iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Donald Cohen

GET UPDATES FROM Donald Cohen
 

Behind the Meningitis Outbreak: Pharmacies Fought FDA Regulation

Posted: 10/19/2012 4:35 pm

Fifteen people have died and several hundred have been infected in an outbreak of meningitis contracted from contaminated spinal steroid injections. The numbers are growing and so is awareness of the growth of a little known corner of the pharmaceutical industry, called compounding pharmacies, which is responsible for the tragedy. "We're nowhere near the end of this problem," Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious diseases expert at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, told CBS This Morning.

The compounding pharmacies originally were supposed to provide customized medication for individual patients but have morphed into bulk manufacturers outside of FDA's regulatory reach.

At the heart of the tragedy is the compounder's successful track record blocking FDA authority that could have averted the disaster. Their efforts are a textbook model of industry opposition to new rules that could save lives. Their arguments are the same that the Chamber of Commerce and industry is using today to block clean air, workplace safety and financial industry protections and they are the same they've used to fight every existing health, safety, consumer and environmental protection we take for granted.

Unfortunately, the compounding pharmacies' success in avoiding FDA oversight has led to tragedy for families.

In 1997, at the urging of regulators who were concerned that the compounders looked increasingly like mass-producing pharmaceutical manufacturers, Congress passed a law that gave the FDA clearer authority to treat drug compounders like drug makers. Four people died from meningitis in 2001-02 after they received contaminated back pain shots. In 2002, the compounders sued and the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the 1997 law.

In October 2003, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held hearings in response to "a significant number of very real problems caused by compounded drugs." Senator Christopher Bond reported that they had "received reports of nonsterile eye drops causing blindness, spinal injections contaminated with bacteria and/or fungus, resulting in hospitalization and, in some cases, death, and children poisoned as a result of pharmacy compounding errors."

The industry testified -- successfully -- against FDA regulation.

Daniel A. Herbert, President, American Pharmacists Association urged the adoption of "voluntary, non-punitive" but not mandatory disclosure by pharmacists of the risks associated with compounded drugs.

A Congressional proposal to create an FDA advisory panel on compounding pharmacies was killed when the International Academy of Compounding Pharmacists (IACP) mobilized its 2700 members to target key lawmakers including Texas Congressman Tom Delay, whose district was home to IACP's headquarters.

In 2007, Senators Edward Kennedy (D, Mass.), Pat Roberts (R, Kan.), and Richard Burr (R, N.C.) proposed the Safe Compounding Drug Act to address the regulatory gaps.

The bi-partisan legislation would have given FDA authority to inspect compounding pharmacies, regulate interstate sales and focus compounding on the original purpose of providing individualized medications rather than becoming stealth mass production manufacturers that operated outside of FDA oversight.

Industry groups inundated Capitol Hill with all too familiar predictions of disaster and unintended consequences. The IACP warned that FDA regulation would put their industry "in jeopardy."

They denied there was a problem that required federal regulation since "state boards of pharmacy have done a great job," according to L.D. King, executive director of IACP.

A letter from a coalition of nine pharmacy organizations claimed that the legislation would have unintended consequences and would "negatively impact patient access to necessary compounded prescription medications."

IACP executive David Miller, told Reuters that the federal regulations would "strangle the industry."

They warned of it would "create onerous [read: big government], new requirements."

And finally, they claimed they were taking care of the problem. In 2006, responding to earlier contaminations and deaths, the pharmacist groups created an industry-run voluntary accreditation process for compounders.

In the face of industry mobilization, Kennedy's legislation never made it out of committee.

It is now clear that the compounders were wrong -- tragically wrong.

The results are in and voluntary industry self-regulation doesn't work. As of October 2012, only 162 of the thousands of these pharmacies have been accredited.

It's clear that state-level regulation isn't enough. The compounding pharmacies are adept at maneuvering through the patchwork of regulatory peaks and valleys and state agencies charged with monitoring the pharmacies certainly simply aren't doing the "great job" that industry claims.

Finally, the typical predictions of economic disaster for industry and for patients are simply unsubstantiated smokescreens intended to frighten policy makers and consumers.

The consequences of inaction aren't idle speculation. Hundreds of people have become ill and too many have died from using contaminated compound medicines over the last 15 years. Congressman Edward Markey (D-MA) is urging Congress to take quick action. Given their track record, compounders will likely use the same misleading rhetoric and ramp up their spending on lobbyists and campaign contributions to block new proposals to put them under FDA rules. The IACP has increased their lobbying spending from $20,000 in 2001 to $116,189 in 2011. Hopefully, Congress will finally realize that industry is crying wolf and take the step they should have taken 15 years ago to close the regulatory loophole. If not, more lives will almost certainly be lost.

 

Follow Donald Cohen on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@crywolfproject

FOLLOW POLITICS
Fifteen people have died and several hundred have been infected in an outbreak of meningitis contracted from contaminated spinal steroid injections. The numbers are growing and so is awareness of the...
Fifteen people have died and several hundred have been infected in an outbreak of meningitis contracted from contaminated spinal steroid injections. The numbers are growing and so is awareness of the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:15 PM on 10/20/2012
The Meningitis Foundation of America (MFA), a national organization, would like the public & media to know that information is available regarding the diagnosis, treatment & prevention of meningitis. MFA was founded in 1997 by parents whose children were affected by meningitis. In addition to supporting vaccination & preventing meningitis, the MFA provides information to educate the public & medical professionals so that the early diagnosis, treatment &, most important, prevention of meningitis, will save lives. Meningitis is a dangerous & often times fatal inflammation of the brain &/or spinal cord that can leave survivors with serious life-long physical problems MFA would like to be considered as a news resource for the disease. For further information, visit the MFA website at www musa org.

Thank you,
MFA
Box 1818
El Mirage AZ 85335
480 270 2652
World Meningitis Day 24 April 2013
www comoonline org
Educate~Vaccinate~Eradicate
10:38 AM on 10/20/2012
And the FDA is yet another scam, a criminal organization helping industry ignore safety measures while collecting our tax dollars to protect us. Like the SEC, the 'regulators' are really 'facilitators'. Of corporate crimes against humanity.
10:21 PM on 10/20/2012
Did you bother to read the artical at all?

The companies are not regulated by the FDA.
12:23 AM on 11/11/2012
The FDA has authority over anyone that manufactures drugs in this country. NECC was legally permitted to compound single items in response to individual prescriptions from individual patients. Once they started mass producing things, they became manufacturers. If the products they were manufacturing were not approved by the FDA then it was the Agency's responsibility to sieze those products and prevent their distribution. In this regard the Agency failed miserably.
Jimsoutside
Work in progress
08:21 AM on 10/22/2012
Not just low-information...low-intelligence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:47 AM on 10/20/2012
Big pharma is out to make big bucks. It is why they hire kids fresh out of college to push their drugs...gotta have a four year degree, but don't worry if you've NEVER had even ONE pharma class...no problem! You deserve to be paid big bucks because you earned it by going to college for four years! Infect, big pharma prefers their drug pushers to have ZERO knowledge of "legal" drugs...and why would that be??

Do your body a favor and RESEARCH the drug some doc (who gets perks...and don't give me the perk-crap is illegal, they get around it by calling it continuing Ed) wants to push on you because he got a nice trip to Vail for continuing Ed...with a ski trip thrown in.
10:25 PM on 10/19/2012
Just because something is fda approved does not mean it is checked. Lots more die from fda approved meds and side effects.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Brinkworth
06:49 PM on 10/19/2012
Please remember that this is one of the first agencies that Romney would shut down. Also remeber thet with pharmaceuticals and pharmacies food producers cut corners to make a buck people die. Don't even try the "FDA" doesn't work so we should rid of it argumument" Because the deaths would be on a national scale without them.
03:48 AM on 10/20/2012
"Please remember that this is one of the first agencies that Romney would shut down."

Can you post a credible source for this? I mean, I know you're not just lying or making stuff up so I'm sure you have one, I mean why would you just blatantly spread FUD and lie like that right?

So I'm just asking for your source so _other people_ who think you're a liar will be satisfied, kind of a devil's advocate thing, you know?
12:32 AM on 11/11/2012
Not sure why so many people want to make this a political issue. This has nothing to do with what any politician, democrat or republican, WOULD do, this is about a failure of government regulators to do their damn jobs.

The FDA was informed of what NECC was doing in 2006. They issued a Warning Letter telling NECC to stop manufacturing unapproved drugs. NECC ignored the letter and FDA forgot about the letter. Even after various other complaints about NECC and Ameridose, including one as late as July of this year, the Agency did absolutely nothing to stop them. When the menigitis issue first hit the news, Deb Autor, a high ranking FDA official noted that the Agency had had "their eye on them [NECC] for a while." Keeping an "eye on them" while the are manufacturing unapproved deadly drugs isn't exactly in keeping with the Agency's mission to protect the public health.

I see that the Massachusetts Board of Pharmacy has fired at least one person over their failure to act on NECC complaints. Let's hope Deb Auto's becomes the first FDA head to roll over this.