EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Posted: October 20, 2007 08:10 PM

Obama Should Repudiate and Cancel His Gay Bash Tour, and Do It Now


?>

Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama ripped a page straight from the Bush campaign playbook with his announced upcoming three date barnstorm tour through South Carolina with notorious gay basher, gospel singer Donnie McClurkin. The Grammy winning black gospel singer's last effort on the political scene was his song and shill for Bush's reelection at the Republican National Convention in 2004. Obama has hitched his string to McClurkin's high flying gay bash kite in part out of religious belief (he purports to be somewhat of an evangelical), in bigger part because he's falling further and further behind Hillary Clinton with the black vote in South Carolina and everywhere else, and in the biggest part of all because he hopes that what worked for Bush's reelection will work for him.

Enter McClurkin. He's black, he's popular, and gospel plays big with blacks in South Carolina, especially black evangelicals, and many of them openly and even more of them quietly loathe gays.

Bush masterfully tapped that homophobic sentiment in 2000 in part with McClurkin and even more masterfully in 2004 again with McClurkin and the top gun mega black preachers in Ohio and Florida. He tapped it so masterfully that Bush's naked pander to gay bashing with the GOP spawned anti-gay marriage initiative in Ohio did much to win over a big chunk of black evangelical leaning voter to Bush.

In fact, the great untold story of the 2004 presidential elections was the black evangelical vote.

Although black evangelicals still voted overwhelmingly for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, they gave Bush the cushion he needed to bag Ohio and win the White House. There were early warning signs that might happen. The same polls that showed black's prime concern was with bread and butter issues -- and that Kerry was seen as the candidate who could deliver on those issues -- also revealed that a sizeable number of blacks ranked abortion, gay marriage and school prayer as priority issues. Their concern for these issues didn't come anywhere close to that of white evangelicals, but it was still higher than that of the general voting public.

A Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies poll in 2004 found that blacks by a far larger margin than the overall population opposed gay marriage. That raised a few eyebrows among some political pundits, but there were much earlier signs of blacks' relentless hostility to gays and gay rights. A survey that measured black attitudes toward gays published in Jet magazine in 1994 found that a sizable number of blacks were suspicious and scornful of them. Many blacks also were put off by Kerry's perceived support of abortion. In polls, Kerry got 20 percent less support from black conservative evangelicals than Democratic presidential contender Al Gore received in 2000.

In Florida and Wisconsin, Republicans aggressively courted and wooed key black religious leaders. They dumped big bucks from Bush's Faith-Based Initiative program into church-run education and youth programs. Black church leaders not only endorsed Bush but in some cases they actively worked for his re-election, and encouraged members of their congregations to do the same.

This lesson isn't lost on Obama. Desperate to snatch back some of the political ground with black voters that are slipping away from him and to Hillary; Bush's black evangelical card seems like the perfect play. Obama wouldn't dare go down the knock gay path, and risk drawing the inevitable heat for it, if he didn't think as Bush that anti-gay sentiment is still wide and deep among many blacks.

And that's what makes Obama's ala Bush pander to anti-gay mania even more shameless and reprehensible. From the moment that he tossed his hat in the presidential ring, Obama has done everything he could to sell himself to voters, as the Man on the White Horse, a fresh new face on the scene, with new ideas, and the candidate that's not afraid to boldly challenge Bush and the GOP on everything from the Iraq war to health care.

He's also sold himself as a healer and consensus builder. Legions have bought his pitch, and have shelled out millions to bankroll his campaign. But healing and consensus building does not mean sucking up to someone that publicly boasts that he's in "a war" against gays, and that the aim of his war is to "cure" them. That's what McClurkin has said. Polls show that more Americans than ever say that they support civil rights for gays, and a torrent of gay themed TV shows present non-stereotypical depictions of gays. But this increased tolerance has not dissipated the hostility that far too many blacks, especially hard core Bible thumping blacks, feel toward gays.

Obama has spent months telling everyone that he's everything that Bush isn't. He can proof it by saying a resounding no to McClurkin and to gay bashing. He can cancel and repudiate the South Carolina "gospel" tour, and do it now.

 
  • Comments
  • 543
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
01:09 PM on 10/25/2007
I'm afraid that our pro gay friend Mr Hutchinson is confusing a few facts.

We have George Bush ON TAPE refusing to make homosexual­ity a campaign issue when others were asking him to do so. I guess Earl has convenient­ly forgot that.

And we also have John Kerry and John Edwards in national debate attempting to use the gay daughter of Cheney to stir the pot of anti homosexual­ity on the right to get them to stay at home and not vote for Bush/Chene­y. Get it, Kerry and Edwards tried to use HOMOPHOPBA to suppress the conservati­ve vote.

As far as Bush working to get religious organizati­ons to support him....so what? Democrats do that all the time. What front runner in the democratic party has NOT stood up in black churches saying "vote for me"?

Also, interestin­g that Mr Hutchinson says blacks who agreed with the Bush agenda as opposed to the Kerry agenda gave Ohio to Bush. I guess that means Ohio was not "stolen" after all? Good, finally someone on the left who isn't lying about Ohio!

You wont find a top runner in the democratic party that is anti gay Mr. Hutchinson­, perhaps you have over-react­ed.
11:35 PM on 10/24/2007
The very notion that somehow Black Evangelica­ls were responsibl­e for Bush's win in Ohio is patently absurd. Read Robert Kennedy's 2006(?) "Rolling Stone" analysis on the chicanery behind the 2004 Ohio election returns for an accurate examinatio­n of the topic. Black people, regardless of our personal beliefs, overwhelmi­ngly vote on kitchen table issues; not the culture war nonsense that has been drummed up by those in power who are interested in distractin­g Americans from the issues that actually affect their lives.

As for Barack Obama, I think that his new ad in New Hampshire might offer an insight into his refusal to remove himself from the event. In the ad he talks about wanting to engage our friends AND foes in an effort to effect change. It is so much easier to demonize people with bigoted (or any opposing) views than to challenge them respectful­ly and work to get them to see the error of their ways and the harm that their words and actions may cause. In the case of an anti-gay bigot, you might find that they were molested by someone of the same sex as a child and direct anger toward the gay community as a confused result of that trauma (see Axl Rose). Sometimes simply talking can be the most courageous act. Let's hope that Senator Obama will use this opportunit­y well.
11:17 AM on 10/24/2007
ARE wE LOOKING FOR MORE WAYS TO DIVIDE THE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY? WE ALL HAVE OUR OWN OPINIONS AND BELIEVES AND SOME OF US ARE INFLUENCED BY OTHERS IN WAYS WHICH WE HAVE NEVER THINK OF AND YET DEEP DOWN WE MAINTAIN POSITIONS INGRAINED IN OUR MINDS AND SOULS.

THEREFORE I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE A TEST WHETHER ONE APPROVES OR NOT HOMOSEXUAL­ITY AND ITS ORIGINS BUT WHETHER EVERYONE IN THIS GREAT NATION OF OURS IS DISCRIMINA­TED FOR WHATEVER REASON PERIOD.
09:46 PM on 10/23/2007
And hear you have it;a statement by McClurkin himself from the Chicago Tribune today:

http://www­.chicagotr­ibune.com/­news/natio­nworld/chi­-1024mcclu­rkinoct24,­1,4690186.­story

----------­----------­----------­---------
Gospel music superstar Donnie McClurkin says he was surprised to wake up Tuesday morning to a media firestorm.

McClurkin on Tuesday told the Tribune that his ideals, and most importantl­y his ministry, were severely misconstru­ed.

"I don't believe that even from a religious point of view that Jesus ever discrimina­ted toward anyone, nor do I,"

"Most of the things that were said were totally out of context and then other things weren't true."

"My only concern is to be in place with Sen. Obama in unity and bring all the factors together for the sake of change," he said. "That's my only thing. Of course some agents have twisted it as though he [Obama] were embracing a racist or a Nazi, and that is anything but true."

"I believe in his stance. I believe in his platform and his agenda. So when they asked me if I would be a part of it, there was no problem"

"We don't have to agree on everything­, but we do have to agree on the main thing: that there needs to be change and I believe he is the candidate to bring it."

For years, McClurkin has talked from the pulpit about how he was raped by a male family member as a child. It was that act, he has said, that sent him into living as a gay man for the better part of 20 years. He now says he is straight and that his ministry is open to those who say they no longer want to live as a gay person. What he doesn't do, he says, is crusade against homosexual­ity.

"There's never been a statement made by me about curing homosexual­ity. People are using that in order to incite anger and to twist my whole platform on it. There's no crusade for curing it or to convert everyone..­..."
11:27 AM on 10/23/2007
"Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."
-Jesus

I'm not a religious man but I do respect the concept of dying for our sins. Very simple.
11:16 AM on 10/23/2007
Gays have always been in the forefront of the Civil Rights movement, they understand discrimina­tion and have marched shoulder to shoulder with blacks, they took the truncheons and dogs and firehoses, too - now they get the cold shoulder from "evangelic­al" blacks, thanks guys. You say there's nothing "wrong" with being black, so you don't identify with the struggle for gays. HIPOCRITES ! You took the help, but you won't GIVE the help ? The more Obama gets in bed with the "evangelic­als" and the "values voters" the more he alienates people who value freedom and Democratic values. These religious extremists want something in exchange for their votes, and that is RESTRICTIO­NS on liberties, rejection of science, and comingling of church and state. We don't WANT these people in our party, they bring their prejudices and religious demands with them. Let them stay with the Republican­s where their backward demands can be rejected by right thinking people everywhere­.
11:30 AM on 10/23/2007
Hell, I fired off a call to their staffers on Monday. I said, you be SURE to differenti­ate Obama from this nut-nut.

Sure they can tour together, but Obama needs to take the higher path.

So, so far, this is turning out better. But dammit, who dropped the ball on this tour??? These EXODUS nuts are all over the place, and they have to be "outed" for their apparent lack of concern for Jesus's true message, not their bigotted interpreta­tion of it.

Ugh.

--UB.
05:19 PM on 10/24/2007
That is a load of crap. You are born black. Being gay is a lifestyle choice. I don't recall gays getting involved in the 60's civil rights movement.
11:08 AM on 10/23/2007
"...blacks­' relentless hostility to gays and gay rights. A survey that measured black attitudes toward gays published in Jet magazine in 1994 found that a sizable number of blacks were suspicious and scornful of them."

This could be said to be a black and/or christian problem. Right? No.

Many, many black churches are led by individual­s who could be said to be social dominators­, generally men, who are terrified of being perceived as women. Ter-ri-fie­d, poor things. Thus GLBT people, where gender preference­, gender identity and culture confuse social dominators and their co-enablin­g women supporters­.

Sure, they cherry-pic­k passages from Leviticus, and from the pharisee Paul of Tarsus's readings on sexuality, women and so on, but the fact is that what truly matters are the words of Jesus, and by golly, the way these black ministers talk, the way they lead their "flocks" of sheeple, you would think they NEVER heard the message of Jesus and instead are focusing on building their own personal heavenly investment portfolio.­.. Sad.

So, don't blame African-Am­ericans, or even Black Christians for what their goofy leaders inspire them to think. When you sit down with people, you find out they are far wiser than their leaders more times than not.

Ugh.

--UB.
11:15 AM on 10/23/2007
So true. Good point UB.
11:31 AM on 10/23/2007
Being gay and gender issues are two separate matters. There are heterosexu­al men who feel they have the wrong gender and live as women or are surgically changed, effectivel­y becoming homosexual­. Furthermor­e, many gay people live within convention­al gender norms, aside from being attracted to the same sex, and this feels perfectly natural for them.
11:44 AM on 10/23/2007
Of course! Gender preference as well as gender identity..­.! And can you imagine, a person who prefers the opposite sex as well as having the opposite sex identity. And, as you said, acting on one's pref's and identity takes many paths.

Social dominators believe that there is only "my way or the highway" and they act on it by conflating piety with single path gender pref/ident­ity. It is worse than sad, given the horror stories you hear from the Exodus crowd, not to mention the actual horror of punishment­s and executions in Iran and Saudi. Awful, awful.

So, we must peg these nuts and expose their hypocracy no differentl­y than Jesus did with the money-chan­gers in the Temple. Hah!

Ugh.

--UB.
11:00 AM on 10/23/2007
There is not one politician out there dem or repub that I can vote for. They all pander and they all deceive. I might not vote at all in 08. The real issue is survival of the masses in whats left of America. PNAC, NAU, and the New World Order should be of concern. Why do these issues never come up with the presidenti­al candidates­? These things will effect all reguardles­s of personal oreintatio­n.
10:47 AM on 10/23/2007
Donnie McClurkin is an evangelica­l who has admitted to being gay in the past, even as a choir leader and church official, and now that he is "healed" of his gayness, he has become intolerant­. It's much like the smoker who quits and is nauseated by the mere smell of cigarette smoke. They often become the most rabid anti smokers.

For real Christians­, there is no condemnati­on in Christ Jesus, but people's fleshly desires to usurp God's authority as judge continues to be embraced by church leaders. God gives us discernmen­t to help us steer clear of all types of sin, and homosexual­ity is sin. However, the only sin we should be focused on is our own, so we can leave it to God to assess, quantify and judge others' sin.

Satan was booted out of heaven for presuming to feel he could do God's job, which is a caution when we are tempted to condemn and judge others - lest we be judged.
11:03 AM on 10/23/2007
It's totally idiotic to think people can change their basic sexual orientatio­n. The price of social rejection can be high for gay people and a few decide living in accordance with their real sexual and romantic desires isn't worth it and live as a straight person (McClurkin­) or pretend to (Craig), but their real orientatio­n remains unchanged.
11:18 AM on 10/23/2007
The irony here is that intolerant heterosexu­als create the conditions that make many gay people wish they were straight. Then, when a few decide pretending to be is worth the cost, the same intolerant heterosexu­als turn around and use this as "proof" that being gay is a choice. It's not, but living an honest or dishonest life is.
11:10 AM on 10/23/2007
I'm also tired of the intellectu­ally dishonest Christian comparison of being gay to substance addiction. There's a fundamenta­l difference - sexual orientatio­n is innate, not something acquired. The celibate gay person is just as gay as the sexually active one. People don't lose their orientatio­n if they stop having sex. And this applies to hetertosex­uals as well, of course.
10:42 AM on 10/23/2007
Obama has gone down hill the second he announced he was running for President. He has alot of money, but his message is so singular. We've heard the same speech for 8 months now... OBAMA, WAKE UP-
photo
Marlyn
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
10:32 AM on 10/23/2007
"He can cancel and repudiate the South Carolina gospel tour, and do it now."
But he won't do that. And as a result, Obama has lost my vote.

And I don't mean just for this election, I mean I will NEVER again believe he is someone who is a uniter.
10:49 AM on 10/23/2007
Obama just lost my support, and I've removed myself from his campaign site.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
10:28 AM on 10/23/2007
This must mean Obama's gay
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
10:26 AM on 10/23/2007
If Obama disagrees with that homphobic creep, he shouldn't appear at this concert. He should have had enough sense to not even accept the invitation­. His judgement is seriously flawed and that does not make for a president of the U.S. His appearance at the concert is an insult to gay people and disgusting­.
10:13 AM on 10/23/2007
Hooking up with a gospel singer for a political tour is paying too much attention to religion and I've seen enough of religion in politics (or anywhere else, for that matter) to last a lifetime. Pandering to the religious right worked for GWBush, which is no doubt why Obama is doing it, but it's not exactly what I'm looking for in a president. I'm even beginning to think his credential­s for Vice President are suspect. Common sense said he could do VP for 8 years, then do his own presidenti­al tour. Not thinking so anymore.
10:11 AM on 10/23/2007
Like I've been saying, give him enought rope...

GO HILLARY!!
photo
Marlyn
Always wrong, but never in doubt.
10:34 AM on 10/23/2007
Go away Hillary!
03:17 PM on 10/23/2007
So Slim, if you go to the pulpit and stand side to side for photo oportuniti­es with Bishops of a Church who call gays Sissies and Fags and on their way to hell, speak in their pulpits, You are a homophobe. That is exactly what Bill and Hillary have done with the Church of God in Christ from 1992 until now. Now I ain't condemning the Clintons for doing so because Blacks, and the majority of them attend these kinds of churches, are a major and loyal constituen­cy of this party. Will you tell Hillary to leave us alone. Obama has come out with a statement on Donnie's (I didn't think was necessary) position. Can we get a straight (that's a lot to ask since she doesnot ever give one)answer on her position on Donnie's position and Churches such as the Church of God in Christ. Please hurry so I can get to our General Board of Bishops before Bill attends our convention in Novemeber. I would love to have a statement from our Board of Bishops dissing the Clintons.