More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Earl Ofari Hutchinson

GET UPDATES FROM Earl Ofari Hutchinson

If Obama Is Playing Politics With the Afghan Troop Removal Then It's the Right Kind of Politics

Posted: 06/23/11 07:04 PM ET

Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney wasted no time in intimating that it was politics more than necessity that prompted President Obama's cautious phased drawdown of US forces in Afghanistan. Romney's gentle knock that it was politics not pragmatism of Obama was tame compared to other GOP critics who accused the president of playing politics with American lives in Afghanistan, compromising the security of American forces there, and subverting the training and security capacity of the Afghan police and military to maintain order in the country. And worst of all, asserting that the troop reduction emboldened the Taliban to step up its war against US forces. The criticism is as wrongheaded as the insidious political motives of Romney and the GOP critics for making the criticism.

Obama is the last one that the GOP could gripe about when it comes to the willingness to use American might in Afghanistan. He has never shirked from that. Just ask Obama's Democratic critics. For the past year they have loudly demanded that Obama get the troops out and get them out fast from Afghanistan. They have penned countless resolutions, declarations, statements, and convened party confabs, all hammering Obama on the Afghan build-up and continued bankroll of billions for a war whose aim of total victory is still mushy, unattainable, and a massive drain on the budget and the economy.

Polls consistently show that a majority of Americans also consider the war endless, futile and a massive drain on the economy. So the criticism that Obama is playing politics with his modest withdrawal of troops, or that he's not getting the troops out fast enough, seems even more far-fetched. The premise of both the GOP and the Democratic critics is that politics is the driving force behind Obama's resolve to press the war.

Long before Obama won the White House, he made it clear that he thought the Afghan war was the right war, in the right place at the right time. That was in stark contrast to his view of the Iraq war. He clearly saw waging war in Afghanistan as of critical importance to U.S. security.

In an August 2007 speech at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, in Washington, D.C., Obama left no doubt that Afghanistan would be his number one priority. He made an impassioned promise to wage what he dubbed the war that had to be won.

Spelling out in minute detail his plan of attack, Obama vowed to drastically increase troop strength; ramp up spending on an array of military-related programs, such as mobile special-forces, pacification teams and intelligence operations; and to beef up military aid to Pakistan. He vowed to take the war to the Taliban in Northwest Pakistan. In a CBS Face the Nation interview the same year, he promised to "finish the job" in Afghanistan.

Even as he promised to set a firm timetable for eventual withdrawal from Iraq, he gave no timetable for a similar withdrawal from Afghanistan. He did just the opposite. He vowed to end corruption, hold free elections, bolster Afghan security forces, boost intelligence gathering and monitoring, beef up Afghan security forces, and ensure a stable government in Afghanistan.

He took much heat for it then and the temperature level went up even higher after he upped the ante in the number of ground forces in the country his first year in office. Obama heard and ignored the Democrats that pounded him even harder for his decision to escalate. The killing of bin Laden didn't change Obama's view that the war still had to be prosecuted for all of the strategic reasons that he has repeatedly talked about for the past three years.

Given Obama's unrelenting commitment to the war and its aims, as problematic as it is of completely achieving those aims, his withdrawal of troops, any troops, from the country has to be considered a move in the right direction. It shows that he is willing to buck hard line conservatives and many in the military that scream that any drawdown of troops is a prescription for defeat. It also finally puts him firmly on the path to doing what Democrats insist that he do and that he bring the war to a final close.

Obama understood that the Iraq war was an ugly and shameful page in U.S. history and that millions of Americans were furious and frustrated by it. The same can be said of the Afghan war. And there have been no shortage of Obama war critics to make that point. Now they're at least getting him to take the first step that they wanted and that's begin the troop withdrawal. If that's what's considered playing politics with the war, then it's the right kind of politics.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is host of the weekly Hutchinson Report Newsmaker Hour on KTYM Radio Los Angeles streamed on ktym.com podcast on blogtalkradio.com and internet TV broadcast on thehutchinsonreportnews.com

 

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/earlhutchinson

Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney wasted no time in intimating that it was politics more than necessity that prompted President Obama's cautious phased drawdown of US forces in Afghanistan...
Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney wasted no time in intimating that it was politics more than necessity that prompted President Obama's cautious phased drawdown of US forces in Afghanistan...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NAMI
Je juge , donc je suis
06:24 PM on 06/26/2011
Mr Hutchinson

well said ..............I really think that the greatest event was KILLING of Bin Laden......Finally .MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
and believe it or not..........i also think that BY TOPPLING the Taliban GOVERNMENT in 2001 , BUSH also accomplished ONE Mission..........Unfortunately he did not pursue OBL
............which finally OBAMA succeeded in doing on May 1 , 2011

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED on TALIBAN GOV and Al-Qaeda not one but 2.

SO BE HAPPY Americans................
Now it is the Afghanis who have to fight to prevent TALIBAN forcing their will on them in a new GOV.
THE TALIBANS are PASHTOONS and comprise 60% of the Population , so they can PARTICIPATE in the POLITICAL process in a Democratic fashion and obey their constitution.

THE US troops should not die for this ........and they have ACCOMPLISHED a lot MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. The Troops must not think that all this has been in vain.!!

SO REMEMBER Sunday MAY 1, 2011 just as you do 9/11 2000

Our NIGHTMARE is OVER..............................
09:31 AM on 06/24/2011
The left wants Obama withdraw all the troops immediately. The right wants him to increase the number of troops so that we can win the war, although they never actually define what victory is. Obama, as he's typically done, has tried to find the middle ground. Actually the exact middle would be to neither increase nor decrease troop levels. So by bringing troops home, he's actually leaning more towards the left. Sure it would be great if he could bring them home faster, just like it would be great if Obama supported the public health insurance option or broke up the TBTF banks or came out in support of gay marriage. Obama is a centrist and has always been one. I'm not happy with a lot of his decisions, but I recognize that he's still better than any Republican. So all these people on the left who complain that Obama hasn't been enough of a progressive and who are now threatening to withdraw their support, let's see how happy you'll be with Mitt Romney as President. If Obama loses in 2012, he'll be fine. He'll go on to write books and make millions on the lecture circuit. Meanwhile, the rest of us will be stuck with a Republican President, only 4 years after the nightmare of George W. Bush.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
09:17 AM on 06/24/2011
Obama has done a 180 degree turn on almost everything he advocated in his 2008 campaign. He has taken a Republican position on war, taxes, public option health care, education, the economy, agreed to negotiate cuts to Social Security and Medicare. With the troop pullout we will still have twice as many troops in Afghan. as when he took office. It appears his political positions have "evolved" from his 2008 positions. He should run as a Republican in 2012!
photo
leftLibertarian
reefer+java=groovy
07:36 AM on 06/24/2011
There is no reason for US troops to still be in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bring them all home now.

But here is a suggestion for those who want them to stay. Go over yourself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NAMI
Je juge , donc je suis
06:31 PM on 06/26/2011
LeftLibertarian

good suggestion for the WAR HAWKS to go and fight yourselves.

BIN LADEN was Killed so finally MISSION ACCOMPLISHED !!

MAY 1, 2011 remember that date. WHAT a GREAT VICTORY over AL Qaeda .
greytunes
Still looking for the Common Man
03:23 AM on 06/24/2011
If President Obama has gotten both sides of Congress angry over the Afgan policy,maybe it isn't too bad of a policy after all.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
11:06 PM on 06/23/2011
It's a relief to know that Obama's realpolitik machinations continue to have the approval of the conservadems.
traceymarie
Independent to Dem in 2007
11:14 PM on 06/23/2011
malkin said Obama is just trying to appease those war hating liberals......can't make this stuff up