Obama Should Repudiate and Cancel His Gay Bash Tour, and Do It Now

Posted October 20, 2007 | 08:10 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Obama Should Repudiate and Cancel His Gay Bash Tour, and Do It Now   digg: Obama Should Repudiate and Cancel His Gay Bash Tour, and Do It Now   reddit: Obama Should Repudiate and Cancel His Gay Bash Tour, and Do It Now   del.icio.us: Obama Should Repudiate and Cancel His Gay Bash Tour, and Do It Now

Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama ripped a page straight from the Bush campaign playbook with his announced upcoming three date barnstorm tour through South Carolina with notorious gay basher, gospel singer Donnie McClurkin. The Grammy winning black gospel singer's last effort on the political scene was his song and shill for Bush's reelection at the Republican National Convention in 2004. Obama has hitched his string to McClurkin's high flying gay bash kite in part out of religious belief (he purports to be somewhat of an evangelical), in bigger part because he's falling further and further behind Hillary Clinton with the black vote in South Carolina and everywhere else, and in the biggest part of all because he hopes that what worked for Bush's reelection will work for him.

Enter McClurkin. He's black, he's popular, and gospel plays big with blacks in South Carolina, especially black evangelicals, and many of them openly and even more of them quietly loathe gays.

Bush masterfully tapped that homophobic sentiment in 2000 in part with McClurkin and even more masterfully in 2004 again with McClurkin and the top gun mega black preachers in Ohio and Florida. He tapped it so masterfully that Bush's naked pander to gay bashing with the GOP spawned anti-gay marriage initiative in Ohio did much to win over a big chunk of black evangelical leaning voter to Bush.

In fact, the great untold story of the 2004 presidential elections was the black evangelical vote.

Although black evangelicals still voted overwhelmingly for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, they gave Bush the cushion he needed to bag Ohio and win the White House. There were early warning signs that might happen. The same polls that showed black's prime concern was with bread and butter issues -- and that Kerry was seen as the candidate who could deliver on those issues -- also revealed that a sizeable number of blacks ranked abortion, gay marriage and school prayer as priority issues. Their concern for these issues didn't come anywhere close to that of white evangelicals, but it was still higher than that of the general voting public.

A Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies poll in 2004 found that blacks by a far larger margin than the overall population opposed gay marriage. That raised a few eyebrows among some political pundits, but there were much earlier signs of blacks' relentless hostility to gays and gay rights. A survey that measured black attitudes toward gays published in Jet magazine in 1994 found that a sizable number of blacks were suspicious and scornful of them. Many blacks also were put off by Kerry's perceived support of abortion. In polls, Kerry got 20 percent less support from black conservative evangelicals than Democratic presidential contender Al Gore received in 2000.

In Florida and Wisconsin, Republicans aggressively courted and wooed key black religious leaders. They dumped big bucks from Bush's Faith-Based Initiative program into church-run education and youth programs. Black church leaders not only endorsed Bush but in some cases they actively worked for his re-election, and encouraged members of their congregations to do the same.

This lesson isn't lost on Obama. Desperate to snatch back some of the political ground with black voters that are slipping away from him and to Hillary; Bush's black evangelical card seems like the perfect play. Obama wouldn't dare go down the knock gay path, and risk drawing the inevitable heat for it, if he didn't think as Bush that anti-gay sentiment is still wide and deep among many blacks.

And that's what makes Obama's ala Bush pander to anti-gay mania even more shameless and reprehensible. From the moment that he tossed his hat in the presidential ring, Obama has done everything he could to sell himself to voters, as the Man on the White Horse, a fresh new face on the scene, with new ideas, and the candidate that's not afraid to boldly challenge Bush and the GOP on everything from the Iraq war to health care.

He's also sold himself as a healer and consensus builder. Legions have bought his pitch, and have shelled out millions to bankroll his campaign. But healing and consensus building does not mean sucking up to someone that publicly boasts that he's in "a war" against gays, and that the aim of his war is to "cure" them. That's what McClurkin has said. Polls show that more Americans than ever say that they support civil rights for gays, and a torrent of gay themed TV shows present non-stereotypical depictions of gays. But this increased tolerance has not dissipated the hostility that far too many blacks, especially hard core Bible thumping blacks, feel toward gays.

Obama has spent months telling everyone that he's everything that Bush isn't. He can proof it by saying a resounding no to McClurkin and to gay bashing. He can cancel and repudiate the South Carolina "gospel" tour, and do it now.

Comments for this post are now closed


Comments
543
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

I'm afraid that our pro gay friend Mr Hutchinson is confusing a few facts.

We have George Bush ON TAPE refusing to make homosexuality a campaign issue when others were asking him to do so. I guess Earl has conveniently forgot that.

And we also have John Kerry and John Edwards in national debate attempting to use the gay daughter of Cheney to stir the pot of anti homosexuality on the right to get them to stay at home and not vote for Bush/Cheney. Get it, Kerry and Edwards tried to use HOMOPHOPBA to suppress the conservative vote.

As far as Bush working to get religious organizations to support him....so what? Democrats do that all the time. What front runner in the democratic party has NOT stood up in black churches saying "vote for me"?

Also, interesting that Mr Hutchinson says blacks who agreed with the Bush agenda as opposed to the Kerry agenda gave Ohio to Bush. I guess that means Ohio was not "stolen" after all? Good, finally someone on the left who isn't lying about Ohio!

You wont find a top runner in the democratic party that is anti gay Mr. Hutchinson, perhaps you have over-reacted.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 10/25/2007

The very notion that somehow Black Evangelicals were responsible for Bush's win in Ohio is patently absurd. Read Robert Kennedy's 2006(?) "Rolling Stone" analysis on the chicanery behind the 2004 Ohio election returns for an accurate examination of the topic. Black people, regardless of our personal beliefs, overwhelmingly vote on kitchen table issues; not the culture war nonsense that has been drummed up by those in power who are interested in distracting Americans from the issues that actually affect their lives.

As for Barack Obama, I think that his new ad in New Hampshire might offer an insight into his refusal to remove himself from the event. In the ad he talks about wanting to engage our friends AND foes in an effort to effect change. It is so much easier to demonize people with bigoted (or any opposing) views than to challenge them respectfully and work to get them to see the error of their ways and the harm that their words and actions may cause. In the case of an anti-gay bigot, you might find that they were molested by someone of the same sex as a child and direct anger toward the gay community as a confused result of that trauma (see Axl Rose). Sometimes simply talking can be the most courageous act. Let's hope that Senator Obama will use this opportunity well.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 10/24/2007

ARE wE LOOKING FOR MORE WAYS TO DIVIDE THE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY? WE ALL HAVE OUR OWN OPINIONS AND BELIEVES AND SOME OF US ARE INFLUENCED BY OTHERS IN WAYS WHICH WE HAVE NEVER THINK OF AND YET DEEP DOWN WE MAINTAIN POSITIONS INGRAINED IN OUR MINDS AND SOULS.

THEREFORE I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE A TEST WHETHER ONE APPROVES OR NOT HOMOSEXUALITY AND ITS ORIGINS BUT WHETHER EVERYONE IN THIS GREAT NATION OF OURS IS DISCRIMINATED FOR WHATEVER REASON PERIOD.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 10/24/2007

And hear you have it;a statement by McClurkin himself from the Chicago Tribune today:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-1024mcclurkinoct24,1,4690186.story

---------------------------------------
Gospel music superstar Donnie McClurkin says he was surprised to wake up Tuesday morning to a media firestorm.

McClurkin on Tuesday told the Tribune that his ideals, and most importantly his ministry, were severely misconstrued.

"I don't believe that even from a religious point of view that Jesus ever discriminated toward anyone, nor do I,"

"Most of the things that were said were totally out of context and then other things weren't true."

"My only concern is to be in place with Sen. Obama in unity and bring all the factors together for the sake of change," he said. "That's my only thing. Of course some agents have twisted it as though he [Obama] were embracing a racist or a Nazi, and that is anything but true."

"I believe in his stance. I believe in his platform and his agenda. So when they asked me if I would be a part of it, there was no problem"

"We don't have to agree on everything, but we do have to agree on the main thing: that there needs to be change and I believe he is the candidate to bring it."

For years, McClurkin has talked from the pulpit about how he was raped by a male family member as a child. It was that act, he has said, that sent him into living as a gay man for the better part of 20 years. He now says he is straight and that his ministry is open to those who say they no longer want to live as a gay person. What he doesn't do, he says, is crusade against homosexuality.

"There's never been a statement made by me about curing homosexuality. People are using that in order to incite anger and to twist my whole platform on it. There's no crusade for curing it or to convert everyone....."

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 10/23/2007

"Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."
-Jesus

I'm not a religious man but I do respect the concept of dying for our sins. Very simple.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 10/23/2007

Gays have always been in the forefront of the Civil Rights movement, they understand discrimination and have marched shoulder to shoulder with blacks, they took the truncheons and dogs and firehoses, too - now they get the cold shoulder from "evangelical" blacks, thanks guys. You say there's nothing "wrong" with being black, so you don't identify with the struggle for gays. HIPOCRITES ! You took the help, but you won't GIVE the help ? The more Obama gets in bed with the "evangelicals" and the "values voters" the more he alienates people who value freedom and Democratic values. These religious extremists want something in exchange for their votes, and that is RESTRICTIONS on liberties, rejection of science, and comingling of church and state. We don't WANT these people in our party, they bring their prejudices and religious demands with them. Let them stay with the Republicans where their backward demands can be rejected by right thinking people everywhere.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 10/23/2007

That is a load of crap. You are born black. Being gay is a lifestyle choice. I don't recall gays getting involved in the 60's civil rights movement.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 10/24/2007

Hell, I fired off a call to their staffers on Monday. I said, you be SURE to differentiate Obama from this nut-nut.

Sure they can tour together, but Obama needs to take the higher path.

So, so far, this is turning out better. But dammit, who dropped the ball on this tour??? These EXODUS nuts are all over the place, and they have to be "outed" for their apparent lack of concern for Jesus's true message, not their bigotted interpretation of it.

Ugh.

--UB.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 10/23/2007

"...blacks' relentless hostility to gays and gay rights. A survey that measured black attitudes toward gays published in Jet magazine in 1994 found that a sizable number of blacks were suspicious and scornful of them."

This could be said to be a black and/or christian problem. Right? No.

Many, many black churches are led by individuals who could be said to be social dominators, generally men, who are terrified of being perceived as women. Ter-ri-fied, poor things. Thus GLBT people, where gender preference, gender identity and culture confuse social dominators and their co-enabling women supporters.

Sure, they cherry-pick passages from Leviticus, and from the pharisee Paul of Tarsus's readings on sexuality, women and so on, but the fact is that what truly matters are the words of Jesus, and by golly, the way these black ministers talk, the way they lead their "flocks" of sheeple, you would think they NEVER heard the message of Jesus and instead are focusing on building their own personal heavenly investment portfolio... Sad.

So, don't blame African-Americans, or even Black Christians for what their goofy leaders inspire them to think. When you sit down with people, you find out they are far wiser than their leaders more times than not.

Ugh.

--UB.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 AM on 10/23/2007

Being gay and gender issues are two separate matters. There are heterosexual men who feel they have the wrong gender and live as women or are surgically changed, effectively becoming homosexual. Furthermore, many gay people live within conventional gender norms, aside from being attracted to the same sex, and this feels perfectly natural for them.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 10/23/2007

Of course! Gender preference as well as gender identity...! And can you imagine, a person who prefers the opposite sex as well as having the opposite sex identity. And, as you said, acting on one's pref's and identity takes many paths.

Social dominators believe that there is only "my way or the highway" and they act on it by conflating piety with single path gender pref/identity. It is worse than sad, given the horror stories you hear from the Exodus crowd, not to mention the actual horror of punishments and executions in Iran and Saudi. Awful, awful.

So, we must peg these nuts and expose their hypocracy no differently than Jesus did with the money-changers in the Temple. Hah!

Ugh.

--UB.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 10/23/2007

So true. Good point UB.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 AM on 10/23/2007

There is not one politician out there dem or repub that I can vote for. They all pander and they all deceive. I might not vote at all in 08. The real issue is survival of the masses in whats left of America. PNAC, NAU, and the New World Order should be of concern. Why do these issues never come up with the presidential candidates? These things will effect all reguardless of personal oreintation.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 10/23/2007

Donnie McClurkin is an evangelical who has admitted to being gay in the past, even as a choir leader and church official, and now that he is "healed" of his gayness, he has become intolerant. It's much like the smoker who quits and is nauseated by the mere smell of cigarette smoke. They often become the most rabid anti smokers.

For real Christians, there is no condemnation in Christ Jesus, but people's fleshly desires to usurp God's authority as judge continues to be embraced by church leaders. God gives us discernment to help us steer clear of all types of sin, and homosexuality is sin. However, the only sin we should be focused on is our own, so we can leave it to God to assess, quantify and judge others' sin.

Satan was booted out of heaven for presuming to feel he could do God's job, which is a caution when we are tempted to condemn and judge others - lest we be judged.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 10/23/2007

If he was gay in the past, he's gay now. And suppressing it like a big dog. Wonder how wide HIS stance is in the men's room. And Obama ? Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. He can't mingle with the gay haters and get the votes of gay supporters. What's wrong with him ? You cannot unite these two sides, you can only educate the ignorant to abandon their hateful views. One side is right, the other is wrong. Anyone who understands the Civil Rights Movement should know that. Gays don't come from outer space, they are your sons and daughters.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 10/23/2007

Obama, US senator mingles with gay haters each and every day that he's present in the senate. Many of Obama's republican collegues hate and or dislike the gay lifestyle and vote whenever they get a chance against gay rights. Are you advocating that he stop mingling with these gay haters who he shares committee assignments as well as floor space?

Yet, where is your outrage about Obama hanging out in the gay bashion of hate mongering called Congress? McClurkin is a private citizen who inspite of his views isn't in the same league of senators and congressmen and Supreme Court justices who say and or believe gays should not have rights and have the legal authority to hurt their lives.

Perhaps, when the 'some' here actually focus on who are denying them their basic rights, they have a better chance to resolve these matters.

Believing Obama's mingling with McClurkin is the gay community's challenge is rather assinine.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 10/23/2007

I'm also tired of the intellectually dishonest Christian comparison of being gay to substance addiction. There's a fundamental difference - sexual orientation is innate, not something acquired. The celibate gay person is just as gay as the sexually active one. People don't lose their orientation if they stop having sex. And this applies to hetertosexuals as well, of course.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 10/23/2007

It's totally idiotic to think people can change their basic sexual orientation. The price of social rejection can be high for gay people and a few decide living in accordance with their real sexual and romantic desires isn't worth it and live as a straight person (McClurkin) or pretend to (Craig), but their real orientation remains unchanged.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 10/23/2007

The irony here is that intolerant heterosexuals create the conditions that make many gay people wish they were straight. Then, when a few decide pretending to be is worth the cost, the same intolerant heterosexuals turn around and use this as "proof" that being gay is a choice. It's not, but living an honest or dishonest life is.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 10/23/2007

Obama has gone down hill the second he announced he was running for President. He has alot of money, but his message is so singular. We've heard the same speech for 8 months now... OBAMA, WAKE UP-

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 10/23/2007
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Earl Ofari Hutchinson›
 

 Site  Web ask.com