More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
GET UPDATES FROM Drew Peternell
 
GET UPDATES FROM Becky Long
 
GET UPDATES FROM Bart Miller
 

Filling the Front Range Water Gap

Posted: 03/ 8/2011 10:35 am

In coming decades, Colorado's Front Range will face booming population growth and a "gap" between water supply and water demand. The discussion of options for meeting the gap continues to focus on old ideas including huge trans-mountain pipelines, which are extremely costly and inflict lasting damage on our rivers, streams and wildlife.

Colorado has better options. Our groups' new report, "Filling the Gap," offers a balanced, realistic blueprint for meeting Front Range water needs through 2050 while protecting our state's waterways and outdoor heritage.

Existing trans-mountain diversions of water from the Western Slope to the Front Range have left the upper Colorado River and scores of its tributaries nearly dry at times. The result is low stream flows, high water temperatures, fewer fish and other indicators of healthy stream habitat.

As Western Slope streams are diverted east, so goes the economic livelihood of many mountain towns and businesses that depend on tourism and recreation.

Many Coloradans live here and most visitors come here because of our state's outstanding outdoor resources and opportunities, from trout fishing to rafting -- it's what makes our state special. Recreation is a multi-billion dollar business in Colorado. Rivers and streams are degraded at the risk of undermining not only our economy but also the high quality of life we enjoy as Coloradans.

Colorado's rivers and streams are at a dangerous tipping point -- and we can no longer take their health for granted in water planning.

Our balanced water plan rests on four solid legs: expanded water conservation, water reuse projects, more water sharing between the agricultural and municipal sectors, and "acceptable planned projects," our name for proposed water supply projects that can meet "smart" guidelines for protecting rivers and the environment.

Conservation is often the cheapest and fastest way to create a new water source. While Denver and other cities have made great strides in promoting conservation, there is much more than could be done. Consider that half of Denver's water use still goes toward outdoor landscaping. By offering incentives for homeowners to modestly reduce turf and water use, Front Range communities can significantly reduce the need for new water sources.

Reusing municipal water is another way to make existing supplies go further. As outlined in our report, water reuse holds huge promise to help reduce the gap between water supply and water demand.

Our plan proposes ag/urban water-sharing arrangements that provide benefits to both cities and farmers. Because it is critical that Colorado preserve its agricultural heritage and open spaces, we recommend innovative sharing arrangements that do not result in a permanent dry-up of irrigated acreage.

Finally, the report identifies proposals for new supply, such as dam upgrades and small-scale storage, that could be acceptable if done right, with minimal damage to natural areas.

"Filling the Gap" identifies some water projects that the conservation groups could accept, if they were developed using a set of economically and environmentally-sound principals for minimizing the harm to streams and rivers. Some of these projects include the Chatfield Reservoir Reallocation, the Windy Gap Firming Project, Beebe Draw Aquifer Recharge, East Cherry Creek Valley's Northern Project, as well expansion or enlargement of the Halligan Reservoir, Seaman Reservoir, and Gross Reservoir.

In sum, our recommended portfolio of water solutions would produce 200,000 acre-feet of water in excess of the Front Range's 2050 demands. "Filling the Gap" offers a pragmatic, responsible way to meet Colorado's future water needs without damaging river and streams, recreational opportunities and the quality of life in this state. To access the report, go to www.westernresourceadvocates.org/gap/.

Bart Miller is director of the water program for Western Resource Advocates, a regional conservation organization dedicated to protecting the West's land, air and water. Drew Peternell is director of the Colorado Water Project for Trout Unlimited, a sportsmen's conservation organization with 10,000 members in Colorado. Becky Long is the Water Caucus Coordinator for the Colorado Environmental Coalition, the largest state-based citizens' group focused on protecting our air, land and water.

 
FOLLOW DENVER
In coming decades, Colorado's Front Range will face booming population growth and a "gap" between water supply and water demand. The discussion of options for meeting the gap continues to focus on old...
In coming decades, Colorado's Front Range will face booming population growth and a "gap" between water supply and water demand. The discussion of options for meeting the gap continues to focus on old...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
ClassicalGas
Colorado Rocky Mountain Hi!
07:16 PM on 03/26/2011
Dear Friends,

I hope you have the time to view this video.

Here is the 6 minute UTube:

Fraser River and Blue Grass
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tzWA8gTb4og
08:57 PM on 03/18/2011
I would like to hear from these authors if the NISP (Northern Integrated Supply Plan) that is being pushed for the Poudre River north of Fort Collins fits within their ideas of "smart" new construction? Why or why not? Lots of bull-er uh, spin from the water buffaloes on NISP, what is the other views?
photo
Rmtns
Republican't is what it is
10:46 AM on 03/12/2011
Here's a wild and crazy idea, how about having development occur where the water is? The western slope has an educated population, transportation, open space and resources, all the things needed except we aren't huddled on the I-25 corridor. Sensible, sane development would be welcomed here in the west. How about taking a road trip one of these fine days?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Robert Schwab
03:46 PM on 03/10/2011
Drew, I am surprised your piece did not address Aaron Million's proposed pipeline across Wyoming to the Front Range carrying untapped water from the Green River that is due the state under the Colorado River compact. Million proposed the pipeline several years ago, environmentalists and water managers in the state dismissed it, and to be honest I don't know where the project stands today. It's one solution, however, that would provide plains farmers and Front Range urban areas more water, yet not at the expense of the Western Slope. The water not being taken now flows immediately away from the state once it flows into Utah. Like energy solutions for our state, Colorado's water solutions have to include all opportunites that meet our high standards of environmental quality, conservation, and growth. No opportunity worth study should be excluded.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Drew Peternell
02:45 PM on 03/11/2011
Robert – The Flaming Gorge pipeline project is still on the table, but our groups don’t think the project makes sense from an economic or environmental perspective. It would be extremely expensive to build a pipeline 500 miles from Flaming Gorge Reservoir on the Utah/Wyoming border to Colorado’s Front Range. The Colorado Water Conservation Board has estimated the initial capital costs of the project at nearly $10 billion, with annual operations and maintenance costs of almost $200 million. The price of water delivered through the pipeline would be the most expensive in history and would exceed what most Front Range water users would be willing or able to pay. The pipeline would be extremely energy-consumptive and would deplete water supplies in Flaming Gorge Reservoir and the Green River, to the detriment of recreational fishing and endangered warm water fish species. Further, it is an open question whether Colorado would be entitled to any water from the pipeline under interstate compact should Colorado River basin water supplies decline as a result of climate change, as is widely predicted. Building a pipeline to carry water that might not exist in the future is a bad investment. Our “Filling The Gap†report lays out better options.
photo
ClassicalGas
Colorado Rocky Mountain Hi!
02:39 AM on 03/27/2011
I found this article today, but I left a link at the top of the thread that I would greatly appreciate you watching.

Thank you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:24 PM on 03/09/2011
The headwaters for most of Nebraska's rivers are in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, so anytime someone talks about dams in Colorado, our ears perk up. "Consider that half of Denver's water use still goes toward outdoor landscaping." I'm guessing he means toward grass lawns in the high-plains desert that is the Front Range. America, not just Denver, has got to get over the conformity to grass lawns. Double the water by xeriscaping.
photo
MimiK
living in dramatic times
02:56 PM on 03/08/2011
Wow - I find your combination of pragmatism and optimism good news. And also surprising.

I don't know if you took climate change into account. Responding pro-actively to climate change -- the precautionary principle -- would, I think, make conservation & small storage/home based systems such as gray water capture critical.

Climate change also points to localized food production and urban farming as critically important water uses, going beyond "balancing" municipal and agribusiness needs with proactively choreographing the absolutely necessary shift from agribusiness to local, small, organic farming, including urban farming.

Whatever, I think we need "public water education" in the West to be a requirement for every citizen.

Cautiously optimistic. But still worried. Thanks for your work.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Drew Peternell
07:22 PM on 03/09/2011
We did not account for specific, quantifiable impacts of climate change in formulating our plan for meeting the Front Range gap, mostly because those impacts so uncertain. You’re right, though, that the potential for climate change to reduce water availability in the Colorado River basin (as many scientists predict) makes solutions like conservation and reuse even more attractive. Conservation and reuse allow us to do more with the water resources we’re already developed. Large pipelines designed to bring new water to the Front Range from the Western Slope might sit empty in a drier future.