The recent report that 23 percent of students taking ACT and SAT tests do not qualify for college-level courses has reignited criticism of the education profession for "failing" to solve the problems plaguing the nation's schools.
While the need for improvement is beyond question, those of us working in the profession have ample reasons for challenging the measures of accountability currently being imposed on us by so-called "national standards."
Rather than working cooperatively with those of us engaged in meeting the countless challenges children are facing, the administration in Washington, like the one before it, is imposing a business performance model on educators that is as ill advised as it is ill suited for solving the problems we confront.
Leading is a principal's job, to be sure. But leading successfully is about creating a better democracy. We don't need Taylorite management techniques that amount to telling us, "Get in line and march." We need time, money and a voice in policy changes necessary for building a path to success.
When Washington applauds school boards for firing principals and teachers without due process, as was done in Central Falls, Rhode Island and continues to be done in less publicized systems, it not only violates the legal rights of educators covered by collective bargaining agreements, it reduces the complex task of administering improvements to the crude, pass-fail simplicity of a Donald Trump TV show.
Those of us who have dedicated ourselves to improving the lives of children in our public schools are not neophytes to be dictated to and dismissed like Trump's apprentices. We are in many ways the heart of the communities we serve, often victimized by the constant experiments of policymakers who have never walked in our shoes and, worse yet, seldom bother to consult us on what changes might be made to improve prospects for students whose development we hold dear.
By constantly imposing new, experimental programs on us -- no matter how well intentioned -- they are breeding failure. How do they expect children to succeed when there's no stability in the approaches Washington is foisting on us, and no continuity in teaching programs from one year to the next?
To impose a business model of performance on our schools only increases the odds of failure. First and foremost, it ignores the unique contributions that administrators make by dealing on a daily basis with the economic and social stresses weighing on parents and their children; for, whatever is ailing the communities we serve is also ailing our schools. We have to cope with these realities in ways business leaders seldom do, in no small part because they live far removed from the more distressed communities where achieving improvement is most challenging.
The fact is, we're an easy mark for academics and Washington policy wonks, because no one sees the principal as having a relationship to the growth of a child. Much of the work we do, so essential for keeping the system functioning, such as maintaining the physical plant or coping with the environment outside the school, is invisible to the public. We're seen solely in relation to teachers.
As a result, we're forced to deal with the contentiousness inherent in the business model that says, "If it doesn't work, throw it out." Approaches like these aren't turnaround plans; they simply turn a blind eye to the reality educators must confront, especially in communities where poverty and crime are more pervasive.
Rather than glib condemnations, what's needed is a new spirit of cooperation, one in which all the stakeholders in public education -- especially school administrators -- are consulted on solutions rather than being targeted for vilification. Instead, we've been completely shut out of policy decisions.
We're the ones at ground zero in public education, directly involved in communities throughout the country. Parents send us what they hold most precious, their children, and we're charged with sending them back a better person.
Yet policy makers seem blind to the realities we face, primary among them the fact that our children aren't machines. Some of them are struggling before they ever get to school. Many of them come to us from dysfunctional families and have totally different levels of readiness that don't lend themselves to standardized, near-term tests as true measures of success. In some cases, success means teaching a child just to learn to read and write.
But what we need most of all is hope, and ironically that's not what we're getting from the current administration. Instead we're getting sermons about the need for standardized plans, without even the conviction to fund them promptly. Of the 40 states that have submitted plans to quality for Race to the Top, only two had been funded before September.
Constantly condemning the school administrators and teachers who are struggling to cope with the complex challenges we face does little but cause the public to lose all hope that we can succeed. If there's no hope in the community, there's no hope in the school. So, the question that cries out is: What hope is there for the child?
Diann Woodard is president of the American Federation of School Administrators
Huffpo readers who support public ed, please visit/get involved at
http://www.facebook.com/MiseducationNation
http://www.facebook.com/pages/NOT-Waiting-for-Superman/149979798356036?ref=ts
Also, please visit
http://www.racetonowhere.com/
and signup to get notified about the screenings
Why vote for someone who can't even read the research and is too ignorant to know that his experiment is already a waste of time and money?
It is a travesty.
You're being bombarded with propaganda pushed by the oligarchs who are funding the reforms - along with the hedge hogs of Wall Street who brought down our economy - all of whom have a financial stake in charter schools and want our tax dollars. To get it, they systematically discredit public schools and their teachers.
The repetitive rhetoric is straight out of the Rove playbook.
Corporations are advocating for privatizing public education with "charters are good, unions are bad, and it's the bad teacher's fault." Here are a few good reads by experts in education, not politicians, foundations, or the hedge fund managers that are driving these reforms. I hope you become enlightened:
The experts on school reform: http://zhaolearning.com/2010/09/03/master-of-myth-what-arne-duncan-says-and-does/
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/diane-ravitch/ravitch-welcome-back-to-school.html
The reviews by experts: http://teacherrevised.org/2010/06/30/movie-review-waiting-for-superman-or-just-another-clark-kent-playing-dress-up/
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/01/philanthrocapitalists-go-hollywood-with.html (follow the money)
The truth: http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/09/obamas-charters-profit-centers-for.html and http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/09/is-there-crisis-in-mathscience.html”
The reform rhetoric is also reminiscent of Milton Friedman's push for vouchers and all other neo-liberal projects that seek to deregulate and privatize everything. Its the same mentality that brought us our oil, health care, and banking crises. There is no reason to expect any different results with education. Sigh.
Imagine if the tobacco companies, the coal & oil industry, or the telecoms had input on textbooks. Our kids might be taught smoking isn't THAT bad, coal mining saves lives, and oil companies care about the environment.
Washington DC went from having the worst schools in the nation to being given nearly 100 million in Federal grants due to it's innovative school reform efforts that had already shown huge improvements in test scores. So what happened? The teachers Union poured a fortune into the DC mayros race to kick out the Mayor who supported these reforms. The kids were getting a better education but that was the last thing that that organization seemed to be concerned about. In DC principals from successful schools were brought in to give their take on what would work and what wouldn't.
So your goal was similar to what happened in DC and the teachers union came in and attempted to kill it. This is why Washington doesn't feel that handholding and singing songs together will do anything. The teachers Union has proven time and again they do not care for children. As principals, you unfortunatly are being painted with the same brush.
I also agree that standardized testing is a load of garbage. Unfortunately, that is the only metric being used to determine which schools should be handed over to a private operator and which teachers are fired.
The reason D.C. got such a huge grant is because they complied with Race from the Top requirements of expanding charters, not because they were doing a good job educating children. Ironically, you criticize the use of test scores then use them as proof that D.C.'s schools improved under Fenty and Rhee.
Fenty's defeat was overwhelming, particularly in minority districts and was considered a referendum on the business model of education. I doubt the unions have even a fraction of the money the corporate execs (Waltons, Broads, Friedmans, Gates, etc.) who have poured millions into supporting pro-market-based reform school candidates have.
With all due respect, your anti-union stance is merely parroting the same scapegoat rhetoric used to support the corporate takeover of our public school system.
I am also disappointed that, in a post that will be read by so many people, Ms. Woodard offers no solutions. Not a one. Just complaints about not being consulted enough. This article will do nothing to further your cause
When we reform our dying inner cities, our high poverty rates, and business practices that kill good paying jobs, our schools will improve. John Dewey said: "Schools are a reflection of society."