John McCain has made a terrible mistake.
Recognizing the likelihood that Barack Obama is going to be his opponent in the general election, John McCain has begun directing his attacks toward the Senator from Illinois. Our first taste was with McCain's victory speech in Virginia, where he criticized the "platitudes" that form the basis of the Obama candidacy. Days later, McCain began a line of attack that has continued into multiple news cycles, accusing Obama of reneging on a pledge he'd made to accept public financing in the general election.
On its own, it is generally a good line of attack against Obama. For all of his misguided policy positions, McCain is generally regarded by the media as trustworthy, and could benefit from shaping a debate to suggest that Obama is not. The problem of course is that John McCain does not have the kind of campaign finance record that he would want to share. The loan he took out to save his campaign was to be paid back by taxpayer dollars, not his own, through the federal matching funds program. A taxpayer funded bailout is certainly not the kind of scenario that proponents of public finance envisioned.
What's worse for McCain is that this may have been his best hand in a race against Obama, and he played it far too early. First, his strategists should have recognized that the best way to defeat Obama was to help Hillary defeat him first. John McCain fairs far worse against Obama than he does against Hillary in general election match-ups. Simply put, the best way to beat Obama is to avoid running against him.
Instead, McCain has opted to elevate Obama to the national stage, beginning the general election battle a few months early, marginalizing Hillary with every attack. To confound her problems, incredibly, she has taken to joining in on the attack against Obama on public finance, actually articulating publicly, a general election scenario which wouldn't include her.
McCain's first strategic move should have been to target Hillary, weakening her as a general election match-up while elevating her in the Democratic primary. Instead, it appears that McCain doesn't believe a Clinton nomination possible, and so wants to focus his energy where it will be needed most. Even so, the move was a terrible blunder... for other reasons.
Trust is an especially difficult angle from which to attack Obama. The trust he has built among his supporters is a substantial part of what drives his campaign. For McCain, there will be very few places to grasp for a deceitful Obama moment. But if he can succeed in shaking those foundations, it could prove worthwhile.
Public financing may well have been McCain's best opportunity. But rather than wait until the general election was in full swing, rather than wait until the media would give it above-the-fold attention, John McCain began his attacks before the race had begun. The story line is a negative one for Obama, and yet it's being dissipated, if not completely diluted, in the wave of momentum that Obama is currently riding. At a time when no one, not even serious political observers, have moved on to the McCain/Obama race, McCain dropped his best gambit in the trash. He gave a Page 1 story a Page 4 death.
The negative press will be blunted. Soon, Obama may give a definitive answer on public financing, ending the story and whatever value it may have had. When the timing is finally right for John McCain to bring it up, it will be a rehash, stale and not worthy of recycling.
The Obama campaign should take advantage of this moment by kicking the story out of the news cycle quickly. Obama should give a definitive answer against publicly financing the campaign. Like most of the best responses from the Obama campaign, the truth will be the appropriate spin.
After all, when Obama preserved the option to publicly finance his campaign, no one could have conceived that his campaign would already be financed by the public. The Obama fundraising operation has broken every record by staggering amounts, almost entirely from small donors. With over 900,000 donors, no special interest money, and less than three percent of the donor base maxed out, Obama could not have asked for a campaign to be more "of the people." The spirit of the pledge is being upheld. And more importantly, Obama owes something to the movement he has helped to create. Having told so many that their role in the campaign was essential, he has to let them participate.
He may look good in comparison to the Doofus, or Huckabee, or Romney, but he is definitely not what the country needs or wants - another incompetent Republican.
Keep it coming Clinton and McCain, every negative statement you make about Obama, including those comments made by your spouses and campaigns, only make his supporters more resolute in their support and willingness to donate more time and money to his campaign. Not to mention the fact that the negative attacks only make his supports, as well as your own, dislike you more.
Two will go down in history; The Clinton's managed to lose it all to a skinny black kid who had never played before and they had the money, the cards and the umpires writing the rules for them. Oops, they forgot the caucuses!
Rudy will get his own little note in history. He's going to become a textbook example of hubris.
The video of McCain strolling through the market in Baghdad will come to be as a mistake too. Especially if he's trying to exhibit competence.
But we agree in essence, he needs to make clear times have changed, new information is available, and while he might be happy to negotiate, the likelihood of him coming to an agreement on something he never pledged to do when it is neither in his nor his supporters' best interest, is low.
But if you count ALL donors from last year as well as this year then the total is around 900,000 and they are shooting for a million.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/02/20/sot.clinton.new.york.cnn
However, don't be naive in this. The Republican machine will have no problem rallying around McCain and the conservative movement will swallow their pride to do what they feel they have to do to hold on to their crumbs of power through McCain.
The conservative movement invested everything in George W. Bush. His failed presidency disproved all of their failed policies. However, a Republican winning will prevent history regarding their movement as a failure. As Romney's empty-suit, pandering campaign showed, the conservative movement will align with anyone to maintain a sense of relevancy.
DO NOT BE NAIVE IN THIS. They will launch the dirtiest campaign we've ever seen. For starters, they will use Barack's whole name for six months: "Barack Hussein Obama", hoping for "Bradley" or "Wilder" effect.
McCain's campaign may have secretly preferred to run against Hillary, but anyone who thinks the Conservatives won't ultimately do what they have to do is beyond naive.
Obama will not be able to just "rise above" the onslaught that's coming. He will have to fight before, during and probably after election day to win power. He's capable of it. But his naive supporters are not doing him any favors underestimating the conservative movement.
Ask yourself this. The neoconservatives told 935 lies to mislead the nation into war under false pretenses against the wrong country. WHAT WON'T THEY DO to hold on to their remains of power?
Go for it, Sidney!
(With apologies for any Sidneys in the audience.)