iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Reese Halter

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Reese Halter
 

Reuniting Economics and Ecology for a Sustainable Future

Posted: 07/20/2012 2:49 pm

Nature and people are being brutally lambasted all over the planet. Recent torrential rains forced the evacuation of 400,000 Japanese citizens, and the severity of the U.S. drought, which has not only laid waste to millions of bushels of corn and soybean, it's now threatening water flow of the mighty Mississippi River.

The worldwide economy is a wholly owned subsidiary of the environment.

Russ Beaton and Chris Maser have produced a powerful new book entitled Economics & Ecology: United for a Sustainable World, which I believe should be required reading for all college freshmen. It is a blueprint to ensure that our species thrives in the 22nd century.

Beaton an economist and Maser an ecologist draw upon over 9 decades of global experience and wisdom to present a detailed plan reuniting economics and ecology; it's well-explained and rich with examples.

The natural world is upside down. It is very apparent that the days of pitting the economy versus the environment are numbered. The Greek root of each word 'oikos' means house. Ecology is the knowledge of understanding the house whilst economics is the knowledge of managing the house.

Our natural environment and the resource base for the world economy are inexorably linked. Therefore these two crucial parts must come together for the house to remain standing, as our species is now heading toward 8 billion by 2025.

Beaton and Maser provide a systemic examination of the living world, and a necessary economic roadmap towards a sustainable future for the human race.

Presently, worldwide economic growth is unsustainable because the natural resource base has been significantly depleted. For instance, many of the world's commercial fish stocks are nearing extinction from 150 years of overharvesting. No amount of government subsidies (or erroneously blaming whales) will change this fact. On the other hand, the scientific knowledge and a quarter of century of data to validate it, says we must now place 50 percent of the world's oceans into 'no-take zones', so that over the next 25 years the oceans can replenish themselves to feed 9 billion people by 2043.

It is time to recognize that nature is a flawless system that creates no waste. Each year in the U.S. we truck 251 million tons of trash to landfills. To put that enormous number into perspective, the average blue whale - the largest mammal on Earth - weighs far in excess of 100 tons. We are throwing away at least 6,750 blue whales worth of garbage every single day. Landfills contaminate ground water. In a warming world, fresh water is very precious and must be safeguarded.

Economics emphases efficiency, yet nature is effective not efficient. For instance, pines (and other wind-pollinated trees) expend a tremendous amount of nitrogen - the most limiting plant element, to make pollen. It takes vast amounts of pollen to fertilize enough pine seeds to perpetuate the genus. An economist might criticize this as highly inefficient, however every grain of pollen, which isn't used towards fertilization, is an exceedingly rich source of nutrition consumed holus bolus by a variety of critters and organisms. There is no waste whatsoever in nature.

In order to achieve a sustainable world there are 15 inviolable biophysical constraints. These are nature's rules of engagement, crucial for survival of both the wild kingdom and the human race.

Externalities including global warming and pollution must be factored into a worldwide sustainable economy. The solution to pollution is not dilution. It is time for economists to embrace uncertainty not dismiss it. In so doing, economists will work with climate and biological scientists, together addressing the uncertainties of global climate change - because world food supplies are at risk.

A triple bottom line, which acknowledges that the planet is a living trust and that we are merely stewards for future generations, is a requisite standard for all businesses, worldwide. Continuous growth or the growth ethic is impossible to sustain. Beaton and Maser rightfully contend that it be removed from mainstream economic thought.

Humans are exceptional problem solvers. Our ability to successfully navigate the global change ahead will rely upon: Ecological integrity and social equity harnessing updated principles of economics to ensure a healthy, viable future for humankind.

Earth Dr Reese Halter is an award-winning broadcaster and distinguished biologist. His latest books are: The Incomparable Honeybee and The Insatiable Bark Beetle.

 

Follow Dr. Reese Halter on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DrReeseHalter

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:38 AM on 07/23/2012
The greatest barrier in our country to true stewardship of our planet is Milton Freeman economics and the right. The political dimension of our country is dominated by compromise and cronyism with the Rich. Competition, the basis for consumption, feeds greed and greater inequality at home and around the world. A regime like ours, that so much of its laws have been crafted with the persuation of the Rich is hard to change. After all, it has created great affluence for us all. The Rich has benefited from owning capital and view capitalism as a religion more than an economic system who's efficiency of consumption in the last 190 years cannot continue if we are to have an ecosystem in the World that supports life. It is hard to ask people to change their way when their way has brought them so much affluence. Global Warming is being used by progressive politicians to bring about change to our capitalistic institutions, but, it is very slow and people that have found affluence with the status quo do not want to change it. People do fear change ...specially when they have to forgoe abundance. In our society we have lived at least 3 or 4 generations in the pursuit of more and more ...it is hard to change the addition to abundance, even though we know it is not sustainable....
12:31 AM on 07/22/2012
This really illustrates to me how much the whole conversation has changed, Put on ice really, since the utter militarization and corporatization of everything US since 911. Green thinking has already been officially retired and its back to stoking hot coals in the heat box to ward off the winter heat with 1900's technology. Soon it will be wear wet shirts to ward off the heat. We are sliding backwards.
10:27 PM on 07/21/2012
Oh yeah, take a civilized country and lets live a sustainable life. Where can I build my,hut, gather my wood and get my bucket of water for the night?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
03:11 PM on 07/21/2012
According to the ecology of the Earth, life itself is underpinned to natural ecosystems and their biodiversity or the eco-nomy of life.

I have a problem with the article's reference to honeybees, and they are not biodiversity but a transported, introduced pollinator that is most assuredly stealing the habitats and ranges of our native pollinators, like the bumble bee. Also, the honeybee is implicated in the extinction of at least, one native American bird -- biodiversity, The Carolina Parakeet or is it parrot! Both inhabited the same locations in trees, and it is believed the honeybee drove out this native bird -- to extinction.
12:32 AM on 07/22/2012
does the carolina parakeet pollinate our "much needed" food supply?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
11:51 AM on 07/22/2012
Naw, this bird was only a strand in the web of all life, in the eco-nomy of life itself, like oxygen releasing, fresh water, a stable, moderated climate, the atmosphere, man's protection from disease pathogens and the very life zone of the Earth, the biosphere/ecosphere or life!

Conversely, agriculture is dead planet and heats up the climate while destroying all the preceding listed in the first paragraph while our native pollinatiors, like bumble bees only pollinated, the living physical, life giving body of the Earth. And, while science claims, extinction of biodiversity [this bird and native pollinators] is as safe for civilization and man as thermonuclear war. Agriculture is a new thing under the sun as over 99.9 percent of man's existence, he didn't resort to agriculture!

Perhaps, you should review, kindergarten ecology.
03:27 PM on 07/20/2012
"A triple bottom line, which acknowledges that the planet is a living trust and that we are merely stewards for future generations, is a requisite standard for all businesses, worldwide."

Well said Dr. Reese.

Biodiversity is the Foundation of Sustainable Development

It is the combination of life forms, and their interactions with each other and with the rest of the environment, that have made Earth a uniquely habitable place for humans. Biodiversity — the variability within and among living organisms and the systems they inhabit — is the foundation upon which human civilization has been built... http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/10/biodiversity-living-foundation-sustainable-development/

Sustainable Land Development Initiative