iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Josef Olmert

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Josef Olmert
 

Solution in Syria?

Posted: 06/22/2012 2:33 pm

The Syrian air force has always been a bastion of Alawite domination over the Syrian military. Back in the early days of independent Syria the Alawites were in control of the air force, and in 1950 General Muhammad Nasser, an Alawite, was the commander-in-chief and was murdered by Sunni officers. Later, it was general Hafiz al-Assad who became the C-I-C of the air force, a good springboard to become the future military dictator. He heaped resources on his favorite wing of the armed forces, filled it with Alawite pilots, but also attached to it one of the most formidable intelligence services, led by loyal Alawites whose task it was to prevent any sign of opposition.

Bashar Assad in his time of predicament believed that his air force would do the dirty job of pacifying rebellious regions, but even that does not work anymore. A colonel in the air force defected with his Mig-21 and caused ripples in the presidential palace in Damascus. Another indication that the regime is fighting a last and losing battle to survive. Yesterday, 153 Syrians were killed, and today the regime claims that 26 soldiers were killed. This is an unsustainable situation for the regime, and the need for an alternative to the impending
catastrophe is ever urgent.

Bashar Assad has now to decide between three alternatives; the first is that he could stay in Damascus and fight to the end, thus turning this old, historic center of Arab and Islamic pride into a scene of unprecedented destruction and bloodshed. He shows signs that this is his number one option, but with growing unrest in the capital, this option may seem less and less attractive to a lot of his cronies. In fact, there are many unverified reports that many of them are more busy contemplating their personal escape than fighting for the Boss.

Then, there is the option of leaving Syria and going to Iran, Venezuela, Russia or any other potential refuge. The problem is that Bashar will have to take with him hundreds, perhaps even thousands of his clan/tribe, as well as so many of those whose hands soak in the blood of so many innocent Syrians.

Can it happen? Very doubtful, if not outright impossible. If having to leave Syria is the option, then Bashar is a spent force. They will have him with his wife and children but not the entire gang, so we are left with what may prove to be the only realistic and likely solution; Bashar and his cronies, including the Alawite-dominated military units still loyal to him, will withdraw to the area where it all began decades ago: the Alawite mountains in northwest Syria, with Kardaha where the Assad clan came from as his center, and with access to the Mediterranean in Latakiyya, a mixed Alawite-Sunni city. The two communities will have to be separated by an Arab/international force, preferably with Turkish participation that will be necessary, because it will be a supreme Turkish interest to prevent an Alawite mass exodus to Turkey, where there are already over half a million Alawites.

According to many reports, large numbers of Alawites already left Damascus, Aleppo, Homs and Hammah and moved back to the mountains. They know what may come their way when the regime is finally collapsing and they do not want to take the risk. The Assad people will come back to their natural territory, where they will provide shelter and defense to the Alawite population, thus sparing their co-religionists the inevitable slaughter that will happen if the regime will conduct the last battle in Damascus. The Alawite population will then have the opportunity to deal with the Assad clan, settle scores with them, keep them in power in the mountains or else, but for the future of Syria it is significant that the Alawite community will have the chance to decide for itself about the best course of action leading it to reintegrate with the rest of Syria when the time comes.

Other regions in Syria will not function much differently. The Kurds in the northeast and the Druze in the south will apply a form of virtual self-rule in their respective territories, and the Sunni government that will be installed in Damascus will have to find a way, with the encouragement of Arab governments, the U.S. and Turkey, to negotiate with the minorities, including the Alawites, in order to formulate a new constitution which will reflect the heterogeneous character of the Syrian population.

And what about the Christians? The populations of Aleppo and Damascus will be immediately threatened by a vindictive Sunni government, not easily forgiving their staying loyal to Bashar Assad. Here is a challenge to the outside backers of the current opposition and future government. They will have to rein them in to prevent excesses.

And lastly the Russians. They will grudgingly accept a framework like this, or similar but will insist on maintaining and protecting their base in Tartus, surely so long as other foreign forces are on Syrian soil. Can that all work?

Maybe, but surely worth the try as the alternative is the current slaughter which is unacceptable and should stop.

 
FOLLOW WORLD
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yaskan
The Independent
02:32 PM on 06/25/2012
No sir,Syria will be all united,the Syrian people will live side by side as soon as they get rid of Assad Occupatation of Syria.
09:21 AM on 06/25/2012
Shows the folly of creating nation-states where no "nation" exists.
photo
Kache
Citizens, Unite!
03:07 PM on 06/24/2012
Greater Lebanon?
02:04 AM on 06/25/2012
lebanon is mixed, syrian coastal regions (latakia/tartus and etc.) is 80% alawite
therefore - no greater lebanon
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yaskan
The Independent
12:22 PM on 06/24/2012
That is what Israel wants,to Divide Syria and Conquer.
03:03 PM on 06/24/2012
That is why they forced Syria to attack them repeatedly since 1948. Those cunning Israelis.
09:32 PM on 06/24/2012
What Israel wants is a quiet Syria, not an anarchic Syria. The nations of the world, including the Israelis, would have been fine with Assad, had he been able to carry on in the manner he was before the uprising.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint wright
Dyslexic old chippy
03:00 AM on 06/24/2012
what certain is the sunni majority will massarce the Alewites once the army calls it a day, they will then start on the Christians and the few jews that still live there rather than New York?

The religon of peace my bum?
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
10:01 PM on 06/22/2012
"We are now left with what may prove to be the only realistic and likely solution in Syria"

Who are the "we"? Israelis, neocons and their dupes?
03:07 PM on 06/24/2012
I have reviewed your posts. A lot of pro- Arab support, and Israel-bashing. Not a word of pity, or concern for the 15,000 Syrian civilians killed, and thousands others raped, tortured and murdered.

Why is that?
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
05:05 PM on 06/24/2012
I have reviewed your posts. It is obvious that your concern with Syrian deaths is in direct proportion to how they may be used as justification for regime change for the benefit of Israel. Where is your remorse for the thousands of Syrians killed by insurgents and mercenaries supported by the Gulf dictators, NATO, and other outside instigators?
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
06:05 PM on 06/22/2012
Except for the Russians, the US could destroy Syria's Air Force in a month, solve the problem.
10:19 AM on 06/23/2012
At certain loss of US life....the Syrians have one of the best air defense systems in the world.
10:29 AM on 06/23/2012
Haha, thats the funniest thing I have heard in a long time. Syria definitely does not have a competent air defense system. They shot down a 30 year old plane yesterday. I could have probably done that with a sling shot. Their air defense would be taken out in a matter of hours by NATO, US, Turkey, or anyone else who is interested.
06:46 PM on 06/24/2012
Why would the US want to interfere in Syria? Do they know who is leading the rebels? Would they be any better than the current regime? Does Obama want to get involved in another Arab country? No one wants to see civilians slaughtered but let someone else carry the heavy load for a change.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
06:03 PM on 06/22/2012
Missed the fourth option: let the forces take over, have an election which the military overrules.
Meanwhile, Assad pretends to be dead. Worked in Egypt, he should consider it :-)
02:09 AM on 06/25/2012
Firstly the forces cant take over because the government in syria is not the same as the one in egypt, where the military was a parallel independent institution. In syria the government ensured that the army is commanded by the government and all the intelligencies watch over the army (and each other) to ensure there is not coup or collapse of government. Secondly, even if they could, the syrian people (i.e. sunni majority) will never let the generals or the army as a whole rule after they massacred a whole lot of them - already in the streets of syrian cities there are chants of 'the syrian army is a traitor'. This is in contrast to the egyptians who said 'the army and people are one' (egyptians considered only some general as traitors like tantawi).
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:44 PM on 06/22/2012
If your scheme happens, it's potentially just going to be like Lebanon in the 1970s.

There's a necessary blood letting to come. Some members of the air force intelligence corps certainly need to die slow and painful deaths, or no-one will be happy. After that, something approximating to the rule of law might do nicely.
02:15 AM on 06/25/2012
'If your scheme happens, it's potentially just going to be like Lebanon in the 1970s.'

not unless there is a full partition and creation of 2 countries (alawite state and republic of syria), based on the partition of india into india and pakistan. The difference here is that the damage has already been done and the communities are already mostly split into sectarian borders since there are not a lot of mixed areas in syria left.

So unlike india and pakistan where both sides of the borders were mostly mixed right before partition the partition of syria might go smoother than expected.

with regards to the comparison to lebanon - it isnt going to happen since the sunnis make up the majority and the country isnt split into equal shares of all sects (i.e. sunnis will dominate in syria, unlike in lebanon where each group held quotas in government).
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:25 AM on 06/25/2012
Just like Lebanon - one country with partly co-habiting, antagonistic factions with strong regional enclaves. If Lebanon had been split into fiefdoms, the civil war might not have happened. 
It doesn't need a big minority to cause trouble.