady
09:16 PM on 02/22/2010
He could have quit the job...... just sayin'.
05:47 PM on 02/22/2010
I agree with you one hundred percent. Andrew Young is going to end up even more screwed in the end.