iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dylan Ratigan

GET UPDATES FROM Dylan Ratigan
 

On Our Way to Climbing Everest

Posted: 12/15/11 01:26 PM ET

If you haven't noticed, your fellow Americans are somewhat pissed about our political situation. No, I take it back -- they're mad as hell. Back in August, I was mad as hell too. I watched in disgust as Washington's debt ceiling debacle grew from a tremor into an earthquake -- one that tore deep fissures in our confidence as a nation to get anything done.

What made it even more frustrating for me, and everyone that I spoke to in late summer of 2011, was that there was little one could do about it but lose your temper. Which of course, I did.

Then, I watched as a funny thing began to happen. Something unexpected, but something so necessary. A summer of simmering frustration turned into a September of action.

People woke up. And then, finally, they began to fight back.

Occupy Wall Street began as a great experiment, with people camping out in Zuccotti Park in downtown New York, sparking a worldwide movement of protests and tent cities. Occupiers had discussions about the future of our economy with a Nobel laureate economist. They echoed back the guidance of spiritual leaders who came to offer words of encouragement. They built a library, they cooked for each other, and they fed the homeless. All of those were noble achievements.

But the most critical thing Occupy Wall Street achieved was this: they lit the match that reignited a national conversation about the link between global inequality and government corruption.

Then something else happened. Members of Congress began introducing bills to fight corruption.

We were inspired to begin work on a project to attack the nefarious influence of money in our political system. As a result, the Get Money Out project was born. It's a project where we band together, using the best of our collective resources, to ban money from the political process. We recognized early on that this couldn't be done in the usual way -- it had to be a national movement. And that's exactly what happened. Over 300,000 of us are now on board, and we've started the "Great 28 Debate" on ratifying a 28th amendment to the Constitution.

There are now 13 different Constitutional amendments being proposed by various groups and politicians, all focused on money and politics. One Republican Presidential nominee, Buddy Roemer, has based his entire campaign on the corrupting influence of big money. Tea Party advocates like Mark Meckler have come on board. Celebrities and entertainers are committing their resources, from Steven Van Zandt to The Goo Goo Dolls to Russell Simmons. And business leaders, like my friend Landon Rowland, former Kansas City Southern Railroad CEO, and Charlie Kolb, President of the Committee for Economic Development (the organization that wrote the original Marshall Plan), are starting to make waves.

For the first time, this is more than just hopeful chatter about a nationwide movement. We're seeing concrete, determined action on the local level. The city of Los Angeles has now passed a resolution demanding Congress pass a Constitutional amendment saying that "only living, breathing human beings are afforded Constitutional rights." We expect many towns and cities to follow suit.

In the past, I've likened this effort to "Climbing Everest." While we have some strong momentum, climbing Everest is no joke. If you and I aspire to be change agents in our society, we must enlist ourselves in a campaign to get money out of politics. As our friend Lawrence Lessig said on The Daily Show this week, "money is the root, and unless we find rootstrikers who are willing to strike at that root, we're never going to fix the problem."

Many of you have signed our petition at Get Money Out. Over the next few months, we need your help to expand this into a full-fledged movement. It is only possible if we enlist each other to work towards this singular goal. We will do that by exposing the auction, advocating municipal resolutions, and convincing our elected representatives to debate and ratify a 28th Amendment to separate business and state.

We also have to put this message everywhere we can. For every school or university that has a student council, that student council should call upon Congress to pass a Constitutional amendment to get money out. If you belong to a local Democratic or Republican club, same deal. If you own shares in a company, call investor relations and tell them how you feel. We can apply direct pressure to state pension managers to do the same thing, as some are starting to do, like New York City's Public Advocate, Bill de Blasio.

And let's not be fooled. Our very own Supreme Court says the Constitution allows corporations to spend unlimited secret funds in elections. Our elected officials are only too happy to use that for their benefit, while the voice of the individual voter is increasingly -- and dangerously -- silenced. President Obama and Mitt Romney are happily scooping up money from Wall Street, while Buddy Roemer, who refuses to take anything but small individual donations from voters, is being shut out. Not only by the Republican establishment, but by the national media who have refused to give him a spot in the GOP presidential debates.

Nevertheless, we can do this. We will do this. Abandon the psychology of what we are going to do, and embrace the psychology of what we are doing.

Behold, the 13 amendments in The Great 28 Debate. Every one of them is depending on us to turn them from a fantasy into a reality.

1) Rep. Ted Deutch - OCCUPIED Amendment (or Outlawing Corporate Cash Undermining the Public Interest in our Elections and Democracy)
Introduced by Congressman Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), the amendment reverses Citizen's United by stating that corporations are not people under the Constitution, and that corporations are barred from making election-related expenditures. It authorizes Congress and the states to regulate all election contributions and expenditures, and reaffirms Congress' right to regulate corporations.

2) Sen. Bernie Sanders - Saving American Democracy Amendment
Senator Bernie Sanders introduced an amendment in the Senate that mirrors the OCCUPIED amendment in the House. Introducing this "companion bill" in the Senate allows both houses of Congress to begin debate on the same bill without having to wait for the other to pass it. Learn more. Read the amendment.

3) Cenk Uygur, Wolf PAC - Wolf PAC Amendment
Wolf PAC, a group started by progressive TV and radio host Cenk Uygur, reverses corporate personhood and prohibits corporations from giving to any politician. The amendment also sets a cap of $100 on all political donations and it establishes a public system to fund political campaigns. Read the amendment.

4) Senator Tom Udall - Udall Amendment
Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.) along with eight other Democratic Senators proposed an amendment that gives Congress the power to regulate all money spent on campaigns and outside political groups such as Super PACs. It allows states to regulate state elections in the same manner. It would clear the way for Congress to pass reform legislation that would limit spending and would withstand a challenge in the Supreme Court. Read the amendment.

5) Rep. Jim McGovern and Free Speech for People - The People's Right's Amendment
Congressman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) introduced the amendment with the support of Free Speech for People, a non-profit group that aims to end corporate personhood. The amendment states that people or persons as used in the Constitution does not include corporations and that corporations are subject to regulation by the people through their elected representatives. Read the amendment.

6) Public Citizen - Democracy is for People Amendment
Pursued by the non-profit group Public Citizen, the amendment would reverse the Citizen's Uniteddecision and permit Congress to regulate political spending by corporations. The amendment has not been drafted into specific language, but is based on a set of core principles. Read those principles and get more information.

7) Russell Simmons - Simmons Amendment
Hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons announced support for an amendment in a speech to Occupy Boston protesters. The amendment establishes public funding of political campaigns and prohibits any political contributions from any source. It gives Congress the authority to design and enforce the public funding system. Read the full text of the amendment. Watch Simmons' speech.

8)Rep. Donna Edwards - Edwards Amendment
Introduced by Representative Donna Edwards (D-Md.), the amendment would overturn theCitizen's United Supreme Court ruling by allowing Congress to regulate political spending by corporations.

9) Rep. Kurt Schrader - Schrader Amendment
Introduced by Representative Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.), the amendment authorizes Congress and the states to regulate the contribution of all funds to candidates and the expenditure of funds to influence elections. Read the amendment.

10) Rep. Marcy Kaptur - Kaptur Amendment
Introduced by Representative Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), the amendment authorizes Congress and the states to set limits on the contributions that may be accepted by and the expenditures that may be made in support or in opposition to candidates running for public office.

11) Move to Amend - Move to Amend
A group opposed to corporate personhood, Move to Amend, has proposed an amendment that would overturn Citizen's United by affirming that corporations are not people and can be regulated, and that money is not speech and can be regulated.

12) Get Money Out - Get Money Out Amendment
The amendment was proposed by the Get Money Out organization, which was started by MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan, and became a part of United Republic in late 2011. The amendment prohibits corporations from making political donations and affirms that political donations are not speech, which allows Congress to regulate them. It also makes election day a federal holiday.

13) Lawrence Lessig - Lessig Amendment
Lawrence Lessig, Harvard professor and founder of Rootstrikers, which joined forces with United Republic in late 2011, introduced an amendment that prohibits corporations from contributing money to any candidate, limits campaign contributions to $100, and gives Congress the power to regulate outside campaign spending. It also establishes Election Day as a national holiday.

So that's the team so far. Join us at GetMoneyOut.com. Tell your friends. Let the world know.

 

Follow Dylan Ratigan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DylanRatigan

 
 
  • Comments
  • 266
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgbouman
Curmudgeon & Designer
08:52 PM on 12/18/2011
It loos as though the Left Coast is right as usual. A core piece of our problem is the personhood of organizations. Stripping organizations of their personhood woul rip the mask of anonymity from most of those who are destroying our nation. That alone won't save us, but without it'll other efforts will fail.
05:28 PM on 12/18/2011
The amendments offered by members of congress don't prohibit corporate contributions, they let congress decide how much corporations can give which just reinstates the slightly less corrupt situation before citizens united. The McGovern amendment does say that corporations are not persons. HJR 88.
The Simmons, Move to Amend, Lessig, and Get the Money Out amendments look like the best so far.
But if congress can allow corporations and individuals to give contributions by law, it can do full public financing by law.
It takes so long to amend the constitution, an all events amendment is needed that would make explicit the right of voters to nullify citizens united and veto bad laws. Something like this:

The voters at scheduled elections, or at their initiative, may veto any act of
any executive officer of government by majority vote.The voters may also
amend or repeal legislation, void court decisions and jury verdicts, grant
pardons and reprieves, and amend or repeal treaties, trade agreements,
government contracts, and House or Senate rules by majority vote.
01:35 PM on 12/18/2011
I was kind of on the fence about this, but if the Goo Goo Dolls are on board, so am I!
photo
MissinAmerica
Is that true, or did you hear it on Fox?
05:38 PM on 12/18/2011
LOL

Whatever works!!
01:03 PM on 12/18/2011
Fight crime, crap and corruption. Hire a professional.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clifton Middleton
Plant It Everywhere
11:51 AM on 12/18/2011
We are sick of this endless, well documented and noble effort to limit the influence of wealth by passing more laws. Stop it. We want a way to MAKE SOME MONEY. we want Free Market Hemp and the people will create our own fuel, food and wealth. It is much better to be for one good idea than to be against everything. Plant It Everywhere and Prosper. and Dylan, you are suppose to be a money guy, get with the program and support the only plan on the table that can replace foreign fuel and guarantee jobs.
lightnessandjoy
Is micro-bio a new disease?
07:06 PM on 12/18/2011
What we?
10:46 AM on 12/18/2011
Only Seconds to sign…

*94 year old Alma Scorchadinner of Broken Arrow Oklahoma actually signed up in only 17 seconds…think you can beat her time? Come on -- she’s only got the partial use of three fingers on her left hand, is legally blind and is using dial-up!

Come on beat Alma…figuratively of course…

Make “The” Difference,

Join “The” Cause,

"GetMoneyOut"
http://www.getmoneyout.com/
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
04:29 AM on 12/18/2011
I think part of this effort can be more easily achieved, by simply doing more of what's already happening, namely re-hosting the political process online. In the past, people needed multi-million-dollar war chests to widely broadcast their message and platform to the general public. Today, you can do that for pennies on the dollar, PLUS reach people that have kind of dropped off the TV dial for various reasons, but still read actively, including folks that have migrated 'outdoors' for whatever reason.  Now that the web is wireless and so widely accessible, it's a way for people to communicate that's super-cheap, and pretty prevalent. People are talking, examining various angles of this whole social issue, and asking questions about how people can live, when Madison Ave. and investment speculators expect thus-and-such in terms of typical 'consumer' (nee: citizen) behavior. There's a lot of Americans, these days, and a lot of people globally, also, continuing on as we have in the past isn't getting the job done, somehow, so how can we, what should we do differently at this stage, when businesses can't keep up with the increased demand for income and resources? And what of issues and questions concerning things like immigration, while you're on the topic? Is the American Dream still what it once was, or was that always just a real estate sales gimmick? What kind of country DO we live in, what kind of country do we WANT to live in, and how far is that, from where we are now, finally, what is honestly gained by railing at corporations, when the means to personal/group advancement are largely at-hand, and have nothing to do with business entities to begin with?
photo
MissinAmerica
Is that true, or did you hear it on Fox?
05:48 PM on 12/18/2011
When corporations are controlling our govt through spending $3bill/yr through their lobbyists, bribing our congress, I'm sorry but I will rail. With the largest campaign contributors buying elections & then controlling who they sponsored , I will rail. Back in the day when $3 million was worth a whole lot more than it does today, that is the amount spent(above board anyways) to convince our congress & Pres Clinton to end Glass-Steagall, which brought on our global economic collapse today. So yes, I will rail. We have a corrupt broken system, like Dylan says. We've been asleep too long. It's TIME to rail.

(...But I loved your line, "Is the American Dream still what it once was, or was that always just a real estate sales gimmick?")
photo
MissinAmerica
Is that true, or did you hear it on Fox?
05:59 PM on 12/18/2011
Major typo in my post above.

Wall Street Lobbyists spent a total of $300 million to get rid of Glass-Steagall, not $3 million, freeing them to start legal gambling & defrauding their customers & basically pulling an Enron on all of us.

It's really time to rail.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MassWG
02:49 AM on 12/18/2011
Thank you for giving Buddy Roemer a mention.

Not only is he big on this issue, he's big on the issue of globalism and trade. He realizes both repubs and dems are beholden to the banks and multinationals, which explains trade policies and tax rules that benefit the banks and multinationals by perpetuating the offshoring of jobs and profits.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:25 AM on 12/18/2011
Dylan, you mistake the effect for the cause. What was ignited was a conviction that oppressed people can shape their own destiny, even in the face of powerful tyranny. Everything from Solidarity in Poland to Otpor in Serbia to the Arab Spring and OWS arose from that conviction. The specific ways that it is expressed is not the cause, it is the effect.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Scott Baker
President:Common Ground-NYC;NYS Coordinator:PBI
12:08 PM on 12/17/2011
Not one of these amendments deals with the issue of who is creating the money in our bank-Fed system; the private banks. Until we take back the money creation power, this will not work. They can always find ways around this. The only presidential candidate talking about this is Libertarian candidate Bill Still (movies "Secret of Oz," "The Money Masters," etc.): http://still2012.com/
05:20 PM on 12/17/2011
There are many issues Scott, but paramount I feel is the issue of influence over our representatives. America with true democratic representation, and not oligarchy, can solve fed issues. Here is a more refined amendment, that Dylan does not comment on, because he's not on his own web site. “For all levels of government, contributions to campaigns and ballot questions, shall only be made by individual, non compensated voters, and only within their own districts: And, all policy officials and staff are prohibited from receiving any favors, jobs, or pay, from any other than taxpayer funded sources, unless the exception can reasonably be made by a board of ethics.” Scott, representation comes before change. The cart and horse thing.
11:36 PM on 12/16/2011
Dylan Ratigan, Jimmy Williams, and the staff of United Re: Public, which came on board do not engage with their crew on the Get Money Out web site. Wake up Dylan. Where's Jimmy? Not on the Get Money Out web site. “For all levels of government, contributions to campaigns and ballot questions, shall only be made by individual, non compensated voters, and only within their own districts: And, all officials and staff are prohibited from receiving any favors, jobs, or pay, from any other than taxpayer funded sources.” This is I feel better than the two amendments offered up by Dylan Ratigan and Lawrence Lessig, which will just be shell games for the money people to get around. You have a working group, and you are ignoring us. What is your deal? I think a reporter should cover this problem. Debate me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyeshinka
03:32 PM on 12/16/2011
I found my way over here because the eXile's Mark Ames is a good fan of Ratigan's and is often on his show. More people need to read independent journals contributed by people who really know what's going on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
02:42 PM on 12/16/2011
If I had any money, I'd send it to them. They are brave and they are smart. All the different people coming together for common cause. It isn't a fluke or ravings of the mad and lazy. When Newt can get a billionaire to write a $20 million check for a super pac to help him get elected, we need to get bigger and louder, person by person. This isn't going to be a do-over.
12:27 PM on 12/16/2011
Thank you Dylan for being one of the leaders on this issue...and for the great list of resources noted in this Blog!
11:49 AM on 12/16/2011
Do not like the analogy to climbing Everest.

It’s really not that hard to climb Everest...thousands have done it. But it has historically been a rich man’s endeavor. First and foremost... you need "the opportunity." You have to get to the mountain. You also have to be mentally and physically prepared, have the right supplies and ensure that the weather will hold.

Oh, and you need guidance.

The legendary 1% masters of the universe who first attempted to reach the summit would have been lost without their nameless faceless Sherpa guides.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
keramos
Guns don't kill, bullets do. Tax the bullets
12:24 PM on 12/18/2011
The legendary 1% don't need no stinkin guides.  They simply ascend to whatever height is necessary.  It's magic.
photo
OkhamsRazzor
The meaning of life is to give life meaning
03:37 PM on 12/18/2011
Honey Badger don't need no sherpa. Honey Badger carries 2 yeti carcasses with him to the top, one to eat and the other to sleep in. Honey Badger don't care.