Seven western states and four Canadian provinces have joined forces in a plan to limit greenhouse gas emissions. An entire new source of long-term revenue is available to British Columbia's government, which will enable protecting massive tracks of old growth forests and fresh water supplies.
The Western Climate Initiative includes: Arizona, California, Montana, New Mexico, Washington, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec, and they have agreed to cut the region's carbon emissions by 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.
The backbone of their plan relies on a system of cap and trade. It is a system that was successfully devised and implemented in the early 1990s to combat acid rain around the Great Lakes caused by the pollution generated from coal burning power plants.
The cap and trade system reduces pollution by requiring utility and other companies to meet tough emission standards. Under this system, businesses that cannot cut their emissions because of costs or technical hurdles would be allowed to buy emission credits from companies that have spent the money to clean-up and lower their emissions.
Most large industrial polluters, automakers and coal-based utilities are scrambling to find companies to sell them offset credits.
In 1990 (Science, Feb 9) Professor Mark Harmon of Oregon State University and others found that the conversion of Pacific northwest old growth forests to young fast growing forests did not decrease atmospheric carbon as compared to old growth forests which capture and store vast amounts of carbon dioxide. In fact, it took those low elevation second growth forests at least 200 years to accumulate the carbon dioxide storage capacity of existing old growth forests.
In other words, British Columbia's standing old growth forests are valuable but not just as milled saw-timber or pulp. British Columbia's old growth is a gold mine for burgeoning worldwide offset markets, as well as its bountiful medicines and other valuable non-timber forest products.
Marriott International with over 3,000 global properties has partnered with Conservation International and is the first hotel company to calculate its carbon footprint and launched an aggressive worldwide campaign to lessen its impact.
Each year it uses 3.2 million tons of CO2 or 66 pounds per available room. To offset this they have undertaken a remarkable initiative. Marriott is spending millions of dollars over a long-term period to protect 1.5 million acres of endangered rainforests (because forests absorb and store CO2) in the Juma Sustainable Development Reserve in partnership with the state of Amazonas in Brazil.
If Brazil is renting its forests for millions of dollars then why shouldn't the government of British Columbia consider its options?
In the late 1960s a young assistant professor (now Emeritus) Peter Dooling at the Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia taught a nascent discipline of forest recreation. Dr. Dooling predicted that forest recreation and tourism would become a major industry in British Columbia.
Today, British Columbia tourism is a multi-billion dollar industry rivaling that of forestry. The 2010 Whistler/Vancouver Olympics easily tipped the scale of tourism revenue now far exceeding that of forestry.
As the world recession deepens and the mighty U.S. housing market continues to sputter and stall, tens of thousands of British Columbia forestry workers have been dislocated.
It is perplexing and frustrating that North Americans buying furniture at IKEA must settle for Scots pine grown and manufactured in Lapland when millions of acres of British Columbia's lodgepole pine are salvage-logged and pulped rather than manufactured and sold throughout the continent (and elsewhere) as distressed cottage pine furniture.
With more than 60 British Columbia glaciers receding, securing fresh water supplies are of paramount importance and maintaining exquisite high elevation old growth forests, which capture, retain and slowly release billions of gallons of snow melt in the springtime is priceless.
While maintaining the integrity of the Brazilian forests are important so too are the last of British Columbia's contiguous great temperate rainforests. Why not rent some of the old growth forests, take advantage of their potent ability to absorb enormous amounts of CO2 and provide a buffer against climate change.
Dr Reese Halter is a Science Communicator: Voice for Ecology, conservation biologist at California Lutheran University, public speaker and founder of the international conservation institute Global Forest Science. He can be contacted through www.DrReese.com
Follow Dr. Reese Halter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DrReeseHalter
Southern Oregon Coast Mixing ÂNature, Tradition, and Economics for Sustainable Future
http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sldt/0509/#/24
"Located in the headwaters of the Port Orford Community Stewardship Area in Southern Oregon, Ocean Mountain Ranch overlooks the newly-designated Redfish Rocks Marine Reserve and the largest remaining old growth forest on the southern coast in Humbug Mountain State Park. OMR is planned to be developed pursuant to a forest stewardship management plan which has been approved by the Oregon Department of Forestry..."
Sustainable Land Development Goes Carbon Negative
http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sldt/0809/#/18
"Ocean Mountain Ranch is also serving as a pilot program and is expected to achieve carbon negative status through the utilization of low impact development practices, energy efficient buildings, renewable/clean energy systems, distributed waste management systems, biochar production, and other practices..."
The use of fossil fuels, ironically, had the effect of *saving* our forests. You no longer had to use local lumber for fuel, you no longer had to use local lumber for building. You no longer had to clear local land for food crops. And the New England forests returned in a generation.
I fear for the forests as we begin to transition away from a fossil fuel economy. Rural communities are already transitioning house-by-house to wood pellet heating from fuel oil. The "grow local' movement will mean reclearing century-old abandoned farms for food production again. If the transition away from fossil fuel comes abruptly (with an 'oil shock') people will look to their back wood lots to keep from freezing in the winter. With a population now past 300 million that could quickly spell disaster for the environment.
I think good intentions conservation-wise will take us a long way down the right path - up until the point of the dreaded 'oil shock'. Then after that all bets are off.
We must cull to protect, and it's much more complictated than mere cap and trade..unless and until we get at least 5 frigid winters in a row, these beetles will probably destroy the majority of our forests, and the problem, and solution, will be moot...
Leemans and Eickhout (2004) found that adaptive capacity decreases rapidly with an increasing rate of climate change. Their study finds that five percent of all ecosystems cannot adapt more quickly than 0.1 °C per decade over time.
Forests will be among the ecosystems to experience problems first because their ability to migrate to stay within the climate zone they are adapted to is limited. If the rate is 0.3 °C per decade, 15 percent of ecosystems will not be able to adapt. If the rate should exceed 0.4 °C per decade, all ecosystems will be quickly destroyed, opportunistic species will dominate, and the breakdown of biological material will lead to even greater emissions of CO2. This will in turn increase the rate of warming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOOc5yiIWkg&feature=related
Now there's a major!
No one or government will change even after it is too late.
The .00001% that get it, ain't enough to undo what we have done. Sorry. Hello climate upheival!