More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Ali Binazir

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Ali Binazir
 

Which Part of 'Bad Boy' Was Unclear, Sandra Dear?

Posted: 03/25/10 12:07 PM ET

There has been a rash of celebrity relationship meltdowns recently as a result of men behaving badly: Jesse James and Sandra Bullock; Tiger Woods and his wife; Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer; Charlie Sheen and the latest hapless woman who took up with him.

What's surprising about these incidents isn't the behavior of the men, but people's reactions as if this were somehow unexpected. It's a bit like the headline "Lion Kills and Eats Antelope, Breaks Vegetarian Vow." This is not news; it's just what lions do.

Now I'm not in the business of criticizing celebrities, since I live in Los Angeles and they go to my yoga classes and might whack me with their mat when I'm in down-dog. They also happen to be perfectly nice people who have done nothing to deserve calumny in a public forum.

However, I am in the business of figuring out what fulfills people in their love lives and helping them achieve that. So if you're interested in that, listen up.

When it comes to relationships, women have three options: short-term (fling), medium-term (boyfriend), and long-term (life partner/husband). Any of those options can be fulfilling in its own right. The problem arises when you think you're signing up for one but end up with another. That's when you get a disjunction between expectation and reality, also known as pain.

Enter the Bad Boy. By virtue (or vice) of who he is, he presses deep-seated evolutionary buttons that can compromise any woman's good judgment (entire books have been written on that, so that's a topic for a different day). Those feelings happen at an unconscious level -- there's not much she can do about that. But woe betide her if she acts on those feelings and tries to shoehorn Mr Bad Boy -- custom-made by nature to be an excellent fling and passable boyfriend -- into the life partner/husband slot.

Now Sandra, Jennifer and Elin are smart, decent women with lots of options. To think that somehow you, my dear reader, are better than those ladies and would never fall into the same trap is not only a mistake, but a mistake with a name: the fundamental attribution error -- i.e. the notion that bad stuff only happens to other people.

So this article is here to help you spot Bad Boys before you get involved with them. Dating a bad boy is like obesity: solving the problem after it's occurred is costly and ineffective. Prevention works best.

Remember that Bad Boys aren't necessarily bad people, and dating one isn't always the end of the world. They're the dating equivalent of dessert -- part of a healthy, balanced diet that keeps things interesting when consumed sparingly. But if you keep on mistaking your chocolate cake for the meal, that's when you end up fat and sick. Just saying.

A guy doesn't necessarily have to build and race motorcycles or be a womanizing pop star to qualify as a Bad Boy. My definition has less to do with what he does and more with the effect he has on you: overall, he brings more pain to your life than joy. Sure, there will be some good times with the bad boy -- that's why women get involved with them. But the net result tends to be heartache.

That said, here's how to spot them, straight out of Chapter 5 of The Tao of Dating: The Smart Woman's Guide to Being Irresistible. In a nutshell, what you're looking out for are extremes of behavior:

1) He moves things along too quickly.
Bad boys tend to make early declarations of affection - genuinely or for effect. They also fall in love easily and have no problem proposing a romantic weekend getaway when they've known you for under 15 minutes.

Looks like: Spontaneity and joie de vivre

Reality: Impulsiveness and trying to get into your pants as swiftly as possible

You get: Plans only made at the last minute; plans cancelled at the last minute; irresponsibility; similarly impulsive overtures to other women.

2) He's just a tad too smooth.
When you first meet him, does he touch you too early and too often? Is he whispering in your ear? Is he overly generous with his compliments? Does he attempt to take you away from your friends and get you alone? Is he always subtly (or blatantly) pushing the boundary of what's appropriate and comfortable? Is he telling stories that seem too well-rehearsed and designed to aggrandize him, impress you, and get you worked up? Is there a lot of showmanship going on? Once you've started dating, are his excuses for marginal behavior all too plausible? Yup -- you've got yourself a bad boy.

Looks like: Romance! These men know this is the ultimate bait for getting a woman, and therefore use it skillfully and without apology.

Reality: Too good to be true is almost always exactly that. Deliberately seductive behavior usually means you're dealing with an experienced player.

You get: sexual infidelity (and disease); unreliability; rapid emotional detachment once he's gotten what he wants from you.

3) Thrillseeking behavior.
He rides a motorcycle -- a big Harley, actually. He skydives, takes all kinds of drugs, drinks a lot, goes out five times a week or more, and generally looks for the adrenaline rush.

Looks like: Excitement you want to be a part of.

Reality: Although many grown, responsible men take calculated risks, chronic thrillseeking heralds immaturity and recklessness.

You get: worry; genuine fear; loneliness as he goes off on his jaunts; infidelity; irresponsibility; run-ins with the law.

4) Devil-may-care attitude.
He lives by his own rules -- and only by his own rules. He dresses like he wants, works when he wants, eats what he wants, says what he wants.

Looks like: Fierce independence.

Reality: Antisocial behavior, which will inevitably extend to you as well.

You get: Inability to make plans, or broken plans when he does make them; verbal abuse; insensitivity to your feelings and desires; financial distress.

5) Studied physical appearance.
A stylish man is good to find. However, you can tell if a man has spent more time than normal on his appearance for effect. Too disheveled goes in the same category as too slick: extremes are what you're watching out for. Heavy cologne is a tip-off.

Looks like: Style, baby, style.

Reality: Narcissism and vanity.

You get: Player tendencies; mistreatment; self-absorption.

6) Evasiveness.
When a man is evasive -- especially about dating, the women in his life, the length of relationships and such -- beware. He may be doing it for sport, but chances are he has something to hide. Good relationships are based on honesty, trust and respect. Chronic evasiveness precludes all three, so this is an inauspicious start to things.

Looks like: Mystery and intrigue.

Reality: Skeletons in the closet.

What you're signing up for: Unreliability, mistrust, lies.

7) Lack of consideration.
Did he ask you out far enough in advance so you'd be able to make plans? Did he call to say he was going to be late? Did he open your car door for you? Did he offer to pay when he invited you out? Did he ask about your sick cat? How about your sick grandmother? How about when you were sick? Does he offer you his coat when you look cold? I'm belaboring the point here, which is this: you know what consideration looks like, and it's different from when a guy's being a jerk to you. Any one of these things is not a big deal, but a bunch of them happening in close succession is a sign.

Looks like: Non-conformity, roguish independence.

Reality: You're dealing with a jerk.

You get: see Devil-may-care attitude above.

So if you're looking for fulfilling relationships, know what you want, know what you're getting yourself into, and check to see if they match up. In the long run, it's the formula for less pain and more joy.

To have a brilliant dating life (and avoid bad boys successfully), get The Tao of Dating, the best damn dating book for women written by a guy who knows guys
Get the full, unabridged version of this list with 3 more items at the Tao of Dating blog
Write to me directly

 
 
 

Follow Dr. Ali Binazir on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DrAliBinazir

There has been a rash of celebrity relationship meltdowns recently as a result of men behaving badly: Jesse James and Sandra Bullock; Tiger Woods and his wife; Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer; Charlie...
There has been a rash of celebrity relationship meltdowns recently as a result of men behaving badly: Jesse James and Sandra Bullock; Tiger Woods and his wife; Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer; Charlie...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 127
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 PM on 04/05/2010
People today are very smart and can fool the best. Having said that, most of the mistakes are made by rushing into love and commiting to soon. . If you give yourselves time, and be observant, meet the people surrounding your friend or p.......and don't live in denial, you will find out a lot about a person. And what you find out can go either way. Rushin into a relationship is not very good. It's ok to have a one night stand with a bad boy, maybe even breakfast, maybe......but no marriage. Having said that , chemistry has to be present. A relationship without chemistry is like you dead before you are dying. Eventually it has to turn into love , gracious, kind , warm , cozy love.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andiannj
12:54 AM on 03/29/2010
Bad boys always make bad husbands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
don quixote12
10:40 PM on 03/27/2010
It's obvious that Bullock walked into the situation knowing what she was doing.
""I was a bolter," she told Vogue in March. "I would get so scared because my idea of marriage was not a very pleasant one. And now I look at it in a different way. I threw away what society's version of it was and I went, 'Why does it have to be anyone else's version but mine?'" "
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1083855,00.html

"Sandra Bullock Signed Prenup In 2005"
http://www.ecanadanow.com/entertainment/2010/03/27/sandra-bullock-signed-prenup-in-2005/

She took a calculated risk and cra.pped out. Just because she is deeply hurt doesn't she didn't know it could happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
don quixote12
10:41 PM on 03/27/2010
I'll add: her taking that risk does not in any way make her responsible for James own choices and behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GirlFriday123
We all live downstream.
11:14 PM on 03/27/2010
I think she knew it was possible, but don't all celebrities do prenup's (although I think that fact alone would make anyone in Hollywood gun shy.)?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GirlFriday123
We all live downstream.
07:32 PM on 03/26/2010
Maybe Bullock, like many women, had bad judgment, but it seems like Binazir is letting whats-his-name off the hook.

Yes there may have been obvious clues, but Mr. Bullock took the same vows she did, and putting the onus on her with an expanded version of 'Bad Boys will be Bad Boys' is basically saying, well he's just couldn't help himself and she should have known better.

She should have known better, and some of these bad boys need to grow up.

I will say, though, every time I read about another fairytale Hollywood marriage going down the tubes, I give thanks for my 'boring', dependable hubby.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister Biggles
09:18 PM on 03/26/2010
No, it means he is responsible for his behavior and she is responsible for hers.

Your post implies that HE is responsible for her behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GirlFriday123
We all live downstream.
09:43 PM on 03/26/2010
What behavior?

What did she do wrong? She married him. Has she been having numerous affairs? What is she responsible for?

But, because he is inherently a bad boy, she should expect that he can't control himself and adhere to an agreement that, we assume, he entered into willingly.

Did she have her eyes open? Probably not, but Binazir is giving women the benefit of his wisdom about how to avoid bad boys, and I have to wonder, has he written another article taking his own gender to task for clinging to their wanderlust even after they have commited outwardly to a monogamous relationship?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
10:05 PM on 03/26/2010
Past behavior is a great predictor of future behavior. Many women think they can change a bad boy. It usually doesn't work out so well. Sandra was going to change him. Women or men should not go into ANY relationship thinking they can change the other. It is a recipe for disaster. You can maybe dress him/her up a bit, but that's about the extent of change. Bullock will have to decide for herself whether she will trust him again. I don't see him out there proving he is working on himself. But it's not my decision to make.
03:02 PM on 03/26/2010
From the comments Sandra made about him, she perceived him to be loving, supportive and having her back.. Based on the image I have of her, I'm inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt. If she was deceived it doesn't equate with being attracted to bad behavior. It depends on how adept he was at the deceit and whether her belief that he was good to her was reasonable. I don't think it's fair to her, especially without knowing the facts, to make her the poster girl for women who knowingly choose to be treated badly out of lust for romance, adventure, drama or whatever or out and out masochism. Please don't over-simplify romantic relations, you are too smart for that.
04:25 PM on 03/26/2010
He was in his early thirties when they met, four or five years younger than she was, and he had already been divorced twice. His last marriage had been married to a drug-using porn star, and the police had been called to his home because of a domestic disturbance. He was the father of three children by his two different wives. He ran with the Hells Angels.

So, again, what part of "bad boy" did Sandra not understand? She understood all of it. She chose to be with him, anyway. That's fine. It's her business and her life. I do find it interesting, though, that she used the term "had her back," if she really used it. I've waited on her at a restaurant I worked in some fourteen, fifteen years ago. She was very "protected" by her father, who shielded her from customers and slipped her into and out of the restaurant. Maybe, Jesse's bad boy persona gave her that same feeling of being shielded? Hmm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LifeChangeStartsNow
I am love, discernment, confident, resourceful, as
05:02 PM on 03/26/2010
And I think, normalevy, you're protesting too much. You know very well that women see what they want to see when it comes to guys and relationships and the "need". Just because sandra bullock is a popular actress does not make her any less a woman.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
12:46 PM on 03/26/2010
I am calling a truce with the men on this board and asking for the end to general sexist statements either way. We are all individuals, there are great and horrible men and women out there, true? We all have different values and expectations, right? So let us try and respect each other more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LonosCurse
Some may never live, but the crazy never die
01:03 PM on 03/26/2010
What's the fun in that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
don quixote12
10:44 PM on 03/27/2010
Good post. The gender sterotypes and sexism may sell books but it doesn't do anything toward living a healthy, honest, loving life.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
04:10 PM on 03/28/2010
right on! thanks, don!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
12:11 PM on 03/26/2010
I might not have the money, house, car, vacations, wardrobe, accessories these women have, but I am learning that none of that matters in the end. I am truly grateful to have a good partner, one all the money and fame in the world can't replace!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyThis
All I Am is You
10:55 AM on 03/26/2010
It's pornography that hurts women in relationships. No not the naked people kind, I'm talking about the emotional pornography of Disney movies, romance novels and the general "they all lived happily ever after" crap. Like physical porn, romantic porn portrays unreal and fantasy situations except that they are romantic rather than sexual. Women digest this crap and think that is how relationships work and that life should be "happily ever after" just like a man expecting sex (and a woman's body) to be like it is in sexual porn. Obviously not all women believe this, just like not all men think sexual porn is how real sex is. it does seem, however, that too many women really ingest all this romantic bs and expect their relationships to be this perfect.
02:28 PM on 03/26/2010
Emotional Pornography. Yep. Examples:

Sleeping with the Enemy. She leaves her abusive husband to end up in a fully furnished, beautiful home, while working as a library assistant to pay the rent. Sure. Oh, and right next door is Prince Charming, who will save her from being killed by her crazed husband. Sure.

Grease. "You better shape up because I need a man, and my heart is set on you," Sandy sings, after changing her appearance so that she is more appealing to Danny. Enough said.

Pretty Woman. A prostitute is picked up off the streets by a very rich man, who ends up falling in love with her and spending his money to buy her clothes, diamond, a make over, and, PRESTO, she's beautiful, and, therefore, now a lady to be awed. So many issues with this...So little time to discuss them all.
03:36 PM on 03/26/2010
Right on Sista! We love these stories at the same time they damage our spirits and change our expectations!

My Granma once said love begins in the heart and radiates outward. If you're lucky, the signal is strong enough to reach your head and your - "well you know". A relationship that begins in the "well you know" region might radiate upwards to the heart, but it rarely reaches your head....and if it does, the message might be scrambled! If the relationship begins in your head ( a crush on your college professor) it might reach the heart, but hopefully not the "well you know" regions... This always meant alot to me. I've always thought relationships are TCS - Togetherness (heart), communication (head) and "well you know". The ones worth keeping are always all THREE!! THanks to Granma for that advice!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LifeChangeStartsNow
I am love, discernment, confident, resourceful, as
05:09 PM on 03/26/2010
I'm witchu girl! I learned growing up through observation to love with your heard and take care of your business first because no one else is going to do it for you. The heart is ruled by the head.
04:26 PM on 03/26/2010
As evidenced by wedding planning. How much time do people spend planning a ridiculous wedding as opposed to thinking ahead of time about what the actual marriage involves?
04:31 AM on 03/26/2010
Women tend to look at a guy and either overlook his faults or thinks she can fix them. Men tend to look too much into the faults of women and it holds them back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister Biggles
07:55 AM on 03/26/2010
No. No. No.

Men are SMART to take an honest look at women. Women are FOOLS to think they can change men.

Men marrying women hoping they'll never change and women marrying men expecting to change them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
12:15 PM on 03/26/2010
Your comments tend to sway to the "he man woman haters club" variety far too often. I think before making general assumptions that offend half your audience on a regular basis, you could at least indulge is by talking about why you have such a huge chip on your shoulder / grudge.
07:16 PM on 03/26/2010
Yes because all men and women fit into your little generalizations. Where did you get the idea that women marry men to change them? Personal anecdotes?
03:34 AM on 03/26/2010
Thanks doctor. I've simply concluded that women see what they want to see in a man depending on what their needs are at the moment---and don't you DARE suggest they are wrong. The bad boy is superficially charming and most women like that. The "good guy" is boring and does not satisfy the need for drama. I've lost all sympathy for the women who pursue these men and later claim heartbreak when the relationship is a sham.
02:02 AM on 03/26/2010
To Simplify, Ms Bullock made her husband to be whatever she envisioned he should be, to graify her needs.
Like that's anything new in human relationships.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister Biggles
07:57 AM on 03/26/2010
We always hear about men treating women as objects...we NEVER hear about women treating men as accessories.

A husband isn't a human being with needs and feelings to many women...he is one check off the box....husband, house, car, job, kids, etc.

And they are more than willing to look past the reality of the man, not caring or figuring she'll change him.
09:45 AM on 03/26/2010
One of the reasons for this is that the pressure society puts on women to marry is still very strong, and, in my opinion, it won't stop until WOMEN quit putting the pressure on one another. In addition, women are still plagued by the concept that men can screw around and not be in love, but women can't. It's O.K. to be a wild boy for a while, particularly when you are young, but it's not O.K. for a woman to be wild girls, so women "fall in love" with every man they want to screw around with. They make him O.K.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KJLSanDiego
12:19 PM on 03/26/2010
you seriously have the biggest chip on your shoulder! I have been in some really effed up relationships with men, but I have managed to allow you to be individuals, and have learned to find and be with good men. you might want to try learning from your mistakes in judgment and finding decent women to be with, rather than repeatedly being with "b's" and falsely assuming we are all the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emhellmer
01:34 AM on 03/26/2010
"Up in the Air" was a good film. It had a great line. A young woman asks an older woman why she always falls for "pricks." The older woman says something like "We like pricks...they are fun, impulsive, and exciting. And then we get surprised when they turn out to be pricks?"

Well, since I'm commenting on this, I'm also going to lament the fact that many people are now going to be associating these gross people with tattoos. Sigh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fmd
01:30 AM on 03/26/2010
The problem as I see it is that bad boys pretend to be good guys long enough to get themselves into a relationship with a good woman. It's not obvious from the beginning and many women keep chasing that phantom that they think is the real person.

Maybe we should turn the problem around and ask why bad boys are attracted to good girls?
09:52 AM on 03/26/2010
I was a "good girl" who was pursued (and won) by bad boys a few times before I saw the pattern. I was told, as part of the early romancing/seduction, that I was a challenge because I was so "aloof". In other words, I expected them to open doors, pick up the tab on dates, call me when they said they would, etc. (Expectations derived from a too-steady diet of Doris Day movies, perhaps?) But, boy, did I pay for those expectations afterward--physically, mentally, and especially emotionally. Once I learned how to spot them, I'd go through them for a short cut if they so much as approached me. The poor dears couldn't handle that at all. :) Revenge? Karma? It was sweet nonetheless.

I suppose getting your heart stomped hard by a bad boy (or a bad girl--let's be fair, they can do the same in reverse) is part of learning how to discern people and their intentions. A lesson best learned early, but too often learned...too often.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister Biggles
10:50 AM on 03/26/2010
What an odd way to look at yourself?

You are not a woman who made a choice. You are a prize that he won.

And the difference between a "good" girl and a bad one is that you made him work and pay for it?
11:45 AM on 03/26/2010
I see where you're coming from, you gave as good as you got and now your wiser for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LifeChangeStartsNow
I am love, discernment, confident, resourceful, as
05:29 PM on 03/26/2010
fmd - I don't agree with you at all! A bad boy can pretend all he wants but it is a pretence. I'm not saying that we can all see through the disguise but if you live with the motto as I do of "if it's too good to be true, it usually is" you avoid a lot of heartache. Not all but a lot.

Women allow their emotional needs, a lot of which are psychological linked to home, habits, cultural brainwashing, etc. to blind them to their real needs.

Girls and women need to stop running after guys, ditch those ridiculous years-long college relationships etc. and start looking out for their own talents to create a great life for themselves, instead of I want a boyfriend, a baby and a house. He'll make me feel good/beautiful/sexy/slim/loved blah blah blah. As you say, it's a phantom image.

Females need to be taught to take care of themselves first, establish their own criteria for a mate after they've had some life experience and know what they truly want out of life.

When they're ready with their heads screwed on right, their minds bright and shining, they know where they're going and their bank accounts are significant, and they feel good about who they are, then they can pay "serious" attention to the males. Then they generally attract the right types.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:40 PM on 03/25/2010
all very true...and I like that this is coming from a man..so you know!

http://goodinred.blogspot.com/

(my thoughts)
doinaheckuvanutjob
Monsanto stole my micro-bio & put in GMO's
05:09 PM on 03/25/2010
Good column.

One thing that also gets forgotten is how to spot a good man or woman for a relationship. A guide to to spotting positive qualities-- based on character, not income or exceptional physical looks, is needed for people's relationship education. For example, the skills of communication, empathy, compassion and understanding are important qualities to spot. Men and women can be addicted to being attracted to 'bad' men and women, and part of doing differently is not only to spot and avoid the bad men and women but also be able to identify and learn to be attracted to good ones.

Being attracted to good partners isn't chemistry and magic. It can take personal work on oneself to develop that interest in a good partner. I know this from my own personal experiences as well as in my professional work. The chemistry and magic comes out of developing an honest relationship rather than from projecting what one wishes on a stranger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LifeChangeStartsNow
I am love, discernment, confident, resourceful, as
05:37 PM on 03/26/2010
doinaheckuvanutjob - agree with you on first para but your second is a mixup. Chemistry must be present to attract that particular mate. The personal work one does on one's self is primordial. But the 'magic' starts from that first chemical attraction and rest is definitely diligent work by both parties if they want to develop a real, honest relationship based on mutual love, respect and freedom. If those pheromones weren't involved, there would be no attraction even when projecting.
doinaheckuvanutjob
Monsanto stole my micro-bio & put in GMO's
06:20 PM on 03/26/2010
I agree with you about the chemistry. However, my point is that usually people attract a bad partner due to chemistry alone. Without learning how to cultivate the qualities of a good relationship-- honesty, trust etc. and appreciate good character qualities, people rely on chemistry to get into bad relationships. I'm advocating letting chemistry take a back seat to learning how to appreciate a good partner with good character. Once one learns how to do that, good character qualities become the turn on that gets the chemistry going. I agree though there are some wonderful people one is never turned on by, that there is some mysterious quality, but chemistry is so over emphasized that we need to learn how to develop as you correctly said real honest relationships based on mutual love, respect and freedom. It's those qualities that should fuel chemistry, not the other way around unless one has already mastered those qualities and finding them in a partner.