iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Posted: October 8, 2010 11:22 AM

The New Civil War Among Whites

What's Your Reaction:

The recent AP-Gfk poll reconfirmed that whites again are at political war with each other. The war this is time is not over slavery, secession, or Lincoln. The war is over President Obama. The division is fueled by the same race, class, and governance issues that sparked the Civil War. The poll found these glaring contrasts. White workers are older, less educated and staunchly conservative. They overwhelming loathe Obama's policies, and have a strong visceral dislike of him. Many openly and passionately say that Obama is shoving the country to socialism. All assail the federal government for giving the company store away to the poor. The poor in this case are blacks, and all at the expense of white workers. A TV ad by Wisconsin House GOP candidate Sean Duffey rammed that point home.

The ad shows a blue-collar, hardhat worker getting dumped from a rolling log into the drink. A grave voice intones the point and the punchline, "Our working folks have been tossed aside." It's brash, bold, in your face, and crudely calculated to prick the deepest fears among white workers that Obama, the Democrats and the federal government is one big ATM machine giving free everything to undeserving minorities which equals money snatched from the pockets of hardworking whites. That race lurks sneakily just beneath the surface in the GOP and Tea-Party-leaning candidates' appeals to white, working-class voters is beyond dispute. The code word drips appeal and imagery in the ads and the campaign stump shouts from the candidates is a surefire sell for a bitter reason.

They never liked Obama anyway. In the 2008 presidential primary they backed Hillary Clinton by overwhelming margins in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and every Southern state. This had less to do with any rapture with Hillary, or of her stance on the issues, but simply she was the white, and the only ballot alternative to Obama. In the general election, they backed GOP presidential rival John McCain by a whopping twenty percent bulge over Obama. By contrast, Obama could not have won without the massive support from younger, college-educated, middle-class whites. They gave him a double-digit bulge in vote numbers over McCain. The bulge carries over to GOP candidates in general. They give current GOP congressional candidates a double-digit vote margin over the support they gave GOP congressional candidates in 2006 and 2008. The Democrats sole hope for staving off major losses in the House and possibly Senate is to rekindle the fire among white supporters that proved the margin of victory in 2008. The choice of a massive rally kick off rally at the University of Wisconsin was the first attempt to rev up the Democrat's white support base. The crowd that turned out -- overwhelming white, young, and college attending or educated -- was the exact prototype of Obama's white support base.

The rally was also tacit recognition that the split between white voters across class, income, and age, lines is real and potentially a make-or-break point for the Democrats. Their political fate in November rests squarely on how effectively they can exploit that division. The GOP already has their answer, and they have tailored their entire election strategy to exploiting the white division for their purposes. It's hardly the first time for that.

Nixon stoked the fury of blue-collar, white, ethnic, rural voters with his slam of the Democrats for coddling criminals, welfare cheats, and fostering a culture of anything-goes permissiveness, and of course, big government Great Society pandering to the poor. The crude, thinly disguised code words and racial cues worked. Nixon eked out a narrow victory over Democratic presidential opponent Hubert Humphrey. The tag of law and order and permissiveness became a staple in the GOP attack playbook for the next four decades. With tweaks and refinements, Reagan, Bush Sr. and George W. Bush used it to ease their path to the White House. In the mid 1990s, Newt Gingrich and ultraconservatives recycled the strategy to seize Congress, and pound out an agenda that made big government, tax and spend Democrats, and soft on crime liberals the fall guys for everything wrong with America. It touched the familiar nerve with white males.

Hate groups, anti-Obama Web sites and bloggers, and radio talk jocks can craft this as the prime reason for the anger and alienation that many white males feel toward health care and, by extension, Obama, while loudly denying that this has nothing to do with race.

GOP strategists are again giddy at the prospect, as one GOP pollster put it: "People who have been part of our majority coalition are looking to come back to us." That's a neat phrase to say white workers are firmly back in the GOP fold again. It's the classic white versus white political battle with an election again riding on the outcome.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He hosts a nationally broadcast political affairs radio talk show on Pacifica and KTYM Radio Los Angeles.
Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter.

 

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/earlhutchinson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 226
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:03 AM on 10/11/2010
I like how the more educated Americans can be relied on for a progressive vote.
In my freshman college history class, it took a Bulgarian exchange student to speak out before the professor admitted there was a dark side to Joseph Stalin.

I got A's in the non engineering classes but I needed to conceal my beliefs and actually write essays contrary to them as these electives existed to indoctrinate not educate. American Universities are too politicized for the free exchange of ideas.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
01:21 AM on 10/11/2010
From the article:
"Nixon eked out a narrow victory over Democratic presidential opponent Hubert Humphrey."

Nixon also beat Alabama Governor George Washington on the "American" party ballot. If you add Nixon and Wallace's votes together they were a clear majority in favor of traditional American values.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
01:22 AM on 10/11/2010
Whoops! Should have been "George Wallace". Time for bed I guess.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:15 PM on 10/10/2010
I don't know, I'm trying to stay current on political stuff, and if 'whites' can't do any better than what I've seen so far, I'm voting for Obama again, if he runs in 2012. I'm looking for a candidate that sounds like they're making a good-faith effort to be honest, has a lot of self-control, good grasp on the issues, doesn't sound like an idiot in an interview, and to my reckoning, that would be...Obama. Elections for Obama's job are free and open to the public, if you've got a good 'handle' on things, and think you can do the job, and you're over 35, and a citizen of the United States, then you're eligible to apply. Maybe there should be a vetting pool, where, 2 years out, they put out an open call, to get at least 10,000 candidates, and then go through, sorting out who's eligible to continue, or not, and then go through, and conduct a test, to see who's competent enough, and then find out who's going to get party sponsorship, so forth, and so on, so that finally, on election day, the voters are presented with a wider field of capable, vetted, qualified, background-checked people who'd honestly be eligible to hold the top job in this country. We want the best and the brightest, right? Ok, then.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scrogginsfarms
proud daughter of the american revolution
10:13 PM on 10/10/2010
so because before the election when obama, the most liberal senator in the chamber, even over bernie sanders the socialist, stated he wanted to "spread the wealth" we were racist?

so now he has numerous self avowed communists and socialists, has taken over health care, higher education, and many other segments of the economy by proxy, he proposed draconian legislation for the energy industry, seeks to limit production and deny new permits in effect hindering the economy of the southern "red" states.

so i oppose all of this because i am a classist, racist, and there is no way possible it could just be his misguided policies, or his continued grasp of keynesian economics, or his obvious disdain for traditional american culture.

you are correct about one thing though and that is the similarities with the prelude to the war of northern aggression.
photo
BligeTheVOTE
a cute bunny gnawing on a wolf carcass
10:20 PM on 10/10/2010
whew....the 60's were good to you
12:02 AM on 10/11/2010
Liberal media and politicains continue to bring up race every chance they get, because they sure can't campaign on accomplishments. Only Liberals believe all of the racist crap they keep saying, the American people aren't stupid, they know what the Democrats are trying to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joel Mendez
actual atheist reverend
07:31 AM on 10/11/2010
actually, we bring up 'race' b/c if you're not white, the truth is, it's an everyday calculation. I must consider whether to be out late with friends in Queens, I can't afford to get lost out there, b/c I might be stopped by police--and I don't drink, don't engage in criminal activities of any sort, and I served--it's just that all that doesn't matter. As far as 'accomplishments', I don't think spending the biggest budget surplus in history wins the previous admin. any points. Nor does the whole war under false pretenses, either. Racism is a fact of American life.
08:49 PM on 10/10/2010
I am always shocked when racism raises its ugly head in America. Shame on any public figure who incites hatred. When are we finally going to move past this?

The attacks that we are being inundated with during this election cycle belittle the democratic process. During these very difficult times all of us should be supporting our President. The challenge for all of us is, how do we improve upon this imperfect union that we call the United States of America? One thing I know for certain...it is not by dividing us.

Please go to http://thompsoninthehouse.blogspot.com and learn about my position on the important issues facing Ohio and our Nation.

Jacquelyn K. Thompson
Candidate for Ohio House District 20
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:17 PM on 10/10/2010
Attack ads are part and parcel to the political process, though. It's kind of like mud wrestling, where each candidate does their best to drag their competitor face-first through the mud, well, maybe face-last, but face-to-mud contact, at any rate. The battle for political primacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joel Mendez
actual atheist reverend
07:42 AM on 10/11/2010
"...finally going to move past this?"
look, there can't be any real moving past this until white privilege is acknowledged for what it is. That racism is more sophisticated, and that it's been euphemized almost out of view doesn't negate the fact that it's there. Problem is, it's hard to see for anyone who's white. Right now, I'm sure lots of 'baggers are typing away, assuming I'm poor, uneducated, on welfare, and non-white, only the last of which is true. Thus demonstrating how you can only have my view if you're not white...
04:32 PM on 10/10/2010
I like how Earl put what's happening to our political system and the impact of race. His article is spot on, but who in our political system discussion going to be open to discuss race?

NO ONE!! Why?

Race will always be bread winners for many of the "professional political pundits" because it's easy to divide and conquer a nation of people, than to come up with a solution.

I have asked several times on this site of why people vote against their own causes and go with the race of a candidate? Crazy concept to me.

Looking at Congress now, how many blacks are in the Senate? How many blacks are in the House?

For the last 400 years what race of people have controlled our government? The straw man argument I hear oftentimes is "blacks/minorities are destroying our country."

If blacks/minorities are destroying "our country", where have the Whites been for the last 400 years??
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
06:38 PM on 10/10/2010
mexicans, muslims, gays, abortionists are all waiting in the wings as issues to push for fear and division. And if all else fails we'll get some celebrity scandal and all the media will go...SQUIRREL!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:21 PM on 10/10/2010
Sooo....show me the lineup, here. Who's ready to go to bat for the US, when Obama leaves office? Or, will he? I think a lot of people still like him, I do, and I think that if he doesn't come up with some strong and convincing competition, I'll vote for him again in 2012. Where are the people that can toe the line, keep their noses clean, know their issues, their subjects, and have the commitment, the dedication, and the savvy to be successful at that job?

Insofar as your argument, saying 'whites have controlled this country', well, it was founded by a bunch of white guys. Of course, that was right on the heels of their ending the colonization being perpetrated by another bunch of white guys, one white guy in particular, King George III. Well, in 2008, King George IV got dethroned, and now we've got Obama, who's done a great job, and still enjoys wide support. So, 21st century, different ballgame, different demographics, door's open for new things coming down the road, so, when do you start YOUR run for office?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
12:48 PM on 10/10/2010
The facts stated in this article are a true barometer of how big the GOP victories will be in November.

The GOP does well when it divides the 98% of us against not the 2% but against eachother.

The GOP southern strategy of wrapping economic issues around cultural issues (the mosque in NYC, Obam as not a 'real' American, socialism, etc.) is on full display this election season.

The fact that, as noted above, the GOP is running ads showing working people being "thrown aside," (after 8 years of Bush throwing working people aside) is another indication that the recent rosy talk among Dems that 2010 is not going to be THAT bad is just more whistling past the graveyard.

The GOP did not invest heavily in 2008 because they knew it was a change election. But now they are back and if you think this 2 year cycle was rough, wait until 2011-2012 when the presidency is on the line.
01:13 PM on 10/10/2010
Dems will take 2012.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:23 PM on 10/10/2010
The jobs went overseas, and the rest are being outsourced. The United States now has 6.5 billion 'competitors' in the world. It's a changed world, and not even the DNC can stop the world from evolving as it has. Soooo....we're going to have to learn how to do things more economically.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
10:09 AM on 10/11/2010
But we can protect our industries by putting tariffs on imports, the way other countries do.

This nation has/had a lot of people who fought and died to preserve the American way of life, not the Bangalore way of life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
12:30 PM on 10/10/2010
I'm a white, middle class guy, who voted for Obama and would welcome a move towards socialism. I happen to be educated and realize that capitalism is unsustainable when you factor in the human condition.

Your article is spot on though. I live in Jacksonville, most recently from Chicago - and I see the ignorance towards Obama and democrats down here and it really riles me up. These people are too stupid to realize that the GOP works for the corporations and the wealthy and that Obama, is in fact, helping the majority of these people down here - by lowering their taxes and making health care (something really lacking in southern America) affordable for them. But they still go to the polls to vote against their best interests; because of race and ignorance or their country and religion. I've never met a more contradictory people.
photo
BligeTheVOTE
a cute bunny gnawing on a wolf carcass
12:50 PM on 10/10/2010
Minneapolis resident who migrated to Louisiana 8 years ago, I can't believe the SHEER IGNORANCE that would send back Vitter who got caught red handed on every Madam's speed dial from LA to DC and likes to sit in his own body filth in a PAMPERS.....ugh!
That's creepier than a back rub from Grandma, and he sold himself as the FAMILY VALUES candidate.
He also has a staff member who was caught on video BEATING his live in girlfriend, and that's who Vitter chose to head his WOMEN'S ISSUES area of his campaign.
Honey, the women of MN wouldn't just vote him out, they'd chase him to the state line beating him with vibrators.
01:11 PM on 10/10/2010
I would like to see a move towards socialism but I don't see how it's possible. The dems have lost too much credibility over the last 20 years.
We're efed. Obama isn't the person who can make it happen.
photo
MamaJoe
Age is a high price to pay for maturity.
12:08 PM on 10/10/2010
I absolutely LOVE President Obama and his policies. I just wish he was English and we could have him, instead of the Hooray Henries we have been saddled with. God help the UK, because those in power are just republicans that are called conservatives and their poodles the liberals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
12:36 PM on 10/10/2010
Well we are facing the same thing here. We have a president who wants to install a social safety net, like the UK, but we have obstructionist republicans running around screaming: SOCIALISM!!!!

I understand things are looking pretty bleak there right now - David Cameron and his ilk are turing to austerity measures and slashing social spending. If the GOP comes to power here again, we may see a rollback in human rights as well.

The rich and powerful are all in bed together, in every country. What did the French do? Off with their heads!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:54 AM on 10/10/2010
Sex & Race - A psychosis left untreated.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 AM on 10/10/2010
SEX & RACE - America's PSYCHOSIS untreated.”
03:40 AM on 10/10/2010
Maybe we should stop calling republicans racist. I'm not sure that's what their problem is. How's this instead:
You have no critical thinking skills. That's why you grasp onto the bible and the constitution which are old. You use these to maintain your position of power and justify your actions and beliefs and conveniantly skip the parts that may call for deeper understanding. You accuse those on the other side of being intellectuals but they also cling to their classics from days gone by. They are not always intellecutals but like you they are elitist-because they have to be. So called "Liberals" have a clear and simple goal -keep people alive. Not happy, just alive. Republicans reduce every aspect of life to a competition involving money and this is where the two sides will never ever agree.
Are republicans rascist? I don't know. I only know they are wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:56 PM on 10/10/2010
I don't think that many Republicans are calling the majority of Democrats "intellectuals". For the most part, if you can go by posts on HP, they are uninformed, uneducated and voting based on emotion rather than critical evaluation. This is why many Dems are satisfied with Obamacare with the view that "at least they did something" - without consideration of the fact that much of the bill is actually poorly conceived and likely to do great damage to our country.
10:59 PM on 10/10/2010
It's the party of no against the party of change for it's own sake.
It all amounts to job security for both of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joel Mendez
actual atheist reverend
08:05 AM on 10/11/2010
perhaps you're right. And I agree, critical thinking skills there are lacking, but the problem has to be addressed somehow...we can't ever get past it until we acknowledge it. I don't think we can go around this wall, so to speak.
02:31 AM on 10/10/2010
This strategy is coming up on its time limit. Very soon, states like Texas, North Carolina, and Virginia will turn reliably blue thanks to the growing Latino populations. So white males can be resentful all they want. If they want to have power, they're going to have to start appealing to other folks' needs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joel Mendez
actual atheist reverend
08:07 AM on 10/11/2010
I don't know, as a Latino, I can tell you that by and large, our communities are reliably socially conservative--and can be counted upon to vote against their interests if social boogeymen are conjured forth.
11:09 PM on 10/09/2010
If Obama was white, he would of have had won with a Reagan type of landslide! But that can never happen with a democrat, particularly with a black candidate, because of the ignorant / racist south, who by the way - never represented the goodness and kindness of the bible (bible belt - it has been more like "Satan's" belt with the millions of lives they destroyed and made miserable - and they still have that DNA). Conservative in America has "always" represented the worst in our country - has anyone noticed that!
02:36 PM on 10/10/2010
If Obama had been white he never would have been elected. And now that the novelty has worn off, his acoloytes are throwing mud at everybody who doesn't goose step behind his lackluster presidency.
04:12 PM on 10/10/2010
Now, y'all are all really ready to jump on the South and proclaim with your broad brush how racists we are, but I've got a question for you - why did Obama get 93% of the black vote? If you can figure out an answer there that doesn't have anything to do with race I'd be really interested to hear ir.
photo
BligeTheVOTE
a cute bunny gnawing on a wolf carcass
05:20 PM on 10/10/2010
GOSH Sparkie....think it might be a HISTORIC breaking of the ulitmate glass ceiling?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Keshe
06:55 PM on 10/10/2010
President Obama got 93% of the black vote primarily because he was the best candidate when it comes to middle class and working people issues. The better question is why so many Southern whites are against him. Is it because the Southern white likes giving tax breaks to the wealthiest two percent? NO. Is it because the Southern whites want to dismantle social security? NO Is it because Southern whites don't benefit from social programs? NO Is it because Southern whites hate good education? NO
To all my Southern Democratic friends, please know that I do not ignore your existence and I do feel for you all living in red states. Everyone with any sense, please vote November 2 and lets continue moving this country Forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
04:09 PM on 10/09/2010
Why do you associate black and poor? I'm sure the Tea Party members (myself included) are just as opposed to white welfare recipiants ... or Asian welfare recipiants ... or Hispanics ... or Ethnic Alabanians ...etc.
10:33 PM on 10/09/2010
You don't know what poverty is!
02:37 PM on 10/10/2010
Elucidate us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
07:59 PM on 10/10/2010
How do you know?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russell Masingale
weary I am of the Astroturf.
05:55 AM on 10/10/2010
only untill it is you recieving the welfare right? like how TP wants to cut spending but not social security or medicare cause some of your team players recieve them right? just likw how joe miller said unemployment is unconstatutional but his wife recieved it after losing her job. hypocrits are rarely welcome in polite society. shame to see that yours is not.