Intervention for America's Oil Addicts

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted June 9, 2008 | 08:54 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Oil greed
The United States is the world's third biggest oil producing nation behind Saudi Arabia and Russia, but you wouldn't know it given its whining about high prices and its huge oil import tab. The Saudis produce 10.72 million barrels daily, Russia, 9.67 and the U.S. 8.37 million. But consumption is 20.59 million barrels a day, making net imports 12.2 million a day. This is more than Germany, Japan, France and Italy import.
This year, at $130 a barrel, oil imports will probably total $578 billion, equivalent to 81.5% of 2007's trade deficit of $708.5 billion for imports of every kind.

We Americans spill or waste more oil than any 20 undeveloped countries. Despite the whining about $4-a-gallon, we pay dramatically less for gasoline than do Canadians at $6 a gallon or Europeans at up to $11 a gallon.

Instead of seeing our wasteful ways as the problem, Americans and their politicians are externalizing blame and looking for scapegoats. But the culprit is Washington and the Bush regime whose intelligence has been about as smart when it comes to comprehending the global supply-demand issue for oil as it was in concluding there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

I'm no genius but all commodities have taken off since 2003. I first forecasted $100 a barrel oil two years ago, $150 a year ago and believe that unless the Americans stop using the stuff prices will hit $200 in a few years before we are plunged into a worldwide recession.

A Simple Solution

So America needs an energy intervention right now which will have added benefits such as helping to clean up the environment, slash trade deficits, reduce dependency on nasty foreign
regimes and finance research into new technologies.

Here is a simple, sensible 21st Century energy policy:

1. Mandate increased fuel efficiencies of at least 10 miles per gallon for every vehicle and within two years require all new cars sold in the U.S. to be hybrids. Measures should be considered, such as subsidies, to help retire the nation's gas guzzlers more quickly. Why? If all vehicles in the U.S. were 10-miles-per-gallon more efficient, the country would cut oil consumption by four million barrels daily, eliminating $189.8 billion, or 27%, from the total trade deficit.

2. But another measure is essential in tandem with fuel efficiencies: an increase in gasoline taxes. This is because studies show that fuel efficiencies don't necessarily decrease consumption but increase it because the same money can buy more tankfuls. So the combination of fuel efficient cars, and more expensive gasoline, would lower consumption rates even faster.

3. The next step would be to earmark higher gasoline taxes for research into alternatives.
In other words, all Americans have to do to vastly improve their economic prospects is to live like Europeans by using smaller, lighter and more efficient vehicles less often.

The Bush/McCain, Big Oil Gimmick

John McCain's remedy is to chop gasoline taxes which will make matters worse. Oil companies will scoop up the savings unless prohibited or, alternatively, sell more oil and make more profits.
What can McCain be thinking? Plentiful and relatively cheap gasoline has led the United States into this predicament in the first place by allowing Detroit to hook the nation on SUVs, pick-up trucks and heavy luxury vehicles.

Fortunately, Obama has a grasp of what's needed. He's rejected the tax cut gimmick, recognizes the need for revenue to do research and connects cheap oil with pollution and the dangerous dependency on hostile and rogue regimes around the world.

 
 

Comments
67
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- 1will See Profile I'm a Fan of 1will permalink

Hybrids?
If you wish to make Hybrid use more widespread then give a tax break to those that buy them. Most people never break even on these cars because of the higher prices and battery life. I would also mandate that government agencies buy these vehicles to encourage demand for Hybrids in our auto industry.
Personally I can't afford the additional cost for these cars. I offset my truck's high fuel usage (20mpg) by riding a motorcyle 3-4 days per week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 06/16/2008
- Diane Francis - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Diane Francis permalink

bush and Clinton were too stupid to understand that by 2003 the emerging economies had grown so much that their consumption had used up all the slack in worldwide inventories available. that's when commodity prices for everything from wheat to oil and zinc began to rise.
Canadians saw this right away because commodities is what its economyis totally based on. So did Australians and Russians.

This oil price is about supply-demand and Washington's failure to comprehend what's going on outside America's borders. it's not about Cheney or Iraq or Exxon.

It's about American xenophobia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 06/13/2008
- Diane Francis - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Diane Francis permalink

The bush regime, like the Clinton, were too stupid to understand that in 2003 the slack in the inventory of the world's commodities -- from rice to oil to wheat to lead, zinc -- were taken up due to economic growth int he energy economies.
This is not about Iraq or Exxon or Cheney, this is about the stupidity and ignorance of Washington as to what's going on around the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 06/13/2008
- shinzy See Profile I'm a Fan of shinzy permalink

I think it's too late. The Bush administration bet the farm going into Iraq, and they lost.

In 1986 oil went from $30 a barrel to $10 a barrel. I said it was the end of the Soviet Union as a super power. US super power status is based on cheap oil. The goal of the US invasion of Iraq was to open up Iraq's oil reserves to "investment" (in other words to steal the oil and sell it cheap to keep the USA going). The plan backfired as Iraq oil production has not increased. The US will not remain a super power with high oil prices. There is plenty of ways to cheaply reduce oil consumption. I fear that the way the US has chosen is through a precipatous drop in living standards. Insulate your house, you will consume less fuel at the same comfort level. You can turn off the heat without insulating, you'll also save fuel, but you will be cold in the winter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 06/12/2008
- BlackbirdHighway See Profile I'm a Fan of BlackbirdHighway permalink

Oh, no, the plan was never to invade Iraq to give us cheap oil. The Cheney Energy Task Force cooked up the plan to invade Iraq to keep that oil off the market, so their buddies in the oil business could get rich. Very very rich!

You have to admit, for the oil companies, this was a brilliant move. The American government pays the costs of the invasion, many hundreds of billions of dollars. The American soldiers pay with their blood, while the oil barons make billions of dollars in profit. Our soldiers should be wearing the logos of Exxon and Chevron on the uniforms. That's who they are fighting for.

This plan didn't backfire, it's working exactly as it was intended right from the start.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 AM on 06/13/2008
- seawolf77 See Profile I'm a Fan of seawolf77 permalink

Obama has a grasp for what's needed. He wants to leave the place with all the oil. What a freakin MORON !!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 06/12/2008
- cylindar See Profile I'm a Fan of cylindar permalink

Some of your ideas are good, but some are lousy. Gasoline tax is a no-no. There are a lot of poor people out there who are having a hard enough time paying for gas. That would throw them over the edge. As far as funding alternative energy, thats easy. Simply cut down on the enormous Pentagon budget and other non-essential garbage funding and pull out of Iraq and you will have more than enough money for funding alternative energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 06/12/2008
- KillTheMessenger See Profile I'm a Fan of KillTheMessenger permalink

"Gasoline tax is a no-no."

Good, we will let the market take care of it, then. Oil producing countries get all our money and we get none of the public transportation systems we need. Sounds like a good deal. Especially for the poor people. /sarcasm off

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 06/12/2008
- not one of the sheep See Profile I'm a Fan of not one of the sheep permalink

I like your solution. Number one increase taxes, number two increase taxes and number three increase taxes. Is there a repetative senario going on here? You are right when you said you are not a genius.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 06/11/2008
- ibsteve2u See Profile I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u permalink

"The United States is the world's third biggest oil producing nation behind Saudi Arabia and Russia."

The above is true...now see the implications that I suspect:

Clinton's free trade treaties and the greed of the multi-nationals (our labor costs reduce their bonus checks) means the U.S. produces fewer and fewer "hard" goods here that can be sold to alleviate our negative trade balance and bring hard currency into the country.

Plus, the Fed has been using crazy credit policies to stimulate our economy with consumer debt to give the appearance that "trickle down economics" isn't the big lie that it is.

Further, to maintain the fiction the Treasury has been printing so many dollars that M3 is expanding at an 20% annualized rate(!!).

As a result, very many "average Americans" over the last decade have either the same or fewer dollars to spend, and those dollars that they do have are worth less.

Now to my point:

Do you think that our oil companies are so patriotic that - once the United States caves and permits oil rigs everywhere whether ashore or near offshore - they'll let us "Americans" have first crack at our own oil?

lollll....I don't...I think that if another nation can pay more for oil harvested in the U.S. than we can, you'll see loaded oil tankers going outbound - and the "average American" be damned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:42 AM on 06/11/2008
- ibsteve2u See Profile I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u permalink

Regarding my M3 number: The folks in our beloved Administration quit publishing M3 figures in March of 2006 - I don't remember their reason, but my interpretation is "It shed light where they didn't want any light shed.".

Regardless, you can find M3 numbers based upon the best data available at http://www.nowandfutures.com/key_stats.html.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 AM on 06/11/2008
- dadw5boys See Profile I'm a Fan of dadw5boys permalink

WOW and JIMMY CARTER has the USA on the road to engery freedom then the Republicans invaded!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 06/10/2008
- KillTheMessenger See Profile I'm a Fan of KillTheMessenger permalink

Wow... I just heard from a hard core GOP voter that he is sure the US can pressure Saudi Arabia into producing 2 million barrels a day more and that our F-16s flying over Saudi territory will bring down the price of oil to 75$/barrel within a few months.

I guess the world is really that simple. I am almost regretting buying that Prius, right now. Does anybody know if there is a Prius-Hummer exchange program somewhere? Just in case that GOP voter is right...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 06/10/2008
- Cathexis See Profile I'm a Fan of Cathexis permalink

Ha! What colour is the sky in your GOP friend's world?

It seems that Republicans' capacity for self-delusion is a limitless resource. Too bad we can't convert THAT to energy! That supply could meet any demand!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 06/11/2008
- dadw5boys See Profile I'm a Fan of dadw5boys permalink

NAH they would UNPEG from the Dollar and the Dollars value would hit bottom!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 06/10/2008
- RoloTomassi See Profile I'm a Fan of RoloTomassi permalink

This is utter nonsense, but not in the way you might think:

All of these methods suggested are valid in one way or another, but it is presented here as a matter of trying to work an energy policy from the ground up, and that WILL NOT HAPPEN.

WHY NOT?

This calls for a reality check; have a good long look at the country you live in, the corporations you work for, and the government that top-loads all advantages to those corporations while simultaneously working on multiple levels to manipulate our actions as consumers at every turn to INCREASE THOSE ADVANTAGES FOR CORPORATIONS.

Governmental and corporate reforms are a necessity and must be accomplished in tandem if we wish to do more than spin our wheels on this issue. We need deep and sweeping reform on the issue of oil corporation transparency, energy market manipulation loopholes, and a well-investigated national policy on national oil resources [a policy that is thorough yet non-destructive to preservation areas].

And perhaps most importantly, to avoid a dire and prolonged economic disaster, we need a concerted effort [that perhaps could be a part of a global initiative] to plan and pursue reasonable energy policy OVERLAPS. This isn't a quick fix situation, and the assertion that we must apply an abrupt break with petrol fuels is simply an absurd and extremely ill-conceived notion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 06/10/2008
- KillTheMessenger See Profile I'm a Fan of KillTheMessenger permalink

You took a lot of words to say absolutely nothing... maybe with exception of ... "I am against it.".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 06/10/2008
- EinChicago See Profile I'm a Fan of EinChicago permalink

"You took a lot of words to say absolutely nothing"

Yeah. That's KTM's exclusive territory. Oh, and a complete inability to grasp reality. Th efact is all these nice ideas are great as theories, but the fact remains the infrastructure we have is nto going anywhere overnight. Should it be changed so that every house includes solar panelsand hydroponic gardens? Sure. Can it be done ? Not in reality. Ms. Fra-ncis's suggestions, taken as a whole are about as realistic as saying that the Right Reverend Saviour and Messiah, our lord Oba-ma (may his Kool Aid be forever chilled and no female cast a shadow across his path), should immediately issue an executive order upon his coronation stating that all car companies should henceforth only sell personal teleporters that are powered merely by the excess energy given off from the convertion of personal waste products into pure gold.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 06/11/2008
- EinChicago See Profile I'm a Fan of EinChicago permalink

"You took a lot of words to say absolutely nothing"

Yeah. That's KTM's exclusive territory. Oh, and a complete inability to grasp reality. Th efact is all these nice ideas are great as theories, but the fact remains teh infrastructure we have is nto going anywhere overnight. Should it be changed so that every house includes solar panelsand hydroponic gardens? Sure. Can it be done ? Not in reality. Ms. Francis's suggestions, taken as a whole are about as realistic as saying that the Right Reverend Saviour and Messiah, our lord Obama (may his Kool Aid be forever chilled and no female cast a shadow across his path), should immediately issue an executive order upon his coronation stating that all car companies should henceforth only sell personal teleporters that are powered merely by the excess energy given off from the convertion of personal waste products into pure gold.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 06/11/2008
- RoloTomassi See Profile I'm a Fan of RoloTomassi permalink

Just because you're not intelligent enough to understand it doesn't lend your critique any value, you moron.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 06/10/2008
- seawolf77 See Profile I'm a Fan of seawolf77 permalink

America has scoured the world to punch ever deeper and more expensive veins to feed it's carnivorous apetite for fossil fuels. We have set to boiling rocks and sand with ever more precious and clean natural gas to create synthetic oil. Kind of like taking caviar and making fake crab meat. We have invaded another soverign nation under false pretenses to secure some more black crack. What do they say about addicts, they have to hot rock bottom. Boy I sure do wonder what that will look like here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 06/10/2008
- ProfessorDuh See Profile I'm a Fan of ProfessorDuh permalink

Americans are discovering that oil is real, while the dollar is not. The soaring crude oil prices over the last 10 months coincided with a decline in the value of the dollar, causing oil prices to become disconnected from supply and demand as speculators ran from dollars and chased oil.
In other words, the Bush-Republican multi-trillion dollar borrow-and-spend plan to wage unjustified war and throw no-bid money at Halliburton and other corrupt corporations is wrecking the U.S. economy while we watch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 06/10/2008
- MajorKong See Profile I'm a Fan of MajorKong permalink

Too bad we tore up all those nice electric trolleys we used to have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 06/10/2008
- ProfessorDuh See Profile I'm a Fan of ProfessorDuh permalink

Actually, we didn't. The oil lobby decided to destroy them for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 AM on 06/10/2008
- USBrit See Profile I'm a Fan of USBrit permalink

Along with the car companies. Read what GM did to the LA trolley system - bought it, shut it down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 06/10/2008
- candyc See Profile I'm a Fan of candyc permalink

As a nation, we are uneducated about ways to conserve gasoline. Or maybe just willfully ignorant.
The other day, I drove (alone) 70 miles going 55, to a meeting. I was passed by hundreds of speeding SUVs and luxury cars going at least 80. Like me, most had no passengers. Later that day, I sat at my local starbucks and watched an endless stream of cars whizzing by with no passengers-only the driver.

In Maryland, our public transportation just sucks. And there are many times when we have to be alone in our cars. But there is NO reason for 80 miles an hour.
We need to be smarter. We need to slow down. We need to invest in comprehensive public transportation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 AM on 06/10/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in