Breast cancer is still very much alive. Over 200,000 women will be diagnosed and 41,000 women are expected to die from breast cancer in the US in 2007. One in eight women will develop breast cancer in their lifetime if they live to 85 years. According to Dr. Michael Osborne, Director of Breast Cancer Programs at Continuum Cancer Center, of New York at Beth Israel Medical Center, an important risk factor for breast cancer is a family history of breast cancer. Genetic testing can help identify individuals who have a highly increased risk of developing cancer before it occurs.
We know that all cancers are genetic but only a few are due to a hereditary predisposition. Hereditary cancer accounts for 7-10% of cancer cases. "For these individuals, they inherited, either from their mother or father, a gene with a mutation. Although an individual with a hereditary cancer predisposition has a high risk of developing breast cancer this does not mean they are at an increased risk for all other cancers," says Dr. Osborne. He further adds that "predisposition increases the risk for certain cancers, depending on which gene has a mutation. It is also important to note that this does not mean that every individual who carries a gene mutation would definitely develop cancer."
Specifically for breast and ovarian cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are responsible for the majority of hereditary forms. "Studies indicate that women with a deleterious mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have up to an 85% risk of breast cancer (compared to the general population risk of 12%) and a 27-50% risk of ovarian cancer (compared to the general population risk of ~1-2%), by age 70. In addition, women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer have a 40-60% lifetime risk for a second breast cancer," notes Dr. Osborne. Mutations in these genes may also be associated with other cancers including prostate, male breast cancer, melanoma and pancreatic cancer. Men who carry a BRCA gene mutation have a 7-10% lifetime risk of breast cancer, which is approaching the general population women's risk of breast cancer. According to Karen Ott, genetic counselor at Continuum Cancer Centers at Beth Israel Medical Center, women need extensive discussion about genetic testing before proceeding.
"Women with a high risk for breast cancer, screening recommendations include monthly breast self-exam beginning at age 18 (which applies to all women), semi-annual clinical breast exam starting at age 25 and annual mammogram, ultrasound examination and breast MRI screening starting at age 25," says Dr. Osborne. Some recommend Breast Specific Gamma Imaging using a short lived radioactive isotope. For men, monthly breast self-exam and semi-annual clinical breast exam are recommended. Mammography may also be a consideration.
"Screening tools only detect cancer; early screening does not prevent cancer nor can it guarantee the stage at which a cancer is found," adds Dr. Osborne. He recommends, for women with these higher risks of breast and ovarian cancer, that they consider risk reducing options. "Risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (fallopian tube and ovary removal) which is recommended since the effectiveness of ovarian cancer screening remains unproven, significantly lowers the risk for both ovarian cancer, by up to 97%, and for breast cancer, by approximately 50% (when performed prior to the age of 50)", he comments. The preventive antiestrogen drugs tamoxifen, for premenopausal women, or raloxifene for postmenopausal women. Prophylactic surgery, or so called risk reducing mastectomy results in a significant breast cancer risk reduction of 90-95%.
Dr. Osborne warns that "not all family histories of breast cancer can be accounted for by BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations." There is also a familial cancer risk that accounts for approximately 10-30% of diagnosed cancer cases. In these families we may see close relatives affected with the same type of cancer. The history could be due to chance, shared environments, or genetic factors. The recent discovery of a new group of genes may account for some of these families susceptibility. At this time medical research continues to look for other breast cancer susceptibility genes which will help identify women at a moderate life-time risk for breast cancer.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
One can only wonder how much of this "gene" induced cancer is actually iatrogenically caused by estrogen replacement therapy, advocated for decades by doctors and big pharma.
Cancer was a factor in the deaths of both of my parents. I know tremendous progress has been made toward prevention, cure, and prolonging life, but a lot more remains to be done. Kudos to those who work in this field, it is something that effects a lot of people.
The picture casts doubt on your wish to be taken seriously. You put yourself on the same level as Entertainment Tonight and the other breast shows.
Why are there so few people commenting on this blog? Come on liberals and conservatives doesn't the everyday things like breast cancer matter to you or are you too busy?
The picture is going to make a lot of men click on the article. Maybe they'll learn something from it,the article,not the picture.
Interesting that even though BRCA1 and BRCA2 create higher risk for male prostate cancer, they never talk about castrating the men to avoid that (even though prostate cancer is a testoserone cancer).
And they never talk in these articles about how surgical menopause statistically shortens a woman's life expectancy by three years in and of itself...and causes huge problems with quality of life every second after the surgical menopause. I know. I'm surgically menopausal, and I regret every day being so.
These are not just the philosophical musings of a new...
Two significant comments in the past two days by...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
Jim Hansen is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for...
Don't write off Saint Sarah all you political pundits,...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
Posted December 21, 2007 | 07:03 AM (EST)