iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Diane Ravitch

GET UPDATES FROM Diane Ravitch
 

In Defense of Facing Reality

Posted: 03/18/2012 9:24 pm

I recently wrote two review articles for the New York Review of Books about the teaching profession. The first was a review of Pasi Sahlberg's Finnish Lessons, about the exceptional school system of Finland, which owes much to the high professionalism of its teachers.

The second of the two articles was a review of Wendy Kopp's A Chance to Make History, and it focused on her organization, Teach for America.

I expressed my admiration for the young people who agree to teach for two years, with only five weeks of training. But I worried that TFA was now seen -- and promoting itself -- as the answer to the serious problems of American education. Even by naming her book A Chance to Make History, Wendy Kopp reinforced the idea that TFA was the very mechanism that American society could rely upon to lift up the children of poverty and close the achievement gaps between different racial and ethnic groups.

Wendy Kopp responded to my review of her book with a blog called "In Defense of Optimism." She wrote that:

... over the last twenty years we in the United States have discovered that we don't have to wait to fix poverty to dramatically improve educational outcomes for underprivileged students. In fact, there's strong evidence that one of the most effective ways to break the cycle of poverty is to expand the mission of public schools in low-income communities and put enormous energy into providing children with the extra time and support they need to reach their potential.

Now I certainly agree with Kopp that schools are enormously important, and that it's vital to have talented educators working in them. We both want to see the day when every child has access to an excellent education. She believes that the teachers and the leaders produced by TFA have figured this out. I disagree. I think that the lesson of Finland and other high-performing nations is that we must improve the teaching profession, so that career educators receive the respect and working conditions they need to succeed, and we must also reduce poverty.

If it were true that we now know how to break the cycle of poverty, poverty would be declining. But poverty is growing in the United States; child poverty is more than 20 percent and rising. Among the world's advanced nations, we are number one in child poverty. It's facile to blame schools and teachers, but more realistic to recognize that poverty is a reflection of economic conditions. Schools cannot create jobs, provide homes for the homeless, or change the economy.

Kopp is right that TFA has become a training ground for leaders. Some of its alumni have moved into high-level positions, like Michelle Rhee, former chancellor of the public schools of the District of Columbia, who now works closely with the nation's most conservative governors to strip teachers of due process rights and to promote charter schools, vouchers, and for-profit education corporations. Another TFA alum, John White, Commissioner of Education in Louisiana, advances the same hard-right agenda for Governor Bobby Jindal.

In my reviews, I contrasted the five-year preparation of teachers in Finland with the American hodge-podge approach to the recruitment and training of teachers. In the U.S., states offer many ways to become a teacher, and our non-system has produced low standards for entry and a revolving door, with 40-50 percent leaving in their first five years of teaching. Finnish teachers are highly respected and seldom leave their profession.

Kopp dismisses Finland as a model because less than 4 percent of its children are poor. But that's part of the story of their success and should not be waved aside as unimportant. Teacher professionalism is also part of Finnish success. In this country, our public school teachers are constantly criticized and disrespected, and few are recognized for their dedication and hard work despite budget cuts, growing class sizes, and a hostile media. So long as the attacks on teachers continue, so long as the politicians continue defunding the schools, and so long as our society continues to tolerate high levels of child poverty and intense racial segregation, we will continue to have low-performing students and "failing" schools.

We will have to learn to hold two ideas in our heads at the same time: We must both reduce poverty and improve our schools. We cannot fix our schools without strengthening the teaching profession and addressing the social conditions that shape their outcomes.

 
 
 

Follow Diane Ravitch on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DianeRavitch

I recently wrote two review articles for the New York Review of Books about the teaching profession. The first was a review of Pasi Sahlberg's Finnish Lessons, about the exceptional school system of F...
I recently wrote two review articles for the New York Review of Books about the teaching profession. The first was a review of Pasi Sahlberg's Finnish Lessons, about the exceptional school system of F...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 406
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geauterre
Writer, Author, Commentator and Humorist.
09:54 PM on 03/25/2012
If anything, the Finland model proves beyond any shadow of a doubt, contraception and aborting fetuses work. It limits the strain on resources. Has a modular effect on societies, as a whole. Promotes self-control, and thereby self-confidence. Increases brain power, smells good and guarantees no fish will rot on ice.

Then, looking impartially at what America wrings out of the wash . . . some spots are ground in dirt . . . some spots are merely soiled . . . some spots are okay . . . some spots are as clean as you can possibly make them . . . and some spots are spotless.

Contraception and aborting fetuses work in ways those suffering diminished capacity could never imagine.
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
06:19 PM on 03/25/2012
In the U.S. a few years back when I was young (and the children say dinos roamed the earth), higher education was planned for only about 10% of the population, and professional entry didn't require its completion. It was understood that not everyone was going to achieve at the highest possble levels.

To compare Finland to the U.S. is not a good comparison. They have better longevity, and less expensive health care, and people of NW Europe developed wooden tools later than in Asia, Asia minor and the Med area. They had to be more hardy to survive, and their offspring had to have more survival traits than those living in milder climates. Not to say they are superior all around. My guess is they have superior traits where education impacts a population.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:42 PM on 03/25/2012
Daniel Kahneman wrote an interesting book, "Thinking, Fast and Slow." In his research, he discusses many of the fallacies most of us commit when interpreting events and making important decisions. Some of these errors include over-estimating how much we really know and understand while at the same time under-estimating how much of our world is determined by pure chance.

Appearances can be deceiving, especially those sorts of solutions that seem to be "no-brainers."

I simply can't imagine a good educational environment being one in which all the teachers are described as bad teachers and all the students, lazy. If that's what it looks like, then maybe we all need some new glasses?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Briteleaf
04:29 PM on 03/25/2012
No one wants to pay more taxes. We're a greedy, self-centered society - GIVEN. The reality of educating teachers better, improving our schools and fighting poverty all take tax dollars. The lips move and the tongues wag that "Our children are our most precious resource." but class rooms are severely overcrowded, some schools have cut back to a 4 day school week, many rural libraries have had to close or go to 16 hours of open library a week, and there's no seat belts on school buses. The rich say 'Schools should be privatized" because they can afford it for their little Fauntleroy.
04:06 PM on 03/25/2012
Rhee is a democrat. quality education is bipartisan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
03:29 PM on 03/25/2012
Online ed=cheaper, more effective.
10:35 PM on 03/25/2012
For some things that is true. Khan academy comes to mind, however there are some things I would avoid online.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thefinalsay
02:12 PM on 03/25/2012
I love the excuses for poverty in this country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Briteleaf
04:38 PM on 03/25/2012
One, tiny little blood vessel could collapse in your brain and you could lose your income and all that you own. It's so hard for the rich to view the reality of poverty. So much easier to dismiss the poor as being too lazy to work. "They just all want a handout" is the call of the jaded and self-satisfied. This week, at my work, we're opening a position to accept applicants. In the 1st week, we had 280 over-qualified applicants. So many jobs have been sent overseas by wealthy corporations looking to up their profits that the unemployment reality is dismal. You think people really would rather be cold and hungry than work? There's always a lazy few that you can point to and dismiss the poor as "wanting handouts" but we've got over 300 million people in this country and tens of millions of them can't find work because there are tens of millions of more people than jobs available. Perhaps you could be one of them oneday...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:52 PM on 03/25/2012
If there aren't enough jobs to offer the public, then we need to rethink the basic economic model that basically expects monthly income from each person. We need to improvise, innovate, and develop things like 'tent cities'. People still gotta eat whether the board of directors is 'hip' to it, or not.
photo
Someone Out There
..................................................
05:41 PM on 03/25/2012
I love the half-wits who oversimplify the causes of complex issues, then blame others when their weak excuses for solutions fail.

Especially the ones who think there has never been a problem a tax cut for millionaires can't fix.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thefinalsay
05:53 PM on 03/25/2012
I love people who can speak logically. you don't qualify.
12:12 PM on 03/25/2012
Its amazing to me how some of the corporate "reformers" like to point to Finland as an example of how far behind the U.S. is, but then push policies that are the exact opposite of Finland's.
photo
tazmodious
Left Hand of Darkness
11:18 AM on 03/25/2012
The problem I'm seeing in all of this talk about school reform is that we, the people of the US, are focusing only on what is wrong. Teachers are bad, unions are bad, people are poor, public education is a failure, etc etc. The failure of public education is becoming a self-fullfilling prohecy.

We do not hear that most students are successful and that most public schools are doing a good job, even in this current economic malaise or budget cuts, teacher layoffs and school closings. We hear a lot about the few cherry picked successes of schools that fit the new Reform Agenda, but we don't hear anythng about the majority of public schools that are doing very well.

We hear nothing in the media about the public school teachers that are highly efficacious, but we do hear daily about the rare terachers who are clearly bad, making it seem like all teachers are bad.

If we continue to focus on failure and ignore the majority of everything being done right, then we will only continue to head in that direction. We will further impose those failures on good performing schools and cause them to fail too.

If we focus on what public education is doing well and learn to apply those successes elsewhere, we will head in that direction. Unfortunately it is not political desirable both on the left and the right to do so and it doesn't sell newspapers.
02:59 PM on 03/25/2012
Bingo! Especially on your last sentence, though I would replace 'it' with 'because'..
08:07 PM on 03/21/2012
This articles raises valid points, but I would like to point out the following benefits of Teach For America that may have been overlooked.

Contrary to popular belief, a clear majority of TFA corps members – 61% - stay in the teaching profession beyond their two-year commitment. Many TFA alumni who do not stay in the classroom go onto pursue policy. Some would argue this to be a fault but I would argue that having passionate, education reform mined individuals in the policy and law fields will inevitably yield positive results for our nation's education system. "More founders and leaders of education organizations participate in Teach For America than in any other organization or program." In other words, those who leave the classroom are still having a positive impact on education reform.

I would also like to point out that 22% of corps members are the first in their family to attend college, 31% received Pell Grants while there and 28% are males, two percent more than the average for teachers. All of these point to TFA's ability to provide role models for our most in-need students. Having young role models to look-up will be essential in transforming the lives of our nation's most in-need students.

Beyond that, lets find a way to have the TFA and career teachers team-up. We are all on the same team, so lets start playing like it. http://solutions-for-schools.com/
04:18 AM on 03/22/2012
Can you be more specific about 'pursuing policy'? M Rhee is a former TFAer who has pursued policy but there are many who would dispute that is positive.
It is true that our kids need role models but they also need teachers. For me the danger with TFA is that it will become policy instead of the stopgap it was intended to be. I think we are already seeing this. There is no way that can be good for education on the whole.
07:30 PM on 03/22/2012
Thank you for the question. Before we get to Ms. Rhee, I wanted to share this article from Education Next http://educationnext.org/creating-a-corps-of-change-agents/ that discusses KIPP founders, Ms. Rhee's and Democratic Colorado State Senator Mike Johnston pursuing education reform after leaving the classroom. Senator Johnston is currently authoring a piece of legislation that would allow 4 paid hours a off of work a year, so parents can more easily attend teacher conferences. This is an essential step, as many parents want to be involved but work 2 to 3 jobs just to make ends meet. It would be hard to argue such measures are not good for education.

On to Michelle Rhee (I think we will respectfully disagree on her positive impact): she had excellent results in her classroom and then founded TNTP (teaches people who to best teach our nation's most in-need students) and now Student's First. Whether you agree with all of her positions (accountability, firing bad teachers, charter school expansion) or not, her voice is an important one in education reform. She brings new ideas to the table and stirs debate around a subject that needs to be talked about more.

I am always confused when people point to her lack of teaching experience, when they neglect to point out that Randi Weingarten - President of the AFT who has a huge voice in policy - only taught about a year more.

Hope the article helps: http://solutions-for-schools.com/
03:03 PM on 03/22/2012
The statement that 61% of TFA alumni "stay in the teaching profession" is false. TFA's own PR claims that "nearly two-thirds" of alumni "work in the field of education," and that half of those remain in the classroom. But independent analysis of TFA indicates that the true figure is between 10 and 15%.
07:21 PM on 03/22/2012
Actually, TFA PR bases its accurate report of 61% of its alumni (those beyond the 2 years corps commitment) "staying in the teaching profession" on an independent study conducted in 2010 by Morgaen L. Donaldson of the University of Connecticut and Susan Moore Johnson of the Harvard Graduate School of Education. You can read it here http://epa.sagepub.com/content/32/2/299 I am interested where you found your independent analysis of 10-15% http://solutions-for-schools.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin Terrace
daughter of a Union Ironworker
06:55 PM on 03/20/2012
Reading the comments here confirms that we are a nation in trouble. We are scared of communism and socialism (Finland) and the bogey man is in every Democratic proposal. We are a nation in a downward spiral. Finland's is based upon equality, which we do not have here and are moving further away from. If teach for America gave us Michelle Rhee, then no thank-you. Her and her ilk have influenced politics in Idaho to denigrate teachers to poverty status. In rural areas teachers are offered less than minimum wage jobs thanks to Michelle Rhee and Tom Luna and their education reform that has removed the caps on Charters, allowed those Charters to tap into district levy money without a popular vote of 2/3 that say they can. Mandated on-line class costs are subsidized by the state and go to Michelles Rhees cronies back east, that is money out of Idaho. The not-for-profit Idaho Digital Learning Academy limits class sizes and emphasizes a team-teaching approach, so not impose class sizes of 200-300 on one teacher. as does K-12, Inc. A teacher reported her class sizes tripled, she was encouraged to pass students, and she compromised ethics as soon as K12, Inc became publicly traded and profits were put before student learning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JMilton1976
10:32 AM on 03/20/2012
Keep dancing around the issue until someone finally says it, the wrong people are having kids. America has a parenting problem, not a school problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbbbmer
An homage to Dorothy Parker...
01:05 AM on 03/21/2012
much of what is deemed 'poor parenting' stems from poverty.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JMilton1976
10:10 AM on 03/22/2012
Of course it does. Study up on Ruby Payne. She is a well known poverty researcher with whom I have worked with extensively in Chicago. Unfortunately, the cycle is unstoppable on many levels. . You might not like my conclusion, but please understand, I'm a researcher on these topics with no political agenda. In fact, as a social worker, I am a very liberal person. Sometimes the truth is very difficult and not politically correct.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
08:22 AM on 03/25/2012
Just deal with the children that exist and try to make their circumstances and their education better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
09:33 AM on 03/20/2012
One of both the causes and effects of poverty is a chaotic life. If your child gets sick and you can't afford a sitter, your car breaks down and you can't afford to repair it or you use the rent money to bail your brother-in-law out of jail and then get evicted the corollary is that you will probably lose your job because your attendance is unreliable. The cycle circles downward from there.

These are things eduction cannot fix in the short run unless it is part of a comprehensive community preservation plan. One such plan is the Harlem Childrens' Zone. While this model has raised a great deal of controversy, it appears to be working fairly well on the small scale on which it was implemented. More such experiments which are getting positive outcomes should be funded.

Without a complete change in certain behaviors neither poverty or education will improve. You can pay teachers the same as CEOs and it won't alter a thing if students don't want to be in school and are belligerent, defiant and disruptive. This is a family-deep problem well beyond a teacher's scope, and why intensive community improvement plans are an absolute requirement if we want a well educated population.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
04:35 PM on 03/20/2012
absolutely right. the HCZ is successful not because it's private or charter or how it pays teachers, it works because it has the five elements that are proven by research to yield positive results: community services, healthcare/nutrition, early childhood education, small classes and highly engaged administrators.
01:21 AM on 04/24/2012
The larger the school district, the harder it is to provide these supports.
09:24 AM on 03/20/2012
What is so difficult or complicated about a National Recommended Reading List besides selecting which books? Do many teachers just dislike the idea that a lot of children could learn a great deal without teachers if they were just told where the worthwhile material was?

And with these really cheap computers and free e-books...

ASUS Eee Pad Memo Hands On
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV3MCzPHMLs

A Short History of the World by H. G. Wells (not sci-fi but an SF writer's perspective)
http://www.bartleby.com/86/

There Will Be School Tomorrow, by V. E. Thiessen
www.feedbooks.com/userbook/11643.pdf

All Day September by Roger Kuykendall
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/2295/all-day-september

Eight Keys to Eden by Mark Clifton
http://www.mysterious-strange-weird.com/index-sensational-mysteries.html
http://www.onread.com/book/Eight-Keys-to-Eden-6514/

Omnilingual by H. Beam Piper
http://librivox.org/omnilingual-by-h-beam-piper/
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/308/omnilingual

Badge of Infamy by Lester del Rey
http://www.booksshouldbefree.com/book/badge-of-infamy-by-lester-del-rey

The Fourth R by George O. Smith
http://www.onread.com/book/The-Fourth-R-17950/

The Year When Stardust Fell by Raymond F. Jones
http://www.amazon.com/Year-When-Stardust-Fell/dp/1935774409
http://www.readcentral.com/book/Raymond-F-Jones/Read-The-Year-When-Stardust-Fell-Online

Pandemic by Bone, Jesse F.
http://www.digilibraries.com/ebook/112122/Pandemic/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JMilton1976
10:28 AM on 03/20/2012
Hilarious! You actually think the majority low income students would take the time to pick up a book in the summer. Jesus Christ, you talk about out of touch..
02:38 PM on 03/20/2012
Where did I mention the majority of anything? I assume the majority of high income students aren't exceptionally bright. So you are prejudiced against whoever you regard as low income. You demonstrate how bright a lot of non-low income people are.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eddie Martinez
08:20 AM on 03/20/2012
Public Education: Schools, Teachers & Books in the U.S. do they represent the 20th century or the 21st century?
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
01:44 PM on 03/21/2012
That depends on your corporate stance