iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Earl Ofari Hutchinson

GET UPDATES FROM Earl Ofari Hutchinson
 

Why Romney Will Pick a Boring White Guy for Vice President

Posted: 05/15/2012 2:42 pm

The word from GOP insiders close to presumptive GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney is that he will pick "a boring white guy" as his vice presidential running mate. That's true for one obvious reason and another even more fundamental reason about the vice presidency. The obvious is Sarah Palin. There's little debate that she did irreparable damage to the at-best problematic chances of GOP presidential candidate John McCain's chances of bagging the White House in 2008. Palin was a desperate gamble by McCain to melt the frost that ultra-conservatives, and conservative Christian evangelicals had toward him, and hopefully appeal to some women voters. But Palin was the most poorly vetted, polarizing VP candidate in decades. She singlehandedly turned off every minority, environmental, civil liberty, and gay activist group, conservative Democrats, centrist independents, and even an array of old-line GOP establishment conservatives who broke ranks and endorsed Obama.

The irony is that in 2008 Romney would have been the one choice that would have come closest to giving McCain the ticket balance that he needed; plus the equally crucial necessity: money. He would have been a cash cow for McCain and with Obama's phenomenal ability to jingle the campaign cash registers off the counter, this would have been a huge asset to plop on McCain's political balance ledger. This was another fatal blow to McCain's slender chances when Obama slaughtered him on fundraising $750 million to $450 million.

Romney won't make that mistake. That's why some of the names floated as potential Romney VP picks such as Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, and even New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie would be too risky. They are either too new, too untested nationally, or too potentially polarizing. It would be Palin all over again.

The bigger reason, though, that he needs a boring white guy on his ticket is that vice presidents must do three things. They must balance the ticket, make up a real or perceived deficit that the presidential contender has, and hopefully help him win the presidency, or at the very least don't help him lose it. Then-Democratic presidential contender Obama understood this. He picked Joe Biden because he fulfilled all three requirements: balance, experience, and most importantly, took away one of McCain's strongest hit points against Obama -- his perceived woeful lack of foreign policy credentials.

There was much pressure on and temptation for Obama to pick Hillary Clinton as his VP running mate. But she violated the rules of thumb in politics. She was a Northern, moderate Democrat, as is Obama. She was with lots of personal and political baggage. She would have piled the X Factor of gender bias to the already worrisome X Factor of racial bias on top of Obama.

Bill Clinton was the one recent exception who defied the rule of thumb on balance in picking a VP. Al Gore, like him, was a young, Southern Baptist. It worked because Clinton needed Gore to bolster his pitch that he was not another stereotypical tax-and-spend -- soft on crime, weak on military and national security Democrat. This was the traditional attack point that every Republican going back to Richard Nixon in 1968 hammered their Democratic opponent on.

The vice presidential pick then has become a high stakes game in the evolution of presidential politics from an office that was for decades considering a graveyard for the politically ambitious or at best, an after-thought ceremonial title that carried no real importance or distinction. The VP is more than just a standard dressing up of the presidential ticket. He or she must be able to actually help a presidential candidate win. There have been a few times in past elections when VPs have made a difference. Lyndon Johnson in 1960 is the textbook example of that. He brought legislative savvy, he was a Southern then still in good stead, and he could deliver two or three Deep South states. He did his job. Bush Sr. also helped Reagan in 1980. He brought experience, insider connections, and as a transplanted Southerner, the regional balance that Reagan needed. And he was moderate enough to give Reagan a little edge with moderate Republicans.

A vice president is increasingly called on to be directly involved in discussing, implementing and even helping to formulate domestic and foreign policy. The near textbook example was Biden's blunt statement that he backs gay marriage. Though some claim that this forced Obama's hand and even put him on the spot on a volatile, political minefield issue, Biden essentially reflected a position that for months had been much discussed, debated, and thought through in the Obama administration. The VP as is now the case in presidential politics is often right in the center of the political debate.

The 2012 presidential election will be a nail biter. But even if it was a potential runaway for either Obama or Romney, the vice presidency would still be important. Obama knew it and picked Biden. McCain missed it and picked Palin. Romney won't miss this and will pick a boring white guy.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on American Urban Radio Network. He is the author of How Obama Governed: The Year of Crisis and Challenge. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is host of the weekly Hutchinson Report Newsmaker Hour heard weekly on the nationally network broadcast Hutchinson Newsmaker Network.

 

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/earlhutchinson

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
04:15 PM on 05/19/2012
The best candidate that Romney could pick would be an intelligent one. It may not happen, remember we are talking about the GOP!
the pariah
Author of "The Lean Pocket Diet"
10:21 AM on 05/21/2012
How is Biden working out?
01:05 PM on 05/19/2012
For those of you blasting the writer for being biased or racist, first read the article. After reading the article the point he is trying to make is that, personality wise, Romney and Obama are similar. They can energize crowds. And that Romney will have to pick a running mate similar in personality to Mr Biden and less like Ms Palin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R clinton
11:58 AM on 05/19/2012
How can the GOP VP not be white when all they talk about is States rights and multiculturalism being bad...Quick read....http://buildbackwards.blogspot.com/2012/05/is-multiculturalism-really-that-bad.html
05:19 AM on 05/19/2012
Mccain could not have pick a boring VP whether a boring black male, boring white male, boring hispanic female, etc. His campaign had no enthusiasm and he was going up against a rock star at the time. His campaign's mistake was they did not get the complete package as VP. The charisma and sex appeal of Palin was a shot in the arm to the campaign, it brought enthusiastic crowds to his campaign, all to see Sarah Palin. It brought a ton of young women. If she had been nuanced and highly intelligent it would have been a homerun pick. That is what Romney needs, not a boring white male or boring any other race or gender VP, he needs someone, preferably a Hispanic female imo, who is a star and has it all, sex appeal, charisma, likability, character, high intelligence, high social skills, and someone who can quickly learn the nuances of all the issues. Forget political experience, you limit yourself on talent this way. She may be in the military, in business, in academia, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:10 PM on 05/17/2012
I am a white 46 yr. old female from SC. It took “GW” eight years to get us on this mess and look what Obama has done for this country. Did he bail out the automotive industry and AIG? We know who did that “GW”. I t makes me sick at my stomach that the people in thus country can actually be this ignorant. America has passed it’s greatness of democracy thanks to these white republicans. Obama has created over 4.2 million new jobs, Obama has taken Bin Laden out, a war that “GW’ started. My country should have never been involved in from the beginning of Iraq1 Those morons have been fighting for thousands of years. Looks like the republicans opened another can of worms that they couldn’t control and as usual we the democrats clean up their mess again.Imagine that.

KK
12:53 PM on 05/19/2012
Wow. Have you ever read a history book. The Auto bailout was done to protect the automakers as well as their union employees. The AIG bailout WAS started by "GW". He loaned them $85 billion. However, it was Mr Obama that increased that amount to $185 billion by May of 2009. Yousay that we should have never been involved in "Iraq1"? What about Somalia, Croatia, Vietnam, Korea, or World War II? Clinton sent troops to both Somalia and Croatia. Vietnam didn't have US combat troops until 1965 when Johnson was in office. Korea started in 1950 when Truman was in office. WWII started in 1941 when FDR was in office. All Democrats.
05:22 PM on 05/17/2012
In contrast to John McCain, who (as the article points out) barely vetted his running mate at all, Mitt Romney will vet his running mate very carefully. I would not underestimate Romney's ability to make a very smart VP pick, who (somehow) appeals to both independent voters and to the right wing.
02:34 PM on 05/17/2012
We already have that in Biden!.
photo
Hoodooman
Non-Aggression Principle
11:22 AM on 05/17/2012
More racism from those who claim to be against it.
12:57 PM on 05/19/2012
While I thought the same thing from the title of the article, once I read the article I found out that it is a very well thought out and written article. Maybe you should try doing so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fonsini
Let there be pie.
10:55 AM on 05/17/2012
And if a Fox News political commentator said that Obama would choose "some boring black guy for Vice President", the reaction would be outrage.

We need to start holding blacks to the same standard of behavior as whites, who cares what color Romney's VP will be, you're throwing racially charged insults at someone who doesn't even exist yet, can't you wait?
12:58 PM on 05/19/2012
Try reading the article before jumping to conclussions.
05:58 AM on 05/17/2012
so 7/8th of our choices for Pres/VP will be boring white guys?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denicci1977
35 yrs, female Georgia early voted 4 Obama2012!
10:57 PM on 05/16/2012
On a side note-Jesus wouldn't be good enough for the GOP ticket.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wilson33
04:18 PM on 05/17/2012
How would you know, liberals only use Jesus when it fits their agenda, other than that, you have no use for him or his Word.

So please with this tired, worn out argument from the left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BilaalUSA
As-Salāmu `Alaykum (السلام عليكم)
08:00 PM on 05/16/2012
A Palin like candidate was a brilliant choice with the exception that she was totally inexperienced on the national front. If McCain had picked an established white female with a squeeky clean record (no troopergate drama etc.) with a deep desire to lead, and not just make a lot of money for herself, he would have probably won. Because McCain missed his chance, Romney will be interpreted by most as duplicating the same mistake regardless of how qualified a female candidate may be. I really believe that Romney will select a well vetted Hispanic male. Romney will hedge his bets that he can work against the best interest of Hispanics by dangling this insincere carrot in their face come election day. And he he just might be right; especially in Florida and the key states that border California.
03:04 PM on 05/16/2012
I don't think there can be anyone more boring than Biden. The poor guy almost fell asleep during the last State of the Union Address, but then in his defense, it was just the same old flowery rhetoric we have been hearing since the summer of 2008, and nothing is going to change until there is real change in the White House.
09:14 AM on 05/16/2012
Where's Dan Quayle these days?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dowl
Lord have mercy on us all
03:51 AM on 05/16/2012
Very well stated, Mr. Hutchinson. Thank you.