iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Earl Ofari Hutchinson

GET UPDATES FROM Earl Ofari Hutchinson
 

It's Not About Hagel, It's About President Obama

Posted: 01/10/2013 9:53 am

The issue is not the dubious foreign policy competence, independence, loose lip-ness or views of Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel. The issue is President Obama. The GOP has used the same shopworn template to hammer Obama so often it can be drawn up while asleep. It goes like this. Pick an Obama nominee, be it to the cabinet, Supreme Court, or federal judiciary. Then either dig up the barest scrap of mud or dirt that can be found on them or failing that dither, delay, and obstruct for months their confirmation.

The former ploy was used to try and scuttle the confirmation of Attorney General Eric Holder. It was repeated again with Secretary of State possible nominee UN Ambassador Susan Rice. This time the ploy worked. She withdrew her nomination. The latter ploy has been used with Obama's judicial nominations. Few have been approved. So few, that Obama has the dubious distinction of having fewer judicial nominees confirmed than any other president in the past quarter century.

Now we come to Hagel. Arch-Hagel nemesis Senator John McCain was on record at one time saying that Hagel would be a fine defense secretary. But what a difference a presidential election and a Democratic president winning it again can make. McCain and company now lead the charge against Hagel. Again, the anti-Hagel hit can only be explained by the fact that he's Obama, not Bush's nominee.

Hagel is a combat veteran, would bring a much needed fresh and flexible view to foreign policy issues, and is tough-minded. He has repeatedly apologized for his intemperate quip in 2006 about the "Jewish Lobby" having its way too much on Middle East policy. He has made it clear he's a staunch supporter of Israel. If he wasn't he would not been picked. His stated reluctance to nuke Iran is a sane and rational position that he explained as folly especially since the U.S. has no plans to send ground troops in there.

So it's back to Obama. Hagel is a pawn in the GOP's high stakes game to harass, obstruct, and sully Obama's presidency. It tried it with the fiscal cliff battle. It will do it again with the coming war over the debt ceiling, spending cuts, and immigration reform. But it's the president's nominees that the GOP figures it can score points against him on the cheap.

The GOP will bluff and bluster at Hagel during the confirmation hearings. Eventually, he will be confirmed in committee and by the full Senate. But it won't be the last time Obama will hear it from the GOP about a nominee. Why? Because it's not about Hagel, it's about Obama.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on American Urban Radio Network. He is the author of How Obama Governed: The Year of Crisis and Challenge. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is the host of the weekly Hutchinson Report on KPFK-Radio and the Pacifica Network.

 

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/earlhutchinson

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
12:58 PM on 01/10/2013
Mr. Hutchinson, respectfully, has it EVER been about anything else? They failed to make Obama Jimmy Carter 2.0 (that is, the Carter in their heads rather than the actual James Earl Carter Jr., who is one of the most respected ex-presidents in modern history). They failed to make a case that going back to the ideas that got us into this mess will work (that is, if by making a case, you manage to blow a small fortune on the biggest lemon candidate in GOP history). They failed to take back the Senate (that is, they failed to the point of losing seats, in spite of the aforementioned small fortune).

Does this stop them? No. Because to stop now means admitting that they have wasted everyone's time and billions of dollars of their donors' money.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PATina
Plus ça change, plus c'est la mĂªme chose
12:19 PM on 01/10/2013
And yet Obama still nominates those who are seemingly more "Republican friendly" in an attempt to NOT go through all of this. Since they are going after him regardless of who he nominates... what is the real point in nominating these "conservatives"?
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
01:00 PM on 01/10/2013
In Hagel's case, the nomination makes sense. He's essentially a man without a party and has been since he spoke out against Iraq. A move like this and they were going to call him traitor regardless. Maybe Obama just thinks that he's the man for the job.
kellygreen
"Ideology is the Science of Idiots" John Adams
01:29 PM on 01/10/2013
1. The culture of the Defense Department is overwhelmingly Republican.

2. An era of "austerity" is coming to the DoD as we draw down from the war in Afghanistan. Sending in a Republican who's a decorated war hero to be the leading hatchet man, gives Democrats political cover from the charge that we are "soft on defense" or "hostile to the military".
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PATina
Plus ça change, plus c'est la mĂªme chose
02:36 PM on 01/10/2013
1. Which gives credence to the lie that Republicans are better at "defense" than Democrats. It seems as if Dems actually agree that Repubs ARE better at defense than Dems... at least that what their actions say. Dems should PROVE they aren't soft on defense by actually nominating a Dem for the job.

2. We'll see... but I won't hold my breath. I seriously doubt we are going to make any serious cuts to defense... and the only "draw down" in Afghanistan will be replacing troops w/ drones.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rf dude
Just an average Man of Bronze - now in Steel!
11:34 AM on 01/10/2013
We are living in the history that one day will be read about and judged, much like we look back to previous and more primitive times today.

I hope we grow from this experience - the alternative is unthinkable.
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
01:00 PM on 01/10/2013
My home state and so many others around it will not be kindly regarded by that history, I can assure you. They may even use the term for the place that I give it: the Fourth World.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rf dude
Just an average Man of Bronze - now in Steel!
04:27 PM on 01/10/2013
Sorry to hear that, but don't worry too much.  The important thing is how we, as a Nation, evolve into something better than is on display now.  Many heroes of the Civil Rights movements came from the Deep South and are remembered for their contributions - in fact, CR would not have been possible without the active involvement of many across the South.

The same is true today - it's what we do to effect positive change that counts!
11:10 AM on 01/10/2013
Sad to say, you're right. It's all about "that" guy in our WHITE House.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverball
10:58 AM on 01/10/2013
....absolutely true.....the first term was about anything to not allow him a second term...now it's about stopping ANYTHING obama....what happened to governing for WE, THE PEOPLE???....oh yeah, i forgot....that would require them to understand and be knowledgeable about the constitution.....