iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dike Drummond, M.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Dike Drummond, M.D.
 

Are Doctors the Canary in the Coal Mine of Medicine?

Posted: 01/26/2013 5:00 pm

Back in the day, coal miners always carried a canary with them in a small cage whenever they would go down in the mine. The canary is a very talkative bird, always singing and tweeting in a constant background noise. Canaries have one more characteristic important to a miner.

When there is bad air in the mine, the canary's sensitive lungs will cause it to drop over dead before the miners notice any shortness of breath. When the bird stops singing, the miners head for the surface -- fast. It is a life saving maneuver.

Here in 2013 as we start to implement the provisions of Obamacare and projections of physician shortages as high as 91,500 by 2020 from respected sources, I believe we have a similar "coal mine" situation in healthcare.

Unfortunately, physicians appear to be the canary in the mine.

Even before the pseudo-shortages of the Affordable Care Act, physicians were not in good shape. Symptomatic burnout is present in an average of one in three doctors on any given office day. A 2012 survey by the Physician's Foundation reported that 60 percent of doctors would retire today if they "had the means."

High patient volumes, the hassles of Electronic Medical Records (EMR), political uncertainty and changing reimbursement rates are all cited in surveys and online forums as new and increasing sources of stress for doctors. Online patient complaints always center on "the doctor seemed rushed, didn't listen or seem to care," which are classic signs of overwork and burnout.

The biggest new burnout threat may be Pay for Performance (P4P)

Healthcare organizations will soon be paid bonuses for reaching certain care quality indicators and patient satisfaction thresholds. Patient satisfaction is incredibly important and should be tracked and rewarded. At the same time, if care organizations simply use these reimbursement changes to dump more stress on the doctors they will actually block the doctor's ability to be present and care for their patients more effectively. Where is the tipping point, where the canary falls off the perch?

How did we get here in the first place?

Healthcare is a classic giving profession. Doctors and nurses learn early that patients come first. Our job is to serve them as best we can, no matter how tired or drained we may be feeling. Their needs come before ours. Simply acknowledging our own needs is a challenge. Finding time and tools to get them met is a struggle for most physicians.

Many healthcare organizations systemize this self care blind spot

It is rare for the physicians and staff to appear in the Mission Statement of a care organization. The patients and care quality will always be front and center in the mission. Any mention of the providers and staff is very rare.

[Take a quick look at your organization's Mission Statement. Does it mention provider or staff health, wellness and satisfaction? If so, is your organization actually doing something about it?]

This creates a double bind where the providers are challenged to get their needs met and their organizations fail to acknowledge we have any in the first place.

The last American sweatshop

As a result, many healthcare workplaces feel like a classic sweatshop environment. There are too many patients to be seen, multiple systems come between the doctor and patient (EMR for instance) there are quotas to be made and no regard whatsoever is paid to the health, wellness or stress levels of the physicians and staff.

The workplace resembles a mine. We are waiting for the physician/canary to drop.

In my work with doctors with career threatening burnout, it is common to hear of hospital departments and group practices where the entire staff is just barely making it through their work week.

Thank god for work hardening

The only reason these toxic workplaces don't implode is the stamina and work ethic of the doctors and staff in the system. On one level, residency is a work hardening program for physicians. We can take a tremendous licking and keep on seeing patients. Our organizations know this and just pile it on. The leaders count on the doctors to carry any load they pile on while taking no responsibility for the stress involved. It is just like putting a canary in a shaft where you know the air is bad and hoping it survives.

Everyone loses

Tragically, unless your group actually monitors for physician health and satisfaction, the toll burnout exacts on the doctors and their patients remains invisible.

Research shows burnout has a pervasive negative effect on every aspect of a physician's practice and life. Physician burnout has been linked to
- Lower quality of care and lower patient satisfaction rates
- Higher rates of medical errors and malpractice risk
- Higher physician and staff turnover
- Higher levels of divorce, alcohol and drug use and suicide for the physician - our Canary.

So how much longer can we simply pile more and more stress on the doctors? When will this canary be stretched beyond its limit and simply topple off its perch and crash to the bottom of the cage? Does anyone care or is this something doctors just have to take care of on their own?

There is a different path available to healthcare organizations.

This path results in a win:win:win situation.

  • More patient satisfaction and higher quality care

  • Happier, healthier doctors

  • Higher profitability as the P4P trend continues

The key is to stop taking the canary down the mineshaft in the first place. Focus the same amount of effort on creating a healthy environment for your physicians and staff as you do on patient satisfaction for one simple reason.

Your doctors cannot produce consistently high patient satisfaction scores if they are not consistently healthy and happy at work.

Happy doctors naturally have happier patients. Put the canary in a sunny window and change the papers in the bottom of her cage. This is a fundamental shift with positive consequences for everyone in healthcare.

The most successful organizations in the near future will be those that acknowledge the universal presence of physician stress and burnout.

  • They will monitor for burnout and support the health of their providers and staff in multiple innovative ways.

  • They will put physician health and wellness in their mission statement as a priority equal to that of patient satisfaction.

There are hundreds of proven ways for both physicians and organizations to make real and lasting changes in the physician experience as soon as this fundamental shift is recognized.

I also predict this type of organization will be rare

Leadership must stop simply loading on more work responsibilities and cracking the whip. Organizations must be committed to caring about the doctors and staff and constantly focused on creating a healthier and more efficient workplace.

With this new priority of physician wellness, these same organizations will be able to activate the power of a physician staff that is balanced and healthy, with their physical, emotional and spiritual needs met. This is the natural foundation for consistent quality care and patient satisfaction.

Just imagine a work environment ...

... where you enjoy your work team and the practice environment, the systems work to let you care for patients smoothly and effectively and you know that your leadership "has your back" and really cares about the quality of your experience as a member of the group. What would that be like? What quality of care would doctors and staff in that organization offer to their patients naturally and automatically.

Our healthcare workplaces don't have feel like a coal mine. We don't have to sit around and wait for the canary to drop.

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

  • Do you work in a healthy workplace in an organization that cares for their physicians and staff?

  • Do you appear in your organizations mission statement?

  • What is the biggest stressor in your practice that your group could change if they
wanted to?

Dike Drummond, M.D., is a family physician, executive coach and creator of the Burnout Prevention Matrix report with over 117 ways doctors and healthcare organizations can work together to prevent physician burnout. He provides stress management, burnout prevention and leadership development services to physicians through his website, The Happy MD.

 

Follow Dike Drummond, M.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/dikedrummond

FOLLOW BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 98
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:59 PM on 01/28/2013
This sounds like an education problem. Making access to a college education and making it easier for people to afford should be the goal. Some people who achieve a certain level in education, won't stop there if they have a passion for it. The problem is, people don't have easy access to affordable education. Everything is inflating in price these days, and the majority of incomes are stagnant. It would seem most people are worried about food on the table and keeping the lights on. Add education into that ratio!? Forget about it!!!
08:49 PM on 01/28/2013
I get some of this, but some of it confuses me. My best friend is an OB/GYN up in Minneapolis. He doesn't work late. He works four days a week, one weekend on call a month, I'm not sure if it's 4 or 6 weeks of vacation a year. He's the only one of my friends who I NEVER hear say something like, "Man, work is kicking my ass!"

I'm sure there is some stress-inducing dysfunction in the system, but it sure looks like it's balanced out (for him) with a work load that doesn't seem like it would burn anyone out - and at a pretty healthy salary to boot.

Is my friend's lifestyle-oriented practice simply an exception in the health care profession? Are most doctors working a lot more hours, in much more of a meat grinder, than he is?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dike Drummond, M.D.
01:26 AM on 01/29/2013
Your friend is most definitely the exception and I congratulate him on his success in creating a medical practice and a darn good life. Bravo. Just look at the studies I quote ... 60% of docs said they would retire if they had the means in a survey just last year. Your friend would not be one of them but 6 out of 10 of his colleagues are ready to walk away from a career they spent their entire 20's preparing for.

Dike
Dike Drummond MD
http://www.thehappymd.com
10:08 AM on 01/30/2013
How does that 6/10 compare to other professions? I'd imagine 60% of people in general would retire if they had the means.

I'm a management consultant specializing in organizational architecture. Creating a healthy, stimulating workplace that doesn't compromise the mental/physical health of employees is central to what I do. That these factors apply to doctors, too, shouldn't be a revelation.

But much of this reads like doctors complaining about things that the rest of us have ALWAYS dealt with. Maybe doctors had come to think of themselves as a "privileged class", immune from the stresses and economic factors that buffet other professions. Maybe doctors felt that after surviving the meat grinder of residency, they were due 30 years of easy living?

Perhaps we're at a point now where a "correction" has occurred. The average internist, per the other article written by a doctor complaining that docs are "exploited", takes home $100K even after taxes and loan repayment - twice the GROSS pay of the average FAMILY.

Not to say the system couldn't be fixed/improved. Many industries have developed fundamental dysfunctions. But maybe we're reaching a point where doctors need to make a choice the rest of us have always had to make: lifestyle vs. maximum compensation.

Doctors have the same workplace & job satisfaction concerns as the rest of us? If this is a new concept, then I can only conclude that doctors have been riding atop a bubble for a LONG time, one that was due to burst.
04:08 PM on 01/28/2013
The US has fewer Docs per capita than anyone. Most Med schools are state-run, class sizes can change but it takes at least 7years to see more docs. Medicare pays for residencies, about $100K for each of about 100K slots, half is salary. Medicare wants to chop this. You can't just replace residents with trained foreign docs, they need some US residency years too. Also residents allow teaching hospitals to function.

A large number of US doc are in their late fifties or older. They trained in an era with more respect and autonomy, and business far less intrusive. These Docs have already struggled with many changes, many find Medicine less emotionally rewarding now. Many want to slow down or retire. Medicare has neglected to shape the physician workforce, though they hold the pursestrings. There seems to be no plan to replace these Docs except with advanced practice nurses and PA's.

Selfless devotion to duty is still the rule. Doctor strikes are almost nonexistent, far more than other health professionals can say. Lots of docs older than 65 still work, albeit less.

Drummond's right, the training programs for many specialists are brutal, even moreso 30 years ago. Perfection is the expectation, mistakes are shamed. It took years for me to realize my training at a notorious inner-city trauma center caused PTSD, by then I'd also spent years in ICU's, horror shows too. Burnout is a problem, so is getting Docs to address it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 AM on 01/28/2013
I'm a physician who just retired early, as have a number of other colleagues, who are not quite of retirement age, have done. I consider myself and these others blessed to have been in medicine during a period when it was immensely satisfying to be a caregiver and working hard & bearing responsibility for patients' lives was rewarding and paid commensurately, i.e. when medicine was medicine, not a government-run bureaucracy roosted over by a bunch of stuffed suits who attended law school.

With the number of frivolous malpractice suits rising steadily over the years in a country where few take responsibility for their unwise choices, an overabundance of lawyers with nothing better to do than ambulance chase, a government continuously ignoring torte reform, and now Obamacare with all its negative changes for the deliverers of healthcare, I wouldn't go in to healthcare if you paid for my education. As I said, I was lucky to have served my patient population when I did ... when even handwriting patient notes, prescriptions and orders was faster than today's electronic records.

Indeed, doctors are going to be the new canary in the coalmine. How many will die before the higher powers responsible for the health care albatross of Obamacare do something about it. Will their fix be something 'intelligent' like lowering the qualifications required for admission/graduation from medical school to increase the caregiver field even at the expense of more life-threatening mistakes? Woe be the patient today.
10:04 AM on 01/28/2013
"Organizations" have NO business in medicine. All they do is skim money off the top leaving less to be used to care for patients. Imagine is some "Organization" told you they were going to oversee your grocery shopping and would take 50% of your grocery money to do so...pretty absurd, yet that is exactly what HMO's and all these other "organizations" do. Ridiculous! Leave medicine to doctors and patients....keep politicians and business men out of it!
09:59 AM on 01/28/2013
Unfortunately, no one will discuss the proverbial elephant in the room....obesity. When most Americans are grossly over-weight, it raises healthcare costs. We need to pass these added expenses to those who incur them...the obese. Only then will they finally realize that their habits are hitting their pocketbooks. We pay for gastric bypass surgery for our population thru government subsidized programs which cost a fortune, when all that is needed is diet and exercise....and severe taxes on fast food establishments who are like the new drug pushers. Restrict fast food calories, restrict fast food advertising and demand more from our population...everything is NOT okay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Distefano
08:05 AM on 01/28/2013
I am hearing that a culture that has forsaken all other values for profit above all else is causing incredible disasters almost everywhere.Blind capitalism on steroids is destroying and obscuring everything meaningful.My heart truly goes out to physicians who desire empathy-driven care,but are under the gun of a system practicing materialistic idolotry.
06:01 AM on 01/28/2013
Astonishing that the American Public, and the voters in particular in this country are not intelligent enough to see that they were sold a complete farse in the "something for nothing" Affordable Health Care Act.... those folks that were making bad economic and healthcare decisions before will continue to make bad decisions... and the only difference will be that we will all be worse off... a dream come true for the social democrats.
09:38 AM on 01/28/2013
My mother DIED at age 63 (a widow with a job, but no insurance, not high-paying) solely due to no access to AFFORDABLE health care. She had heart disease, needed expensive tests, then potential pacemaker surgery. She suffered from high blood pressure, early-stage heart failure and then developed fibrillation. She was not poor enough for Medicaid, nor old enough for Medicare. She found out about her bhp when she got pneumonia, had hospitalized for a few days. Paying for hospital stay forced her to use up most of her small savings account. She found a DR who'd see her twice a yr for cash to write her high blood pressure prescription. But after a few yrs she developed other symptoms. DR told her she needed tests/possible surgery. Mother didn't have thousands of $$$s it would cost! We know what she died of because there had to be an autopsy. Pathologist told my brother & I it was "such a shame" she died of what was treatable with meds (the fibrillation-heart failure), then common pacemaker surgery. The ACA will make it possible for many more people to become insured, so no others will have to die needlessly, like my mother did. Obama NEVER said the ACA is "something for nothing." Stop spreading LIES and DISINFORMATION!
10:06 AM on 01/28/2013
Every county in the United States has a hospital which is free to those without resources. Was your mother out of the country?
10:44 AM on 01/28/2013
Let's see... my grandmother had MS, my other grandmother had Alzheimers, my mother had Alzheimers, my father died of kidney/heart failure at the age of 45... in his case due to the lack of technology that our wonderful (pre-Obamacare) health care industry devised for all those that followed with similar ailments, my sister has sever mental illness... and somehow... some way... the family steps in to work things out without burdening others... and we always had a hospital that was accomodating inspite of lack of insurance coverage... I am very sorry to hear about your mother. But to destroy the best health care system the world has ever seen (in the aggregate) just to score political points is shameful, if not genuinely sinful.
08:27 PM on 01/27/2013
I do work in a setting where I'm supported. It's a small private practice (2 MDs & 3 midlevels) however there's always the underlying pressure to order more procedures. I started my career in 1979 & it's been a bumpy road from the get-go. Healthcare has always been money driven but now that fact is thinly veiled. The medical system is defaulting to less trained & less knowledgeable healthcare providers in order to meet the bottom line. Eisenhower said beware of the military-industrial complex. We are within the medical-industrial complex.
09:43 AM on 01/28/2013
People don't want to acknowledge it is the medical insurance companies who are the real Death Panels. It is not the Doctor who decides what is best medical treatment for a patient. It is what treatment the patient's insurance will approve! FOR PROFIT insurance corps have a LEGAL duty to FIRST and ABOVE ALL make profits for their shareholders. They make their profits by investing insurance premiums paid to them by their policyholders - NOT by approving medical treatments to treat their policyholders injuries & illnesses!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Secord
07:51 PM on 01/27/2013
The bottom is about to fall out of healthcare in the United States between the inevitable implementation of the Sustainable Growth Rate Formula, the estimated cost of implementing EMR @ $40 thousand/office, the estimated cost of implementing ICD-10 @ $80 thousand/office and the provisions of the ACA. Medicare will become worthless as no one will participate in it with such a cut in reimbursement and private insurance will follow Medicare in their own fee schedule and doctors will drop out of those plans as well. We will end up with the same system they have in England: the rich will go to private hospitals and private fee for service doctors; everyone else will put up with the system, with doctors becoming government employees as you could never survive in private practice. The same rationing of care will occur as it does in England and innovation and new drugs coming to market will be a thing of the past. The only way to survive that is to not participate in the system and be a concierge practice. This is a sad situation, about to get much worse, especially if you consider that I can resign from Medicare, but hospitals can't and will start closing their doors (and especially in light of the new Medicare rule which won't reimburse for care rendered on a readmission within 30 days of discharge). The perfect storm of rises costs, falling reimbursement and no tort reform in sight.
09:52 AM on 01/28/2013
I am 68. I attended a meeting two weeks ago about the changes for 2013 & 2014 in Medicare due to ACA. The speaker was FROM Medicare! Medicare is going to begin PAYING doctors a ten percent bonus for taking more (or starting to take) Medicare patients. All of the changes are for the GOOD! The only Medicare beneficiaries who won't like one of the changes are "high income" people on Medicare who are going to have to pay more money for their premiums, based on how much income they have. To me, that isn't unreasonable. Starting 2013, Medicare will pay a little over 52% of the costs of brand name & generic prescription drug for patients "in the donut hole." By 2020, dreaded donut hole will go away. So the elderly who now can't afford to take their prescriptions as they're supposed to because they can't afford them once they fall into the donut hole won't have to worry about it any more. This will SAVE MONEY. Because they get SICKER when they don't take their meds as prescribed. Medicare has to pay out MORE money to help them solely due to unaffordability of medications in the donut hole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Secord
11:27 AM on 01/28/2013
O.k. Why do you think Medicare is offering this 10% fee advantage to physicians (which is no where in the ACA, so although I don't doubt you hearing this, I've never heard anything of this from the AMA and it isn't in the ACA as published)? When the SGR formula inevitably kicks in, all reimbursement from Medicare falls by nearly 27%. They've been staving this off since it was made a law in 1997 and will one day have to finally enact it. Once Medicare reimbursement falls by 27%, no one will take it as that level of reimbursement will be as poor as Medicaid and you won't be able to keep the lights on. Also not mentioned in your note was how all the new benefits will be paid for? To make it seem more affordable, Obama robbed Medicare of about $700 billion and the system is slated to go insolvent in 2024 (not that far away). We know that when President Bush signed the Medicare Part D program, we had no way of paying for it and it added 7.1 trillion to the debt. Your excitement over having no "doughnut hole" in coverage lasts until Medicare goes bust....and then all the checks stop. How does that not occur to people?
10:09 AM on 01/28/2013
Amen. Soon all doctors will from countries we can't even pronounce with degrees which aren't worth the paper they are written on. Then the public will complain that something needs to be done, but by then all the smart kids will be in computer science and business...very sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:19 PM on 01/27/2013
Yeah, it is hard to get all the stuff together to get a good diagnosis these days unless a patient comes to the doctor with enough information. We, the patients, have to do a lot of looking at what all is wrong with us and put together the information in a package and even make sure to bring visuals that illustrate what we find is wrong, things like charts of our BP history help a tremendous amount.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dike Drummond, M.D.
09:41 PM on 01/27/2013
And since you don't know what state your doc is in ... it can really help to get them to take a big breath and be present with you for your visit. I know it is not supposed to be your responsibility and it can help. I assure you they will be grateful and you will have a better visit.

Dike
Dike Drummond MD
http://www.thehappymd.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:09 AM on 01/28/2013
My primary is always attentive when she is with me. I do think she has a large patient load though because sometimes she is unable to see me on short notice and I try to stay well so I do not have to go see her.

But, your input is valuable. Thanks.
02:46 PM on 01/27/2013
I wish more doctors will speak up. Here you are, some laws said YOU MUST take care of patients when you are on call. The hospital and some patients DO NOT care about you being paid. I got a letter from AETNA insurance for a trauma patient that I took care of three years ago, I was told the patient was retroactively dis-enrolled six months after the initial surgery, so, they want the money they paid three years ago back; they sent it to a collection agency. If you do not return it, it will be takent out of future patients enrolled with the insurance that you take care of. For the hospital, one of the benefits of having a hospital priviledge is that YOU MUST take calls ," we DO NOT CARE about you being paid". Unfortunately, if you do not pay your office rent, we will send letters from our lawyer and kick you out. What a MESS!
09:24 AM on 01/27/2013
At least physicians have choices. There is job demand for their services almost anywhere in the U.S., or the world for that matter. Plus they can work for themselves or for a clinic or HMO. I think a big problem is that the A.M.A. limits the number of medical schools and therefore the number of graduates to keep the supply down.

When I graduated with a B.S. degree I applied to several medical schools. In spite of my education, mensa-IQ, and relatives in the profession I could not get accepted. So I went to another field and later earned 2 Masters degrees in other areas. But I, like most others in most fields, got stuck in the world of seniority and limited opportunity to move about.

So I got burn-out too. But at the same time I had fewer choices than anyone with an M.D. degree has.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msega17341
11:27 AM on 01/27/2013
Could someone check that statement about the AMA having control over the number of medical schools in the the U.S.??????
01:53 PM on 01/27/2013
You can do your own checking. Use search terms like: AMA ACCREDITATION FOR MEDICAL SCHOOLS and you could also check on the WHO (world health organization) role in accrediting schools as well. In my opinion, we would have a lot more qualified physicians if these organizations encouraged the expansion of medical schools. It's the old "supply and demand" thing in action. Again, IMHO, if we had more graduating physicians, there would be less cost to the consumer but also less pay and opportunity for the doctor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msega17341
12:34 AM on 01/28/2013
AMA and who seem to be accreditation reviewers how does that give them the power to stop the establishment of new medical schools????
07:24 PM on 01/27/2013
The AMA is not an accrediting body. nor is the WHO
Perhaps you are thinking of the AAMC.
11:48 PM on 01/27/2013
The AAMC ultimely plays a role, but this is taken from the AMA web page at:
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/clinical-practice-improvement/clinical-quality/accreditation-collaboration.page =

"provides health care accreditation and related services that support performance improvement in health care organizations. The Joint Commission currently evaluates and accredits nearly 17,000 health care organizations and programs in the United States."

But my point was not to nit-pick the various agencies and organizations invovlved. I wanted to point out that there are not enough medical schools, and there have not been enough medical schools for decades in this country. I have to wonder how much of this is motivated by politics and/or money.
08:51 AM on 01/27/2013
My doctor works part time and only sees patients with a long term appointment. If I have an immediate problem, I go to an emergent care office. I like my doctor, she does spend time and listen to me. She can't be the only doctor who operates this way.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Dike Drummond, M.D.
09:58 AM on 01/27/2013
There are several practice models that give primary care doctors plenty of time to see you. Two common types are called direct primary care and concierge medicine. These are docs who have opted out of the big practice/high volume model in favor of a very small, very low overhead practice that allows them to make a living with only about 400 patients rather than the 2500 or so the big clinics demand.

These are the docs who have taken action to get themselves out of the mine. This is a viable option for primary care docs - not so much for everyone else.

Dike
Dike Drummond MD
http://www.thehappymd.com
03:36 PM on 01/27/2013
So, you are implying that it is those doctors' choices to become canaries. In other words, they have the option of low volume (400 patient) clinics, and high volume (2500 patients) clinics. But, they chose the later. My question, then, is why are you suggestion that this situation be changed if the physicians are the ones that chose the 2500 route? Also, knowing that some people prefer to work in high pressure environments, is it not likely that we will destroy this model and create a big problem for the profession if we make the changes you suggest? Finally, based on the suggestions you made, will it not be better to create a third model of practice for the physicians?
09:53 PM on 01/28/2013
OK, my best friend is an OB/GYN in a lifestyle-oriented practice. He had Wednesdays off. One call weekend a month. 5 weeks vacation a year. And he's on his way home at 5 every day. And he makes an awfully good living.

Maybe his practice is an exception and not the rule, but he's about the only one of my friends who I NEVER hear say, "Man, work is kicking my ass!"

I'm having a very difficult time hearing a profession whose average take-home pay - even after medical school loans - is in the six figures as being so stressed and burned out. Welcome to the rest our world, the world where margins are tightening and professionals have to work more for less than ever before, and burnout is common. I'm not sure where doctors got the idea they're entitled to be above it.

I have no doubt there is dysfunction in the system that needs to be improved, and health care is a very complex issue with interactions on multiple levels. There are no silver bullets. But this is the second article I've read lately - another from a doctor trying to make the case that doctors are essentially no better paid than schoolteachers and are being "exploited" (his word, not mine) - and it just doesn't jibe with what I see in the lives of any of the doctors I know personally.
08:33 AM on 01/27/2013
An equally disturbing aspect of the medical chain of events is the lack of true new technology. Research goes the way of pharma/profit influences rather than the trends in patient need. A glaring example of this is in eye disease research. Nothing new for more than twenty years in discovering root causes of glaucoma, macular degeneration. Not only are MDs overworked, they have few new tools to work with. And Obamacare will NOT help, rather will further complicate MDs ability to treat.
03:37 PM on 01/27/2013
How will Obamacare complicate ability to treat?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maryweinstein
04:56 PM on 01/27/2013
One way that comes to mind is the Obamacare provision ( to be enacted in 2015, I think I read) to reimburse doctors and other healthcare providers based on "quality of care", not volume of patients. Quality of care is a subjective benchmark, based on any number of items having nothing to do with the patient's medical problems, and it's likely to be decided by federal beancounters ( or perhaps the panel of 16?) with little or no medical or healthcare experience.

The myriad (and counting) number of regulations associated with Obamacare will also complicate patient care.
06:21 PM on 01/27/2013
Obamacare affecting number of doctors available to treat, based on reduced payouts to MDs. More and more MDs saying no thanks, BO. Obamacare to dictate what doctors can do, restricting to 'by the numbers' treatments. Obamacare also expects all treatments go thru internal medicine docs first. Number of these types woefully lacking.