The November election is looking to be another dreary choice between the lesser of two evils. Do you want the big spending interventionist or the big spending interventionist? One probably would spend a bit more money while the other one probably would start a few more wars.
American democracy at its best!
A few years back -- I've forgotten the particular profligate war-mongers involved -- the Cato Institute's president, Ed Crane, posited that the foundation's policy staffers were forced into the voting booth at gunpoint. Which of the evils would we choose? Several of us responded: pull the trigger!
So it appears likely to be in November. We already know that President Barack Obama goes to bed dreaming of new spending schemes and has yet to meet a civil liberty that he is unwilling to violate. The permanently premature winner of the Nobel Peace Prize also routinely threatens to loose the dogs of war around the world and, albeit with perhaps a tinge of reluctance, follows through by escalating existing conflicts, bombing other nations, and assassinating foreign citizens.
His presumptive Republican Party opponent, Mitt Romney, is a late, convenient, and not altogether convincing convert to limited government and fiscal responsibility. The former governor's foreign policy sounds more bellicose than that of George W. Bush, who not only started unnecessary and counterproductive foreign wars, but sacrificed domestic liberties even when doing so did not advance Americans' security.
This is a choice? When I step into the voting booth, just pull the trigger, please!
But it doesn't have to be this way. In 2008 Congressmen Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich offered genuine choices, not echoes, in the Republican and Democratic primaries, respectively. This time only Rep. Paul ran. But he has presented a vision of a republic rather than an empire to enthusiastic audiences crossing partisan lines.
Unfortunately, he lost out to a dubious mix of crack-pots, wind-bags, narcissists, authoritarians, ignoramuses, and opportunists. Naturally, most of them wanted to spend more money -- they just argued about how much on what -- and all wanted a foreign policy focused on killing foreigners. Washington has rich friends to protect, failed societies to remake, inconsiderate allies to manipulate, bad guys to overawe, and an entire world to reengineer.
The principal exception to this dismal parade was former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson. He took many of the same positions as Rep. Paul, but was excluded from most of the debates despite originally registering the same one percent in the polls as former Gov. Jon Huntsman and former Sen. Rick Santorum, who were invited to participate.
Johnson finally gave up the GOP race and decided to seek the Libertarian Party presidential nomination. The LP convention opened on Wednesday May 2, with the vote scheduled for Saturday May 5. He would be a good choice, but even as the LP nominee he still would have difficulty winning gaining media attention in the fall.
Another option is a Paul-Johnson ticket.
No doubt, representatives of Republicrat duopoly will cast 2012 as a decisive election, one of the most important if not the most important in a generation. They will rally their respective "bases" by demonizing the other side, even as the two candidates hug the center line while proposing more domestic spending and new foreign interventions. Partisans will prophecy disaster if the opposing candidate wins, even though we all know that the result will be the same irrespective of who ends up taking the oath of office next January: higher spending, fewer liberties, and more wars.
The American people desperately need an alternative to the Republicrat Parties. For four decades the Libertarian Party has made an effort with only limited success. Candidates serious (former Rep. Bob Barr in 2008) and pure (a variety of unknowns over the years) have been unable to break the one percent barrier. Even Rep. Paul tried in 1988 with no more success.
Former Gov. Johnson alone isn't likely to do much better. He remains barely known outside of New Mexico. The LP lacks an effective national organization. The political class will avoid mentioning his name. The media will largely follow suit. As partisans insist that any defection will help the devil on the other side, he will be lucky to break the one percent barrier.
However, Rep. Paul is the potential Transformer. Like the movie, he shows up in everyday garb, an avuncular grandfather who looks like he should be collecting Social Security while enjoying retirement near a golf course in Florida. But then he turns into a vigorous otherworldly machine committed to combating statism in all its variants, from bloated entitlements to executive surveillance to promiscuous war-making. And on his second successive Republican presidential run he has broken into the national consciousness by challenging the GOP status quo and winning double digit support in many states.
Most important, he has picked up the most name recognition ever for a presidential outlier espousing explicitly libertarian ideas. Transferring that name recognition to the Libertarian Party would immediately turn it into a serious force in November. Admittedly not with a realistic chance for victory. There just aren't enough libertarian-minded Americans to give him a majority or plurality in November as the LP nominee. However, he could aspire to match Ross Perot's 19 percent in 1992. And he might win double-digit poll ratings from the start, making it harder, and perhaps even hard, for debate organizers to exclude him.
With only 14 Republican primaries to go, he should drop out of the GOP race and announce his intention to seek the LP nomination. Some Paul supporters still hope he will triumph at the convention in August. But Rep. Paul isn't going to capture the GOP nomination in August, even if his supporters continue to pick up extra delegates with good local organizations and smart political tactics.
Nor is Mitt Romney, despite his apparently friendly personal relationship with Rep. Paul, going to make meaningful substantive concessions warranting the latter's political support. A speaking slot at midnight? Maybe. A serious commitment to slash entitlements or foreswore new wars? Fuggedaboutit! And with the 76-year-old Paul planning to retire from Congress, a Romney administration couldn't even offer assistance for Paul's congressional legislation if it was inclined to do so.
The congressman also may hope to use his sway to promote his son's future prospects. However, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) already is making his way by making waves. Sen. Paul will do better if libertarian ideas do better. And that will not come from Rep. Paul showing up at the GOP convention supinely endorsing Romney. It will come from Rep. Paul raising the standard of individual liberty and limited government in all their forms during the November race.
Finally, a few states might bar Rep. Paul from their November ballots under so-called "sore loser" laws since he already has run in the primaries as a Republican. In fact, most do not apply to presidential races and Gary Johnson faces the same problem. But to the extent such statutes create a barrier, it could be chalked up as a cost of "doing business" -- necessary to win the public attention that comes only from participating in intra-major party debates. And this public attention would yield far more recognition and votes nationally in November even if he was denied a ballot line by some states.
Although the case for Rep. Paul heading the LP ticket is strong, so is Gary Johnson's claim to the vice presidential position. In fact, the latter is well-qualified for the presidential nod. A successful businessman, he served two terms as New Mexico governor, from 1995 to 2003. He cut spending growth with prolific use of the veto -- more than the other 49 governors combined. As governor, he backed educational choice and, though a physical fitness fanatic (climbing Mt. Everest in May 2003), promoted marijuana legalization. Since then he opposed the Iraq war and nation-building in Afghanistan. He is a likely future LP star.
Competition is good, but this year joining Rep. Paul in the second spot would buttress the ticket, giving the LP its best tandem ever. Two serious people, two serious political figures. The VP slot, normally a public unknown and political nullity, would be held by someone with as good a claim to the vice presidency and even presidency as the current office holders.
Running with Rep. Paul would allow Gary Johnson to tap into the former's fervent fan base this year. Moreover, it would well-position Johnson for a run for the LP presidential nomination -- or conceivably the GOP nomination, as well -- in four years. Strengthening Johnson as a publicly recognized advocate of libertarian ideas would simultaneously bolster Sen. Rand Paul's present position and future prospects in the Republican Party. Sen. Paul and the libertarian movement are unlikely to succeed if the ideas have only one champion. As they acquire wider attention and acceptance they are more likely to triumph in the political marketplace.
Indeed, the battle for liberty is for the long-term. The Republicrat duopoly is certain to win in November -- at least, as certain as anything in politics. And the usual suspects want to keep voter choices forever constrained.
When facing Republican presidents, the left talks of peace and civil liberties, but most of its activists unite behind a president who gives war and betrays civil liberties so long as he pushes the welfare state ever upward and outward. The right takes a similar approach, with most partisans glorifying in war and repression while forgiving bloated spending. Indeed, columnist Michael Gerson, who served President George W. Bush -- an enthusiastic big spender and warmonger -- seemingly views this as "Reform Conservatism." So much for the supposed battle of principle in Washington.
However, Ron Paul and Gary Johnson can change that. They should run together for the Libertarian Party nominations for president and vice president, respectively. That wouldn't guarantee their selection -- Libertarians, even more than libertarians, are a tempestuously independent lot. However, Paul-Johnson would be the strongest ticket the LP could offer. It would be the best alternative available to the Republicrats. And only it would encourage real long-term political change.
Come November, another big-spending war-monger seems certain to win the presidency. The result will be more American money and lives needlessly wasted. However, the future is not fixed and people can rise to the challenge. Calling on Ron Paul and Gary Johnson: Your moment has arrived. Will you step forward and seize it?
This post first appeared at Forbes online.
Stan Sorscher: We All Do Better When We All Do Better
 |
 |
|
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Electoral Votes (270 to win) |
332 | 206 |
| Obama | Romney | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 65,899,660 | 60,932,152 |
| Percent | 51.1% | 47.2% |
| Democrats* | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Current Senate | 53 | 47 |
| Seats gained or lost | +2 | -2 |
| New Total | 55 | 45 |
| Democrats | Republicans | |
|---|---|---|
| Seats won | 201 | 234 |
There is no change without Gary Johnson / Judge Grey.
Ron Paul, I wish you were there.
Call me a traitor if you will, but be it known: I am black, I am female, I am a Democrat, and I am a liberal, but I will absolutely vote as a Libertarian for Gary Johnson if he holds these campaign promises. I voted for Obama and can only say: "Too many photo ops and not enough action for center and left. No more banquets, songs and parties. Sir, you are not a pop star, and this nation is danger."
Seriously: we Democrats need only hand the President a fiddle and a certain analogy becomes terrifyingly appropriate. Do we really need him singing Al Green at a time like this, with the nation racially and economically on fire, and its borders collapsing?
I'm looking more closely at Gary Johnson. If he fools me sufficiently into thinking he'll actually do the things he claims he will, he has my vote, and adios Democratic Party this election.
Here's what a War on Drugs will get you (NSFW, NSFL in fact):
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1072898.1336193004!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/image.jpg
I'm tired of my tax dollars going to massacres like the above, to the latest pet campaigns of both right and left, and to bombing brown babies for oil.
Enough already. I hope Gary's for real.
In case you hadn't noticed. one would think with the sheer volume of criminal election activities this year would have journalist's all over it. NADA. Fox has one guy that reports on the goings on around Ron paul's campaign. As for the rest of the biggies? Squat, Zip, Nothing!. From our Commander in Chief and his Attorney General, we get DEAFENING SILENCE! Not a peep even from the DNC. Are you getting the picture yet? Our JOINT CHIEF'S? So quiet I don't even know their names.
The longer it goes on like that, The more angry parents are waking up to broken TV screen's. Yup I've even heard of an account of a college girl doing that to her dad brand new big screen in order to get his attention. I can say without doubt. Convention this August is going to be something to behold. Ron Paul 2012. Thank again Doug for not doing a hit piece on Doc Paul. That's a very rare thing these days.
The traitorstream and others are in for a rude awakening. Like Jury Tampering. Election Rigging is still a FELONY!. Anyone interested in knowing just how blatant it is, all you need to do is just type "Election Fraud 2012" into youtubes search bar. That's provided you care enough about your children's futures, and have about a week to watch the hundreds of real time video recordings that Doc Paul's supporters have taken at every caucus and primary event that has taken place to date.
There are three grassroots projects in the works, that are going to happen before November. One is a huge Ron Paul Support Camp out on private property in Tampa at convention.
The next is the, "TWO YOU LOSE" Campaign. We the People don't need Term LIMIT legislation to clean up our law making houses in DC. It don't matter what side of the Isle your on. And if it means throwing out a few baby's with the bathwater to clean out the corruption in those chambers then so be it.
And the third is a grassroots petition to force the Senate to begin impeachment proceeding against Obama and Holder for not doing the jobs we pay them to do
You have got to know that we now have TWO new voting blocks added to the mix. One I call the ANGRY VOTER BLOCK. The other I call the EMBARRASSED PARENTS VOTING BLOCK. What most people that can't figure out about Doc Paul's attraction for our youth are missing, is really quite simple to understand, and It goes like this.
Our children, even 12 year olds, by their total support, commitment and active dedication are screaming at the entire world. "We don't want to live in this corrupt world you have given us". Ron Paul's honesty, tenacity, determination and intelligence on both fiscal and foreign policy issues are spot on and easy to grasp if a person takes the time to see through our once trusted major Press and Media's marginalization campaign. The overt intentional in your face Election Rigging, Vote Mismanagement, Voter Suppression coupled up with the stupid antics that the talking bobble heads have been reduced to using to keep Ron Paul unelectable makes our children mad and they go home and slap mom and dad in the face in order to knock the fog loose, and then the guilt sets in and the next thing you know. Mom and dad who got fed up with politics and dropped out decades ago find themselves reregistering to vote. How about that? Two new supporters because of one ticked off student.
When they used their out of pocket money to support Doc Paul's campaign only to have their face spat upon by an all out War on Ron Paul's campaign by our Traitotsteam Press and TV Media. Our Spin Doctors are saying. "Nope. Were not allowed to let your guy get any positive primetime airtime. So say the Gods. Sorry bout your luck. You just are not entitled to Open Free and Fair election"s. Bernanke and Associates does not want Ron Paul anywhere near the presidential ink pen and bully pulpet. What is sad about the whole deal is, Even though in some cases,a few of the Bobble Heads find it distasteful, They still are going along with the program.Those that didn't comply either got pink slips, or had their show canceled. (i.e.) Judge Napolitano's Freedom Watch" for example. That might turn out to be a good thing. I kinda hope Doc Paul chooses him for VP. They are just doing what the bosses tell them to do. Right? And their bosses over at the Fed.
Gary Johnson for President on the L ticket, with Ron Paul as VP would give Gary Johnson some life insurance.
There still may be a change Ron Paul can prevail in the R party, but if not, already being on the ballot in the L party, without having personally encouraged the same, would grant the L party some press.
Novelty sells, as does celebrity. A celebrity willing to be in a subordinate position would be pretty novel.
A co-presidency would be novel. Gary Johnson could judiciously line-item, while Paul would, in a very interesting photo-op situation, be over in the Senate.
Creative thinking is required to save us from corruption run amok.
We need to part out the subsidy- and coercion- industries, and this will require interesting and novel teamwork.
They do this all the time to viable third party candidates, from merely smearing them as they do everyone not in their pocket who is not Ron Paul, to suppressing their media presence as they have done Paul. The reason they suppress Ron Paul is they can't find any dirt on him.
Thus, they play loudspeakers of white noise whenever anyone mentions his name or he accomplishes anything of note (such as his consistent donation earnings) in order to try to fool the masses into being unaware he exists.
If that fails to work, they'll declare him "unpresidential" like Dennis Kucinich, who in many ways was the Democratic version of Gary Johnson. Gary is tall, white-bread American looking and photogenic. They're going to have a tough time declaring him "unpresidential"; bank on them instead digging for past misconduct with a woman then publicizing it.
The media is not our friends, folks. They're the mouthpiece of a rather sinister new regime and we need to vote carefully for folks who know what the First Amendment says, and that limiting misinterpretation and misuse of it is not limiting it.
Good luck to Gary Johnson because if his platform is what he says it is, and he sticks to it, he'll get this liberal Democrat's vote.