iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Earl Ofari Hutchinson

GET UPDATES FROM Earl Ofari Hutchinson
 

Romney Puts Bush Back in the White House Saddle

Posted: 09/17/2012 1:38 pm

The terrifying prospect that GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney would put George W. Bush back in the White House, if elected, came a step closer to reality with the public unveiling of his transition team. Bush won't literally return to the White House under a Romney regime, but it's close. The names of the transition team read like a who's who of the Bush administration.

A tip-off that Bush's imprint would be all over a Romney administration came even before he announced he'd formed his transition team. It came at a closed door confab for Romney's fat cat donors back in June. The usual Bush suspects were there, including former Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, Bush's Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff and Bush political guru Karl Rove. There are more than three dozen ex-Bush officials that have hovered close to Romney in the last year.

The pack of the old Bushites make up the same cast of characters that were the architects of Bush's failed, flawed, and costly foreign and war policies. The bug Bush planted in Romney's ear about how to conduct the nation's affairs is plainly in evidence on the pet Bush themes, namely a talk-and-act-tough foreign policy, especially on Russia, and a virtually open taxpayer's checkbook to the Defense Department on spending. Romney even contradicted his own VP running mate Paul Ryan who agreed as part of congressional budget negotiations to cut billions from the military budget. Romney publicly and repeatedly declared that not a penny would be slashed from it.

His lambaste of President Obama for allegedly going soft on the anti-American protests in Cairo and his hard line blast at Obama for his alleged tepid response to the murder of America's Libyan ambassador for which he was roundly and rightly hammered further confirmed that the bring-em'-on-take-no-prisoners mantra that was the trademark of the Bush years would be back in the White House saddle with Romney. Bush's hang tough stance earned the U.S. the frustration of its European allies, inflamed hostilities with the Arab world, and cost the lives of thousands of U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the gross nose thumb at civil liberties protections with Guantanamo, and some provisions of the Patriot Act.

Romney's transition team conjures up the shuddering thought of a Bush Administration III return on domestic policy too. Former positions that Romney's transition team members held with Bush as agency heads, top administrators, or cabinet holders include the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services, Small Business Administration, the Treasury Department, and the Security and Exchange Commission. Coupled with former Bush foreign policy bigwigs that have Romney's ear, they cover nearly every key area of White House policy making and department administration.

It's not unusual for incoming presidents from the same party to lean heavily on former administration officials from their party. Obama tapped several key Clinton former officials. President-Elects want to hit the ground running, and not to stumble out of the gate, by bringing on board experienced and seasoned officials who know the Washington ropes. But Romney, if elected, won't avoid a stumble from the gate. In fact bringing on Bush's people almost certainly guarantees it.

Bush's policy fumbles occurred in nearly every area of policy that Romney would charge former Bush officials with running. The financial collapse, the economic meltdown, the disastrous accelerated deregulation of the financial industry, the soaring budget deficit spurred in large part by the colossal tax cut giveaways to the rich, two mega billion wars, and a housing collapse, were overseen by the Bush former officials that Romney wants. They fell asleep at the wheel while the house crumbled.

There's an irony in the public disclosure of the candidates that Romney proposes to head agencies and cabinet posts in his administration. The law that virtually mandates that presidential contenders plan for their administration immediately after they secure their party's nomination was signed into law by Obama.

Romney then didn't jump the gun, and isn't being presumptuous about a White House win. He was the GOP presidential nominee in all but official name back in May, and the GOP convention simply made it official. Under the law he was compelled to make known his transition team and candidates for administration posts. The good thing is that Romney's move gives the public the horrifying glimpse of those that will hold prominent places in a Romney administration, and even more frightening those who would carry out his policy, advise him on policy, and in more cases than not even set policy. The even better, and likely, hope is that Romney's transition team is just a paper exercise and will never see the light of the White House; that is another disastrous Bush III White House.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is a frequent political commentator on MSNBC and a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on American Urban Radio Network. He is the author of How Obama Governed: The Year of Crisis and Challenge. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is the host of the weekly Hutchinson Report on KPFK-Radio and the Pacifica Network.

 

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/earlhutchinson

FOLLOW POLITICS
The terrifying prospect that GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney would put George W. Bush back in the White House, if elected, came a step closer to reality with the public unveiling of his transit...
The terrifying prospect that GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney would put George W. Bush back in the White House, if elected, came a step closer to reality with the public unveiling of his transit...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brittadv2
Nation of laws... Really?
09:35 PM on 09/19/2012
And I wonder what Obama's doing? Oh..... Thats right! giving OUR jobs to the illegal immigra.... Oh my bad mean "dreamers." lol.
11:12 PM on 09/18/2012
How is the "Let's all be friends" policy working out? Our Flag being burned in 20 + countries.....
01:15 PM on 09/18/2012
A vote for Romney is a vote for invading Iran, and remaining in Afghanistan indefinitely. I'm terribly concerned about this, and I hope enough people understand that Romney will put the neocons back in charge of foreign policy. I'm not worried about economic policy, because there's not much that government can do to fix it, as much as we all wish it were otherwise. In other words, it's the war, not the economy, stupid!
06:22 PM on 09/17/2012
Hey where is Don Rumsfeld? Colin Powell?

Come on, lets double down and make this the most comical campaign in American History.
06:13 PM on 09/17/2012
Bush Deux!
05:44 PM on 09/17/2012
Hey, a question for y'all. When Obama talks about how "we tried that, and it didn't work", is he talking about capitalism?
06:20 PM on 09/17/2012
LOL!

r u serious?

He was talking about tax cuts as a means to spur the economy.
Bush made the biggest tax cuts in history and yet we ended up with a economy collapse. Clinton raised them and we had budget surpluses. In fact, Reagan raised them and then Bush 1 raised them and then Clinton raised them.......and presto budget surplus.
Bush 2 cuts them and bang we are in the tank big time.

Why? Because rich people don't hire people because they have extra cash on hand. They put the money to work....not in companies but in commodities which pushes the prices up of things people need. Tax cuts starve the economy because localities lay off teachers and others who would create the demand for private goods...which would create a demand in labor in the private industry. You take those tax dollars out of circulation and you have a shrinking economy. Just look at the Middle East....all those rich sheiks and all that oil. Its stays in a small group of people and their countries don't prosper. Look at Germany, high tax rates = strong economy.
photo
drdrepublican
Believe in something or fall for anything
04:54 PM on 09/18/2012
President Obama has poured taxpayer money into the economy by the means of Solyndra, GM unions, the Fisker auto disaster, cash for clunkers and by printing money. Has that worked? The Clinton surplus was part of a on paper dot-com bubble which evaporated three months after it was announced.... I never got a job from a poor person and I want my employer to have a lot of money so my payroll check will not bounce. More money in my pocket affords me to buy and invest in more goods and services. Teachers are paid by local government with property taxes so federal tax cuts have nothing to do with it. Middle Eastern countries do not prosper because of greed and class, something Obama wants to bring here. Germany has an economy that supplies food, cars, services and money for the better part of Europe. The taxes that the German population pays is for a very generous internal welfare system that is about to come to an end...
09:52 PM on 09/19/2012
I don't know where to start here, lower tax rates means higher tax revenue,sorry, it's true. productivity is the victim of higher tax rates.The rates didn't collapse the economy, sub-prime loans, politically correct open-ended wars, corruption of our elected officials, unilateral expansion of regulatory government. Those government teachers you speak of are spending taxpayer money, confiscated from their neighbors. I lived a long time in Germany, It is a strong economy, they are mostly content in their government sponsored serfdom, living under the U.S. military umbrella.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wgbastos
10:14 AM on 09/18/2012
Here is a capialist question for you: What do you think happens when some investor (a private equity firm for example) buys out a company from its previous owner? What does that do to the economy (local or otherwise) ? Do you have a clue?
05:42 PM on 09/17/2012
Seriously? No Republican in government at the time when Bush was in the White House can be in a Republican White House, forever and ever?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alumcreek
sorry to see humanity repeating errors ad nauseam
02:59 PM on 09/17/2012
This may become a Bushleague nation forever and ever. Don't smarten up, dumb down. Its the American right wing way
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MNKen
You're not the boss of me...my cat is!
02:49 PM on 09/17/2012
To round out this nightmare cast of characters, you just need to add Paul Wolfowitz. He has the distinction of creating the desire for war with Iraq, throwing billions and billions of dollars at the wars, then going on to become a farce at the World Bank.

He could ruin the American economy and our department of defense all by himself. Whatta guy!
02:46 PM on 09/17/2012
There they go again....
02:44 PM on 09/17/2012
All the Obama campaign has to do is run this quote:

"The financial collapse, the economic meltdown, the disastrous accelerated deregulation of the financial industry, the soaring budget deficit spurred in large part by the colossal tax cut giveaways to the rich, two mega billion wars, and a housing collapse, were overseen by the Bush former officials that Romney wants. "

Seriously.
02:35 PM on 09/17/2012
Clarity on what we already knew, a Romney victory is essentially as good as putting Bush back in the office.

The Prez takes heat for not cleaning up the mess that Bush left us. Realistically it will take alot more than 4 years to undo the damage done by Bush's admin. And longer if Congress keeps stalling and blocking any progress.

Let's not be conned again in 2012.

Vote Obama, and take back Congress.

Send Repubs a message that we are DONE with BUSH, and DONE w partisan-obstructionist practices.
02:25 PM on 09/17/2012
Anyone delusional enough to vote for a guy who is surrounding himself with George W's advisors is beyond stupid
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:22 PM on 09/17/2012
And yet the stupid remain. Loud and ever ignorant.
02:16 PM on 09/17/2012
Horrifying. Frightening. Disastrous. All fitting descriptors of the possibility of the Bush III White House, Mr. Hutchinson. Americans should not even be asking themselves if they're better off now than they were four years ago. They should merely contemplate if the country would be better off with a 3rd term for the Bush administration. Yikes!!!