I ask this question rhetorically because there is a wealth of data demonstrating the value of a high school education in terms of higher income and greater career advancement compared to dropping out. But when I ask this question, I am also speaking specifically about the typical curriculum that high school offer and the jobs that many high school students will land upon graduation. Let me rephrase the question: Is the usual coursework that most students take on their way to graduation going to prepare them for life after high school? In other words, are courses in English, history, social studies and the like preparing students for the "real world?"
I suppose it is (and they do) if that world after high school includes college. But, despite the fact that high school graduates are going onto college more than ever, that number is much lower among minorities and those who attend low-performing schools. Add to that the current economic climate, higher college tuitions, and fewer scholarship and student loan opportunities, and it's not unreasonable to assume that many students will not be entering higher education in the next decade. For those young people, the market for jobs that offer a living wage isn't a much better option than college because they leave high school with few if any practical skills. So, in essence, a large proportion of graduates are leaving high school thoroughly unprepared to compete in the increasingly competitive job market.
We're already seeing many students struggle with completing high school (about one third of all students and nearly half of all Hispanics and Blacks). The reasons why are myriad including poverty, poor early preparation by parents, a subculture that doesn't value education, and low-performing schools. Another contributor to this equation lies in the students themselves who either have little interest in a typical high school curriculum or who see no practical value of a diploma to them. Because many high school students believe that most of what they learn in high school has little or no use in the real world, it's not surprising that they demonstrate little motivation to aspire to a diploma.
But what if high school students who weren't capable or motivated enough to go to college wanted to have a career after graduation? Don't they deserve a chance to get ahead? With this perspective, I believe that high schools should provide two tracks to a diploma, one that readies students for college and the other for a career that offers a reasonable wage and opportunities for career advancement. I realize the idea of high schools offering paths to both college and a vocation is not new; some sort of vocational training has been a part of some high school curricula for years. But given the efforts at public education reform that are currently being made, this oh-so-practical approach to high school education would seem worthy of serious consideration.
But this two-track path to high school education is actually losing steam because the so-called industrial arts, otherwise known as shop class, have been the first casualties of school budget cuts. Yet, high school dropouts will cost the U.S. almost $320 billion in lost wages (add in ill-prepared high school graduates and that number soars). That sounds short sighted to me.
When students learn about carpentry, metal work, automobile repair, wood working, electronics, etc., they are laying the foundation for a career in the trades, historically stable and decent-paying jobs that are usually in reasonable abundance because they can't be outsourced. They can enter the work force with some degree of preparedness which not only increases their chances of landing a good job, but, just as importantly, gives them confidence in themselves and hope for a better future.
As the product of a liberal arts education, I often tell people that I had a "worthless" major, psychology, because it offered me no real skills upon graduation. Yet, I value liberal arts education immensely because of the broad range of ideas and knowledge to which students are exposed allowing them to become well-rounded and engaged citizens. But a liberal arts education, which is what the typical high school curriculum offers, is a luxury that many young people can ill afford. Let's get real. Even if unmotivated students learn about the classics, political science, and philosophy (and they likely won't), that knowledge won't pay the bills.
I also spent my summers working as a carpenter through high school and college and learned to work on cars. Not only did I gain some practical skills, but I also learned about the satisfaction of making something from nothing and the pride of fixing something that was broken. I was fortunate that I didn't need to use those skills to support myself later in life, but I still value (and use) them to this day. High school students who aren't on an academic track can gain the same career and psychological benefits that they can put to immediate use following graduation.
And my argument for a vocational track in high school is not intended to push students down a particular path in high school or to limit the options available to them. To the contrary, when our public education system offers two educational paths in high school that actually meet the needs of a diverse range of students, it will give students more choices and more opportunities for gainful employment after they graduate. Perhaps just as important, it just might motivate a large swath of high school students who are either heading toward dropping out or will graduate with no useful skills to apply themselves in high school. Why? Because, quite simply, they will see that what they learn will actually help them get ahead in life.
Missouri Must Increase Graduation Rate
Texas high school seniors in state program also graduate with an associate of ...
Fantasia Receives Honorary High School Diploma
Local virtual school to open enrollment statewide
The value of earning a high school diploma
Teen Mothers Receive High School Diploma
'American Idol' champ Fantasia Barrino receives high school diploma
something to be proud of, and it's a considerable advantage for life in general, let alone
getting into a good college.
I just wish they didn't make kids take so much higher math. About 90% of us will never ever use it !
Our high schools, particularly suburban ones, expect all of their students to graduate college as well as high school. The required classes have increased greatly in the past 50 years. I'm not dissing the foreign language offerings (I think they should be increased in assortment) or the computer uses now applied to learning. In many of the fields, I fault the basic levels because they are taught in a way that emphasizes only the mechanics while ignoring the topics and problem solving so essential to today's lives. Schools are also faced with the student who finds the subject matter useless NOW, as did one of the Oppenheimers, learning it only when he found a need for it. And now our schools face significant monetary problems. How will they survive?
I remember touring one of the facilities as a Freshman and being told that if I had any interest in becoming an automotive mechanic, carpenter, electrician, plumber, cosmetologist, or anything related to criminal justice, then I should sign up to get my education there. A schoolbus even came by the highschool every day at 11am to pick the kids up and bring them to the BOCES facility.
How could that be? My oldest daughter majored in psychology, including a Masters, and has worked as a psychologist very successfully for about fifteen years.
Did you lack interest in your chosen field?
You say you value liberal arts education. I say I value a more comprehensive education that includes the liberal arts as well.
Writing cogently about education in the space these comments allow is difficult. Part of the problem with high school curricula stems from the steady push-down of college level material into the secondary level. Because we compartmentalize and specialize, the push-down from the different disciplines is not an integrated set of skills and ideas. In fact, the result is often a potpourri of pointlessness. As our general knowledge has increased, we have not dealt well with the task of delivering useful awareness of that knowledge.
High schools that rethink what they cover and how they cover it also need to understand that the educational system at all levels should support students in becoming self-motivated autodidacts who realize that education is a life-long endeavor, which includes specific vocational learning for students who early in life have little interest in the liberal arts. One task of education is to keep whatever flame there is alive, another is to fan the individual character of the flame.
----------------
Um, quick question, what the @#$@ do you care, honestly? Is that the only way you really view, measure, or assess people, is by their economic productivity output, or whatever?
Frankly, it seems like the Nation's colleges really don't seem to turn out inventors, problem-solvers, or others that'd really make you think that committing 4-6-8+ years of your life to the higher education process is a bona-fide worthy endeavor, instead it seems to turn out money-grubbers, self-important people with little letters after their names that, come right down to it, really aren't that much smarter than anyone else, just that they have 'that' attitude. Give me a dropout any day that has something between their ears and a good dose of monkey curiosity, and a basic understanding of the Dewey decimal system and the InterGooglers, and I'll show you the next innovator, the next inventor, the next person that never took the time to learn how it couldn't be done, and thus exited the education process without the institutional 'blinders' that sometimes just serve to prevent people from really using what they've got, upstairs. Learn the basics, and go get em. The rest is a snobby little yuppie club.
Well, considering the massive deficits, massive debt, and continually shrinking tax base in this country, you should care. These people who drop out of high school not only fail to contribute tax revenue, they are more often than not a drain on government spending due to the entitlements that come their way.
So yes, you should care that we are sending more and more uneducated, unskilled goofballs out into society to soak up the little tax dollars that are being provided by those of us who actually contribute to the economy.
The trade schools can start 1/2 day classes for all years following freshmen year and it would help many more kids find employment and mentorship. The mentorship can be in local places for kids.