President Obama got it right and terribly wrong on the UN Racism Conference in Geneva. He rightly demanded that the conference conveners drop the stock Zionism is racism plank from the draft resolution of the conference. The Israel knock was the same sticking point that former President Bush used to dodge going to the anti-racism conference in Durban, South Africa in 2001. The conveners complied and sanitized the objectionable language from the resolution. That should have been enough to get a U.S. delegation on a plane to Geneva.
For a brief moment it looked like it would be enough. An Obama spokesperson went so far as to publicly praise the move and say that the administration was deeply grateful for the change. The Obama administration wasn't grateful enough though to attend.
This is where President Obama gets it terribly wrong. The 20 nations that initially put the anti-Israel language in the resolution as well as certain other rhetorical points that the U.S. can't stomach can't be challenged in absentia. There is still too much bitter racial and ethnic hate and turmoil in too many places in the world that have nothing to do with Israel and Middle East problems that scream for attention. Attention that President Obama can't duck. The United States has the money, muscle, and political clout to take the lead in the continuing fight against racism, repression, genocide, state sponsored ethnic war and cleansing in every part of the globe. That's all state or group sponsored racial and human rights abuses and that includes abuses by some of the nations that ritually target Israel for its human rights abuses.
Obama seems to welcome that chance to confront those nations on their abuses saying repeatedly that he will engage them whenever and wherever he can. He's shown signs of keeping that promise on Cuba and Iran. But they are relatively soft targets since there is broad international consensus that the US must dump its archaic, outdated, and failed policy on Cuba, a policy that's out of step with all of Latin America. In the case of Iran, US outreach is a matter of international security since Iran is a looming regional and international nuclear threat.
Diplomatic détente with Cuba and Iran, though, doesn't do much to spotlight caste oppression in India, the plight of the Kurds in Turkey and other Mid East countries, skinhead violence in Germany and Britain, the continuing theft of Indian lands in Brazil, Mexico, and Guatemala, and the genocidal ethnic attacks in Darfur and the Congo. Nor does it prod Canada and Australia to do even more to right the historic wrongs against Indians and Aborigines. The US must also call on the carpet those corrupt African and Asian dictatorial regimes that elevate violence and terror to state policy against dissidents, many of whom are invariably of different ethnic groups.
In 2001, a clearly conflicted Secretary of State Colin Powell understood this. He thought the decision to bail out of the Durban conference was a grave mistake, and that the U.S. should and could do more good by being there to prove that it did take the fight against global racism seriously. Powell understood that the racism conference was supposed to draw up a battle plan to combat racism wherever it reared its ugly head in the world.
In the provisional agenda the UN Racism conference drew up in 1997 it called for nations to identify victims of discrimination, develop prevention, education, and protection measures, and provide long term strategies to bolster national and international efforts to combat discrimination. The obsessive focus on Israel just kept getting in the way of making any real headway on that agenda. The disputed resolution equating Zionism with racism passed in 1975 by a deeply divided U.N. was vague and ill-defined and had no force of law.
It did nothing to alleviate Palestinian suffering. Instead, it made Israel dig its heels in deeper and refuse more concessions on Palestinian rights. The U.N., with the consent of Arab nations and the Palestinians, wised up to the blunder and overwhelmingly voted to dump the resolution in 1991. However, it still keeps cropping up as a barrier to getting the US to the conference table.
The big danger in a one track focus on Israel is that the conference will again give short shrift to the ethnic warfare that still rages in these countries.
The Congressional Black Caucus has been one of the Obama administration's loudest cheerleaders. Yet it flatly called the Obama administration's decision to skip Geneva disappointing. It's more than disappointing. It's yet another opportunity the US blew to struggle against global racism. Bush didn't do that, and that was no real surprise. But Obama is not Bush and for him to blow the opportunity to engage against global racism at Geneva repeats Bush's folly.
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His weekly radio show, "The Hutchinson Report" can be heard on weekly in Los Angeles on KTYM Radio 1460 AM and nationally on blogtalkradio.com
It's similar to the demand from some Muslim leaders that criticizing Islam be designated as an act that's condemnable as racism. In effect, both are claiming immunity from being criticized.
The only time that it's worth it to avoid criticism is when your moral foundation is unsound, and won't stand up to scrutiny. The US needs to disentangle its interests from Israel, and Israel needs to get over its sense of exceptionalism. Racism is deplorable in every form--and we all perpetrate it from time to time.
The U.S. should not only be at the conference, it should be leading the conference based on the diverse makeup of U.S. society. That is my opinion anyway. Racism extends beyond the conflict between the people of the Middle East. Whatever though, it seems America is America by permission versus by sovereign right, history, and will of the collective people. The truth is starting to harden and tolerance is waning for this type of obvious conflict in interest -- witness global backlash. The offensive language and the bluster of fools should not stop the U.S. (with a brown president) from being heavily involved in talks on addressing global racism. Here is another case where I disagree with the president and I understand the political back story and influence that forces this decision and frankly it makes me puke. I am not anti-Israel either, but it seems to me we are all up in the Israeli Kool-Aid, or rather Israel is all up in the American flavor -- like no other country. America consists of people descendant from other lands who would like to see their nations get favorite nation status also. Hypocrisy and inconsistency can only stand but so long before mass dissent manifests. What is going to happen when there is mass dissent against such capitulation to Israel -- violent repression? Again, let me be clear for the super sensitive, this ain’t about Israel, this is about America.